Intracoronary administration of darbepoetin-alpha at onset of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: Results of the randomized Intra-Co-EpoMI trial

Efficacy of IntraCoronary Erythropoietin Delivery BEfore Reperfusion-Gauging Infarct Size in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ICEBERG)

Previous clinical studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the effect of erythropoietin in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study investigated whether directed intracoronary infusion of darbepoetin-α into ischemic myocardium before reperfusion would reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.Eighty STEMI patients received one of the following treatments simultaneously with the first balloon inflation: intracoronary darbepoetin-α 300 μg (n = 40) or saline (n = 40), administered via the over-the-wire balloon system. The primary endpoint was infarct size estimated by serial cardiac enzyme levels after procedure. The secondary endpoints were (1) infarct size and proportion of salvaged myocardium measured with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline; (2) post-infarct remodeling (PIR), defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume more than 20% at 4 months compared to the baseline on CMR; and (3) composite cardiovascular endpoints assessed at 4 months.The peak CK-MB [median 270.0 (interquartile range 139.8-356.3) versus 231.5 (131.0-408.5) ng/mL, P = 0.55] and troponin-I [128.5 (63.5-227.8) versus 109.0 (43.8-220.0) ng/mL, P = 0.52) ] did not differ between the darbepoetin-α and control group. Fifty-seven patients completed the baseline and 4-month follow-up CMR. There were no differences in infarct size [30.6 (18.1-49.8) versus 31.5 (22.5-47.3) cm³, P = 0.91), proportion of salvaged myocardium [26.7% (15.9-42.6%) versus 35.8% (22.4-48.8%), P = 0.12) or PIR (8.0% versus 6.7%, P = 0.62) between the two groups. Composite cardiovascular outcomes did not differ between the two groups.In conclusion, administration of intracoronary darbepoetin-α before reperfusion did not reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.

Assessment of the area at risk after acute myocardial infarction using 123I-MIBG SPECT: Comparison with the angiographic APPROACH-score

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the area at risk (AAR) associated with an acute myocardial infarction is crucial for evaluating prevention and revascularization strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides a more widely available assessment of anatomical AAR than the established anatomical angiographic methods.

METHODS

Seventy patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) underwent coronary angiography with percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy with left myocardial relative radiotracer uptake evaluation 12 ± 10 days after STEMI. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the culprit artery was occluded (50 patients) or sub-occluded (20 patients). Two scores were calculated as a percentage of the left ventricular myocardium surface, the first using a standard 17-segment summed rest score derived from the relative quantitative evaluation of 123I-MIBG myocardial uptake (MAR) and the second using the modified APPROACH-score (ApAR).

RESULTS

For the patients with occluded artery, this study showed a high correlation between MAR and the angiographic score (Pearson r = .762 and P < .0001). For the patients with sub-occluded artery, for which the ApAR is not reliable, this study showed no correlation between MAR and the angiographic score (Pearson r = .18 and P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy provides ARR assessment similar to that of ApAR in patients with a single occluded coronary artery. However, MAR differs from ApAR when angiographic scores are known to be inaccurate (sub-occluded culprit artery) or impossible to use. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential clinical interest of 123I-MIBG SPECT as an alternative for area at risk assessment after STEMI even when the culprit artery is sub-occluded or when the angiographic scores cannot be used.

Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common problem experienced by critically-ill people. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been used as a pharmacologic strategy when the blunted response of endogenous erythropoietin has been reported in critically-ill people. The use of ESAs becomes more important where adverse clinical outcomes of transfusing blood products is a limitation. However, this indication for ESAs is not licensed by regulatory authorities and is called off-label use. Recent studies concern the harm of ESAs in a critical care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To focus on harms in assessing the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), alone or in combination, compared with placebo, no treatment or a different active treatment regimen when administered off-label to critically-ill people.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OvidSP, CINAHL, all evidence-based medicine (EBM) reviews including IPA and SCI-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, BIOSIS Previews and TOXLINE up to February 2017. We also searched trials registries, checked reference lists of relevant studies and tracked their citations by using SciVerse Scopus.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies, which compared scheduled systemic administration of ESAs versus other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically-ill people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and evaluated the eligibility of retrieved records, extracted data and assessed the risks of bias and quality of the included studies. We resolved differences in opinion by consensus or by involving a third review author. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. We used fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity between studies. We fitted three-level hierarchical Bayesian models to calculate overall treatment effect estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 27,865 records identified, 39 clinical trials and 14 observational studies, including a total of 945,240 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies are awaiting classification. Overall, we found 114 adverse events in 33 studies (30 RCTs and three observational studies), and mortality was reported in 41 studies (32 RCTs and nine observational studies). Most studies were at low to moderate risk of bias for harms outcomes. However, overall harm assessment and reporting were of moderate to low quality in the RCTs, and of low quality in the observational studies. We downgraded the GRADE quality of evidence for venous thromboembolism and mortality to very low and low, respectively, because of risk of bias, high inconsistency, imprecision and limitations of study design.It is unclear whether there is an increase in the risk of any adverse events (Bayesian risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.21; 3099 participants; 9 studies; low-quality evidence) or venous thromboembolism (Bayesian RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.41; 18,917 participants; 18 studies; very low-quality evidence).There was a decreased risk of mortality with off-label use of ESAs in critically-ill people (Bayesian RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 930,470 participants; 34 studies; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low quality of evidence suggests that off-label use of ESAs may reduce mortality in a critical care setting. There was a lack of high-quality evidence about the harm of ESAs in critically-ill people. The information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Most studies neither evaluated ESAs' harm as a primary outcome nor predefined adverse events. Any further studies of ESA should address the quality of evaluating, recording and reporting of adverse events.

Effect of Erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: five-year results of the REVIVAL-3 trial

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (EPO) has been suggested to promote cardiac repair after MI. However, the randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled REVIVAL-3 trial showed that short term high dose EPO in timely reperfused myocardium does not improve left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months. Moreover, the study raised safety concerns due to a trend towards a higher incidence of adverse clinical events as well as a increase in neointima formation after treatment with EPO. The present study therefore aimed to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes.

METHODS

After successful reperfusion 138 patients with STEMI were randomly assigned to receive epoetin beta (3.33×10⁴ U, n = 68) or placebo (n = 70) immediately, 24 and 48 h after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome of the present study- the combined incidence of MACE 5 years after randomization - occurred in 25% of the patients assigned to epoetin beta and 17% of the patients assigned to placebo (RR 1.5; 95% CI 0.8-3.5; p = 0.26). Target lesion revascularization was required in 15 patients (22.1%) treated with epoetin-ß and 9 patients (12.9%) treated with placebo (p = 0.15). Analysis of patients in the upper and lower quartile of baseline hemoglobin as an indirect estimate of endogenous erythropoietin levels revealed no significant impact of endogenous erythropoietin on efficiency of exogen administered epoetin-ß in terms of death and MACE.

CONCLUSION

These long-term follow-up data show that epoetin beta does not improve clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier NCT00390832; trial registration date October 19th 2006.

Kinetics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I differ in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary intervention

PURPOSE

Cardiac biomarkers including troponins are the cornerstone of the biological definition of acute myocardial infarction. New high-sensitivity cardiac assays determining troponin T (hs-cTnT) as well as I ((hs-cTnI) from Abbott and s-cTnI from Siemens) raise concerns because of their unclear kinetics following the peak.

AIMS

This study aims to compare kinetics of creatine kinases, hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI and s-cTnI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 106 consecutive patients admitted in our institution for STEMI and treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated for all the patients simultaneously kinetics of creatine kinases, hs-cTnT (Roche) and two different cTnIs (hs-cTnI from Abbott and s-cTnI from Siemens). Modelling of kinetics was realized using mixed effects with cubic splines.

RESULTS

Kinetics of markers showed a first peak at 10.7h (8.0-12.0) for creatine kinases, 11.8h (10.4-13.3) for hs-cTnT (Roche); 11.8h (10.7-11.8) for hs-cTnI from Abbott and 10.2h (8.7-11.6) for s-cTnI from Siemens, respectively. This peak was followed by a nearly log linear decrease for hs-cTnI/s-cTnI and creatine kinases in contrast to hs-cTnT, which appeared with a biphasic shape curve marked by a second peak at 76.9h (69.5-82.8). The analysis of the decrease in percentage of the peak value at 77h showed that hs-cTnT follows a twice lower decrease than other markers.

CONCLUSION

Kinetics of hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI and s-cTnI differ significantly with a linear decrease regarding both cTnI assays contrasting with a biphasic shape curve for hs-cTnT. This is of importance for clinical management of patients in routine settings especially in follow-up after STEMI including the suspicion of reinfarction.

Administration of erythropoietin in patients with myocardial infarction: does it make sense? An updated and comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine protective effects of erythropoietin on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of duration of hospitalization in intervention and control groups. Values of P<0.1 for Q test or I(2)>50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature searches of all major databases retrieved 973 studies. After screening, a total of 15 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD of -0.047; 95% CI: -0.912 to 0.819; P=0.9), left ventricular end diastolic volume (WMD of -0.363; 95% CI: -3.902 to 3.175; P=0.8), left ventricular end systolic volume (WMD of 0.346; 95% CI: -2.533 to 3.226; P=0.8), infarct size (WMD of -0.446; 95% CI: -2.352 to -1.460; P=0.6), stroke (OR of 2.1; 95% CI: 0.58 to 7.54; P=0.2), re-myocardial infarction (OR of 1.06; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.185; P=0.8), heart failure (OR of 0.53; 95% CI: 0.259 to 1.105; P=0.09), mortality (OR of 0.56; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.19; P=0.13), thrombosis (OR of 0.774; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.4), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR of 0.926; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.35; P=0.6). Short-term administration of EPO in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing PCI does not result in improvement in cardiac function, reduction of infarct size and all-cause mortality. Low dose EPO therapy may not be the choice of treatment for the patients with MI, while higher doses might be more effective.

High-dose erythropoietin for tissue protection

BACKGROUND

The discovery of potential anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has led to clinical trials investigating the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in conditions such as stroke and myocardial infarction. Experimental studies have been favourable, but the clinical efficacy has yet to be validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have reviewed clinical studies regarding the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in humans with the purpose to detail the safety and efficacy of rHuEPO for this indication. A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-six randomized controlled trials that enrolled 3176 patients were included. The majority of trials (20 trials including 2724 patients) reported no effect of rHuEPO therapy on measures of tissue protection. Five trials including 1025 patients reported safety concerns in the form of increased mortality or adverse event rates. No studies reported reduced mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is sparse to support a tissue-protective benefit of rHuEPO in humans. Moreover, a number of studies indicate that short-term administration of high-dose rHuEPO is associated with an increased risk of mortality and serious adverse events. Further work is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of toxicity of rHuEPO in humans.

Safety and clinical outcome of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been investigated in small studies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents did not show a clear effect on left ventricular function or clinical outcome, but some studies suggested an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, until December 2012. We included randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of ESAs in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, with ≥30 days of follow-up. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis after PCI. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Individual patient data were obtained from 10 of 11 trials, including 97.3% (1,242/1,277) of all patients randomized to control (n = 600) or to ESAs (n = 642). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment allocations. Mean follow-up time was 248 (±131) days. The primary end point occurred in 3.5% (20/577) in the control group and in 2.1% (13/610) in the ESA group (hazard ratio for ESAs, 0.63; 95% CI [0.31-1.27]; P = .20). Mortality occurred in 13 (2.3%) in the control group and 5 (0.8%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio for ESAs, 0.38; 95% CI [0.13-1.06]; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration does not result in an increased risk of adverse cardiac events in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Results of ongoing studies may provide further insight to the potential beneficial clinical effects of ESAs in STEMI patients.