First experience of intraoperative echocardiography-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy delivery

Shortening of time-to-peak left ventricular pressure rise (Td) in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Aims

We tested the hypothesis that shortening of time‐to‐peak left ventricular pressure rise (Td) reflect resynchronization in an animal model and that Td measured in patients will be helpful to identify long‐term volumetric responders [end‐systolic volume (ESV) decrease >15%] in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

Td was analysed in an animal study (n = 12) of left bundle‐branch block (LBBB) with extensive instrumentation to detect left ventricular myocardial deformation, electrical activation, and pressures during pacing. The sum of electrical delays from the onset of pacing to four intracardiac electrodes formed a synchronicity index (SI). Pacing was performed at baseline, with LBBB, right and left ventricular pacing and finally with biventricular pacing (BIVP). We then studied Td at baseline and with BIVP in a clinical observational study in 45 patients during the implantation of CRT and followed up for up to 88 months.

Results

We found a strong relationship between Td and SI in the animals (R = 0.84, P < 0.01). Td and SI increased from narrow QRS at baseline (Td = 95 ± 2 ms, SI = 141 ± 8 ms) to LBBB (Td = 125 ± 2 ms, SI = 247 ± 9 ms, P < 0.01), and shortened with biventricular pacing (BIVP) (Td = 113 ± 2 ms and SI = 192 ± 7 ms, P < 0.01). Prolongation of Td was associated with more wasted deformation during the preejection period (R = 0.77, P < 0.01). Six patients increased ESV by 2.5 ± 18%, while 37 responders (85%) had a mean ESV decrease of 40 ± 15% after more than 6 months of follow‐up. Responders presented with a higher Td at baseline than non‐responders (163 ± 26 ms vs. 121 ± 19 ms, P < 0.01). Td decreased to 156 ± 16 ms (P = 0.02) with CRT in responders, while in non‐responders, Td increased to 148 ± 21 ms (P < 0.01). A decrease in Td with BIVP to values similar or below what was found at baseline accurately identified responders to therapy (AUC 0.98, P < 0.01). Td at baseline and change in Td from baseline was linear related to the decrease in ESV at follow‐up. All‐cause mortality was high among six non‐responders (n = 4), while no patients died in the responder group during follow‐up.

Conclusions

Prolongation of Td is associated with cardiac dyssynchrony and more wasted deformation during the preejection period. Shortening of a prolonged Td with CRT in patients accurately identifies volumetric responders to CRT with incremental value on top of current guidelines and practices. Thus, Td carries the potential to become a biomarker to predict long‐term volumetric response in CRT candidates.

Myocardial strain characteristics at different interventricular pacing timings: implications for device programming and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy

AIMS

Response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure depends on the degree of correction of electromechanical dyssynchrony between the left and right ventricles (LV, RV). It is not known whether chronic programming of interventricular (VV) intervals based on characterisation of myocardial strain at different pacing intervals performed acutely would have better long-term clinical outcomes. We hence aimed to evaluate this relationship between speckle tracking strain patterns and rates at different VV intervals and long-term clinical outcomes of programmed VV pacing in patients with CRT in a prospective, longitudinal follow-up study.

METHODS

We assessed echocardiographic effects, myocardial strain patterns and rates in acute settings at VV intervals; 'LV Off', 'VV0', 'VV60' and 'RV Off' to provide 'RV-only', 'simultaneous BiV', 'sequential LV-RV' and 'LV-only' pacing respectively in 338 patients (age, 67.5 ± 10.3 years; male, 70%) with CRT. Thereafter, devices were programmed chronically to VV60, and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

With VV0, VV60 and LV only pacing, LVEF improved to 33.6 ± 12.3%, 40.0 ± 11.4% and 42.6 ± 11.2%, respectively, from 23.7 ± 10.2% at baseline (p < .001). Incremental improvement in strain occurred with VV0, VV60 and LV only pacing; greatest with LV only pacing. At 1 year, 23% patients had NYHA III-IV compared to 96% at baseline (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRT, different VV timings show significant differences in acute myocardial strain patterns and rates, and LVEF. These changes are markedly favourable with LV-only and sequential LV-RV pacing, the latter with chronic programming also results in long-term clinical improvement.

Cardiovascular Imaging Applications in Clinical Management of Patients Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiovascular imaging techniques, including echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, multi-slice computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance, have wide applications in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our aim was to provide an update of cardiovascular imaging applications before, during, and after implantation of a CRT device. Before CRT implantation, cardiovascular imaging techniques may integrate current clinical and electrocardiographic selection criteria in the identification of patients who may most likely benefit from CRT. Assessment of myocardial viability by ultrasound, nuclear cardiology, or cardiac magnetic resonance may guide optimal left ventricular (LV) lead positioning and help to predict LV function improvement by CRT. During implantation, echocardiographic techniques may guide in the identification of the best site of LV pacing. After CRT implantation, cardiovascular imaging plays an important role in the assessment of CRT response, which can be defined according to LV reverse remodeling, function and dyssynchrony indices. Furthermore, imaging techniques may be used for CRT programming optimization during follow-up, especially in patients who turn out to be non-responders. However, in the clinical settings, the use of proposed functional indices for different imaging techniques is still debated, due to their suboptimal feasibility and reproducibility. Moreover, identifying CRT responders before implantation and turning non-responders into responders at follow-up remain challenging issues.

Acute correction of electromechanical dyssynchrony and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Aims

Echocardiographic measures of dyssynchrony at baseline have not demonstrated a good ability to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to determine if the acute correction of electromechanical dyssynchrony, assessed by the change in simple pulsed‐Doppler measures, was related to CRT response at 6 months.

Methods and results

Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at pre‐discharge after CRT implantation. Intraventricular, interventricular, and atrioventricular dyssynchrony were evaluated by the left pre‐ejection interval (LPEI), the interventricular mechanical delay, and the ratio of left ventricular filling time to RR interval, respectivelxy. A patient was considered responder if he/she was alive without hospitalization for heart failure and had an absolute increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >5 points. Forty‐eight patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years, 73% male, mean LVEF 30 ± 5%) were included. CRT led to an acute correction of intraventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony but not to an acute correction of atrioventricular dyssynchrony. There were 31 (65%) responders at 6 months. Two factors were independently associated with CRT response in multivariate analysis: ischemic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.87; P= 0.032) and delta LPEI (odds ratio 1.03 per 1 ms decrease, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.05; P = 0.007). By receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut‐off value of delta LPEI was −16 ms. The proportion of responders in patients without ischemic cardiomyopathy and with a delta LPEI greater than −16 ms was 85%.

Conclusions

Acute correction of intraventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony evaluated by the LPEI predicted CRT response at 6 months.

Statistical ranking of electromechanical dyssynchrony parameters for CRT

Objective

Mechanical evaluation of dyssynchrony by echocardiography has not replaced ECG in routine cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) evaluation because of its complexity and lack of reproducibility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential correlations between electromechanical parameters (atrioventricular, interventricular and intraventricular from the dyssynchrony model presented in 2000), their ability to describe dyssynchrony and their potential use in resynchrony.

Methods

455 sets of the 18 parameters of the model obtained in 91 patients submitted to various pacing configurations were evaluated two by two using a Pearson correlation test and then by groups according to their ability to describe dyssynchrony, using the Column selection method of machine learning.

Results

The best parameter is duration of septal contraction, which alone describes 25% of dyssynchrony. The best groups of 3, 4 and ≥8 variables describe 59%, 73% and almost 100% of dyssynchrony, respectively. Left pre-ejection interval is highly and significantly correlated to a maximum of other variables, and its decrease is associated with the favourable evolution of all other correlated parameters. Increase in filling duration and decrease in duration of septum to lateral wall contraction difference are not associated with the favourable evolution of other parameters.

Conclusions

No single electromechanical parameter alone can fully describe dyssynchrony. The 18-parameter model can be simplified, but still requires at least 4-8 parameters. Decrease in left pre-ejection interval favourably drives resynchrony in a maximum of other parameters. Increase in filling duration and decrease in septum-lateral wall difference do not appear to be good CRT targets.

Role of cardiovascular imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a literature review

: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in patients with symptomatic drug-refractory heart failure and broad QRS complex on the surface ECG. Despite the presence of either mechanical dyssynchrony or viable myocardium at the site where delivering left ventricular pacing being necessary conditions for a successful CRT, their direct assessment by techniques of cardiovascular imaging, though feasible, is not recommended in clinical practice by the current guidelines. Indeed, even though there is growing body of data providing evidence of the additional value of an image-based approach as compared with routine approach in improving response to CRT, these results should be confirmed in prospective and large multicentre trials before their impact on CRT guidelines is considered.

Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients are usually assessed by echocardiography, which provides a number of anatomical and functional information used for cardiac dyssynchrony assessment, prognostic stratification, identification of the optimal site of pacing in the left ventricle, optimization of the CRT device, and patient follow-up. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, echocardiography has the advantage to be non-invasive, repeatable, and safe, without exposure to ionizing radiation or nefrotoxic contrast. In this article, we review current evidence about the role of echocardiography before, during, and after the implantation of a CRT device.

The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Background:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become a mainstay in the management of heart failure. Up to one-third of patients who received resynchronization devices do not experience the full benefits of CRT. The clinical factors influencing the likelihood to respond to the therapy are wide QRS complex, left bundle branch block, female gender, non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (highest responders), male gender, ischaemic cardiomyopathy (moderate responders) and narrow QRS complex, non-left bundle branch block (lowest, non-responders).

Objective:

This review provides a conceptual description of the role of echocardiography in the optimization of CRT.

Method:

A literature survey was performed using PubMed database search to gather information regarding CRT and echocardiography.

Results:

A total of 70 studies met selection criteria for inclusion in the review. Echocardiography helps in the initial selection of the patients with dyssynchrony, which will benefit the most from optimal biventricular pacing and provides a guide to left ventricular (LV) lead placement during implantation. Different echocardiographic parameters have shown promise and can offer the possibility of patient selection, response prediction, lead placement optimization strategies and optimization of device configurations.

Conclusion:

LV ejection fraction along with specific electrocardiographic criteria remains the cornerstone of CRT patient selection. Echocardiography is a non-invasive, cost-effective, highly reproducible method with certain limitations and accuracy that is affected by measurement errors. Echocardiography can assist with the identification of the appropriate electromechanical substrate of CRT response and LV lead placement. The targeted approach can improve the haemodynamic response, as also the patient-specific parameters estimation.

Safety, feasibility, and outcome results of cardiac resynchronization with triple-site ventricular stimulation compared to conventional cardiac resynchronization

BACKGROUND

The nonresponder rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be due to incomplete resynchronization, with dyssynchrony persisting in approximately 30% of patients. We hypothesized that CRT with triple-site ventricular stimulation (TRIV) may improve resynchronization and its outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of TRIV and collected data on clinical outcomes to dimension future studies.

METHODS

Our pilot randomized trial was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of TRIV with 2 right ventricular leads and 1 left ventricular leads compared to conventional CRT. The primary end-point was the rate of severe adverse events at 6 months. Secondary end-points included functional improvement parameters, quality-of-life (QOL) score, and changes of echocardiographic indices at 6 and 12 months in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were enrolled at 11 centers and randomized to control or TRIV arm. All implant procedures but one were successful. At 6 months, there was no statistical difference between proportions of patients with at least 1 severe adverse event in both groups (34.1% vs 25.7%, P = .425). There also was no difference between functional improvement parameters, 6-minute walking distances (P = .40), QOL scores (P = .27), and echographic indices. At 12 months, the proportions of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction gain of more than 5%, 10%, or 15% were significantly superior with TRIV.

CONCLUSION

TRIV pacing is an effective and safe technique and may provide a greater benefit in ventricular remodeling than conventional CRT. Further studies are needed to assess its long-term benefit.