Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for cardiac output in critically ill patients: A pilot study of ultrasound versus the thermodilution method

Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography

Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.

Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions.

Evaluation of Fetal Left Ventricular Size and Function Using Speckle-Tracking and the Simpson Rule

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate left ventricular (LV) size and function in healthy fetuses and to test a cohort of fetuses at risk for abnormal function using speckle-tracking software.

METHODS

Two hundred control fetuses were examined between 20 and 40 weeks' gestation. With the use of offline speckle-tracking software, the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were measured and the following computed: stroke volume (SV), SV per kilogram, cardiac output (CO), CO per kilogram, and ejection fraction. These were regressed against 7 independent variables related to the size, weight, and age of the fetuses. Five fetuses with risk factors for LV dysfunction were examined to sample the validity of the data from the control group.

RESULTS

The R² values for measurements of the end-diastolic volume, SV, and CO correlated with the 7 independent variables of fetal size and age (0.7-0.78), whereas the SV/kg, CO/kg, and ejection fraction had lower R² values (0.02-0.1). The measurements were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilke > 0.5). The 5 fetuses at risk for abnormal LV function had measurements of LV size and function that were consistent with the expected pathologic condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Speckle tracking can provide a comprehensive evaluation of the size and function of the fetal LV.

Reliability of Cardiac Output Measurements Using LiDCOrapid and Calibration by Transesophageal Echocardiography With the Continuous Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the accuracy of arterial waveform analysis estimations of cardiac output (CO_AW) and the efficacy of calibrations involving transesophageal echocardiography with continuous cardiac output values obtained using a pulmonary artery catheter.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University hospital operating room.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

INTERVENTIONS

A pulmonary artery catheter was placed in each patient, and continuous cardiac output was determined using thermodilution principles. LiDCOrapid and transesophageal echocardiography were used to measure CO_AW and to perform the calibration, respectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Simultaneous recording of continuous cardiac output and CO_AW values were performed every 20 minutes, after inducing anesthesia. CO_AW was calibrated using transesophageal echocardiography (CO_AW-cal) before and after initiating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); the CO_AW and CO_AW-cal were recorded concurrently using a LiDCOrapid monitor. For the pre-CPB dataset (34 data pairs), the mean bias and percentage error were, respectively, 0.10 L/min and 34% for CO_AW versus continuous cardiac output and -0.098 L/min and 27% for CO_AW-cal versus continuous cardiac output. Similarly, for the post-CPB (45 data pairs), the mean bias and percentage error were, respectively, 0.75 L/min and 34% for CO_AW and 0.059 L/min and 26% for CO_AW-cal. A 4-quadrant plot demonstrated an acceptable pre-CPB concordance rate of 93.3% for CO_AW and 93.8% for CO_AW-cal.

CONCLUSION

CO_AW measurements, using LiDCOrapid, have acceptable trending ability pre-CPB. The determination of cardiac output variations, using transesophageal echocardiography, is useful for managing patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.