Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance

Disparities in quantification of mitral valve regurgitation between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and trans-thoracic echocardiography: a systematic review

Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular heart disease. Therapy stratification for MR depends on accurate assessment of MR severity and left ventricular (LV) dimensions. While trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been the standard/preferred assessment method, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has gained recognition for its superior assessment of LV dimensions and MR severity. Both imaging modalities have their own advantages and limitation for therapy guidance. However, the differences between the two modalities for assessing/grade severity and clinical impact of MR remains unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the differences between TTE and CMR in quantifying MR severity and LV dimensions, providing insights for optimal clinical management. A literature search was performed from inception up to March 21st 2023. This resulted in 2,728 articles. After screening, 22 articles were deemed eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The included study variables were, mitral valve regurgitation volume (MRVOL), regurgitation fraction (MRFRAC), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV stroke volume (LVSV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). TTE showed a significant higher MRVOL (10.4 ml, I2 = 88%, p = 0.002) and MRFRAC (6.3%, I2 = 51%, p = 0.05) compared to CMR, while CMR demonstrated a higher LVEDV (21.9 ml, I2 = 66%, p =  < 0.001) and LVESV (16.8 ml, I2 = 0%, p =  < 0.001) compared to TTE. Our findings demonstrate substantial disparities in TTE and CMR derived measurements for parameters that play a pivotal role in the clinical stratification guidelines. This discrepancy prompts a critical question regarding the prognostic value of both imaging modalities, which warrants future research.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed "moderate" MR.

Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by fully automated 3D echocardiography left chamber quantification software versus CMR: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now recommended by guidelines for left ventricular (LV) volumetric measurements, widespread implementation has been limited due to time constraints and required expertise. We hypothesized that fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software might provide accurate measurements, and that its application could eliminate these obstacles.

METHODS

To address this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search for studies that compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using fully automated 3DE software (HeartModel or Dynamic HeartModel, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), from 2015 to 2021. A random effects model was used to determine biases, correlations, and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine effects of moderators on the outcome.

RESULTS

Of 12 studies (616 subjects), mean differences and 95 % CIs in EDV, ESV, and EF between fully automated 3DE software and CMR were -19.6 mL (95 % CI; -27.6 to -11.5 mL), -11.4 mL (-16.7 to -6.2 mL), and 0.4 % (-1.1 to 2.0 %), respectively. Corresponding correlation values between the two methods were 0.91 (0.86-0.94), 0.89 (0.82-0.93), and 0.85 (0.81-0.88), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that there were no effects of either publication year, type of software, or type of analysis on the outcome of LV volumetric and functional parameters except for publication year on LVESV correlation values.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, the observed differences were no >20 mL. EF showed similar values to CMR. Excellent correlations between the two techniques make fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software useful for routine clinical practice in adult population.

Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery

Valvular regurgitation is common in developed countries with an increasing prevalence due to the aging of the population and more accurate diagnostic imaging methods. Echocardiography is the gold standard method for the assessment of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation. Nonetheless, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an additional tool for assessing mainly the severity of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation in the setting of indeterminate findings by echocardiography. Moreover, CMR is a valuable imaging modality to assess ventricular volume and flow, which are useful in the calculation of regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction of mitral valve regurgitation, aortic valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, and pulmonary valve regurgitation. Notwithstanding this, reference values and optimal thresholds to determine the severity and prognosis of valvular heart regurgitation have been studied lesser by CMR than by echocardiography. Hence, further larger studies are warranted to validate the potential prognostic relevance of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation determined by CMR. The present review describes, analyzes, and discusses the use of CMR to determine the severity of valvular heart regurgitation in clinical practice.

Left Heart Chamber Volumetric Assessment by Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Heart Transplant Recipients

Background

Recently, a new automated software (Heart Model) was developed to obtain three-dimensional (3D) left heart chamber volumes. The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the automated 3D echocardiographic algorithm in heart transplant (HTx) patients. Conventional manual 3D transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) tracings and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images were used as a reference for comparison.

Methods

This study enrolled 103 healthy HTx patients prospectively. In protocol 1, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), left atrial max volume (LAVmax), LA minimum volume (LAVmin) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained using the automated 3D echocardiography (3DE) and compared with corresponding values obtained through the manual 3DE. In protocol 2, 28 patients’ automated 3DE measurements were compared with CMR reference values. The impacts of contour edit and surgical technique were also tested.

Results

Heart Model was feasible in 97.1% of the data sets. In protocol 1, there was strong correlation between 3DE and manual 3DE for all the parameters (r = 0.77 to 0.96, p<0.01). Compared to values obtained through manual measurements, LV volumes and LVEF were overestimated by the automated algorithm and LA volumes were underestimated. All the biases were small except for that of LAVmin. After contour adjustment, the biases reduced and all the limits of agreement were clinically acceptable. In protocol 2, the correlations for LV and LA volumes were strong between automated 3DE with contour edit and CMR (r = 0.74 to 0.93, p<0.01) but correlation for LVEF remained moderate (r = 0.65, p < 0.01). Automated 3DE overestimated LV volumes but underestimated LVEF and LA volumes compared with CMR. The limits of agreement were clinically acceptable only for LVEDV and LAVmax.

Conclusion

Simultaneous quantification of left heart volumes and LVEF with the automated Heart Model program is rapid, feasible and to a great degree it is accurate in HTx recipients. Nevertheless, only LVEDV and LAVmax measured by automated 3DE with contour edit seem applicable for clinical practice when compared with CMR. Automated 3DE for HTx recipients is a worthy attempt, though further verification and optimization are needed.

Quantification of chronic aortic regurgitation using left and right ventricular stroke volumes obtained from two new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: feasibility and accuracy

The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of chronic aortic regurgitation (CAR) quantification using left and right ventricular stroke volumes (LVSV and RVSV, respectively) obtained from two new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software-Dynamic HeartModel (DHM) and 3D Auto RV. Patients (n=116) with more than mild isolated CAR were included and divided into two groups: central (n=53) and eccentric CAR (n=63) groups. LVSV and RVSV were automatically measured by DHM and 3D Auto RV. Next, aortic regurgitant volume (ARVol) was calculated three ways: as the difference between LVSV and RVSV, by the two-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, and using effective regurgitant orifice area derived from real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) multiplied by CAR velocity time integral (the reference standard). DHM plus 3D Auto RV correlated well with RT3DE in ARVol measurement in both groups (central, r = 0.90; eccentric, r = 0.96), with no significant difference based on consistency analysis. In the eccentric group, PISA led to an obvious underestimation (mean difference= - 4.20 ml, P < 0.05). The kappa agreement between DHM plus 3D Auto RV and RT3DE in grading CAR severity in both groups was good (central, k = 0.89; eccentric, k = 0.86), but that between PISA and RT3DE in the eccentric CAR group was suboptimal (k = 0.74). This study indicates that ARVol quantification using DHM plus 3D Auto RV is feasible and reproducible in patients with more than mild isolated CAR. This new method has great correlation and agreement with RT3DE in ARVol measurement, with evident advantages over PISA in eccentric CAR.

Gender differences in primary mitral regurgitant volumes at specific regurgitant fractions as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

Guidelines suggest using a regurgitant fraction of 50% and regurgitant volume of 60 ml for determination of severe mitral insufficiency. Recent MRI data has suggested that a regurgitant fraction of 40% defines severe primary mitral insufficiency. We sought to determine whether there were gender differences in primary mitral regurgitant volumes for regurgitant fractions of 40% and 50%. A database search identified 394 patients that had MRI with a mitral regurgitant volume ≥ 10 ml or a study indication of mitral insufficiency. Chart review identified 97 patients with primary mitral insufficiency. Of these patients, 53 (54%) were women. Men had significantly larger left ventricular volumes, myocardial mass, stroke volumes and mitral regurgitant volumes (37 ± 25 ml vs. 24 ± 12 ml). The difference in regurgitant fraction between genders was not significant (27 ± 14% vs. 24 ± 11%; p-value = 0.24). Regurgitant fraction and regurgitant volume had a strong linear correlation in both men (r = .95) and women (r = .92). Despite similar linear correlations, the slope-intercept equations differed significantly between men and women (p < .001). A regurgitant fraction of 40% correlated with a regurgitant volume of 59 ml in men and 39.5 ml in women, while a regurgitant fraction of 50% correlated with a regurgitant volume of 76.2 ml in men and 49.6 ml in women. Regurgitant fraction, determined by cardiac MRI, provides a gender independent assessment of primary mitral insufficiency, and suggests that regurgitant volume thresholds for severe primary mitral insufficiency may be lower in women.

Quantitative assessment of tricuspid regurgitation using right and left ventricular stroke volumes obtained from tomographic equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography

BACKGROUND

Quantitative assessment of valve regurgitation using volumetric method by comparing right and left ventricular stroke volumes is still under investigations.

AIMS

To investigate the accuracy of tomographic equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (t-ERV) for the quantification of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (44 men; mean age 59 ± 12 years) who underwent both t-ERV and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies within 2 weeks for right ventricular systolic function assessment were eligible for inclusion. A sub-group of 22 patients underwent both t-ERV and CMR. Patients with mitral/aortic regurgitation by TTE were excluded of the study. TR regurgitant volume (RVol) was calculated using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method from TTE and the volumetric method (right ventricular stroke volume minus left ventricular stroke volume) from t-ERV. There was a significant correlation between RVol as assess by ERV and by TTE (R = 0.95, P < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient between TTE and ERV for TR quantification was 0.95 (P < 0.0001). Among patients who underwent CMR, the correlation between RVol obtained by TTE and by t-ERV and CMR were R = 0.81 and R = 0.75, respectively (all P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

TR assessment using the t-ERV correlates well with PISA from TTE in patients referred for right ventricular systolic function assessment.

Optimal Number of Heartbeats Required for Representing Left Chamber Volumes and Function in Patients with Rate-Controlled Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of heartbeats required for representing left heart chamber function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

To determine the optimal number, we performed an automated quantification analysis of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) data sets in 93 patients with AFib for whom 10-20 consecutive one-beat full-volume 3DE data sets were acquired twice. We measured left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and maximal left atrial volume (LAVmax) in each heartbeat; each parameter was averaged using a serial number of heartbeats randomly selected, and these values were compared with the averaged value obtained from the entire set of heartbeats. Coverage probability was determined using predefined cutoff values, the relative percentage differences in LVEDV and LAVmax of 5%, and the absolute percentage differences in LVEF of 5%. The optimal number of heartbeats was defined as the minimum number of heartbeats showing coverage probability ≥95%.

RESULTS

Out of 93 patients, 73 patients had acceptable left ventricular contour casts (feasibility, 78%), and 79 patients had acceptable left atrial contour casts (feasibility, 85%). Using the aforementioned criteria, the minimum optimal number of heartbeats was nine for LVEDV and six for LAVmax. The corresponding minimum optimal number of heartbeats for LVEF was eight. However, the results varied as a function of the size of the chamber, the left ventricular function, and whether the AFib ventricular rate was controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AFib, the optimal number of heartbeats required to obtain representative chamber volumes and function was six to nine heartbeats randomly selected using 3DE automated quantification software.