Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock according to left ventricular function: The French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) programme

Blood Urea Nitrogen to Left Ventricular Ejection Ratio as a Predictor of Short-Term Outcome in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most critical complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with mortality above 50%. Both blood urea nitrogen and left ventricular ejection fraction were important prognostic indicators. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of admission blood urea nitrogen to left ventricular ejection fraction ratio (BUNLVEFr) in patients with AMI complicated by CS (AMI-CS).

METHODS

268 consecutive patients with AMI-CS were divided into two groups according to the admission BUNLVEFr cut-off value determined by Youden index. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was the composite events of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Cox proportional hazard models were performed to analyze the association of BUNLVEFr with the outcome.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value of BUNLVEFr is 16.63. The 30-day all-cause mortality and MACEs in patients with BUNLVEFr≥16.63 was significantly higher than in patients with BUNLVEFr<16.63 (30-day all-cause mortality: 66.2% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001; 30-day MACEs: 80.0% vs. 48.0%, p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, BUNLVEFr≥16.63 remained an independent predictor for higher risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 3.553, 95% CI: 2.125-5.941, p < 0.001) and MACEs (HR = 2.026, 95% CI: 1.456-2.820, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses found that the effect of BUNLVEFr was consistent in different subgroups (all p-interaction>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The admission BUNLVEFr provided important prognostic information for AMI-CS patients.

PEAL Score to Predict the Mortality Risk of Cardiogenic Shock in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The in-hospital mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high (28% to 45%). As a result, several studies developed prediction models to assess the mortality risk and provide guidance on treatment, including CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II scores, which performed modestly in external validation studies, reflecting the heterogeneity of the CS populations. Few articles established predictive scores of CS based on Asian people with a higher burden of comorbidities than Caucasians. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of a contemporary Asian population with CS, identify risk factors, and develop a predictive scoring model.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2019 to collect the patients who presented with all-cause CS in the emergency department of a single medical center in Taiwan. We divided patients into subgroups of CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or heart failure (HF-CS). The outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. We built the prediction model based on the hazard ratio of significant variables, and the cutoff point of each predictor was determined using the Youden index. We also assessed the discrimination ability of the risk score using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

We enrolled 225 patients with CS. One hundred and seven patients (47.6%) were due to AMI-CS, and ninety-eight patients among them received reperfusion therapy. Forty-nine patients (21.8%) eventually died within 30 days. Fifty-three patients (23.55%) presented with platelet counts < 155 × 103/μL, which were negatively associated with a 30-day mortality of CS in the restrictive cubic spline plot, even within the normal range of platelet counts. We identified four predictors: platelet counts < 200 × 103/μL (HR 2.574, 95% CI 1.379-4.805, p = 0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (HR 2.613, 95% CI 1.020-6.692, p = 0.045), age > 71 years (HR 2.452, 95% CI 1.327-4.531, p = 0.004), and lactate > 2.7 mmol/L (HR 1.967, 95% CI 1.069-3.620, p = 0.030). The risk score ended with a maximum of 5 points and showed an AUC (95% CI) of 0.774 (0.705-0.843) for all patients, 0.781 (0.678-0.883), and 0.759 (0.662-0.855) for AMI-CS and HF-CS sub-groups, respectively, all p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on four parameters, platelet counts, LVEF, age, and lactate (PEAL), this model showed a good predictive performance for all-cause mortality at 30 days in the all patients, AMI-CS, and HF-CS subgroups. The restrictive cubic spline plot showed a significantly negative correlation between initial platelet counts and 30-day mortality risk in the AMI-CS and HF-CS subgroups.

Interchangeability in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Measured by Echocardiography and cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Not a Perfect Match in the Real World

Comparisons of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have been reported in core-lab settings but are limited in the real-world setting. We retrospectively identified outpatients from 4 hospital sites who had clinically indicated quantitative assessment of LVEF_TTE and LVEF_CMR and evaluated their concordance. In 767 patients (mean age 47.6 years; 67.9% males) the median inter-modality interval was 35 days. There was significant positive correlation between the 2 modalities (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). Median LVEF was 54% (IQR 47%, 60%) for TTE and 59% (IQR 51%, 64%) for CMR, (P < 0.001). Normal LVEF_TTE was confirmed by CMR in 90.6% of cases. Of patients with severely impaired LVEF_TTE, 42.3% were upwardly reclassified by CMR as less severely impaired. The overall proportion of patients that had their LVEF category confirmed by both imaging modalities was 64.4%; Cohen's Kappa 0.41, indicating fair-to-moderate agreement. Overall, CMR upwardly reclassified 28% of patients using the British Society of Echocardiography LVEF grading, 18.6% using the European Society of Cardiology heart failure classification, and 29.6% using specific reference ranges for each modality. In a multi-site "real-worldˮ clinical setting, there was significant discrepancy between LVEF_TTE and LVEF_CMR measurement. Only 64.4% had their LVEF category confirmed by both imaging modalities. LVEF_TTE was generally lower than LVEF_CMR. LVEF_CMR upwardly reclassified almost half of patients with severe LV dysfunction by LVEF_TTE. Clinicians should consider the inter-modality variation before making therapeutic recommendations, particularly as clinical trial LVEF thresholds have historically been guided by echocardiography.

Cardiogenic Shock Does Not Portend Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Although a strong association of cardiogenic shock (CS) with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is well established, less attention has been paid to its prognostic influence on long-term outcome. We evaluated the impact of CS in 1173 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions between 1997 and 2009. Patients were followed up until the primary study endpoint (cardiovascular mortality) was reached. Within the entire study population, 112 (10.4%) patients presented with CS at admission. After initial survival, CS had no impact on mortality (non-CS: 23.5% vs. CS: 24.0%; p = 0.923), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81; p = 0.457). CS patients ≥ 55 years (p = 0.021) with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular function (LVF; p = 0.039) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; p = 0.013) had increased risk of cardiovascular mortality during follow-up. The present investigation extends currently available evidence that cardiovascular survival in CS is comparable with non-CS patients after the acute event. CS patients over 55 years presenting with impaired LVF and CKD at the time of ACS are at increased risk for long-term mortality and could benefit from personalized secondary prevention.

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Various Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions After Acute Myocardial Infarction

The 2016 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines introduced a new term, mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (mrEF) heart failure, however, the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients with mrEF after acute myocardial infarction remain unclear. This retrospective study analyzed the baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), reduced LVEF (rEF) ≤40%, mrEF 41% to 49%, and preserved LVEF (pEF) ≥50% in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality and the secondary end point was the composite events of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In 218 patients, 71 (32.6%) were patients with mrEF. Compared with those with pEF, patients with mrEF had some similar clinical characteristics to that of rEF. The 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with rEF, mrEF, and pEF were 72.7%, 56.3%, and 32.0%, respectively (p = 0.001). The 30-day MACE were 90.9%, 69.0%, and 60.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, patients with mrEF and rEF had comparable 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 1.33, p = 0.404), and pEF was associated with decreased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared with rEF (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71, p = 0.001). In contrast, the risk of 30-day MACE in mrEF and pEF were lower than that of rEF (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.031 and HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.80, p = 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, 1/3 of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock were mrEF. The clinical characteristics and short-term mortality in patients with mrEF were inclined to that of rEF and the occurrence of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction is of prognostic significance.

Minimal invasive temporary percutaneous right ventricular circulatory support after left ventricular assist device implantation

OBJECTIVES

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening situation with high mortality rates. Mechanical unloading of the left ventricle may be achieved via left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Postoperative right ventricular (RV) failure, however, has very limited therapeutic options and is associated with increased postoperative mortality. In this paper, we describe a percutaneous right heart bypass for temporary postoperative RV support.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined all patients receiving percutaneous RV mechanical support after LVAD implantation. All patients receiving trans-jugular mechanical right heart bypass during or after LVAD implantation in our tertiary medical centre between November 2014 and December 2019 were examined retrospectively. The venous draining cannula was placed in the femoral vein; the pulmonary cannula was placed in the pulmonary artery using fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

In total, 14 patients received RV support using the trans-jugular technique. Mean age was 48.4 ± 14.9 years. Nine patients were treated with mechanical circulatory support before LVAD implantation. Biventricular support was done in 7 patients. All patients were treated with an HVAD. Mean postoperative intensive care unit stay was 46.3 ± 32.4 days. Mean right heart bypass support time was 10.6 ± 4.3 days. Twelve patients (86%) could be bridged to RV recovery, RV assist device implantation or heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous RV mechanical support is feasible, safe and shows acceptable outcome. Early implantation of RV support may contribute to successful outcome after LVAD implantation.

New insights into cardiogenic shock and coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction is challenging, and continues to be associated with high rates of in-hospital and long-term mortality. Coronary revascularization is critical for improving prognosis in CS. Thus, a systematic protocol-driven approach to cardiogenic shock, the development of specialized cardiac care centres, technical advances in interventional cardiology enabling treatment of more complex and severe lesions, the availability of recent antithrombotic therapies and the evolution of new haemodynamic support devices are important considerations in current management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute ischaemic heart disease. Despite these potentially meaningful developments, several substantial gaps in knowledge still exist regarding optimal coronary revascularization of patients with cardiogenic shock. This review will describe current principles in the revascularization of these patients, with a focus on: the time to transfer and revascularize; the choice of vascular access site; the need for complete revascularization or only a culprit lesion strategy; the optimal antithrombotic therapy; the type, place and timing of haemodynamic support; and the medical care system network.

Predictive factors for long-term mortality in miscellaneous cardiogenic shock: Protective role of beta-blockers at admission

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in intensive care medicine, management of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains difficult and imperfect, with high mortality rates, regardless of aetiology. Predictive data regarding long-term mortality rates in patients presenting CS are sparse.

AIM

To describe prognostic factors for long-term mortality in CS of different aetiologies.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-five patients with CS admitted to our tertiary centre between January 2013 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Mortality was recorded in December 2016. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to determine predictors of long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (72.7%), with an average age of 64±16 years and a history of cardiomyopathy (63.5%), mainly ischaemic (42.3%). Leading causes of CS were myocardial infarction (35.3%), decompensated heart failure (34.2%) and cardiac arrest (20.7%). Long-term mortality was 62.5%. After multivariable analysis, previous use of beta-blockers (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.89; P=0.02) and coronary angiography exploration at admission (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86; P=0.02) were associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality. Conversely, age (HR 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; P<0.001), catecholamine support (HR 1.45 for each additional agent, 95% CI 1.20-1.75; P<0.001) and renal replacement therapy (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.09-2.55; P=0.02) were associated with an increased risk of long-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term mortality rates in CS remain high, reaching 60% at 1-year follow-up. Previous use of beta-blockers and coronary angiography exploration at admission were associated with better long-term survival, while age, renal replacement therapy and the use of catecholamines appeared to worsen the prognosis, and should lead to intensification of CS management.

Design and preliminary results of FRENSHOCK 2016: A prospective nationwide multicentre registry on cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Most data on the epidemiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) have come from patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs). However, CS can have other aetiologies, and could be managed in intensive care units (ICUs), especially the most severe forms of CS.

AIM

To gather data on the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients hospitalized in ICCUs and ICUs for CS, whatever the aetiology, in France in 2016.

METHODS

We included all adult patients with CS between April and October 2016 in metropolitan France. CS was defined (at admission or during hospitalization) by: low cardiac output, defined by systolic blood pressure<90mmHg and/or the need for amines to maintain systolic blood pressure>90mmHg and/or cardiac index<2.2L/min/m²; elevation of the left and/or right heart pressures, defined by clinical, radiological, biological, echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic overload signs; and clinical and/or biological signs of malperfusion (lactate>2mmol/L, hepatic insufficiency, renal failure).

RESULTS

Over a 6-month period, 772 patients were included in the survey (mean age 65.7±14.9 years; 71.5% men) from 49 participating centres (91.8% were public, and 77.8% of these were university hospitals). Ischaemic trigger was the most common cause (36.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

To date, FRENSHOCK is the largest CS survey; it will provide a detailed and comprehensive global description of the spectrum and management of patients with CS in a high-income country.