Reperfusion therapies in pulmonary embolism-state of the art and expert opinion: A position paper from the "Unité de Soins Intensifs de Cardiologie" group of the French Society of Cardiology

Investigating the effects of systemic thrombolysis on electrocardiography and pulmonary artery blood pressure in patients with pulmonary embolism

Background and Aims

We aimed to evaluate the association between electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiographic findings in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) before and after systemic thrombolysis.

Methods

We included 38 PE patients admitted to the hospital with approved right ventricular (RV) dysfunction who were indicated for systemic thrombolysis. Indications for systemic thrombolysis were considered as patients who were either hemodynamically unstable on admission or became unstable in the course of hospital admission. Systemic thrombolysis was performed by either Reteplase or Alteplase. ECG and echocardiographic findings were documented at baseline and 12-24 h following systemic thrombolysis.

Results

Our results showed that TAPSE significantly increased while RV size and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP) notably decreased after systemic thrombolysis (p < 0.001). The ECG abnormalities markedly diminished after systemic thrombolysis in PE patients (p < 0.001). Additionally, 100% of our patients had more than one ECG abnormality at baseline, while 55.3% had no ECG abnormalities after systemic thrombolysis. Further, the median number of ECG abnormalities remarkably attenuated after systemic thrombolysis (from 2.0 (1.0) to 0.0 (1.0), p < 0.001). Our results also revealed that delta RV size (r = 0.51, p = 0.001) and delta TAPSE (r = 0.4, p = 0.012) were positively correlated while mortality (r = -0.55, p = 0.001) was negatively associated with changes in the number of ECG abnormalities before and after systemic thrombolysis.

Conclusion

We showed that systemic thrombolysis improved echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings in PE patients. Additionally, a greater decreased number of ECG abnormalities after systemic thrombolysis was accompanied by more improvement in RV size and TAPSE and a lower mortality rate.

Challenges, Recommendations, and Epidemiology of Pulmonary Embolism in India: A Narrative Review

An embolized clot that travels to the lungs from the legs or, less commonly, other parts of the body (known as deep vein thrombosis or DVT) causes pulmonary embolism (PE), which is characterized by obstruction of blood flow to the pulmonary artery. As PE has the propensity to masquerade as various illnesses affecting both the cardiovascular (CV) and the respiratory system, it is crucial to identify PE at the earliest. Appropriate diagnosis of PE may lead to earlier treatment and improved patient outcomes. While pulmonary angiography remains the established gold standard for diagnosing PE, the contemporary standard of care for this condition is the computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). Anticoagulation therapy is the fundamental strategy for managing PE, with the forefront of treatment being the use of novel and upcoming oral anticoagulants known as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The NOACs provide a practical single-drug treatment strategy, which does not hinder the patient's lifestyle and domestic responsibilities. Although PE may be fatal, early detection may lead to effective management. Despite that, mortality and morbidity associated with PE are very high in India. The awareness among Indian healthcare professionals about PE should be improved, and unified pan-country diagnostic and management guidelines should be formulated to tackle the country's PE burden.

Integration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation into the Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Overview of Current Evidence

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) refers to a large embolic burden causing right ventricular failure and hemodynamic instability. It accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of PE but contributes significantly to overall PE mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is the first-line revascularization therapy in high-risk PE. Surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy is recommended in patients with an absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides respiratory and hemodynamic support for the most critically ill PE patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The complex management of these individuals requires urgent yet coordinated multidisciplinary care. In light of existing evidence regarding the utility of ECMO in the management of high-risk PE patients, a number of possible indications for ECMO utilization have been suggested in the literature. Specifically, in patients with refractory cardiac arrest, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or refractory shock, including in cases of failed thrombolysis, venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) should be considered, either as a bridge to percutaneous or surgical embolectomy or as a bridge to recovery after surgical embolectomy. We review here the current evidence on the use of ECMO as part of the management strategy for the highest-risk presentations of PE and summarize the latest data in this indication.

Intensive Care Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and requires prompt diagnosis and management. The prognosis of affected patients depends on the clinical severity. Therefore, risk stratification is imperative for therapeutic decision-making. Patients with high-risk PE need intensive care. These include patients who have successfully survived resuscitation, with obstructive shock or persistent haemodynamic instability. Bedside diagnostics by means of sonographic procedures are of outstanding importance in this high-risk population. In addition to the treatment of hypoxaemia with noninvasive and invasive techniques, the focus is on drug-based haemodynamic stabilisation and usually requires the elimination or reduction of pulmonary vascular thrombotic obstruction by thrombolysis. In the event of a contraindication to thrombolysis or failure of thrombolysis, various catheter-based procedures for thrombus extraction and local thrombolysis are available today and represent an increasing alternative to surgical embolectomy. Mechanical circulatory support systems can bridge the gap between circulatory arrest or refractory shock and definitive stabilisation but are reserved for centres with the appropriate expertise. Therapeutic strategies for patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE in terms of reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy or catheter-based procedures need to be further evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.

Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and surgical embolectomy in acute pulmonary embolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgery is an important option to consider in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary emboli. Earlier intervention, better patient selection, improved surgical techniques and the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) have contributed to improve the safety of surgery for pulmonary emboli.

RECENT FINDINGS

VA ECMO is rapidly changing the initial management of patients with massive pulmonary emboli, providing an opportunity for stabilization and optimization before intervention. The early and long-term consequences of acute pulmonary emboli are better understood, in particular with regard to the risks of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), an entity that should be identified in the acute setting as much as possible. The presence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease can be associated with persistent haemodynamic instability despite removal of the acute thrombi, particularly if pulmonary hypertension is established. The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) is an important component in the management of massive and submassive acute pulmonary emboli to determine the best treatment options for each patient depending on their clinical presentation.

SUMMARY

Three types of surgery can be performed for pulmonary emboli depending on the extent and degree of organization of the thrombi (pulmonary embolectomy, pulmonary thrombo-embolectomy and pulmonary thrombo-endarterectomy). Other treatment options in the context of acute pulmonary emboli include thrombolysis and catheter-directed embolectomy. Future research should determine how best to integrate VA ECMO as a bridging strategy to recovery or intervention in the treatment algorithm of patients with acute massive pulmonary emboli.

Cardiogenic shock among cancer patients

Sophisticated cancer treatments, cardiovascular risk factors, and aging trigger acute cardiovascular diseases in an increasing number of cancer patients. Among acute cardiovascular diseases, cancer treatment, as well as the cancer disease itself, may induce a cardiogenic shock. Although increasing, these cardiogenic shocks are still relatively limited, and their management is a matter of debate in cancer patients. Etiologies that cause cardiogenic shock are slightly different from those of non-cancer patients, and management has some specific features always requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Recent guidelines and extensive data from the scientific literature can provide useful guidance for the management of these critical patients. Even if no etiologic therapy is available, maximal intensive supportive measures can often be justified, as most of these cardiogenic shocks are potentially reversible. In this review, we address the major etiologies that can lead to cardiogenic shock in cancer patients and discuss issues related to its management.