Persistencia y seguridad del apremilast en el tratamiento de la psoriasis en la práctica clínica habitual: experiencia en 30 pacientes

Apremilast in Psoriasis Patients With Serious Comorbidities: a Case Series and Systematic Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

Patients with serious comorbidities are traditionally excluded from clinical trials. Apremilast is not contraindicated in active infections, malignancy and serious hepatic or renal impairment, but real-life data is needed to support this recommendation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to present our personal as well as literature-sourced real-world evidenced on apremilast use in psoriasis patients with serious baseline comorbidities.

METHODS

A case-series and systematic literature review were performed. The psoriasis archives of a tertiary-care hospital, four electronic databases (MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Google scholar) and other sources were searched (January 2014 - July 2021). Identified records were considered eligible, if they reported on the use of apremilast monotherapy in psoriasis patients with chronic infections, history of malignancy, serious liver, renal, psychiatric, or other disease(s).

RESULTS

At least 841 psoriasis patients with serious baseline diseases received apremilast. Only 3 cases of cancer progression and no infection reactivations or worsening of other diseases were documented. No increased frequency/severity of adverse events or reduced drug efficacy were noted. Main limitations of this study are the exclusion of a few reports due to inappropriately documented data and the fact that at least some patients might have been counted more than once.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast is a safe and adequately efficacious option for psoriasis that cannot be treated/is challenging to treat with classic systemic agents and/or biologics.

Retrospective study of apremilast drug survival in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting: a long-term experience

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence about the real-world survival of apremilast in patients with psoriasis, especially over the long term.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term survival of apremilast and its predictive factors when used to treat psoriasis.

METHODS

A retrospective hospital-based study, including data collected from 104 patients. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportional hazard Cox regression models were used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The average duration of the treatment before discontinuation was 28.82 months (95% CI, 22.08-35.57 months) and the median was 12 months (95% CI, 2.68-21.31 months). The retention rates were 51% (1 year), and 33% (5 years). The survival study revealed statistically significant differences between patients with PASI<10 and those in the PASI≥10 group (log-rank test, p<0.001). The five-year prevalences were 64% for patients with a PASI of <10 and 5% for those with an index ≥10. In the PASI<10 patient group the retention rates were 77% (1 year) and 64% (5 years). Furthermore, 66% of patients who continued apremilast treatment for more than 2 years were receiving off-label doses (30 mg/day).

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast may be a suitable and efficient alternative for the treatment of psoriasis patients in the PASI<10 group. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience

Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis. Pivotal studies have demonstrated short and long term efficacy and safety of apremilast but few data in real life are still available. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy and safety results of apremilast in clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, focusing on therapeutic results obtained after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. From May 2018 to December 2018, 40 patients with plaques psoriasis have been enrolled. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area, Physician Global Assessment, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were performed at baseline at 24 (W24) and 52 (W52) weeks after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patient that achieved PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 at week 24 and 52 of treatment. Additional measure of efficacy was percentage of patients reaching the minimal disease activity (MDA = PGA0/1 and DLQI 0/1) after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. As secondary endpoint, we evaluated the percentage of patient that achieved DLQI 0-1 at W24 and W52, and long-term safety of apremilast. The percentage of patients who achieved PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 was 47.5%, 30% and 10% and 25%, 35% and 10% at W24 and W52 respectively. About the half of the reported patients reached MDA at W24 (n = 21) and at W52 (n = 20). The 60% of patients achieved and maintained DLQI 0-1 at W24 until W52. Diarrhea, nausea, headache, insomnia, and other AEs have been reported by 28 patients. Apremilast in real life experience confirmed the levels of efficacy and safety obtained in pivotal trials. In particular, the good initial response to the treatment is predictive of the maintenance or improvement of the outcome over W52. The efficacy is supported by an excellent safety profile even in frail patients.