Imaging of the interaction of cancer cells and the lymphatic system

Regulation of lymphangiogenesis by extracellular vesicles in cancer metastasis

Metastasis is not only one of the hallmarks of cancer but, unfortunately, it also is the most accurate biomarker for poor prognosis. Cancer cells metastasize through two different but eventually merged routes, the vasculature and lymphatic systems. The processes of cancer metastasis through blood vessel have been extensively studied and are well documented in the literature. In contrast, metastasis through the lymphatic system is less studied. Most people believe that cancer cells metastasize through lymphatic vessel are passive because the lymphatic system is thought to be a sewage draining system that collects whatever appears in the tissue fluid. It was recently found that cancer cells disseminated from lymphatic vessels are protected from being destroyed by our body's defense system. Furthermore, some cancer cells or cancer-associated immune cells secrete lymphangiogenic factors to recruit lymphatic vessel infiltration to the tumor region, a process known as lymphangiogenesis. To ensure the efficiency of lymphangiogenesis, the lymphangiogenic mediators are carried or packed by nanometer-sized particles named extracellular vesicles. Extracellular vesicles are lipid bilayer particles released from eventually every single cell, including bacterium, with diameters ranging from 30 nm (exosome) to several micrometers (apoptotic body). Components carried by extracellular vesicles include but are not limited to DNA, RNA, protein, fatty acid, and other metabolites. Recent studies suggest that cancer cells not only secrete more extracellular vesicles but also upload critical mediators required for lymphatic metastasis onto extracellular vesicles. This review will summarize recent advances in cancer lymphatic metastasis and how cancer cells regulate this process via extracellular vesicle-dependent lymphangiogenesis.

Optical tracer size differences allow quantitation of active pumping rate versus Stokes-Einstein diffusion in lymphatic transport

Lymphatic uptake of interstitially administered agents occurs by passive convective–diffusive inflow driven by interstitial concentration and pressure, while the downstream lymphatic transport is facilitated by active propulsive contractions of lymphatic vessel walls. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging in mice was used to measure these central components of lymphatic transport for the first time, using two different-sized molecules––methylene blue (MB) and fluorescence-labeled antibody immunoglobulin G (IgG)-IRDye 680RD. This work confirms the hypothesis that lymphatic passive inflow and active propulsion rates can be separated based upon the relative differences in Stokes–Einstein diffusion coefficient. This coefficient specifically affects the passive-diffusive uptake when the interstitial volume and pressure are constant. Parameters such as mean time-to-peak signal, overall fluorescence signal intensities, and number of active peristaltic pulses, were estimated from temporal imaging data. While the mean time to attain peak signal representative of diffusion-dominated flow in the lymph vessels was 0.6±0.2??min for MB and 8±6??min for IgG, showing a size dependence, the active propulsion rates were 3.4±0.8??pulses/min and 3.3±0.5??pulses/min, respectively, appearing size independent. The propulsion rates for both dyes decreased with clearance from the interstitial injection-site, indicating intrinsic control of the smooth muscles in response to interstitial pressure. This approach to size-comparative agent flow imaging of lymphatic function can enable noninvasive characterization of diseases related to uptake and flow in lymph networks.

The lymphatic system and pancreatic cancer

This review summarizes current knowledge of the biology, pathology and clinical understanding of lymphatic invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. We discuss the clinical and biological consequences of lymphatic invasion and metastasis, including paraneoplastic effects on immune responses and consider the possible benefit of therapies to treat tumors that are localized to lymphatics. A review of current techniques and methods to study interactions between tumors and lymphatics is presented.

Advanced drug delivery to the lymphatic system: lipid-based nanoformulations

The delivery of drugs and bioactive compounds via the lymphatic system is complex and dependent on the physiological uniqueness of the system. The lymphatic route plays an important role in transporting extracellular fluid to maintain homeostasis and in transferring immune cells to injury sites, and is able to avoid first-pass metabolism, thus acting as a bypass route for compounds with lower bioavailability, ie, those undergoing more hepatic metabolism. The lymphatic route also provides an option for the delivery of therapeutic molecules, such as drugs to treat cancer and human immunodeficiency virus, which can travel through the lymphatic system. Lymphatic imaging is useful in evaluating disease states and treatment plans for progressive diseases of the lymph system. Novel lipid-based nanoformulations, such as solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers, have unique characteristics that make them promising candidates for lymphatic delivery. These formulations are superior to colloidal carrier systems because they have controlled release properties and provide better chemical stability for drug molecules. However, multiple factors regulate the lymphatic delivery of drugs. Prior to lymphatic uptake, lipid-based nanoformulations are required to undergo interstitial hindrance that modulates drug delivery. Therefore, uptake and distribution of lipid-based nanoformulations by the lymphatic system depends on factors such as particle size, surface charge, molecular weight, and hydrophobicity. Types of lipid and concentration of the emulsifier are also important factors affecting drug delivery via the lymphatic system. All of these factors can cause changes in intermolecular interactions between the lipid nanoparticle matrix and the incorporated drug, which in turn affects uptake of drug into the lymphatic system. Two lipid-based nanoformulations, ie, solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers, have been administered via multiple routes (subcutaneous, pulmonary, and intestinal) for targeting of the lymphatic system. This paper provides a detailed review of novel lipid-based nanoformulations and their lymphatic delivery via different routes, as well as the in vivo and in vitro models used to study drug transport in the lymphatic system. Physicochemical properties that influence lymphatic delivery as well as the advantages of lipid-based nanoformulations for lymphatic delivery are also discussed.