1
|
Shekouhi R, Gerhold C, Chim H. The role of surgery in the management of radiation-induced brachial plexopathy: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024; 49:490-498. [PMID: 37684017 DOI: 10.1177/17531934231197794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
This systematic literature review of the clinical characteristics of radiation-induced brachial plexopathy and outcomes after intervention includes 30 trials with 611 patients. The mean radiation dose to the brachial plexus was 56 Gy, and the mean duration of radiation was 4 weeks. The mean time from radiation to the onset of symptoms was 35 months. The most commonly reported symptom was sensory loss (n = 323, 62%), followed by motor deficits (n = 294, 56%) and neuropathic pain (n = 284, 54%). In total, 65 (56%) patients had panplexus involvement and 51 (44%) patients had partial plexus involvement. The most common surgical procedure was neurolysis with flap coverage (n = 108, 6%), followed by neurolysis alone (n = 71, 30%). Of the 237 patients who underwent surgery, 125 (53%) reported an improvement in pain. Motor and sensory deficits were improved in 46 (19%) and 39 (16%) patients, respectively, suggesting that surgery is beneficial in relieving pain, but not as beneficial in restoring motor and sensory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin Shekouhi
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Cameron Gerhold
- College of Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Harvey Chim
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Lilian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milano MT, Doucette C, Mavroidis P, Yorke E, Ryckman J, Mahadevan A, Kapitanova I, Kong FMS, Grimm J, Marks LB. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Tolerances for the Inferior Aspect of the Brachial Plexus: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:931-943. [PMID: 36682981 PMCID: PMC11325459 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
We sought to systematically review and summarize dosimetric factors associated with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy (HIGRT). From published studies identified from searches of PubMed and Embase databases, data quantifying risks of RIBP after 1- to 10-fraction SBRT/HIGRT were extracted and summarized. Published studies have reported <10% risks of RIBP with maximum doses (Dmax) to the inferior aspect of the brachial plexus of 32 Gy in 5 fractions and 25 Gy in 3 fractions. For 10-fraction HIGRT, risks of RIBP appear to be low with Dmax < 40 to 50 Gy. For a given dose value, greater risks are anticipated with point volume-based metrics (ie, D0.03-0.035cc: minimum dose to hottest 0.03-0.035 cc) versus Dmax. With SBRT/HIGRT, there were insufficient published data to predict risks of RIBP relative to brachial plexus dose-volume exposure. Minimizing maximum doses and possibly volume exposure of the brachial plexus can reduce risks of RIBP after SBRT/HIGRT. Further study is needed to better understand the effect of volume exposure on the brachial plexus and whether there are location-specific susceptibilities along or within the brachial plexus structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
| | | | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeff Ryckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Parkersburg, West Virginia
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina Kapitanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital/Li Ka Shing School of Medicine, Shenzhen/Hong Kong, China
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Niu GM, Gao MM, Wang XF, Dong Y, Zhang YF, Wang HH, Guan Y, Cheng ZY, Zhao SZ, Song YC, Tao Z, Zhao LJ, Meng MB, Spring Kong FM, Yuan ZY. Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110023. [PMID: 37995850 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine the significance of contouring the brachial plexus (BP) for toxicity estimation and select metrics for predicting radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≤ 2 cm from the BP were eligible. The BP was contoured primarily according to the RTOG 1106 atlas, while subclavian-axillary veins (SAV) were contoured according to RTOG 0236. Apical PTVs were classified as anterior (PTV-A) or posterior (PTV-B) PTVs. Variables predicting grade 2 or higher RIBP (RIBP2) were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression. RESULTS Among 137 patients with 140 BPs (median follow-up, 32.1 months), 11 experienced RIBP2. For patients with RIBP2, the maximum physical dose to the BP (BP-Dmax) was 46.5 Gy (median; range, 35.7 to 60.7 Gy). Of these patients, 54.5 % (6/11) satisfied the RTOG limits when using SAV delineation; among them, 83.3 % (5/6) had PTV-B. For patients with PTV-B, the maximum physical dose to SAV (SAV-Dmax) was 11.2 Gy (median) lower than BP-Dmax. Maximum and 0.3 cc biologically effective doses to the BP based on the linear-quadratic-linear model (BP-BEDmax LQL and BP-BED0.3cc LQL, α/β = 3) were selected as predictive variables with thresholds of 118 and 73 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION Contouring SAV may significantly underestimate the RIBP2 risk in dosimetry, especially for patients with PTV-B. BP contouring indicated BP-BED0.3cc LQL and BP-BEDmax LQL as potential predictors of RIBP2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geng-Min Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Miao-Miao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yi-Fan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Huan-Huan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ze-Yuan Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Shu-Zhou Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong-Chun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhen Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lu-Jun Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Mao-Bin Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, HKU Shenzhen Hospital, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Zhi-Yong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quashie EE, Li XA, Prior P, Awan M, Schultz C, Tai A. Obtaining organ-specific radiobiological parameters from clinical data for radiation therapy planning of head and neck cancers. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245015. [PMID: 37903437 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad07f5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Different radiation therapy (RT) strategies, e.g. conventional fractionation RT (CFRT), hypofractionation RT (HFRT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), adaptive RT, and re-irradiation are often used to treat head and neck (HN) cancers. Combining and/or comparing these strategies requires calculating biological effective dose (BED). The purpose of this study is to develop a practical process to estimate organ-specific radiobiologic model parameters that may be used for BED calculations in individualized RT planning for HN cancers.Approach.Clinical dose constraint data for CFRT, HFRT and SBRT for 5 organs at risk (OARs) namely spinal cord, brainstem, brachial plexus, optic pathway, and esophagus obtained from literature were analyzed. These clinical data correspond to a particular endpoint. The linear-quadratic (LQ) and linear-quadratic-linear (LQ-L) models were used to fit these clinical data and extract relevant model parameters (alpha/beta ratio, gamma/alpha,dTand BED) from the iso-effective curve. The dose constraints in terms of equivalent physical dose in 2 Gy-fraction (EQD2) were calculated using the obtained parameters.Main results.The LQ-L and LQ models fitted clinical data well from the CFRT to SBRT with the LQ-L representing a better fit for most of the OARs. The alpha/beta values for LQ-L (LQ) were found to be 2.72 (2.11) Gy, 0.55 (0.30) Gy, 2.82 (2.90) Gy, 6.57 (3.86) Gy, 5.38 (4.71) Gy, and the dose constraint EQD2 were 55.91 (54.90) Gy, 57.35 (56.79) Gy, 57.54 (56.35) Gy, 60.13 (59.72) Gy and 65.66 (64.50) Gy for spinal cord, optic pathway, brainstem, brachial plexus, and esophagus, respectively. Additional two LQ-L parametersdTwere 5.24 Gy, 5.09 Gy, 7.00 Gy, 5.23 Gy, and 6.16 Gy, and gamma/alpha were 7.91, 34.02, 8.67, 5.62 and 4.95.Significance.A practical process was developed to extract organ-specific radiobiological model parameters from clinical data. The obtained parameters can be used for biologically based radiation planning such as calculating dose constraints of different fractionation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin E Quashie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02903, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, United States of America
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Phillip Prior
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Christopher Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - An Tai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iovoli AJ, Prasad S, Malhotra HK, Malik NK, Fung-Kee-Fung S, Singh AK, Farrugia MK. Brachial Plexopathy After Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Apical Lung Tumors. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 13:e246-e253. [PMID: 36581198 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of brachial plexus injury (BPI) after single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to apical lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of all patients treated with single-fraction lung SBRT at our institution from 2007 to 2022. Apical tumors were identified as those with an epicenter located above the arch of the aorta. Dosimetric analysis of dose to the brachial plexus (BP) was done using both the subclavian vessel (SCV) surrogate structure and anatomic BP. BPI was assessed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, as regional paresthesia, marked discomfort and muscle weakness, and limited movement of the arm or hand. RESULTS A total of 45 patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 21 months. There were 9 patients who exceeded the BP dose constraint using the SCV or anatomic BP volume. Only 1 patient (2.2%) developed grade 2 BPI, occurring 7 months after SBRT. Dose to the anatomic BP for the affected patient was 26.39 Gy. For the entire cohort, the median SCV and anatomic maximum BP doses were 8.44 and 7.14 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variability in dose delivered to the BP after SBRT to apical lung tumors. BPI after single-fraction SBRT to apical tumors is rare and rates are comparable with those reported with multifraction regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin J Iovoli
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sharan Prasad
- College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Harish K Malhotra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Nadia K Malik
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Simon Fung-Kee-Fung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mark K Farrugia
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Medin P, Hrycushko B, van der Kogel AJ. In Reply to Goyal and Madan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:232-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
7
|
Morse RT, Doke K, Ganju RG, Sood S, Mavroidis P, Chen AM. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for apical lung tumors: Dosimetric analysis of the brachial plexus and preliminary clinical outcomes. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e183-e192. [PMID: 34929402 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosimetric constraints of the brachial plexus have not yet been well-established for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study evaluated long-term experience with the treatment of early stage apical lung tumors with SBRT and reports on dosimetric correlates of outcome. METHODS Between 2009 and 2018, a total of 78 consecutive patients with 81 apical lung tumors underwent SBRT for T1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Apical tumors were those with tumor epicenter superior to the aortic arch. The brachial plexus (BP) was anatomically contoured according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) atlas. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine incidence of brachial plexus injury (BPI) and a normal tissue complication probability model (NTCP) was applied to the dosimetric data. RESULTS Five patients (6.4%) reported neuropathic symptoms consistent with BPI and occurred a median 11.9 months after treatment (range, 5.2 to 28.1 months). Most common dose and fractionation in those developing BPI were 50 Gy in 5 fractions (4 patients). Symptoms consisted of pain in 2 patients (40.0%), numbness in the hand or axilla in 4 patients (80.0%), and ipsilateral hand weakness in 1 patient (20.0%). In the overall cohort the median BP Dmax (EQD23 Gy) was 5.13 Gy (range, 0.18 to 217.2 Gy) and in patients with BPI the median BP Dmax (EQD23 Gy) was 32.14 Gy (range, 13.4 to 99.9 Gy). The NTCP model gave good fit with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (OR 7.3, 95% CI: 0.8-68.3) for BP Dmax (EQD23 Gy) threshold of 20 Gy. CONCLUSION Significant variation exists in the dose delivered to the brachial plexus for patients treated by SBRT for apical lung tumors. The incidence of neuropathic symptoms in the post-SBRT setting was appreciable and prospective clinical correlation with dosimetric information should be utilized in order to develop evidence-based dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Morse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center
| | - Kaleigh Doke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado
| | - Rohit G Ganju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center
| | - Sumit Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota
| | | | - Allen M Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hrycushko B, van der Kogel AJ, Phillips L, Chhabra A, Folkert MR, Sayre JW, Vernino S, Hassan-Rezaeian N, Yamada Y, Timmerman R, Medin PM. Brachial Plexus Tolerance to Single-Session SAbR in a Pig Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:565-571. [PMID: 34597718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The single-session dose tolerance of the spinal nerves has been observed to be similar to that of the spinal cord in pigs, counter to the perception that peripheral nerves are more tolerant to radiation. This pilot study aims to obtain a first impression of the single-session dose-response of the brachial plexus using pigs as a model. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten Yucatan minipigs underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for treatment planning, followed by single-session stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. A 2.5-cm length of the left-sided brachial plexus cords was irradiated. Pigs were distributed in 3 groups with prescription doses of 16 (n = 3), 19 (n = 4), and 22 Gy (n = 3). Neurologic status was assessed by observation for changes in gait and electrodiagnostic examination. Histopathologic examination was performed with light microscopy of paraffin-embedded sections stained with Luxol fast blue/periodic acid-Schiff and Masson's trichrome. RESULTS Seven of the 10 pigs developed motor deficit to the front limb of the irradiated side, with a latency from 5 to 8 weeks after irradiation. Probit analysis of the maximum nerve dose yields an estimated ED50 of 19.3 Gy for neurologic deficit, but the number of animals was insufficient to estimate 95% confidence intervals. No motor deficits were observed at a maximum dose of 17.6 Gy for any pig. Nerve conduction studies showed an absence of sensory response in all responders and absent or low motor response in most of the responders (71%). All symptomatic pigs showed histologic lesions to the left-sided plexus consistent with radiation-induced neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS The single-session ED50 for symptomatic plexopathy in Yucatan minipigs after irradiation of a 2.5-cm length of the brachial plexus cords was determined to be 19.3 Gy. The dose-response curve overlaps that of the spinal nerves and the spinal cord in the same animal model. The relationship between the brachial plexus tolerance in pigs and humans is unknown, and caution is warranted when extrapolating for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Albert J van der Kogel
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Lauren Phillips
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Avneesh Chhabra
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - James W Sayre
- Departments of Biostatistics; Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven Vernino
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nima Hassan-Rezaeian
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Paul M Medin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yan M, Kong W, Kerr A, Brundage M. The radiation dose tolerance of the brachial plexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:23-31. [PMID: 31309161 PMCID: PMC6606964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the incidence of radiation induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) and the associated radiotherapy doses to this structure. METHODS Databases were queried without language restriction for cohort studies reporting RIBP incidence and associated brachial plexus dose maximum dose (bpDmax). Studies specifying RIBP relative risk (RR) effect size were selected for meta-analysis. RRs for RIBP from each study were converted to a regression coefficient (β) and standard error corresponding to a continuous representation of bpDmax. The adjusted β from individual studies were combined using a random effects model and weighted by inverse variance (1/SE2). The trim and fill approach was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS We identified 25 studies that included 37 unique patient cohorts eligible for analysis. Seventeen cohorts experienced an RIBP incidence ≤5%, of which 6 cohorts exceeded conventional plexus constraints of 60 Gy for bpDmax. Five of the 6 cohorts were simulated with 3D-CT techniques. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated a significant increase in RIBP risk for each Gy increase in bpDmax (RR, 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.15). Results remained significant after adjustment for publication bias and when sensitivity analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that current brachial plexus constraints of 60-66 Gy are safe. Meta-analysis provides a log-linear model to quantify the association of brachial plexus dose and RIBP risk, and thus inform the therapeutic ratio for dose escalation. Further prospective studies reporting dosimetric data can better refine this model and inform brachial plexus constraint guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Weidong Kong
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Kerr
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Brundage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lindberg K, Grozman V, Lindberg S, Onjukka E, Lax I, Lewensohn R, Wersäll P. Radiation-induced brachial plexus toxicity after SBRT of apically located lung lesions. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1178-1186. [PMID: 31066326 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1601255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the rate and dose response of brachial plexus toxicity post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of apically situated lung lesions. Material/methods: We retrospectively identified all patients with apically located tumors, defined by the epicenter of the tumor being located superiorly to the aortic arch, and treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2013. Patients with a shorter follow-up than 6 months were excluded. Primary aim was to evaluate radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP). Dose to the plexus was assessed by a retrospective delineation of the brachial plexus on the CT used for treatment planning. Then, Dmax, D0.1cc, D1cc and D3.0cc of the brachial plexus were collected from the dose-volume histograms (DVH) and recalculated to the biologically effective dose (BED) using α/β = 3 Gy. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, based on four different dose-volume parameters (BED3,max, BED3,0.1cc, BED3,1.0cc, BED3,3.0cc) was fitted to the data. Results: Fifty-two patients with 56 apically located tumors were identified. Median prescription dose per fraction was 15 Gy (range 6-17) and median number of fractions was 3 (3-10). With a median follow-up of 30 months (6.1-72) seven patients experienced maximum grade 2 (scored 3 times) or 3 (scored 4 times) RIBP after a median of 8.7 months (range 4.0-31). Three patients had combined symptoms with pain, sensory and motor affection and four patients had isolated pain. Median BED3,max for the patients experiencing RIBP was 381 Gy (range 30-524) versus BED3,max of 34 Gy (range 0.10-483) for the patients without RIBP. The NTCP models showed a very high predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.80-0.88). Conclusion: SBRT of apically located lung lesions may cause severe neurological symptoms; for a three-fraction treatment, we suggest that the maximum dose to the plexus should be kept ≤30 Gy (130 Gy BED3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin tumors, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rolf Lewensohn
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin tumors, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wersäll
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neurological complications of systemic tumor therapy. Wien Med Wochenschr 2018; 169:33-40. [PMID: 30232660 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0654-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of malignant tumors has considerably improved in recent years, and also the number of "long term cancer survivors" is increasing.The spectrum of anti-tumoral agents is increasing at a fast pace and in addition to conventional therapies such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, new drugs with entirely new mechanisms are appearing. Side effects of old and new drugs can affect the central and peripheral nervous system, the neuromuscular junction, and muscle. These side effects often have to be distinguished from other causes and need neurological expertise. Although the majority of patients still receive conventional therapies, several new strategies such as immune therapies are being implemented. These drugs have also drug specific side effects, which do not always follow the classical principles of "toxicity."This review focuses on the well-known and described side effects of conventional cancer therapies and adds new observations on new drugs.
Collapse
|