The Safety Profile of Concurrent Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in the Modern Era

Pembrolizumab and low-dose, single-fraction radiotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a prospective, single-centre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 pilot trial in the USA

BACKGROUND

Currently, the use of radiotherapy alone for people with multiple myeloma is limited to palliation of pain, pending fracture, and control of spinal-cord compression. Single immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1), have not been successful. We aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of pembrolizumab and low-dose, single-fraction, hypofractionated radiotherapy to treat patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

METHODS

For this prospective, single-centre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, we recruited patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma from the Winship Cancer Institute (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA). Key inclusion criteria were aged 18 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0 or 1, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma as indicated by progression under International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, and adequate candidacy for both pembrolizumab and radiotherapy. Baseline and post-treatment assessments were serial bone-marrow biopsy, peripheral blood collections, staging, serial serum and urine paraprotein analysis, serial PET-CT imaging, and a physical examination. On day 1, patients received hypofractionated 8 gray in 1 fraction (8 Gy/1 fx) radiotherapy to either symptomatic or progressing extra-osseous or osseous myeloma sites. Patients also received pembrolizumab (200 mg/kg intravenously) on day 2 or 3, then once every 3 weeks (±7 days) for 2 years or until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or death. Dose reduction and interruptions were not allowed. The primary outcome was acute toxicity defined as grade 3 or worse toxicity at 3 months within the radiated site when used in combination with pembrolizumab. All patients were analysed per protocol and included in safety analyses. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03267888); it is completed and closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

32 patients were screened between June 1, 2018, and Sept 2, 2022, and 25 were enrolled in the trial and treated on protocol. Of the 25 treated patients, 11 (44%) were female and 14 (56%) were male. 19 (76%) patients were White and six (24%) were Black or African American. Toxicity, as the primary outcome, was deemed to be acceptable as no grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed. At 3-month follow-up, eight (32%) of 25 patients had treatment benefit (one had stable disease, three had partial response, two had very good partial response, and two had complete response). There was no grade 3 or worse radiation-related toxicity within irradiated volumes. One (4%) patient of the 25 who received combination treatment had a grade 3 pembrolizumab-related adverse event. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Combination treatment of low-dose, single-fraction radiotherapy with pembrolizumab was safe, with early promise of response activity. Our approach could be an option for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have not responded to previous treatment. Larger trials to substantiate our findings are needed.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Real-World Utilization of Radiation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the Connect MM Registry

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) is an important treatment modality for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although patients are living longer with MM, they are more likely to have comorbidities related to treatment, such as bone pain; however, RT can provide symptom relief. To date, the characterization of patients who have received RT in the real-world setting has been limited.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Connect® MM Registry is a large, US multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with newly diagnosed MM from mostly community sites. RT utilization and outcomes were analyzed quarterly throughout treatment. Factors associated with RT use were identified via multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3011 patients were enrolled in the Connect MM Registry with 903 patients (30%) having received RT at any time. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in overall RT use among patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 versus ≥2, International Staging System disease stage I/II versus III, a history of plasmacytoma or a novel agent in their first regimen, and any number of bone lesions or severe osteoporosis/fracture. RT use was associated with having bone lesions or severe osteoporosis (vs not having bone lesions). Additionally, RT use was associated with ethnicity (Hispanic vs not) and Connect MM Registry cohort (cohort 1 [enrolled 2009-2011] vs 2 [enrolled 2012-2016]). In the 6 months before death, increased RT use was associated with increasing number of treatment lines (P < .0001) and high- versus standard-risk disease (per International Myeloma Working Group criteria; P = .0028).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world results from the Connect MM Registry show RT is frequently used and is associated with clinical factors, including performance status and disease stage. Earlier in MM diagnosis, RT may be used as an adjunct to palliate symptoms or delay systemic therapy. Toward the end of life, RT is more frequently used for palliation when treatment options are often limited.

Radiotherapy in Combination with Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma-A Critical Toxicity Evaluation in the Modern Treatment Era

Radiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment modality in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), aiming at analgesia and stabilization of osteolytic lesions. As a multifocal disease, the combined use of RT, systemic chemotherapy, and targeted therapy (ST) is pivotal to achieve better disease control. However, adding RT to ST may lead to increased toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of ST given concurrently with RT. Overall, 82 patients treated at our hematological center with a median follow-up of 60 months from initial diagnosis and 46.5 months from the start of RT were evaluated retrospectively. Toxicities were recorded from 30 days before RT up to 90 days after RT. 54 patients (65.9%) developed at least one non-hematological toxicity, with 50 patients (61.0%) showing low-grade (grade I or II) and 14 patients (17.1%) revealing high-grade (grade III and IV) toxicities. Hematological toxicities were documented in 50 patients (61.0%) before RT, 60 patients (73.2%) during RT, and 67 patients (81.7%) following RT. After RT, patients who had received ST during RT showed a significant increase in high-grade hematological toxicities (p = 0.018). In summary, RT can be safely implemented into modern treatment regimens for MM, but stringent monitoring of potential toxicities even after completion of RT has to be ensured.

RR Myelo POINT: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Assessing the Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Multiple Myeloma and Possible Interactions with Concurrent Systemic Treatment

Background and purpose: Although chemotherapy, biological agents, and radiotherapy (RT) are cornerstones of the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the literature regarding the possible interactions of concurrent systemic treatment (CST) and RT is limited, and the optimal RT dose is still unclear. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent RT for MM at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2020. The data of 312 patients and 577 lesions (treated in 411 accesses) were retrieved. Results: Most of the treated lesions involved the vertebrae (60%) or extremities (18.9%). Radiotherapy was completed in 96.6% of the accesses and, although biologically effective doses assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED 10) > 38 Gy and CST were significantly associated with higher rates of toxicity, the safety profile was excellent, with side effects grade ≥2 reported only for 4.1% of the accesses; CST and BED 10 had no impact on the toxicity at one and three months. Radiotherapy resulted in significant improvements in performance status and in a pain control rate of 87.4% at the end of treatment, which further increased to 96.9% at three months and remained at 94% at six months. The radiological response rate at six months (data available for 181 lesions) was 79%, with only 4.4% of lesions in progression. Progression was significantly more frequent in the lesions treated without CST or BED 10 < 15 Gy, while concurrent biological therapy resulted in significantly lower rates of progression. Conclusion: Radiotherapy resulted in optimal pain control rates and fair toxicity, regardless of BED 10 and CST; the treatments with higher BED 10 and CST (remarkably biological agents) improved the already excellent radiological disease control.

The Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy with Concurrent Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin-Based Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

The concurrent delivery of radiation therapy (RT) with salvage chemotherapies in the management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is an area of ongoing investigation. This study examined the safety and efficacy of palliative RT given in the setting of concurrent dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with MM received RT to 64 different sites within three weeks of receiving DCEP from 2010 to 2020. A median dose of 20 Gray (range 8-32.5 Gy) was delivered in a median of 5 fractions (range 1-15). Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1-5) of DCEP. Rates of hematologic and RT toxicity were recorded along with pain, radiographic, and laboratory responses to treatment.

RESULTS

RT was completed in 98% of patients. 21% of patients experienced RTOG grade 3+ hematologic toxicity before RT, which increased to 35% one-month post-RT (P = .13) before decreasing to 12% at 3 to 6 months (P = .02). The most common toxicity experienced was thrombocytopenia. Grade 1 to 2 non-hematologic RT-related toxicity was reported in 15% of patients while on treatment and fell to 6% one-month after completing RT. Pain resolved in 94% of patients with symptomatic lesions at baseline. Stable disease or better was observed in 34/39 (87%) of the targeted lesions on surveillance imaging.

CONCLUSION

RT administered concurrently with DCEP was well-tolerated by most of the patients in this series, with low rates of hematologic and RT-related toxicity. RT was also very effective, with the vast majority of patients demonstrating resolution of their pain and a significant response on follow-up imaging.

Effective Pain Control With Very Low Dose Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Uncomplicated Osseous Lesions

BACKGROUND

Osteolytic lesions are present in 75% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and frequently require palliation with radiation therapy (RT). Prior case series of patients with MM with bone pain undergoing palliative RT suggests doses ≥12 Gy (equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions, EQD2) provide excellent bone pain relief. However, recent advances in care and novel biologic agents have significantly improved overall survival and quality of life for patients with MM. We hypothesized that lower-dose RT (LDRT, EQD2 <12 Gy) offers an effective alternative to higher-dose RT (HDRT, EQD2 ≥12 Gy) for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bone lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with MM treated with RT for uncomplicated, painful bone lesions and stratified by EQD2 ≥/< 12 Gy. Clinical pain response (CPR) rates, acute and late toxicity, pain response duration, and retreatment rates between LDRT and HDRT groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with 70 treated lesions were included: 24 patients (48 lesions) treated with HDRT and 11 patients (22 lesions) with LDRT. Median follow-up was 14 and 16.89 months for HDRT and LDRT, respectively. The median dose of HDRT treatment was 20 Gy versus 4 Gy in the LDRT group. The CPR rate was 98% for HDRT and 95% for LDRT. There was no significant difference in any-grade acute toxicity between the HDRT and LDRT cohorts (24.5% vs 9.1%, Χ² P = .20). Pain recurred in 10% of lesions (12% HDRT vs 9.5% LDRT). Median duration of pain response did not significantly differ between cohorts (P = .91). Five lesions were retreated, 2 (9.5%) in the LDRT cohort, and 3 (6.3%) in the HDRT cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this study, LDRT effectively palliated painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions with acceptable CPR and duration of palliation. These data support prospective comparisons of LDRT versus HDRT for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions.

Utilization of radiation therapy in multiple myeloma: trends and changes in practice

Plasma cell disorders including plasmacytomas and multiple myeloma (MM) are exquisitely radiosensitive, and thus, radiation therapy (XRT) is used effectively in their management. The role of XRT in the setting of novel MM therapeutics has not been explored. The 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) for MM with patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 was studied. Association between utilization of XRT as part of initial therapy and patient, disease, or treating facility characteristics was studied. A total of 111,281 cases with 91.6% MM, 7% osseous plasmacytoma (PLA-O), and 1.4% extramedullary plasmacytoma (PLA-E) were identified. XRT was utilized as part of initial therapy in 25.4% cases, including 69.3% of PLA-O, 60% of PLA-E, and 21.5% of MM patients. Patients with PLA-E and MM were significantly less likely to receive XRT as compared to PLA-O (p < 0.001). A significantly decreased use of XRT was noted over time (p < 0.001), and for advancing patient age (p < 0.001), women (p < 0.001), and blacks (p < 0.001), and with increasing income (p = 0.015). Patients with Medicare were less likely to receive XRT (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78, 0.94) as compared to uninsured as were those with initial treatment at academic or high-volume facilities and facilities performing stem cell transplant. There was overall decreased utilization of XRT in recent years, possibly due to advent of efficacious systemic agents for MM therapy, with a higher XRT utilization for plasmacytomas. Patterns of XRT use need to be explored prospectively, so that uniform standards of healthcare delivery can be maintained and treatment heterogeneity can be minimized.