1
|
Stevens S, Moloney S, Blackmore A, Hart C, Rixham P, Bangiri A, Pooler A, Doolan P. IPEM topical report: guidance for the clinical implementation of online treatment monitoring solutions for IMRT/VMAT. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:18TR02. [PMID: 37531959 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acecd0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
This report provides guidance for the implementation of online treatment monitoring (OTM) solutions in radiotherapy (RT), with a focus on modulated treatments. Support is provided covering the implementation process, from identification of an OTM solution to local implementation strategy. Guidance has been developed by a RT special interest group (RTSIG) working party (WP) on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM). Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the WP members (in consultation with manufacturers, vendors and user groups), existing guidance or legislation and a UK survey conducted in 2020 (Stevenset al2021). OTM is an inclusive term representing any system capable of providing a direct or inferred measurement of the delivered dose to a RT patient. Information on each type of OTM is provided but, commensurate with UK demand, guidance is largely influenced byin vivodosimetry methods utilising the electronic portal imager device (EPID). Sections are included on the choice of OTM solutions, acceptance and commissioning methods with recommendations on routine quality control, analytical methods and tolerance setting, clinical introduction and staffing/resource requirements. The guidance aims to give a practical solution to sensitivity and specificity testing. Functionality is provided for the user to introduce known errors into treatment plans for local testing. Receiver operating characteristic analysis is discussed as a tool to performance assess OTM systems. OTM solutions can help verify the correct delivery of radiotherapy treatment. Furthermore, modern systems are increasingly capable of providing clinical decision-making information which can impact the course of a patient's treatment. However, technical limitations persist. It is not within the scope of this guidance to critique each available solution, but the user is encouraged to carefully consider workflow and engage with manufacturers in resolving compatibility issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Moloney
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, United Kingdom
| | | | - Clare Hart
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Rixham
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Bangiri
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair Pooler
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dogan N, Mijnheer BJ, Padgett K, Nalichowski A, Wu C, Nyflot MJ, Olch AJ, Papanikolaou N, Shi J, Holmes SM, Moran J, Greer PB. AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA. Med Phys 2023; 50:e865-e903. [PMID: 37384416 PMCID: PMC11230298 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been widely utilized for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and their use for transit dosimetry applications is emerging. Yet there are no specific guidelines on the potential uses, limitations, and correct utilization of EPIDs for these purposes. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 307 (TG-307) provides a comprehensive review of the physics, modeling, algorithms and clinical experience with EPID-based pre-treatment and transit dosimetry techniques. This review also includes the limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of EPIDs, including recommendations for commissioning, calibration and validation, routine QA, tolerance levels for gamma analysis and risk-based analysis. METHODS Characteristics of the currently available EPID systems and EPID-based PSQA techniques are reviewed. The details of the physics, modeling, and algorithms for both pre-treatment and transit dosimetry methods are discussed, including clinical experience with different EPID dosimetry systems. Commissioning, calibration, and validation, tolerance levels and recommended tests, are reviewed, and analyzed. Risk-based analysis for EPID dosimetry is also addressed. RESULTS Clinical experience, commissioning methods and tolerances for EPID-based PSQA system are described for pre-treatment and transit dosimetry applications. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical results for EPID dosimetry techniques are presented as well as examples of patient-related and machine-related error detection by these dosimetry solutions. Limitations and challenges in clinical implementation of EPIDs for dosimetric purposes are discussed and acceptance and rejection criteria are outlined. Potential causes of and evaluations of pre-treatment and transit dosimetry failures are discussed. Guidelines and recommendations developed in this report are based on the extensive published data on EPID QA along with the clinical experience of the TG-307 members. CONCLUSION TG-307 focused on the commercially available EPID-based dosimetric tools and provides guidance for medical physicists in the clinical implementation of EPID-based patient-specific pre-treatment and transit dosimetry QA solutions including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nesrin Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ben J Mijnheer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kyle Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Adrian Nalichowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Chuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Medical Foundation, Roseville, California, USA
| | - Matthew J Nyflot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Niko Papanikolaou
- Division of Medical Physics, UT Health-MD Anderson, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Jie Shi
- Sun Nuclear Corporation - A Mirion Medical Company, Melbourne, Florida, USA
| | | | - Jean Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter B Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delaby N, Barateau A, Chiavassa S, Biston MC, Chartier P, Graulières E, Guinement L, Huger S, Lacornerie T, Millardet-Martin C, Sottiaux A, Caron J, Gensanne D, Pointreau Y, Coutte A, Biau J, Serre AA, Castelli J, Tomsej M, Garcia R, Khamphan C, Badey A. Practical and technical key challenges in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: The GORTEC point of view. Phys Med 2023; 109:102568. [PMID: 37015168 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Anatomical variations occur during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT) treatment. These variations may result in underdosage to the target volume or overdosage to the organ at risk. Replanning during the treatment course can be triggered to overcome this issue. Due to technological, methodological and clinical evolutions, tools for adaptive RT (ART) are becoming increasingly sophisticated. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the key steps of an H&N ART workflow and tools from the point of view of a group of French-speaking medical physicists and physicians (from GORTEC). Focuses are made on image registration, segmentation, estimation of the delivered dose of the day, workflow and quality assurance for an implementation of H&N offline and online ART. Practical recommendations are given to assist physicians and medical physicists in a clinical workflow.
Collapse
|
4
|
A C Fiagan Y, Bossuyt E, Nevens D, Machiels M, Chiairi I, Joye I, Paul M, Gevaert T, Verellen D. The use of in-vivo dosimetry to identify head and neck cancer patients needing adaptive radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109676. [PMID: 37084887 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experiencing anatomical changes during their radiotherapy (RT) course may benefit from adaptive RT (ART). We investigated the sensitivity of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (EIVD) systemto detect patients that require ART and identified its limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted for 182 HNC patients: laryngeal cancer without elective lymph nodes (group A), postoperative RT (group B) and primary RT including elective lymph nodes (group C). The effect of anatomical changes on the dose distribution and volumetric changes was quantified. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain the optimal cut-off value for the gamma passing rate (%GP) with a dose difference of 3% and a distance to agreement of 3mm. RESULTS Fifty HNC patients receiving ART were analyzed: 1 in group A, 10 in group B and 39 in group C. Failed fractions (FFs) occurred in 1/1, 6/10 and 23/39 cases before ART in group A, B and C respectively. In the four cases in group B without FFs, only minor dosimetric changes were observed. One of the cases in group C without FFs had significant dosimetric changes (false negative). Three cases received ART because of clinical reasons that cannot be detected by EIVD. The optimal cut-off value for the %GP was 95%/95.2% for old/new generation machines respectively. CONCLUSION EIVD in combined with 3D imaging techniques can be synergistic in the detection of anatomical changes in HNC patients who benefit from ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawo A C Fiagan
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Evy Bossuyt
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Daan Nevens
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Melanie Machiels
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ibrahim Chiairi
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ines Joye
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Meijnders Paul
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bossuyt E, Nevens D, Weytjens R, Taieb Mokaddem A, Verellen D. Assessing the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow in radiotherapy using transit in vivo dosimetry. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100420. [PMID: 36820237 PMCID: PMC9937948 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Currently in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) is primarily used to identify individual patient errors in radiotherapy. This study investigated possible correlations of observed trends in transit IVD results, with adaptations to the clinical workflow, aiming to demonstrate the possibility of using the bulk data for continuous quality improvement. Materials and methods In total 84,100 transit IVD measurements were analyzed of all patients treated between 2018 and 2022, divided into four yearly periods. Failed measurements (FM) were divided per pathology and into four categories of causes of failure: technical, planning and positioning problems, and anatomic changes. Results The number of FM due to patient related problems gradually decreased from 9.5% to 6.6%, 6.1% and 5.6% over the study period. FM attributed to positioning problems decreased from 10.0% to 4.9% in boost breast cancer patients after introduction of extra imaging, from 9.1% to 3.9% in Head&Neck patients following education of radiation therapists on positioning of patients' shoulders, from 6.1% to 2.8% in breast cancer patients after introduction of ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy with daily online pre-treatment imaging and from 11.2% to 4.3% in extremities following introduction of immobilization with calculated couch parameters and a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy solution. FM related to anatomic changes decreased from 10.2% to 4.0% in rectum patients and from 6.7% to 3.3% in prostate patients following more patient education from dieticians. Conclusions Our study suggests that IVD can be a powerful tool to assess the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow and its use for continuous quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evy Bossuyt
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium,Corresponding author.
| | - Daan Nevens
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Reinhilde Weytjens
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Hospitals, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Avelino SR, Dias JR, Peron TM, Vidal GS. Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13822. [PMID: 36356260 PMCID: PMC9797176 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2003] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to evaluate the SunCHECK PerFRACTION, the software for in vivo monitoring using EPID images. MATERIALS/METHODS First, the PerFRACTION ability to detect errors was investigated simulating two situations: (1) variation of LINAC output and (2) variation of the phantom thickness. An ionization chamber was used as reference to measure the introduced dose variations. Both tests used EPID in integrated mode (absolute dose). Second, EPID measurements in integrated mode were carried out during an independent Brazilian governmental audit that provided four phantoms and TLDs. PerFRACTION calculated the absolute dose on EPID plane, and it compared with predicted calculated dose for every delivered plan. The dose deviations reported using PerFRACTION were compared with dose deviations reported by the independent audit. Third, an end-to-end test using a heterogeneous phantom was performed. A VMAT plan with EPID in cine mode was delivered. PerFRACTION calculated the mean dose on CBCT using EPID information and log files. The calculated doses at four different points were compared with ionization chambers measurements. RESULTS About the first test, the largest difference found was 1.2%. Considering the audit results, the variations detected by TLD measurements and by PerFRACTION dose calculation on EPID plane were close: 12 points had variations less than 2%, 2 points with variation between 2% and 3%, and 2 points with deviations greater than 3% (max 3.7%). The end-to-end tests using a heterogeneous phantom achieved dose deviation less than 1.0% in the water-equivalent region. In the mimicking lung region, the deviations were higher (max 7.3%), but in accordance with what is expected for complex situations. CONCLUSION The tests results indicate that PerFRACTION dose calculations in different situations have good agreement with standard measurements. Action levels were suggested for absolute dose on EPID plane as well as 3D dose calculation on CBCT using PerFRACTION.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gabriel Souza Vidal
- VITTA Radiotherapy CenterBrasília‐DFBrazil,Department of Radiation OncologyStephenson Cancer CenterUniversity of OklahomaOklahoma CityUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fiagan YA, Bossuyt E, Machiels M, Nevens D, Billiet C, Poortmans P, Gevaert T, Verellen D. Comparing treatment uncertainty for ultra- vs. standard-hypofractionated breast radiation therapy based on in-vivo dosimetry. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:85-90. [PMID: 35602547 PMCID: PMC9117915 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Postoperative ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy (UHFRT) in 5 fractions (fx) for breast cancer patients is as effective and safe as conventionally hypofractionated RT (HFRT) in 15 fx, liberating time for higher-level daily online Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) corrections. In this retrospective study, treatment uncertainties occurring in patients treated with 5fx (5fx-group) were evaluated using electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (EIVD) and compared with the results from patients treated with conventionally HFRT (15fx-group) to validate the new technique and to evaluate if the shorter treatment schedule could have a positive effect on the treatment uncertainties. Materials and methods EPID-based integrated transit dose images were acquired for each treatment fraction in the 5fx-group (203 patients) and on the first 3 days of treatment and weekly thereafter in the 15fx-group (203 patients). A total of 1015 EIVD measurements in the 5fx-group and 1144 in the 15fx-group were acquired. Of the latter group, 755 had been treated with online IGRT correction (i.e., Online-IGRT 15fx-group). Results In the 15fx-group 12.0% of fractions failed (FFs) compared to 3.8% in the 5fx-group and 6.9% in the online-IGRT 15fx-group. Causes for FFs in the 15fx-group compared with the 5fx-group were patient positioning (7.4% vs. 2.2%), technical issues (3.1% vs. 1.2%) and breast swelling (1.4% vs. 0.5%). In the online-IGRT 15fx-group, 2.5% were attributed to patient positioning, 3.8% to technical issues and 0.5% to breast swelling. Conclusions EIVD demonstrated that UHFRT for breast cancer results in less FFs compared to standard HFRT. A large proportion of this decrease could be explained by using daily online IGRT.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chalise AR, Bojechko C. Using eclipse scripting to fully automate in-vivo image analysis to improve treatment quality and safety. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13585. [PMID: 35315570 PMCID: PMC9194972 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An automated, in-vivo system to detect patient anatomy changes and machine output was developed using novel analysis of in-vivo electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images for every fraction of treatment on a Varian Halcyon. In-vivo approach identifies errors that go undetected by routine quality assurance (QA) to compliment daily machine performance check (MPC), with minimal physicist workload. METHODS Images for all fractions treated on a Halcyon were automatically downloaded and analyzed at the end of treatment day. For image analysis, compared to first fraction, the mean difference of high-dose region of interest is calculated. This metric has shown to predict changes in planning treatment volume (PTV) mean dose. Flags are raised for: (Type-A) treatment fraction whose mean difference exceeds 10%, to protect against large errors, and (Type-B) patients with three consecutive fractions with mean exceeding ±3%, to protect against systematic trends. If a threshold is exceeded, a physicist is e-mailed, a report for flagged patients, for investigation. To track machine output changes, for all patients treated on a day, the average and standard deviations are uploaded to a QA portal, along with the reviewed MPC, ensuring comprehensive QA for the Halcyon. To guide clinical implementation, a retrospective study from November 2017 till December 2020 was conducted, which grouped errors by treatment site. This framework has been used prospectively since January 2021. RESULTS From retrospective data of 1633 patients (35 759 fractions), no Type-A errors were found and only 45 patients (2.76%) had Type-B errors. These Type-B deviations were due to head-and-neck weight loss. For 6 months of prospective use (345 patients), 13 patients (3.7%) had Type-B errors and no Type-A errors. CONCLUSIONS This automated system protects against errors that can occur in vivo to provide a more comprehensive QA. This fully automated framework can be implemented in other centers with a Halcyon, requiring a desktop computer and analysis scripts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananta Raj Chalise
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Casey Bojechko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fiagan YA, Bossuyt E, Nevens D, Dirix P, Theys F, Gevaert T, Verellen D. In vivo dosimetry for patients with prostate cancer to assess possible impact of bladder and rectum preparation. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 16:65-69. [PMID: 33294646 PMCID: PMC7701258 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE In all treatment sites of our radiotherapy network, in vivo dosimetry (PerFRACTION™) was fully implemented in February 2018. We hypothesized that additional help with bladder and rectum preparation by home nursing would improve patients' preparation and investigated if this could be assessed using in vivo dosimetry (IVD). MATERIALS/METHODS A retrospective study was conducted with a test group who received additional help with bladder and rectum preparation by home nurses and a control group who only received information on bladder and rectum preparation according to the standard protocol. Patients were treated with a 6 MV Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. Electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based integrated transit dose images were acquired on the first 3 days of treatment and weekly thereafter or more if failed fractions (FF) occurred. Results were analyzed using a global gamma analysis with a threshold of 20%, tolerance of 5% (dose difference) and 5 mm (distance to agreement), and a passing level of 95%. RESULTS Data of 462 prostate patients was analyzed: 39 and 423 in a test and control group respectively with a comparable number of measurements (on average 8.0 (σ = 4.8) and 7.1 (σ = 4.5) respectively per treatment course). Of the FF, 39% and 31% were related to variations in bladder and rectum filling for the test and control group respectively. Subgroups were created based on the number of FF, no statistically significant differences were observed. CONCLUSION Two dimensional EPID-based IVD successfully detected deviations due to variations in bladder and rectum filling, however it could not confirm the hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawo A.C. Fiagan
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evy Bossuyt
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Daan Nevens
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Frank Theys
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bossuyt E, Weytjens R, Nevens D, De Vos S, Verellen D. Evaluation of automated pre-treatment and transit in-vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy using empirically determined parameters. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 16:113-129. [PMID: 33458354 PMCID: PMC7807610 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose First reports on clinical use of commercially automated systems for Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)-based dosimetry in radiotherapy showed the capability to detect important changes in patient setup, anatomy and external device position. For this study, results for more than 3000 patients, for both pre-treatment verification and in-vivo transit dosimetry were analyzed. Materials and methods For all Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) with EPID images was performed. In-vivo dosimetry using transit EPID images was analyzed, including causes and actions for failed fractions for all patients receiving photon treatment (2018-2019). In total 3136 and 32,632 fractions were analyzed with pre-treatment and transit images respectively. Parameters for gamma analysis were empirically determined, balancing the rate between detection of clinically relevant problems and the number of false positive results. Results Pre-treatment and in-vivo results depended on machine type. Causes for failed in-vivo analysis included deviations in patient positioning (32%) and anatomy change (28%). In addition, errors in planning, imaging, treatment delivery, simulation, breath hold and with immobilization devices were detected. Actions for failed fractions were mostly to repeat the measurement while taking extra care in positioning (54%) and to intensify imaging procedures (14%). Four percent initiated plan adjustments, showing the potential of the system as a basis for adaptive planning. Conclusions EPID-based pre-treatment and in-vivo transit dosimetry using a commercially available automated system efficiently revealed a wide variety of deviations and showed potential to serve as a basis for adaptive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evy Bossuyt
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Daan Nevens
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah De Vos
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, Antwerp, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|