Patterns of Recurrence Among Higher-Risk Patients Receiving Daily External Beam Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation to 40 Gy in 10 Fractions

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Association of Dosimetric Parameters With Patient-Reported Outcomes

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery offers a well-tolerated adjuvant radiation therapy option for patients with breast cancer. We sought to describe patient-reported acute toxicity as a function of salient dosimetric parameters during and after an APBI regimen of 40 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions.

Methods and Materials

From June 2019 to July 2020, patients undergoing APBI were assigned a weekly, response-adapted, patient reported outcomes-common terminology criteria for adverse events-based acute toxicity assessment. Patients reported acute toxicity during treatment and for up to 8 weeks after treatment. Dosimetric treatment parameters were collected. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were used to summarize patient-reported outcomes and their correlation to corresponding dosimetric measures, respectively.

Results

Overall, 55 patients who received APBI completed a total of 351 assessments. Median planning target volume was 210 cc (range, 64-580 cc), and median planning target volume:ipsilateral breast volume ratio was 0.17 (range, 0.05-0.44). Overall, 22% of patients reported moderate breast enlargement and 27% reported maximum skin toxicity as severe or very severe. Furthermore, 35% of patients reported fatigue, and 44% of patients reported pain in the radiated area as moderate to very severe. Median time to first report of any moderate to very severe symptom was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-27 days). By 8 weeks after APBI, most patients reported resolution of symptoms, with 16% reporting residual moderate symptoms. Upon univariable analysis, none of the ascertained salient dosimetric parameters were associated with maximum symptoms or with the presence of moderate to very severe toxicity.

Conclusions

Weekly assessments during and after APBI showed that patients experienced moderate to very severe toxicities, most commonly skin toxicity, but that these typically resolved by 8 weeks after radiation therapy. More comprehensive evaluations among larger cohorts are warranted to define the precise dosimetric parameters that correspond to outcomes of interest.

Is consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer still beneficial in the era of immunotherapy? A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) carries a dismal prognosis. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TR) after first-line chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors in this setting remains unclear. As TR can improve overall survival (OS) after conventional chemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed OS of an inhouse cohort treated either with TR or with chemoimmunotherapy alone.

METHODS

A total of 41 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab or durvalumab) for ES-SCLC at our hospital since 2019 were analyzed. TR was administered in 10 fractions of 3 Gy. Patient characteristics, number of immunotherapy cycles received, brain irradiation, and presence of hepatic and cerebral metastasis at diagnosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was OS after first diagnosis.

RESULTS

Consolidative TR was associated with a significantly longer OS than systemic therapy alone (1-year OS 78.6% and 2‑year OS 37.1% vs. 1‑year OS 39.7% and 2 years not reached, p = 0.019). With regard to radiotherapy indication, survival at 1 year was 88.9% (log-rank p = 0.016) for patients receiving consolidative TR. For patients receiving TR in case of progression, 1‑year survival was 66.7%. Hepatic and cerebral metastasis at first diagnosis had no significant effect on OS.

CONCLUSION

TR was significantly associated with longer OS. The survival benefit of TR was most pronounced for consolidative radiotherapy after initial chemoimmunotherapy compared to TR in case of progression. Although retrospective findings need to be interpreted with caution, in the absence of prospective data, our findings provide a basis for offering consolidative TR in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Once-Daily Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Tomotherapy: Results of a Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

We report long-term outcomes of phase 2 trial on patients with invasive breast cancer treated with accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using tomotherapy after breast conservative surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From December 2010 to December 2018, we treated 338 women with APBI-tomotherapy: 38.5 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions. Patients selected were age ≥50 years old, with ≤3 cm in size unifocal tumor and at least 2 mm of clear margins. Disease outcomes were analyzed by clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular phenotypes, and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2017 updated consensus groupings.

RESULTS

The median age was 65 years (range, 50-86). The invasive ductal (87.5%) and the luminal A-like molecular phenotype (70%) were the most common tumors. Overall 242 patients (71.6%) were considered "suitable" for enrollment in APBI according to the eligibility criteria of the ASTRO-2017 consensus statement. With a median follow-up of 76 months (range, 17-113), 2 patients (0.6%) had an invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), and 2 patients (0.6%) had an axillary ipsilateral failure. The rate of local control in terms of free of IBTR was 99.4% and locoregional control (no recurrence in ipsilateral breast as well as in regional nodes) was 98.8%. Progression-free survival was 98.4% and 92% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Acute and late skin toxicity, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were 7.7% (G1) and 0.6% (G2) and 4.4% (G1) and 1.1% (G2), respectively. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities, however. Very few patients (2%) or physicians (2%) assessed cosmetic outcome as fair or poor at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase 2 trial on APBI-tomotherapy shows excellent long-term results. Once-daily fractionation schedule was well tolerated with a low rate of adverse events and worse cosmetic outcome. In this series, even among those deemed cautionary or unsuitable for APBI by ASTRO criteria, we demonstrated a low rate of IBTR.

Breast Radiation Therapy Under COVID-19 Pandemic Resource Constraints-Approaches to Defer or Shorten Treatment From a Comprehensive Cancer Center in the United States

Purpose

Breast radiation therapy accounts for a significant proportion of patient volume in contemporary radiation oncology practice. In the setting of anticipated resource constraints and widespread community infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic, measures for balancing both infectious and oncologic risk among patients and providers must be carefully considered. Here, we present evidence-based guidelines for omitting or abbreviating breast cancer radiation therapy, where appropriate, in an effort to mitigate risk to patients and optimize resource utilization.

Methods and Materials

Multidisciplinary breast cancer experts at a high-volume comprehensive cancer center convened contingency planning meetings over the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic to review the relevant literature and establish recommendations for the application of hypofractionated and abbreviated breast radiation regimens.

Results

Substantial evidence exists to support omitting radiation among certain favorable risk subgroups of patients with breast cancer and for abbreviating or accelerating regimens among others. For those who require either whole-breast or postmastectomy radiation, with or without coverage of the regional lymph nodes, a growing body of literature supports various hypofractionated approaches that appear safe and effective.

Conclusions

In the setting of a public health emergency with the potential to strain critical healthcare resources and place patients at risk of infection, the parsimonious application of breast radiation therapy may alleviate a significant clinical burden without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes. The judicious and personalized use of immature study data may be warranted in the setting of a competing mortality risk from this widespread pandemic.