Treatment of Early Stage High-Risk Endometrioid-Type Endometrial Cancer and Patterns of Disease Relapse: A Retrospective Analysis

Association between subtypes of metabolic syndrome and prognosis in patients with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Purpose

To investigate the association between subtypes of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and prognosis of patients with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Patients and methods

Patients with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma who received surgical treatment as primary therapy at the Department of Gynecology of the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the diagnosis criteria of MetS, the patients were categorized as patients without MetS, patients with MetS but without raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG, including previously diagnosed diabetes), and patients with MetS and raised FPG. All the included patients were followed from the dates of surgery until death, June 2021, or loss to follow-up, whichever came first, and cancer recurrence (including metastasis) was studied as the main outcome. Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between subtypes of MetS and the study outcome adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results

Among the included 387 patients with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 193 (49.9%) were without MetS, 65 (16.8%) were with FPG not involving MetS, and 129 (33.3%) were with raised FPG involved MetS. With a median follow-up of 1,253 days, the cumulative incidence of cancer recurrence was 8.76% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5%–14.62%), 28.31% (95% CI 2.33%–47.38%), and 7.54% (95% CI 1.54%–13.17%), respectively. After adjusting for age, menopause, histological grade, tumor size, lymph-vascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, and treatments, comorbid FPG not involving MetS is a stronger risk factor of cancer recurrence than comorbid raised FPG involving MetS (hazard ratio 2.82 (95% CI 1.10–7.24) versus 1.18 (95% CI 0.45–3.13)) when compared to patients without MetS.

Conclusion

Comorbid MetS generally presents as a risk factor of poor prognosis in patients with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma after surgical treatment, but the magnitude of the association may vary between subtypes, in which FPG not involving MetS appears to be predominant.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy versus Radiotherapy in High-risk, Early-stage Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) vs. radiotherapy (RT, alone or combined with CT) on the prognosis of patients with high-risk, early-stage (stage I and stage II) endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective clinical study was conducted in Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between 2010 and 2019. In the present study, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients, who underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by postoperative adjuvant CT or RT (alone or combined with CT), and were diagnosed with stage IA grade 2/3 with lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), and stage IB with two or more uterine risks, including old age, histological grade 2 or 3, LVSI and stage II, were included. According to the postoperative adjuvant therapy, all eligible patients were divided into two groups: CT group and RT (RT±CT) group. The primary objective was to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the CT and RT groups. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were also presented in the present study.

RESULTS

A total of 145 eligible patients were included. Among these patients, 97 patients underwent adjuvant CT and 48 patients underwent adjuvant RT (RT±CT). The median follow-up was 47.2 months, and the five-year OS rate was 92.7% in the CT group and 88.6 % in the RT group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-2.99). The 5-year DFS rate for the two groups was 85.7% and 80.2%, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.33-2.05). The cumulative incidence of local-regional disease recurrence at 60 months of follow-up was 6.2% in the CT group and 6.3% in the RT group (HR=1.11; 95%CI: 0.28-4.35). The cumulative incidence of distant recurrence at 60 months of follow-up was 5.2% in the CT group and 10.4% in the RT group (HR=0.65; 95%CI: 0.19-2.24). Both groups of patients were well-tolerant, and the only grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in efficacy for adjuvant CT or adjuvant RT (RT±CT) in high-risk, early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. CT exhibited a trend of reducing the distant relapse, although there was no significant difference, when compared with adjuvant RT (RT±CT).