Combined Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival for Uterine Serous Cancer

Prognosis of Stage I Endometrial Cancer According to the FIGO 2023 Classification Taking into Account Molecular Changes

Optimum risk stratification in an early stage of endometrial cancer (EC) combines molecular and clinicopathological features. The purpose of the study was to determine the prognostic value of molecular classification and traditional pathological factors in a sample group of patients with stage I EC according to the FIGO 2023 criteria, to achieve a more personalized approach to patient care and treatment. The immunohistochemistry for p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and DNA sequencing for POLE exonuclease domain and clinicopathological parameters, including disease disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in 139 patients, were analyzed. It has been shown that the independent recurrence risk factors are stage IC (p < 0.001), aggressive histological types EC (p < 0.001), and the presence of p53abn protein immunoexpression (p = 0.009). Stage IC (p = 0.018), aggressive histological types EC (p = 0.025) and the presence of p53abn protein immunoexpression (p = 0.010) were all significantly associated with lower 5-year OS rates. Our research studies confirm that the molecular category corresponds to a different prognosis in clinical stage I EC according to the new 2023 FIGO classification, with POLEmut cases presenting the best outcomes and p53abn cases showing the worst outcomes. Beyond the previous routine clinicopathological assessment, the new EC staging system represents an important step toward improving our ability to stratify IC stage EC risk.

Defining the Optimal Treatment Strategy in Patients With Uterine Serous Carcinoma

AIMS

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer with high rates of relapse and death. As adjuvant therapy might be beneficial in early-stage disease, the impact of standard complete surgical staging is questioned. Therefore, we wanted to explore the optimal treatment strategy for women diagnosed with USC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study of women diagnosed with primary USC in the UK and the Netherlands. Treatment strategy in relation to overall survival and progression-free survival was recorded and evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Furthermore, primary surgical staging and/or adjuvant treatment in relation to patterns of recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 272 women with a median age of 70 years were included. Most patients presented with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease (44%). Overall, 48% of patients developed recurrent disease, most (58%) with a distant component. Women treated with chemotherapy showed significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.81; P = 0.005) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.80; P = 0.04) in multivariable analysis. Furthermore, even in surgically staged women with FIGO stage IA disease, a high recurrence rate of 42% was seen.

CONCLUSION

Women with USC who received adjuvant chemotherapy showed better survival rates compared with those who received other or no adjuvant treatment. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed across all tumour stages, including surgically staged FIGO stage IA. These data question the role of surgical staging in the absence of macroscopic disease in USC.