Phase I/II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pulmonary Metastases in Pediatric Patients

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Adolescent and Young Adult Malignancies

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies examining local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) following stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for adolescent and young adult (AYA) populations/histologies with local recurrences or metastatic disease.

METHODS

The RSSearch® Patient Registry, an international SABR registry, was evaluated for AYA patients treated with SABR. AYA patients with adult histologies/primaries were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were employed to characterize LC and OS following SABR. Potential prognostic factors were assessed with log-rank tests for initial univariate analysis (UVA). For multivariate analyses (MVA), a Cox proportional hazards multivariate model was utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 19 AYA patients with 39 lesions treated with SABR were identified and included in the analysis. Four lesions (10.3%) were treated with SABR for primary tumor recurrence and 35 lesions were treated for metastatic disease. The median patient age was 34 years (range: 16-39 years). Common lesion locations included lung (11 lesions; 28.2%), non-spinal bone (nine lesions; 23.1%), and spine (six lesions; 15.4%). The median biological effective dose (BED10) was 61.5 Gy (range: 26.4-180). One-year LC and OS following SABR were 77.7% (95% CI: 58.5-88.7) and 72.7% (95% CI: 46.3-87.6), respectively. On UVA, BED10 ≥ 60 Gy was associated with superior one-year LC (94.4% vs. 47.6%; p<0.0001) as were sarcoma primaries (two-year LC: 92.3% vs. 42.2%;p = 0.0002). Central nervous system (CNS) primaries had significantly poorer one-year LC (20% vs 87.5%; p<0.0001) as well as spinal metastases (33.3% vs. 87.0%; p<0.0001). On MVA, BED10 < 60 Gy was associated with inferior LC (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.51;p = 0.01) with sarcoma primaries associated with superior LC (HR = 0.04;p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

SABR with BED10 ≥ 60 Gy resulted in durable LC for AYA patients, particularly those with sarcoma primaries, though poor outcomes were noted in metastatic CNS malignancies.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Targeted Therapy for Lung Metastases in Pediatric Sarcoma

Purpose

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary metastases from pediatric sarcomas.

Methods and Materials

This study was a single institutional retrospective chart review including patients younger than 21 years of age at diagnosis who had received SBRT for pulmonary metastasis from metastatic sarcoma. Our current electronic record system was queried for all eligible patients. Primary endpoint was tumor response as defined by Respone Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria. Secondarily, we analyzed factors that affected tumor response as well as toxicity of treatment. Median dose was 50 Gy ranging from 30 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions to the planning tumor volume.

Results

There were 7 patients, ranging in age from 6 to 21 years with a total of 14 pulmonary lesions treated with SBRT. Median and mean follow-up times for the 7 patients were 10.6 months and 15.9 months, respectively. The complete response rate was 50%, partial response 21%, stable disease 21%, and progressive disease 7%. Four of the 7 patients were treated with concurrent systemic therapy, 3 of which were targeted oral therapies. Additionally, we observed that patients who were on targeted therapy such as regorafenib or pazopanib seemed to have better local control compared with patients without targeted therapy.

Conclusions

With an overall response rate of 92%, SBRT provided a noninvasive effective palliative treatment option with few side effects in this small retrospective study of 7 patients. A larger prospective clinical trial is warranted to evaluate the role of SBRT in the treatment of unresectable metastatic pediatric sarcomas.

Disease Control and Toxicity Outcomes after Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Cancers in Young-Adult and Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors have poor survival outcomes despite standard-of-care systemic therapy. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) may improve tumor control. We report the outcomes with the use of SABR in our pediatric solid tumor population.

METHODS

This was a single-institutional study in patients < 30 years treated with SABR. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates in R v4.2.3.

RESULTS

In total, 48 patients receiving 135 SABR courses were included. The median age was 15.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 14-23 y) and the median follow-up was 18.1 months (IQR: 7.7-29.1). The median SABR dose was 30 Gy (IQR 25-35 Gy). The most common primary histologies were Ewing sarcoma (25%), rhabdomyosarcoma (17%), osteosarcoma (13%), and central nervous system (CNS) gliomas (13%). Furthermore, 57% of patients had oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) at the time of SABR. The one-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94%, 22%, and 70%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed, while the rates of any grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were 11.8%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung, or brain metastases and those who underwent surgery for a metastatic site had a significantly longer PFS. LC at 1-year was significantly higher for patients with a sarcoma histology (95.7% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.01) and for those who received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) > 48 Gy (100% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR is well tolerated in pediatric patients with 1-year local failure and OS rates of <10% and 70%, respectively. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are needed to address progression outside of the irradiated field.

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT.

Methods and Materials

Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED10), LC, and toxicity incidence.

Results

Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED10 was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy10 increase in BED10 associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts.

Conclusions

SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics.

The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Cancers With Advancements in Molecular Tumor Characterization and Targeted Therapies

Ongoing rapid advances in molecular diagnostics, precision imaging, and development of targeted therapies have resulted in a constantly evolving landscape for treatment of pediatric cancers. Radiotherapy remains a critical element of the therapeutic toolbox, and its role in the era of precision medicine continues to adapt and undergo re-evaluation. Here, we review emerging strategies for combining radiotherapy with novel targeted systemic therapies (for example, for pediatric gliomas or soft tissue sarcomas), modifying use or intensity of radiotherapy when appropriate via molecular diagnostics that allow better characterization and individualization of each patient’s treatments (for example, de-intensification of radiotherapy in WNT subgroup medulloblastoma), as well as exploring more effective targeted systemic therapies that may allow omission or delay of radiotherapy. Many of these strategies are still under investigation but highlight the importance of continued pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluating the role of radiotherapy in this era of precision oncology.

Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: From Palliation to Ablation

Simple Summary

In the United States, over 13,000 patients are diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma annually leading to over 5000 deaths per year despite aggressive treatments including radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. Although the majority of patients present with localized disease, unfortunately many will develop metastatic disease, which is generally not curable. There is growing evidence that local ablative therapies may be beneficial in patients with a variety of metastatic malignancies. In this review article, we explore the evolving role of radiotherapy in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. In particular, we review the growing role of ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease, local control of the primary site, and palliation.

Abstract

The management of patients with metastatic cancer is rapidly changing. Historically, radiotherapy was utilized for the treatment of localized disease or for palliation. While systemic therapy remains the mainstay of management for patients with metastatic cancer, radiotherapy is becoming increasingly important not only to palliate symptoms, but also to ablate oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease and improve local control in the primary site. There is emerging evidence in multiple solid malignancies that patients with low volume metastatic disease that undergo local ablative therapy to metastatic sites may have improved progression free survival and potentially overall survival. In addition, there is increasing evidence that select patients with metastatic disease may benefit from aggressive treatment of the primary site. Patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma have a poor overall prognosis. However, there may be opportunities in patients with low volume metastatic soft tissue sarcoma to improve outcomes with local therapy including surgery, ablation, embolization, and radiation therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a safe, convenient, precise, and non-invasive option for ablation of sites of metastases. In this review article, we explore the limited yet evolving role of radiotherapy to metastatic and primary sites for local control and palliation, particularly in the oligometastatic setting.