Radiation-Induced Brachial Plexopathy in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Comprehensive Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

Function and strength declines in a client with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is a progressively disabling outcome of radiotherapy for a variety of cancers. This report describes measured declines over time in a client with very late RIBP, secondary to radiotherapy for breast cancer.

CASE DESCRIPTION

After diagnosis of stage IIIA (right) breast cancer (age 50), this woman underwent bilateral mastectomy, chemotherapy and daily radiotherapy (25 sessions) to the right chest wall, supraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes. A neurological exam (age 72) showed diminished deep tendon reflexes in the right brachioradialis, biceps and triceps; nerve conduction tests revealed decreased amplitude of sensory and motor nerves in the right arm. Also, standardized measurements of grip and pinch strength were obtained by a hand therapist. The client was sent to a neurooncologist, who referred her to occupational therapists to update standardized assessments of grip/pinch strength and functional dexterity, as well as provide assistive technology and therapy suggestions.

OUTCOMES

Grip strength decreased 28.1%, with recent grip strength < 50% of the median normative value for the dominant hand. Lateral pinch strength dropped by 67%, now 16% of normal. Lateral key/three-point pinch strength decreased by 95%, now 2.3% of normal. Functional dexterity decreased also in the affected hand, with astereognosis noted.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report describing increasing deficits in RIBP using standardized measures of grip and pinch strength, manual dexterity and stereognosis. Sadly, there is no successful intervention to increase muscle strength in RIBP which results in progressive strength loss, as shown with this client's hand strength over three years.

Unveiling innovative therapeutic strategies and future trajectories on stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for targeted treatment of breast carcinoma

This comprehensive review delineates the latest advancements in stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems engineered for the targeted treatment of breast carcinoma. The manuscript commences by introducing mammary carcinoma and the current therapeutic methodologies, underscoring the urgency for innovative therapeutic strategies. Subsequently, it elucidates the logic behind the employment of stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems, which promise targeted drug administration and the minimization of adverse reactions. The review proffers an in-depth analysis of diverse types of stimuli-responsive systems, including thermoresponsive, pH-responsive, and enzyme-responsive nanocarriers. The paramount importance of material choice, biocompatibility, and drug loading strategies in the design of these systems is accentuated. The review explores characterization methodologies for stimuli-responsive nanocarriers and probes preclinical evaluations of their efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution in mammary carcinoma models. Clinical applications of stimuli-responsive systems, ongoing clinical trials, the potential of combination therapies, and the utility of multifunctional nanocarriers for the co-delivery of assorted drugs and therapies are also discussed. The manuscript addresses the persistent challenge of drug resistance in mammary carcinoma and the potential of stimuli-responsive systems in surmounting it. Regulatory and safety considerations, including FDA guidelines and biocompatibility assessments, are outlined. The review concludes by spotlighting future trajectories and emergent technologies in stimuli-responsive drug delivery, focusing on pioneering approaches, advancements in nanotechnology, and personalized medicine considerations. This review aims to serve as a valuable compendium for researchers and clinicians interested in the development of efficacious and safe stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of breast carcinoma.

Is there any radiation-induced brachial plexopathy after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy?

Introduction

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is one of the most concerning late radiation effects after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy (HF-PMRT) to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the RIBP events occurring in breast cancer patients after HF-PMRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by helical tomotherapy. Furthermore, the dosimetric parameters of the ipsilateral brachial plexus were reported.

Materials and methods

Breast cancer patients who underwent HF-PMRT using the IMRT via HT at our institute were included. In the first cohort, subjective RIBP symptoms were measured using a QuickDASH questionnaire, whereas objective RIBP events were assessed using a comprehensive physical evaluation in the second cohort. The ipsilateral brachial plexus from all eligible patients' treatment plans was contoured, and the dosimetric parameters were explored.

Results

From March 2014 to December 2022, 229 patients were enrolled; 107 and 72 individuals were in the first and second cohorts, respectively. The first cohort's median follow-up period was 27 months, and the second cohort was 31 months. In the first cohort, 80 patients (74.77%) had a normal function, 21 (19.63%) had a mild grade, and 6 (5.61%) had a moderate grade; no severe or very severe RIBP was observed. However, the comprehensive physical evaluation of the second cohort indicated no RIBP events. Dosimetric analysis revealed that the median maximum dose was 44.52, 44.52, and 44.60 Gy; the median mean dose was 33.00, 32.23, and 32.33 Gy; and the median dose at 0.03 cc was 44.33, 44.36, and 44.39 Gy for all patients, patients in the first and second cohort, respectively. Each dosimetric parameter was evaluated, and no statistically significant differences were detected.

Conclusion

The absence of RIBP events supports the safety of employing HF-PMRT by HT for the chest wall and all regional lymph nodes. We propose that applying the ICRU Report 83 criteria for IMRT planning, which limit the maximum dose (107% of the prescribed dose) to less than 2% of the planning target volume and exclude the brachial plexus region from the maximal dose area, is a practical way to minimize the risk of RIBP from HF-PMRT.

Neurologic Complications in Adult Cancer Survivorship

Over the past decade, the improvement in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics has extended the overall survival of patients diagnosed with cancer including brain cancer. However, despite these unprecedented medical successes, patients continue to experience numerous neurologic complications after treatment that interfere with their independence, functionality, and overall quality of life. These include, among others, cognitive impairment, endocrinopathies, peripheral and cranial neuropathies, and vasculopathy. This article describes the long-term neurologic complications cancer survivors commonly experience to increase awareness of these complications and discuss treatments when available. Further research is necessary to understanding of mechanisms of neurologic injury and advance diagnosis and treatment. Effective patient education, monitoring, and managing neurologic issues after cancer treatment may improve independence, functionality, and quality of life during survivorship.

Brachial plexopathy after breast cancer: A persistent late effect of radiotherapy

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is an iatrogenic, progressively disabling, and often very late effect of adjuvant radiotherapy most commonly seen in breast cancer survivors but also in those treated for lymphoma, lung, and head and neck cancers. In late-onset RIBP following breast cancer, the nerve injury is chronic and irreversible, occurring more commonly when axillary and/or supraclavicular nodes have been irradiated, as well as the breast/chest wall. RIBP is manifested initially by paresthesia, hypoesthesia, dysesthesia, and later by weakness in the ipsilateral hand with those symptoms progressing distally to proximally up through the shoulder. Depressed/absent deep tendon reflexes in the upper extremity and muscle fasciculations occur also. Neither patients nor their health care providers tend to associate these unusual neurological symptoms with cancer treatments received ≥20 years prior, often failing to link these sensory-motor symptoms with radiotherapy decades before. Because long-term follow-up of these patients now typically falls to general practitioners, many cases may be missed or misdiagnosed because of the rarity of this disorder. Physiatrists and allied rehabilitation professionals must be aware of this progressively disabling, incurable condition to provide appropriate diagnoses and compensatory rehabilitation therapies. Additionally, professional oncology organizations should include RIBP in their long-term, survivorship guidelines for breast cancer. Researchers examining the iatrogenic late effects of radiotherapy should extend their follow-up periods well beyond the current 5-6 years to ascertain the true incidence of RIBP today. Rehabilitation providers must continue to advocate for awareness, diagnosis, and management of iatrogenic outcomes experienced by long-term cancer survivors.

Clinical, Neurophysiologic, and Pathologic Features in Patients With Early-Onset Postradiation Neuropathy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to study early-onset radiation-induced neuropathy reviewing neurologic course, steroid response, and available nerve biopsies.

METHODS

Patients coded with radiation-induced neuropathy within 6 months of radiation were reviewed from January 1,1999, to August 31, 2022. Patients had to have electrodiagnostically confirmed neuropathy localized within or distal to radiation fields. Neurologic course and nerve biopsies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (16 male and 12 female patients, mean age 63.8 years) were identified. The average radiation dose was 4,659 cGy (range 1,000-7,208). Tumor infiltration was not observed on MRI and PET. Postradiation onsets averaged 2 months (range 0-5). Localizations included brachial (n = 4) plexopathies, lumbosacral (n = 12) plexopathies, radiculopathies (n = 10), and mononeuropathies (n = 2). Neuropathic pain (n = 25) and weakness (n = 25) were typical. The clinical courses were subacute monophasic (n = 14), chronic progressive (n = 8), or static (n = 1), and 5 were without follow-up. Nerve biopsies (n = 8) showed an inflammatory ischemic process with perivascular inflammatory infiltrates (n = 7) or microvasculitis (n = 2). Nine patients, 7 with monophasic courses, received steroid burst therapy with symptom improvement in 8. No patients recovered entirely back to baseline.

DISCUSSION

In contrast to chronic radiation-induced neuropathy, early-onset patients most commonly have painful monophasic courses with residual deficits, possibly steroid responsive. An ischemic inflammatory pathogenesis is suggested.

A comparison of acute patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer patients with and without regional nodal irradiation using the ESAS and PRFS tool

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is commonly administered in patients with breast cancer with node-positive disease to prevent cancer recurrence. The purpose of this study is to identify whether RNI is associated with greater acute symptom burden from baseline to 1 to 3 months post completion of radiotherapy (RT) when compared to localized RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient and treatment characteristics were collected prospectively for breast cancer patients with and without RNI from February 2018 to September 2020. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Patient-Reported Functional Status (PRFS) tool were completed by patients at baseline, weekly during RT, and at a 1- to 3-month follow-up visit. The Wilcoxon rank-sum or Fisher exact tests were used to compare variables between patients with or without RNI.

RESULTS

A total of 781 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline symptom reporting was similar between cohorts, with the exception of PRFS scores (p = 0.0023), which were worse in patients receiving RNI. Across all time points, differences in outcomes between cohorts were minimal, except for lack of appetite (p = 0.03) and PRFS scores (p = 0.049), which were significantly aggravated in patients treated with RNI.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that RNI is associated with greater symptom burden as assessed with the ESAS. Further research should be conducted over a longer time period to determine the impact of late effects of RNI on patient-reported symptoms.

The spectrum of brachial plexopathy from perineural spread of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Perineural spread of breast cancer to the brachial plexus can lead to pain, sensory alterations, and upper-extremity weakness. Although rare, perineural spread is an often-misdiagnosed long-term complication following breast cancer diagnosis. The objective of this study was to critically review the clinical, radiological, and pathological findings of biopsy-proven perineural spread of breast cancer to the brachial plexus.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a single institution in which a total of 19 patients with brachial plexus involvement from perineural spread of breast cancer who underwent fascicular biopsy between 1999 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and pathological data were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the cohort.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer perineural spread was 60.6 ± 11.5 years. The diagnosis of brachial plexopathy due to perineural spread was on average 12 years after the primary diagnosis of breast cancer. There was also a delay in diagnosis due to the rarity of this disease, with a mean time from initial symptom onset to diagnosis of perineural spread of 25 ± 30 months. All patients at the time of presentation had upper-extremity weakness and pain. Nearly all patients demonstrated T2 signal change and nodular so-called sugar-coating contrast enhancement on brachial plexus MRI. Similarly, all patients who underwent PET/MRI or PET/CT had increased FDG uptake in the involved brachial plexus. Breast cancer perineural spread has an overall poor prognosis, with 16 of 19 patients dying within 5.9 ± 3.0 years after diagnosis of perineural spread.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural spread should be considered in patients with a history of breast cancer, even 10 years after primary diagnosis, especially in patients who present with arm pain, weakness, and/or sensory changes. Further diagnostic workup with electrodiagnostic studies; brachial plexus MRI, PET/CT, or PET/MRI; and possibly nerve biopsy is warranted to ensure accurate diagnosis.

[Radiation induced brachial plexopathy: Diagnosis, risk factors, principles of care]

Radiation plexitis, also known as radiation-induced brachial neuropathy is a rare toxicity following axillary, breast, cervical or thoracic radiotherapy, first described in 1966 by Stoll and Andrew. Although improvements in radiotherapy techniques have greatly reduced its risk over the past seventy years, its severe form remains a dreaded complication that is difficult to manage in patients with increased life expectancy. This article summarizes the epidemiological elements, risk factors, diagnostic methods, doses and constraints to be respected in radiotherapy and the treatment strategies of radiation plexitis.