Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Delineation of Organs at Risk in the Head and Neck Region

MRI for Differentiation between HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important risk factor for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). HPV-positive (HPV+) cases are associated with a different pathophysiology, microstructure, and prognosis compared to HPV-negative (HPV-) cases. This review aimed to investigate the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discriminate between HPV+ and HPV- tumours and predict HPV status in OPSCC patients. A systematic literature search was performed on 15 December 2022 on EMBASE, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Cochrane according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-eight studies (n = 2634 patients) were included. Five, nineteen, and seven studies investigated structural MRI (e.g., T1, T2-weighted), diffusion-weighted MRI, and other sequences, respectively. Three out of four studies found that HPV+ tumours were significantly smaller in size, and their lymph node metastases were more cystic in structure than HPV- ones. Eleven out of thirteen studies found that the mean apparent diffusion coefficient was significantly higher in HPV- than HPV+ primary tumours. Other sequences need further investigation. Fourteen studies used MRI to predict HPV status using clinical, radiological, and radiomics features. The reported areas under the curve (AUC) values ranged between 0.697 and 0.944. MRI can potentially be used to find differences between HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC patients and predict HPV status with reasonable accuracy. Larger studies with external model validation using independent datasets are needed before clinical implementation.

vOARiability: Interobserver and intermodality variability analysis in OAR contouring from head and neck CT and MR images

BACKGROUND

Accurate and consistent contouring of organs-at-risk (OARs) from medical images is a key step of radiotherapy (RT) cancer treatment planning. Most contouring approaches rely on computed tomography (CT) images, but the integration of complementary magnetic resonance (MR) modality is highly recommended, especially from the perspective of OAR contouring, synthetic CT and MR image generation for MR-only RT, and MR-guided RT. Although MR has been recognized as valuable for contouring OARs in the head and neck (HaN) region, the accuracy and consistency of the resulting contours have not been yet objectively evaluated.

PURPOSE

To analyze the interobserver and intermodality variability in contouring OARs in the HaN region, performed by observers with different level of experience from CT and MR images of the same patients.

METHODS

In the final cohort of 27 CT and MR images of the same patients, contours of up to 31 OARs were obtained by a radiation oncology resident (junior observer, JO) and a board-certified radiation oncologist (senior observer, SO). The resulting contours were then evaluated in terms of interobserver variability, characterized as the agreement among different observers (JO and SO) when contouring OARs in a selected modality (CT or MR), and intermodality variability, characterized as the agreement among different modalities (CT and MR) when OARs were contoured by a selected observer (JO or SO), both by the Dice coefficient (DC) and 95-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95 $_{95}$ ).

RESULTS

The mean (±standard deviation) interobserver variability was 69.0 ± 20.2% and 5.1 ± 4.1 mm, while the mean intermodality variability was 61.6 ± 19.0% and 6.1 ± 4.3 mm in terms of DC and HD95 $_{95}$ , respectively, across all OARs. Statistically significant differences were only found for specific OARs. The performed MR to CT image registration resulted in a mean target registration error of 1.7 ± 0.5 mm, which was considered as valid for the analysis of intermodality variability.

CONCLUSIONS

The contouring variability was, in general, similar for both image modalities, and experience did not considerably affect the contouring performance. However, the results indicate that an OAR is difficult to contour regardless of whether it is contoured in the CT or MR image, and that observer experience may be an important factor for OARs that are deemed difficult to contour. Several of the differences in the resulting variability can be also attributed to adherence to guidelines, especially for OARs with poor visibility or without distinctive boundaries in either CT or MR images. Although considerable contouring differences were observed for specific OARs, it can be concluded that almost all OARs can be contoured with a similar degree of variability in either the CT or MR modality, which works in favor of MR images from the perspective of MR-only and MR-guided RT.

Proposal for standardized ultrasound analysis of the salivary glands: Part 1 submandibular gland

Objectives

The Salivary Gland Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery seeks to standardize terminology and technique for ultrasonograpy used in the evaluation and treatment of salivary gland disorders.

Methods

Development of expert opinion obtained through interaction with international practitioners representing multiple specialties. This committee work includes a comprehensive literature review with presentation of case examples to propose a standardized protocol for the language used in ultrasound salivary gland assessment.

Results

A multiple segment proposal is initiated with this focus on the submandibular gland. We provide a concise rationale for recommended descriptive language highlighted by a more extensive supplement that includes an extensive literature review with additional case examples.

Conclusion

Recommendations are provided to improve consistency both in performing and reporting submandibular gland ultrasound.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.