1
|
Colen J, Nguyen C, Liyanage SW, Aliotta E, Chen J, Alonso C, Romano K, Peach S, Showalter T, Read P, Larner J, Wijesooriya K. Predicting radiation-induced immune suppression in lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:6485-6500. [PMID: 38837261 PMCID: PMC11489021 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is known to modulate the immune system and contribute to the generation of anti-tumor T cells and stimulate T cell infiltration into tumors. Radiation-induced immune suppression (RIIS) is a side effect of radiation therapy that can decrease immunological function by killing naive T cells as well as SBRT-induced newly created effector T cells, suppressing the immune response to tumors and increasing susceptibility to infections. PURPOSE RIIS varies substantially among patients and it is currently unclear what drives this variability. Models that can accurately predict RIIS in near real time based on treatment plan characteristics would allow treatment planners to maintain current protocol specific dosimetric criteria while minimizing immune suppression. In this paper, we present an algorithm to predict RIIS based on a model of circulating blood using early stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. METHODS This Python-based algorithm uses DICOM data for radiation therapy treatment plans, dose maps, patient CT data sets, and organ delineations to stochastically simulate blood flow and predict the doses absorbed by circulating lymphocytes. These absorbed doses are used to predict the fraction of lymphocytes killed by a given treatment plan. Finally, the time dependence of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) following SBRT is modeled using longitudinal blood data up to a year after treatment. This model was developed and evaluated on a cohort of 64 patients with 10-fold cross validation. RESULTS Our algorithm predicted post-treatment ALC with an average error of0.24 ± 0.21 × 10 9 $0.24 \pm 0.21 \times {10}^9$ cells/L with 89% of the patients having a prediction error below 0.5 × 109 cells/L. The accuracy was consistent across a wide range of clinical and treatment variables. Our model is able to predict post-treatment ALC < 0.8 (grade 2 lymphopenia), with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 98%. This model has a ∼38-s end-to-end prediction time of post treatment ALC. CONCLUSION Our model performed well in predicting RIIS in patients treated using lung SBRT. With near-real time model prediction time, it has the capability to be interfaced with treatment planning systems to prospectively reduce immune cell toxicity while maintaining national SBRT conformity and plan quality criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Colen
- University of Virginia, Department of Physics,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Old Dominion University, Joint Institute on Advanced
Computing for Environmental Studies, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
- Hampton Roads Biomedical Research Consortium, Portsmouth,
Virginia, USA
| | - Cam Nguyen
- University of Virginia, Department of Physics,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Seth W. Liyanage
- Stanford University, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric Aliotta
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Joe Chen
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Clayton Alonso
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kara Romano
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Sean Peach
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Timothy Showalter
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Paul Read
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - James Larner
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Krishni Wijesooriya
- University of Virginia, Department of Physics,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cella L, Monti S, Pacelli R, Palma G. Modeling frameworks for radiation induced lymphopenia: A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110041. [PMID: 38042499 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is a frequent, and often considered unavoidable, side effect of radiation therapy (RT), whether or not chemotherapy is included. However, in the last few years several studies have demonstrated the detrimental effect of RIL on therapeutic outcomes, with conflicting findings concerning possible inferior patient survival. In addition, since immunotherapeutic treatment has become an integral part of cancer therapy, preserving the immune system is recognized as crucial. Given this background, various research groups have reported on different frameworks for modelling RIL, frequently based on different definitions of RIL itself, and discordant results have been reported. Our aim is to critically review the current literature on RIL modelling and summarize the different approaches recently proposed to improve the prediction of RIL after RT and aimed at immunity-sparing RT. A detailed description of these approaches will be outlined and illustrated through their applications as found in the literature from the last five years. Such a critical analysis represents the necessary starting step to develop an effective strategy that ultimately could harmonize the diverse modelling methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cella
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
| | - Serena Monti
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palma
- Institute of Nanotechnology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|