1
|
Deng Z, Liu J, Yu YV, Jin YN. Machine learning-based identification of an immunotherapy-related signature to enhance outcomes and immunotherapy responses in melanoma. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1451103. [PMID: 39355255 PMCID: PMC11442245 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1451103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy has revolutionized skin cutaneous melanoma treatment, but response variability due to tumor heterogeneity necessitates robust biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response. Methods We used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), consensus clustering, and 10 machine learning algorithms to develop the immunotherapy-related gene model (ITRGM) signature. Multi-omics analyses included bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing of melanoma patients, mouse bulk RNA sequencing, and pathology sections of melanoma patients. Results We identified 66 consensus immunotherapy prognostic genes (CITPGs) using WGCNA and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from two melanoma cohorts. The CITPG-high group showed better prognosis and enriched immune activities. DEGs between CITPG-high and CITPG-low groups in the TCGA-SKCM cohort were analyzed in three additional melanoma cohorts using univariate Cox regression, resulting in 44 consensus genes. Using 101 machine learning algorithm combinations, we constructed the ITRGM signature based on seven model genes. The ITRGM outperformed 37 published signatures in predicting immunotherapy prognosis across the training cohort, three testing cohorts, and a meta-cohort. It effectively stratified patients into high-risk or low-risk groups for immunotherapy response. The low-risk group, with high levels of model genes, correlated with increased immune characteristics such as tumor mutation burden and immune cell infiltration, indicating immune-hot tumors with a better prognosis. The ITRGM's relationship with the tumor immune microenvironment was further validated in our experiments using pathology sections with GBP5, an important model gene, and CD8 IHC analysis. The ITRGM also predicted better immunotherapy response in eight cohorts, including urothelial carcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma, indicating broad applicability. Conclusions The ITRGM signature is a stable and robust predictor for stratifying melanoma patients into 'immune-hot' and 'immune-cold' tumors, enhancing prognosis and response to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaidong Deng
- Department of Neurology, Medical Research Institute, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan
University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Neurology, Medical Research Institute, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan
University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanxun V. Yu
- Department of Neurology, Medical Research Institute, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan
University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Frontier Science Center for Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University,
Wuhan, China
| | - Youngnam N. Jin
- Department of Neurology, Medical Research Institute, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan
University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Frontier Science Center for Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University,
Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roccuzzo G, Bongiovanni E, Tonella L, Pala V, Marchisio S, Ricci A, Senetta R, Bertero L, Ribero S, Berrino E, Marchiò C, Sapino A, Quaglino P, Cassoni P. Emerging prognostic biomarkers in advanced cutaneous melanoma: a literature update. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2024; 24:49-66. [PMID: 38334382 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2314574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past two years, the scientific community has witnessed an exponential growth in research focused on identifying prognostic biomarkers for melanoma, both in pre-clinical and clinical settings. This surge in studies reflects the need of developing effective prognostic indicators in the field of melanoma. AREAS COVERED The aim of this work is to review the scientific literature on the most recent findings on the development or validation of prognostic biomarkers in melanoma, in the attempt of providing both clinicians and researchers with an updated broad synopsis of prognostic biomarkers in cutaneous melanoma. EXPERT OPINION While the field of prognostic biomarkers in melanoma appears promising, there are several complexities and limitations to address. The interdependence of clinical, histological, and molecular features requires accurate classification of different biomarker families. Correlation does not imply causation, and adjustments for confounding factors are often overlooked. In this scenario, large-scale studies based on high-quality clinical trial data can provide more reliable evidence. It is essential to avoid oversimplification by focusing on a single biomarker, as the interactions among multiple factors contribute to define the disease course and patient's outcome. Furthermore, implementing well-supported evidence in real-life settings can help advance prognostic biomarker research in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Roccuzzo
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bongiovanni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Tonella
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Pala
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Marchisio
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Rebecca Senetta
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Ribero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Berrino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|