A comparison of direct laryngoscopy to video laryngoscopy by paramedic students in manikin-simulated airway management scenarios

Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Setting: A Retrospective Comparison

OBJECTIVE

Since the introduction of video laryngoscopy (VL) as a technique for orotracheal intubation, its use has become widespread among prehospital providers. However, little information is available about the efficacy and success of VL compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL) in the helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) setting. The objective of this study was to investigate whether VL or DL increased successful first-pass orotracheal intubations and overall intubation success by HEMS providers.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed on adults intubated by a HEMS program from January 2015 to July 2017. All orotracheal intubations with at least 1 attempt were included. Excluded were emergent cricothyrotomies, nonintubated patients, and those intubated before HEMS care.

RESULTS

DL accounted for 21 intubations, whereas VL was used for 150 intubations. Nineteen of 21 (90.5%) DL intubations were successful on first pass, whereas 127 of 150 (84.7%) VL intubations were successful on first pass. The overall success rate was 90.5% for DL and 92.7% for VL. For both first-pass and overall success rates, the differences between modalities were not statistically significant. DL and VL had nearly identical complication rates, with hypoxia being the primary complication in both groups.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference was found in the first-pass rate, the overall success rate, or complications between DL and VL.

Endotracheal Intubation by Paramedics Using Neodymium Magnet and Modified Stylet in Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluates the success and efficacy of endotracheal intubation (ETI) using a modified intubation stylet and a magnet system to direct the stylet into the trachea. The system was developed by the researchers in an attempt to increase the success and efficacy of ETI.

METHODS

ETI procedures were performed on an airway management manikin by emergency medical technicians with at least four years of experience in ETI. The technicians used a stylet modified with an iron ball affixed to the tip and a neodymium magnet, designed specifically for the study. The intention was to guide the endotracheal tube into the trachea at the level of the thyroid and cricoid cartilages on the manikin with the aid of the modified stylet and the magnetic force of the neodymium magnet. The success rate, completion time, and degree of difficulty of two procedures were compared: magnetic endotracheal intubation (METI) and classic ETI (CETI).

RESULTS

The success rate was 100% in both groups. The mean completion times for the METI and CETI procedures were 18.31 ± 2.46 s and 20.01 ± 1.95 s, respectively. There were significant differences in completion time and degree of difficulty between the METI and CETI procedures (both p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found the use of a neodymium magnet and modified stylet to be an effective method to guide the endotracheal tube into the trachea. The present study may provide a basis for future studies.