Ureteroscopy for treatment of obstructing ureteral calculi in pregnant women: Single center experience

Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To investigate the outcomes of internal ureteral stents in comparison with ureteroscopy (URS) for pregnant women with urolithiasis.

Data sources

Relevant studies published from January 1980 to June 2022 were identified through systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.

Methods of study selection

A total of 499 studies were initially identified. We included pregnant women in any stages of gestation who underwent double-J (D-J) stent insertion only or ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis; for a study to be included, the number of participants needed to exceed 10. This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO website (Reference: CRD42020195607).

Results

A total of 25 studies were identified with 131 cases undergoing serial stenting and 789 cases undergoing URS. The pooled operative success rate was 97% for D-J stent insertion and 99% for URS. Only a few patients passed stones spontaneously after serial D-J stenting. The pooled stone free rate (SFR) in URS operations was about 91%. For internal ureteral stent therapy, the rate of normal fertility outcomes was 99%, although the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 45%. For group receiving URS treatment, the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99% and the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 1%. However, the pooled rate of premature birth and abortion were the similar between the two groups (< 1%); the rate of serious complications was also similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Although internal ureteral stents may cause more minor complications, both ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stents showed had low rates of adverse effects on fertility outcomes when used to treat pregnant women with symptomatic urolithiasis. Evidence suggests that URS may have a greater advantage for pregnant patients with urinary stones when conditions permit. Since, it has been proven to be safe and effective, internal ureteral stents could be considered in emergency or other special situations.

Incidence of kidney stones in pregnancy and associations with adverse obstetrical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4.7 million pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Renal stones are a common cause of non-obstetrical abdominal pain in pregnant women. Though the management of renal stones in pregnancy is challenging, it remains unclear how the incidence of kidney stones may affect the course of pregnancy and delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of renal stones in pregnancy and its impact on adverse obstetrical outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic literature search of three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. After the selection of articles, an additional hand-search of their citations was completed to maximize sensitivity. Databases were examined from the last four decades (19 March 1970) up to the search date (19 March 2020).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles were excluded if they were not relevant to kidney stones or did not report outcomes related to pregnancy. Case reports, animal studies, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Conference abstracts, gray literature, and unpublished data were not eligible.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

All screening, extraction, and synthesis were completed in duplicate with two independent reviewers. All outcomes reported in the included studies were systematically evaluated to determine suitability for meta-analysis. Random-effects models and sensitivity analyses were used to account for interstudy variation. Renal stone incidence rates were pooled to generate summary proportions. Risk of bias assessment was completed using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included through systematic review and approximately 4.7 million pregnancies across nine studies were included for meta-analysis. There are three major findings of this review regarding renal stone incidence in pregnancy and maternal, child, and birth-related outcomes associated with renal stones. First, we found pooled incidence of renal stones was 0.49%, or one case for every 204 pregnancies. Second, renal stones during pregnancy were significantly associated with the development of preeclampsia and urinary tract infection, as well as increased likelihood of low birth weight, preterm labor, and C-section deliveries. However, renal stones were not significantly associated with premature rupture of membranes or infant mortality. Third, there were limited obstetrical complications reported with either medical or surgical therapies although comparative outcomes were not provided in the majority of studies, precluding formal meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although renal stones in pregnancy are relatively rare, there may be an associated risk of serious adverse obstetrical outcomes. However, further research is required to understand whether these obstetrical outcomes are causal or due to other confounders. Interdisciplinary care and pregnancy-specific counseling should be advised for pregnant women with kidney stones.