Effects of tirofiban plus clopidogrel versus clopidogrel plus provisional abciximab on biomarkers of myocardial necrosis in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with early aggressive approach. Results of the CLOpidogrel, upstream TIrofiban, in cath Lab Downstream Abciximab (CLOTILDA) study

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January Week 1 2013) and EMBASE (OVID, 1947 to Week 1 2013) on 11 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. We used odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty trials involving 66,689 patients were included. During PCI (48 trials with 33,513 participants) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers decreased all-cause mortality at 30 days (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) but not at six months (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.05). All-cause death or myocardial infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72) and at six months (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without acute coronary syndromes.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS (12 trials with 33,176 participants), IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of all-cause death at 30 days but not at six months, and reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with acute coronary syndromes. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January Week 1 2013) and EMBASE (OVID, 1947 to Week 1 2013) on 11 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. We used odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty trials involving 66,689 patients were included. During PCI (48 trials with 33,513 participants) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers decreased all-cause mortality at 30 days (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) but not at six months (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.05). All-cause death or myocardial infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72) and at six months (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.61; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without acute coronary syndromes.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS (12 trials with 33,176 participants), IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of all-cause death at 30 days but not at six months, and reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with acute coronary syndromes. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction.

Early high-dose rosuvastatin for contrast-induced nephropathy prevention in acute coronary syndrome: Results from the PRATO-ACS Study (Protective Effect of Rosuvastatin and Antiplatelet Therapy On contrast-induced acute kidney injury and myocardial damage in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine if in addition to standard preventive measures on-admission, high-dose rosuvastatin exerts a protective effect against contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk for CI-AKI, and the role of statin pre-treatment in preventing renal damage remains uncertain.

METHODS

Consecutive statin-naïve non-ST elevation ACS patients scheduled to undergo early invasive strategy were randomly assigned to receive rosuvastatin (40 mg on admission, followed by 20 mg/day; statin group n = 252) or no statin treatment (control group n = 252). CI-AKI was defined as an increase in creatinine concentration of ≥0.5 mg/dl or ≥25% above baseline within 72 h after contrast administration.

RESULTS

The incidence of CI-AKI was significantly lower in the statin group than in controls (6.7% vs. 15.1%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20 to 0.71; p = 0.003). The benefits against CI-AKI were consistent, even applying different CI-AKI definition criteria and in all the pre-specified risk categories. The 30-day incidence of adverse cardiovascular and renal events (death, dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, or persistent renal damage) was significantly lower in the statin group (3.6% vs. 7.9%, respectively; p = 0.036). Moreover, statin treatment given on admission was associated with a lower rate of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 6 month follow-up (3.6% vs. 7.2%, respectively; p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose rosuvastatin given on admission to statin-naïve patients with ACS who are scheduled for an early invasive procedure can prevent CI-AKI and improve short-term clinical outcome. (Statin Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention [PRATO-ACS]; NCT01185938).

Treatment with tirofiban for acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a systematic review and network analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of tirofiban in comparison to usual care or other GPIIb/IIIa antagonists (eptifibatide and abciximab). Results were analysed by drug administration with planned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or as medical management without planned PCI, and separately for STEMI or NSTE ACS patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials of tirofiban, abciximab, eptifibatide or usual care given to patients with acute coronary syndrome. Nine databases were searched up to March 2010. Pair-wise meta-analysis was used to combine all available direct comparisons; indirect comparisons and network analysis were performed when this was not possible. The primary outcome was MACE (major adverse cardiac event).

RESULTS

The search yielded 8, 119 records and 50 trials were included (total number of patients = 52,958). Compared to usual care, high and medium-dose tirofiban (25 and 10 µg/kg/min) administered with planned PCI reduced MACE at 30 days for patients with STEMI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45, 0.99; RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10, 0.80), but was not effective as a medical management. Medium-dose tirofiban (10 µg/kg/min) administered with planned PCI or low dose (0.4 µg/kg/min) as medical management reduced the risk of MACE for patients with NSTE ACS (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21, 0.75; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41, 0.83) in comparison to usual care, but at the expense of increased thrombocytopenia (RR 3.26, 95% CI 1.31, 8.13). Evidence from RCTs and network analysis indicated tirofiban and abciximab were equally effective and safe. Comparing tirofiban and eptifibatide treatment by indirect and network analysis produced inconclusive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban was more effective than usual care for STEMI and NSTE ACS patients receiving planned PCI, and NSTE ACS patients receiving medical management. Tirofiban and abciximab were equally effective. Comparisons of tirofiban and eptifibatide were inconclusive.

Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Therefore, great interests have been focused in the last decades on improvement in antiplatelet therapies, that currently are regarded as main pillars in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease, with special attention to glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GP IIb-IIIa) receptors, that mediates the final stage of platelet activation. GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, especially abciximab, have been shown to improve clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI. Upstream administration cannot routinely recommended, but may potentially be considered among high-risk patients within the first 4 h from symptoms onset. In case of periprocedural administration of antithrombotic therapy, Bivalirudin should be considered, especially in patients at high risk for bleeding complications. Among high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes, an early invasive strategy with selective downstream administration of GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors is the strategy of choice, whereas bivalirudin should be considered in patients at high risk for bleeding complications. Among patients with unstable angina GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors should be considered only in case of evidence of intracoronary thrombus or in case of thrombotic complications (as provisional use). Further, randomized trials are certainly needed in the era of new oral antiplatelet therapies, and with strategies to prevent bleeding complications such as larger use of radial approach, mechanical closure devices, bivalirudin, or postprocedural protamine administration to promote early sheat removal.

Short-term high-dose atorvastatin for periprocedural myocardial infarction prevention in patients with renal dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

Short-term high-dose atorvastatin administered before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (pMI) in high-risk patients, such as those with acute coronary syndromes and those with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. It is unknown whether short-term high-dose administration reduces the rate of pMI in patients with chronic kidney disease. Recently, we observed that in 304 patients with estimated creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min randomized to receive 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or placebo for 48 h before elective coronary angiography and/or angioplasty, statin administration did not reduce contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluate the pMI in the subgroup of 161 patients who underwent PCI.

METHODS

In all patients, creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB) [upper reference limit (URL) 5 ng/ml] was assessed before and at 12 and 24 h after PCI. The pMI, defined as CK-MB elevation more than three times the URL, occurred in 27 (17%) patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of pMI was 10.4% (of 77 patients) in the atorvastatin and 23% (of 84 patients) in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified the pretreatment with high-dose atorvastatin as an independent predictor of reduced risk of pMI [odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.96, P < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

This post-hoc analysis shows that short-term high-dose atorvastatin administration reduced pMI in patients with renal dysfunction submitted to elective PCI, but without benefit regarding CIN prevention.

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing invasive strategy

It is still unknown whether upstream administration of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, aiming at cooling the culprit lesion before angioplasty, is superior to its selective downstream administration in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) undergoing coronary angioplasty. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing upstream to downstream administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing early invasive strategy. We obtained results from all randomized trials on this issue. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases from January 1990 to March 2010. The following key words were used: "randomized trial," "myocardial infarction," "ACS," "coronary angioplasty," "upstream," "downstream," "Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors," "abciximab," "tirofiban," and "eptifibatide." Primary and secondary clinical end points were mortality and myocardial infarction at 30 days, respectively. Major bleeding complications were assessed as a safety end point. Seven randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 19,929 patients (9,981 or 50.0% in the upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors group and 9,948 or 50% in the downstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors group). Upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors did not decrease 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.84) or recurrence of myocardial infarction (7.0% vs 7.6%, p = 0.11) but were associated with higher risk of major bleeding complications (1.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.0002). In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy, upstream administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors does not improve clinical outcome compared to a downstream selective administration, and it is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding complications. Therefore, a strategy of upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors cannot be recommended.

Initial combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: is it ready for prime time?

The increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is primarily being driven by the increasing global rates of overweight/obesity. Given the magnitude of this epidemic, we can expect these metabolic abnormalities to play an increasing role in the development of cardiovascular disease. In a pathophysiologic sense, type 2 diabetes is a multiorgan, multifactorial condition, characterized by β-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance in peripheral tissues and the liver, defective incretin activity, and elevated levels of free fatty acids and proinflammatory mediators. Despite the considerable burden of disease associated with type 2 diabetes, most patients are not at, or are unable to achieve, recommended glycemic control guideline targets. In part, this is because of the relentlessly progressive nature of the disease, but it may also be attributable to the current diabetes treatment paradigm, which is characterized by ineffective lifestyle interventions, followed by monotherapy and frequent early treatment failure with prolonged periods of elevated glucose as a consequence of clinical inertia. Thus, it is most appropriate to rethink the current treatment paradigm for type 2 diabetes in the context of a more aggressive initial therapy; specifically with early initiation of combination therapy. Our current understanding of the complex pathophysiology of the disease and the progressive deterioration in glycemic control over time supports the philosophy of earlier intervention with a more comprehensive initial therapy. Thus, while control of hyperglycemia remains the paramount goal, focusing on the underlying pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes is increasingly becoming the therapeutic strategy, with the aim of potentially providing disease modification. Although this is a logical approach, it remains to be demonstrated that early combination therapy will result in disease modification in a clinical setting. Not surprisingly, the incretin-based therapies have gained a great deal of attention in the context of being a component of initial combination therapy, given their potential beneficial effects on β-cell function with lowered risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high. IIb/IIIa blockers strongly inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects and safety of IIb/IIIa blockers when administered during PCI, and as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), and EMBASE (1980 to October 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We collected major bleeding as adverse effect information from the trials. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for effect measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-eight trials involving 62,417 patients were included. During PCI, IIb/IIIa blockers decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95) and at six months (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00). Death or MI was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72), and at 6 months (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.59; absolute risk increase (ARI) 8.0 per 1000). The efficacy results were homogeneous for every endpoint according to the clinical condition of the patients, but were less marked for patients pre-treated with clopidogrel, especially in patients without ACS.As initial medical treatment of NSTEACS, IIb/IIIa blockers did not decrease mortality at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03) or at six months (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.15), but slightly decreased death or MI at 30 days (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99) and at six months (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), although severe bleeding was increased (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.43; ARI 1.4 per 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When administered during PCI, intravenous IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of death and of death or MI at 30 days and at six months, at a price of an increase in the risk of severe bleeding. The efficacy effects are homogeneous but are less marked in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel where they seem to be effective only in patients with ACS. When administered as initial medical treatment in patients with NSTEACS, these agents do not reduce mortality although they slightly reduce the risk of death or MI.

[Effectiveness and safety of triple antiaggregation in patients undergoing coronary intervention]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors) effectiveness and safety in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) or stable coronary disease referred for percutaneous coronary revascularization pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines by means of a systematic review.

SOURCE OF DATA

Electronic search using Medline, Embase, Pascal, Cochrane Library and ISI Proceedings and manual review of the articles found.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the clinical efficacy (risk of death or infarction) and safety (bleeding and thrombocytopenia) of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients pretreated with thienopyridines.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were obtained by duplicate.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (8,604 patients) were included. Addition of GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors reduced the risk of death or myo-cardial infarction at 30 days in those trials that included patients with NSTEACS (RR 0.67; 95%CI 0.56-0.80) but not in studies that excluded NSTEACS patients (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.75-1.53) (p test of interaction 0.0175), As a counterpart, GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors increased the risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors reduces the risk of adverse cardiac events in NSTEACS patients pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines but increases the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Its utilization in stable coronary patients does not seem justified.

Coronary revascularization for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: state of the art

Immediate as well as early revascularization may be beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without ST elevation, but has traditionally employed as an 'ischemia-guided' strategy. A number of randomized trials (including more than 10 000 patients) and observational studies have compared routine invasive versus selective invasive treatment in patients with an acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation. Most randomized trials are limited by a high cross-over rate, whereas observational studies are limited by selection bias. Data from registries have demonstrated benefits with an invasive approach. The results from randomized trials are less clear regarding mortality reduction, although long-term survival after hospital discharge may be better after the invasive approach. In the randomized trials, there was a decreased risk of death or myocardial infarction after the invasive approach (odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.76-1.0). Despite the optimal timing of angiography and subsequent revascularization, if appropriate, angiography and revascularization should be considered in every patient admitted with an ACS without ST elevation, particularly in patients with high-risk characteristics, such as ST segment depression > 0.1 mV, accelerated angina in the prior 2 months, nitrate use in the prior week before admission and elevated troponin.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers for percutaneous coronary revascularization, and unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous coronary revascularisation (i.e. coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stent implantation), and in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the risk of acute vessel occlusion by thrombosis is high in spite of treatment with aspirin and heparin. GP IIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit platelet aggregation and may prevent mortality and myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of GP IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary revascularisation, and in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 1, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2001), EMBASE (1980 to Nov 1999), reference list of articles, medical websites and handsearch among abstracts from cardiology congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers with standard medical treatment during percutaneous coronary revascularisation, and in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A list of titles and abstracts was screened separately by two reviewers who assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Percutaneous coronary revascularisation: Fourteen trials involving 17,788 patients were included. GP IIb/IIIa blockers were associated with decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.52, 0.97)) but not at 6 months (OR 0.85 (0.66, 1.11)). Mortality or infarction was decreased both at 30 days (OR 0.62 (0.55, 0.70); ARR: 31 per 1,000), and at 6 months (OR 0.65 (0.58, 0.73); ARR: 38 per 1,000)), but severe bleeding was increased (10 per 1,000; OR 1.38 (1.04, 1.85)). Unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Eight trials involving 30,006 patients were included. GP IIb/IIIa blockers were not associated with decreased mortality at 30 days (OR 0.90 (0.80, 1.02)) or at 6 months (OR: 1.01 (0.88, 1.16)). Mortality or infarction was decreased at 30 days (OR 0.91 (0.85, 0.98); ARR: 13 per 1,000)) and at 6 months (OR 0,88 (0.81, 0.95); ARR: 13 per 1,000)), although severe bleeding was increased (1 per 1,000; OR 1.27 (1.12, 1.44)).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers reduce the risk of death at 30 days and markedly that of death or MI at 30 days and 6 months in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary revascularisation at a price of a moderate increased risk of severe bleeding. In contrast, in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, these agents do not reduce mortality, only slightly reduce the risk of death or MI, and slightly increase the risk for severe bleeding.