Using echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

CRT Optimization: What Is New? What Is Necessary?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has proven to improve quality of life, reduce heart failure hospitalization, and prolong life in selected heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, on optimal medical therapy and with electrical dyssynchrony. To ensure maximal benefit for CRT patients, optimization of care should be implemented. This begins with appropriate referring as well as selecting patients, knowing that the presence of left bundle branch block and QRS ≥ 150 ms is associated with the greatest reverse remodeling. The LV lead, preferably quadripolar, is best targeted in a postero-lateral position. After implantation, optimal device programming should aim for maximal biventricular pacing and in selected cases further electrical delay optimization might be of use. Even as important, is the implementation of thorough multidisciplinary heart failure care with medication uptitration, remote monitoring, rehabilitation, and patient education. The role of newer pacing strategies as endocardial or His-bundle pacing remains the subject of ongoing investigation.

Comparison of left ventricular torsion and strain with biventricular pacing in patients with underlying right bundle branch block versus those with left bundle branch block

The benefits of biventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain poorly understood in those with right bundle branch block (RBBB). The aim of this study was to examine the differences in several speckle tracking-derived parameters, including left ventricular torsion and longitudinal strain with CRT on and off for patients with underlying left bundle branch block (LBBB) and RBBB. Twelve patients with CRT and RBBB were compared with a similar group of patients with underlying LBBB who were sent for evaluation and atrioventricular optimization. Echocardiographic images were acquired with biventricular pacing on and off. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, the ejection fraction, and QRS duration. During intrinsic conduction (CRT off), patients with LBBB had lower torsion angles than those with RBBB (2.3 ± 1.0° in those with LBBB vs 6.3 ± 1.0° in those with RBBB, p = 0.03) but trended toward improvements in torsional parameters, including torsional angle and peak untwisting velocity with CRT on, whereas these parameters worsened in patients with RBBB. Compared with CRT off, analyses of septal and lateral strain curves showed significant improvements in septal strain during 100% and 200% of systole with CRT on in patients with LBBB, whereas biventricular pacing resulted in a trend toward worsening of septal strain in patients with RBBB. Negligible changes were noted in lateral strain values. In conclusion, CRT favorably improves regional mechanics in patients with LBBB primarily involving the ventricular septum, with a negligible positive impact on cardiac function in patients with underlying RBBB.

Optimizing electrode placement for hemodynamic benefit in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Research is needed to explore the relative benefits of alternative electrode placements in biventricular and left ventricular (LV) pacing for heart failure with left bundle branch block (LBBB).

METHODS

A fast computational model of the left ventricle, running on an ordinary laptop computer, was created to simulate the spread of electrical activation over the myocardial surface, together with the resulting electrocardiogram, segmental wall motion, stroke volume, and ejection fraction in the presence of varying degrees of mitral regurgitation. Arbitrary zones of scar and blocked electrical conduction could be modeled.

RESULTS

Simulations showed there are both sweet spots and poor spots for LV electrode placement, sometimes separated by only a few centimeters. In heart failure with LBBB, pacing at poor spots can produce little benefit or even reduce pumping effectiveness. Pacing at sweet spots can produce up to 35% improvement in ejection fraction. Relatively larger benefit occurs in dilated hearts, in keeping with the greater disparity between early and late activated muscle. Sweet spots are typically located on the basal to midlevel, inferolateral wall. Poor spots are located on or near the interventricular septum. Anteroapical scar with conduction block causes little shift in locations for optimal pacing. Hearts with increased passive ventricular compliance and absence of preejection mitral regurgitation exhibit greater therapeutic gain. The durations and wave shapes of QRS complexes in the electrocardiogram can help predict optimum electrode placement in real time.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between poor responders and hyperresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy can be understood in terms of basic anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology. Computational modeling suggests general strategies for optimal electrode placement. In a given patient heart size, regional pathology and regional dynamics allow individual pretreatment planning to target optimal electrode placement.

Importance of adjunctive heart failure optimization immediately after implantation to improve long-term outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Despite improvement in morbidity and mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), disease progression continues to affect a subset of patients and there is limited effort to identify contributing factors. Our objective was to investigate if a protocol-driven approach incorporated in a management strategy of heart failure immediately after implantation would provide incremental benefits beyond usual care after implantation. We reviewed 114 consecutive patients with CRT implanted from 2005 through 2009 who received usual care after implantation or underwent protocol-driven CRT care after implantation. Preimplantation characteristics in patients receiving usual versus protocol-driven care were similar in left ventricular (LV) dimension (LV internal diastolic diameter 6.2 ± 0.8 vs 6.4 ± 1.0 cm), LV ejection fraction (26 ± 8% vs 25% ± 8%), QRS width, and medication usage. Major adjustments during the protocol-driven approach were uptitration of neurohormonal blockers (64%), echocardiographically guided atrioventricular optimization (50%), heart failure education (42%), arrhythmia management (19%), and LV lead repositioning (7%). Although positive LV remodeling was noted in the 2 groups at 6 months, extent was significantly greater in the protocol-driven approach compared to usual care (change in LV internal diastolic diameter 0.7 ± 0.6 cm vs 0.2 ± 1.2 cm, p = 0.01; change in LV ejection fraction 11 ± 7% vs 7 ± 9%, p = 0.01), which was associated with fewer major adverse events (14% vs 53%, p <0.001). In conclusion, a protocol-driven approach for patients with CRT started immediately after implantation is associated with incremental favorable effects on reverse remodeling and fewer adverse events compared to usual care after implantation. These effects appeared to be driven not only by changes in device settings and arrhythmia management but also by concomitant medication optimization and heart failure education.

Electrogram-based optimal atrioventricular and interventricular delays of cardiac resynchronization change individually during exercise

BACKGROUND

Limited data suggest that optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays are different at rest than during exercise in patients with heart failure. We assessed the feasibility and reproducibility of an electrogram-based method of optimization called QuickOpt at rest and during exercise.

METHODS

Patients with a St Jude Medical cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were subjected to a graded treadmill test, and QuickOpt was repeatedly measured prior to, during, and after the exercise.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (16 males, aged 67.4 ± 7.7 years) participated. At rest, delays (in ms) were 110.4 ± 20.1 for sensed AV delay and -70 (LV pacing first) to +20 (RV pacing first) for VV delay. The changes in QuickOpt-derived delays at rest were not significant despite change in body position. During exercise, QuickOpt-derived AV delays did not change in 11 patients, were shorter during peak exercise in 8 patients, and were longer in 3 patients (average value during peak exercise was 126.5 ± 15.8 ms, P = 0.04 compared to baseline). The QuickOpt-derived VV delay gradually shifted toward earlier right ventricular pacing during exercise in 19 patients, while no changes were seen in 3 patients, and a shift occurred toward earlier left ventricular pacing in 2 patients (average value during peak exercise was -30.7 ± 22.2; P = 0.001 compared to baseline). There was no correlation between changes in the QuickOpt-derived AV and VV delays and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of electrogram-based algorithm is feasible both at rest and during exercise. The results are reproducible. QuickOpt-derived AV and VV delays individually change during exercise.

Impaired renal function is associated with echocardiographic nonresponse and poor prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES

Aims of this study were to investigate the effect of renal function on left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and to explore the relation between LV reverse remodeling and changes in renal function at 6-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Renal insufficiency is highly prevalent in heart failure patients, including patients eligible for CRT, and is associated with poor prognosis.

METHODS

The study comprised 490 patients undergoing CRT. Response to CRT was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at 6-month follow-up. Primary end point during long-term follow-up was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 70 ± 28 ml/min/1.73 m². At 6-month follow-up, 263 patients (54%) demonstrated response to CRT. Responders had an eGFR of 74 ± 26 ml/min/1.73 m² versus 64 ± 28 ml/min/1.73 m² in nonresponders (p < 0.001). During long-term follow-up, patients with an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² had higher mortality than patients with an eGFR of 60 to 90 ml/min/1.73 m² or an eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.001). Finally, responders to CRT had preservation of renal function (ΔeGFR -0.6), whereas nonresponders had a slight worsening in renal function (ΔeGFR -4.7, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired renal function in CRT candidates is associated with nonresponse during 6-month follow-up. Additionally, patients with impaired renal function have worse long-term survival after CRT. Response to CRT results in preservation of renal function.

Filtered QRS duration on signal-averaged electrocardiography correlates with ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction

OBJECTIVES

The relationships between filtered QRS duration and ventricular dyssynchrony were studied.

METHODS

We measured filtered QRS duration on signal-averaged electrocardiography and analyzed tissue Doppler imaging in chronic heart failure patients with ejection fraction less than 50%.

RESULTS

In 64 patients, interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchronies were observed in 25 and 38 patients, respectively. All patients with interventricular dyssynchrony were associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony. Filtered QRS showed 0.82 and 0.78 of the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the detection of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, respectively, with 89.7% and 96.2% specificity and 52.0% and 52.6% sensitivity, with cutoff values of 174 and 153 milliseconds. Specificity and sensitivity as well as AUC were lower in the ROC of QRS duration than filtered QRS duration.

CONCLUSION

Filtered QRS duration provided more reliable information to estimate ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction than QRS duration did.

Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine the feasibility and value of a protocol-driven approach to patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) who did not exhibit a positive response long after implant.

BACKGROUND

Up to one-third of patients with advanced heart failure do not exhibit a positive response to CRT.

METHODS

A total of 75 consecutive ambulatory patients with persistent advanced heart failure symptoms and/or adverse reverse remodeling and CRT implanted >6 months underwent a comprehensive protocol-driven evaluation to determine the potential reasons for a suboptimal response. Recommendations were made to maximize the potential of CRT, and adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

All patients (mean left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction 23 +/- 9%, LV end-diastolic volume 275 +/- 127 ml) underwent evaluation. Eighty-eight percent of patients had significantly better echocardiographic indexes of LV filling and LV ejection with optimal setting of their CRT compared with a temporary VVI back-up setting. Most patients had identifiable reasons for suboptimal response, including inadequate device settings (47%), suboptimal medical treatment (32%), arrhythmias (32%), inappropriate lead position (21%), or lack of baseline dyssynchrony (9%). Multidisciplinary recommendations led to changes in device settings and/or other therapy modifications in 74% of patients and were associated with fewer adverse events (13% vs. 50%, odds ratio: 0.2 [95% confidence interval: 0.07 to 0.56], p = 0.002) compared with those in which no recommendation could be made.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine protocol-driven approach to evaluate ambulatory CRT patients who did not exhibit a positive response is feasible, and changes in device settings and/or other therapies after multidisciplinary evaluation may be associated with fewer adverse events.