Prognostic value of preoperative indexed end-systolic left ventricle diameter in the outcome after surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

Outcomes of Watchful Waiting Strategy and Predictors of Postoperative Prognosis in Asymptomatic or Equivocally Symptomatic Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation With Preserved Left Ventricular Function

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical timing for asymptomatic or equivocally symptomatic chronic severe aortic regurgitation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred ten consecutive patients (median age 65 years) with asymptomatic or equivocally symptomatic chronic severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were registered. First, the treatment plans (aortic valve replacement or watchful waiting) after initial diagnosis were investigated. Then, 2 studies were set: Study A (n=144) investigated the prognosis of patients who were managed under the watchful waiting strategy after initial diagnosis; Study B (n=99) investigated the postoperative prognosis in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at initial diagnosis or after watchful waiting. The primary outcomes were all-cause death in Study A and postoperative cardiovascular events in Study B. In Study A, 3 died of noncardiovascular causes during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the survival curve was similar to that of an age-sex-matched general population in Japan. In Study B, 9 experienced the primary outcome during a median follow-up of 5.0 years. In Cox regression analysis, preoperative left ventricular end-systolic diameter enlargement (hazard ratio, 1.11; P=0.048) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter >45 mm (hazard ratio, 12.75; P=0.02) were significantly associated with poor postoperative prognosis. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, left ventricular end-systolic diameter >45 mm predicted a higher risk of the primary outcome (P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Watchful waiting was achieved safely in asymptomatic or equivocally symptomatic chronic severe aortic regurgitation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic diameter >45 mm predicted a poor postoperative outcome and may be an optimal cut-off value for surgical indication.

2023 Korean Society of Echocardiography position paper for diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, part I: aortic valve disease

This manuscript represents the official position of the Korean Society of Echocardiography on valvular heart diseases. This position paper focuses on the clinical management of valvular heart diseases with reference to the guidelines recently published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology. The committee tried to reflect the recently published results on the topic of valvular heart diseases and Korean data by a systematic literature search based on validity and relevance. In part I of this article, we will review and discuss the current position of aortic valve disease in Korea.

Long-Term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Regurgitation - Importance of Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter

BACKGROUND

We determined the left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) cut-off value for risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in Japanese asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic valve regurgitation (AR), and investigated the effect of left ventricular dilation on long-term postoperative outcomes.Methods and Results: The 168 patients who underwent surgical AVR for AR at Shiga University of Medical Science between January 2002 and December 2022 were included in this study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cut-off value of preoperative LVDs for the incidence of MACCE was 42.8 mm (area under the curve 0.616). Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with preoperative LVDs >42.8 mm (n=77) and those with preoperative LVDs ≤42.8 mm (n=91) using propensity score matching. The 10-year estimated rates of freedom from MACCE in those with LVDs >42.8 and ≤42.8 mm were 59.9% and 85.7%, respectively; the curves differed significantly (P=0.004). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, preoperative LVDs >42.8 mm was an independent predictor of MACCE (hazard ratio 2.485; 95% confidence interval 1.239-4.984; P=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative LVDs >42.8 mm is associated with an increased risk of MACCE in Japanese patients undergoing AVR for AR.

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation: a narrative review

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is the third most frequently encountered valve lesion and may be caused by abnormalities of the valve cusps or the aorta. Echocardiography is instrumental in the assessment of AR as it enables the delineation of valvular morphology, the mechanism of the lesion and the grading of severity. Severe AR has a major impact on the myocardium and carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Established and novel echocardiographic methods, such as global longitudinal strain and three-dimensional echocardiography, allow an estimation of this risk and provide invaluable information for patient management and prognosis. This narrative review summarises the epidemiology of AR, reviews current practices and recommendations with regards to the echocardiographic assessment of AR and outlines novel echocardiographic tools that may prove beneficial in patient assessment and management.

Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Clinical Outcomes in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has not been previously studied.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of LVEF in BAV patients according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data collected in 2,672 patients included in an international registry of patients with BAV. Patients were classified according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction: isolated aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 749), isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 554), mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) (n = 190), or no significant aortic valve dysfunction (n = 1,179; excluded from this analysis). The study population was divided according to LVEF strata to investigate its impact on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The risk of all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement or repair (AVR) and all-cause mortality increased when LVEF was <60% in the whole cohort as well as in the AS and AR groups, and when LVEF was <55% in MAVD group. In multivariable analysis, LVEF strata were significantly associated with increased rate of mortality (LVEF 50%-59%: HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.09-3.07]; P = 0.022; LVEF 30%-49%: HR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.13-3.41]; P = 0.016; LVEF <30%: HR: 4.20 [95% CI: 2.01-8.75]; P < 0.001; vs LVEF 60%-70%, reference group).

CONCLUSIONS

In BAV patients, the risk of adverse clinical outcomes increases significantly when the LVEF is <60%. These findings suggest that LVEF cutoff values proposed in the guidelines to indicate intervention should be raised from 50% to 60% in AS or AR and 55% in MAVD.

Cardiac Surgery in Women in the Current Era: What Are the Gaps in Care?

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women in United States and worldwide. One in 3 women dies from cardiovascular disease, and 45% of women >20 years old have some form of CVD. Historically, women have had higher morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Sex influences pathogenesis, pathophysiology, presentation, postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and survival. This review summarizes current cardiovascular surgery outcomes as they pertain to women. Specifically, this article seeks to address whether sex disparities in research, surgical referral, and outcomes still exist and to provide strategies to close these gaps. In addition, with the growing population of women of reproductive age with cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors, indications for cardiac surgery arise in pregnant women. The current review will also address the unique issues associated with this special population.

Optimal Management of Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation - How to Determine Cutoff Values for Surgical Intervention?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular heart disease, but the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial. In the natural history of chronic severe AR, sudden death is rare, and the annual mortality rate is comparatively low. Considering the hemodynamic features of combined volume and pressure overload and long-term compensation in patients with chronic AR, symptoms related to AR do not frequently occur. Therefore, the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a key factor in determining the timing of surgical intervention in patients with severe chronic AR. In addition to symptoms, an ejection fraction <50% and an LV endsystolic diameter (LVESD) >45 mm are appropriate cutoff values for surgical intervention in Japanese patients, whereas LV end-diastolic diameter is not a good indicator. An LVESD index of 25 mm/m²is controversial, because adjusting for body size may cause overcorrection in Japanese patients who have a small body size compared with Westerners. Accumulation of data from the Japanese population is indispensable for establishing guidelines on optimal management of patients with chronic AR.

Early surgery is associated with improved long-term survival compared to class I indication for isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery has higher mortality compared with other single-valve operations. The optimal timing and indications remain controversial, and earlier surgery before the development of class I surgical indications may improve outcomes. We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of surgery for isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR), based on class I indication versus an earlier operation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing isolated TV surgery for TR without other concomitant valve surgery at our center during 2004 to 2018 were studied. Indications were divided into class I versus earlier surgery (asymptomatic severe TR with right ventricular dilation and/or dysfunction) for comparative analyses of characteristics and outcomes. The primary outcome was mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 159 patients (91 females [57.2%]; 115 for class I, 44 for early surgery), with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.6 years, 119 (74.8%) with surgical repairs, and a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 4.0 years. Overall operative mortality was 5.1% (8 patients) (class I, 7.0%; early surgery, 0.0%; P = .107), and class I had a higher composite morbidity than early surgery (35.7% [n = 41] vs 18.2% [n = 8]; P = .036). On Cox proportional hazard model analysis, class I versus early surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 4.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-19.7; P = .04), age (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .046), and diabetes (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.13-5.55; P = .024) were independently associated with higher mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with class I indication for isolated TV surgery had worse survival compared with those undergoing earlier surgery before reaching class I indication. Earlier surgery may improve outcomes in these high-risk patients.

Reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and investigate the factors related to left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR).

METHODS

A total of 246 patients who underwent AVR for chronic AR at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Primary end-points included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events. Secondary end-points included cardiac function on echocardiography 1 year after surgery. We explored the predictive factors for reverse remodelling 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival rate was 86.0%, with no cardiac deaths in 93.8% and no major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events in 79.9% of patients. Postoperative LV function and symptoms were significantly improved 1 year after surgery, but 34 patients (13.8%) did not recover normal function and structure. A significant negative correlation was found between the incidence of cardiac death and major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events and reverse remodelling. Multivariate logistic regression identified preoperative LV ejection fraction (P = 0.001, odds ratio = 1.057) and LV end-systolic dimension index (P = 0.038, odds ratio = 0.912) as significant predictive factors of reverse remodelling 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative LV ejection fraction and LV end-systolic dimension index were predictive factors for reverse remodelling after surgery, which was associated with late outcomes. Earlier surgery may thus help to restore normal LV function and achieve better late outcomes after AVR for AR.

Sex and Race Differences in the Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Valvular Heart Diseases

Valvular heart diseases have long been considered to be similar in men and women and across races/ethnicities. Recently, studies have demonstrated major differences between sexes. Unfortunately, studies on valvular heart diseases, as on other cardiovascular diseases, are mostly performed in Caucasian men or in cohorts with a vast majority of Caucasian men. Therefore, our knowledge on valvular diseases in women and non-Caucasians remains limited. Nevertheless, aortic stenosis has been shown to be almost as prevalent in women as in men, and less prevalent in African Americans. Men appear to have a more calcified aortic valve lesion, and women tend to have a more fibrosed one. Primary mitral regurgitation is more frequent in women who have more rheumatic and Barlow etiologies, whereas men have more fibroelastic deficiency and posterior leaflet prolapse/flail. Left ventricular remodelling due to valvular heart diseases is sex related in terms of geometry and probably also in composition of the tissue. Outcomes seem to be worse in women after surgical interventions and better than or equivalent to men after transcatheter ones. Regarding other valvular heart diseases, very few studies are available: Aortic regurgitation is more frequent in men, isolated tricuspid regurgitation more frequent in women. Rheumatic valve diseases are more frequent in women and are mostly represented by mitral and aortic stenoses. Many other sex/gender- and race/ethnic-specific studies are still needed in epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, management, and outcomes. This review aims to report the available data on sex differences and race specificities in valvular heart diseases, with a primary focus on aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation.

Prognostic Markers and Long-Term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation

Background

The objectives of the present study were (1) to evaluate the echocardiographic prognostic factors associated with improved left ventricular (LV) systolic function after aortic valve replacement, and (2) to compare the long‐term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) patients with or without LV dysfunction.

Methods and Results

A total of 280 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement because of chronic aortic regurgitation were studied. Patients with reduced LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%; group reduced LVEF [rEF]; N=80) were compared with those with preserved LV systolic function (LVEF ≥50%; group preserved LVEF; N=200). Postoperative clinical outcomes, overall survival, and freedom from cardiac death were compared. Postoperative echocardiographic examinations were reviewed, and changes in echocardiographic parameters were analyzed. The parameters related to LVEF improvement or normalization were evaluated, and risk factors affecting long‐term survival were identified. Follow‐up was complete in 100% of patients, with a median follow‐up of 104.8 months. Overall and cardiac mortality‐free survival rates at postoperative 10 years were 80.1% and 92.9% and 87.3% and 97.2% in groups rEF and preserved LVEF, respectively (P=0.036 and P=0.058, respectively). LVEF tended to decrease in the early postoperative period but improved thereafter in both groups. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio was a parameter of postoperative improvement or normalization of LVEF in all patients (area under the curve, 0.719; P=0.003) and in group rEF patients (area under the curve, 0.726; P=0.011) with a cutoff value of 12.73. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio also was the parameter of overall survival in all patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P=0.001) and in group rEF patients (HR, 1.08; P=0.005).

Conclusions

Long‐term outcomes and survival after aortic valve replacement were related to preoperative LV function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio was correlated with the postoperative improvement or normalization of LVEF and long‐term survival, especially in group rEF patients.

Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts occurrence of aortic insufficiency following aortic valve preservation and repair surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (LVESD) ≥5.0 cm is a class IIa indication for surgical intervention for aortic insufficiency (AI); however, the effect of LV dilatation on the longevity of the aortic valve (AV) has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative LV dimension on the long-term outcome of AV preservation surgery.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, 256 patients underwent AV preservation surgery at a single center. The median duration of follow-up was 5 years. The primary outcome was the development of >1+ AI at 6 years; secondary outcomes include long-term mortality, freedom from >2+ AI, and freedom from AV reoperation. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify predictors of AV deterioration.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 0.8%, and mean survival at 8 years was 85.5 ± 3.4%. Mean freedom from >1+ AI at 6 years was 71.1 ± 3.4%. Patients with preoperative indexed LVESD (LVESDi) ≥2.0 cm/m² were at greater risk of developing >1+ AI at 6 years compared with patients with preoperative LVESDi of 1.5 to 1.9 cm/m² and ≤1.4 cm/m² (50.3 ± 0.1% vs 80.9 ± 0.1% vs 92.2 ± 0.1%, respectively; P < .01). On risk-adjusted multivariable analysis, preoperative LVESDi was an independent predictor for recurrence of >1+ AI (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative LVESDi ≥2 cm/m² is associated with increased risk of recurrent >1+ AI following AV preservation surgery. Further investigation of the appropriate operative threshold for AI may be warranted.

Transaortic repair of concomitant mitral insufficiency in patients with critical aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valvular replacement

Background

In this study, we present operation technique and outcomes of transaortic mitral valve repair in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis.

Methods

Between January 2005 and March 2016, a total of 11 patients (7 females, 4 males; mean age 71.2±4.1 years; range, 65 to 77 years) with severe aortic valve stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm2 or aortic valve area index <0.6 cm2/m2) and concomitant moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (non-ischemic, regurgitant jet origin between A2-P2 portions) secondary to left ventricular dysfunction (EuroSCORE logistic score >5%, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) who were operated were retrospectively analyzed. Aortic valve replacement and transaortic mitral edge-to-edge repair was applied to all patients. Operations were performed through sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and bicaval venous return. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to evaluate mitral valve before surgery and valve functions after surgery. Postoperative course of all patients was monitored, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 24.5±4.1% and the mean transaortic pressure gradient was 35.8±4.8 mmHg. The mean aortic cross-clamp time was 62.09±10.1 (range, 43 to 76) min and the median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 90.1±11.9 (range, 66 to 114) min. No hospital mortality was observed. In the postoperative period, two patients experienced renal insufficiency. Hemofiltration was initiated in these patients and no dialysis was required at two weeks. One patient had postoperative atrial fibrillation and one patient had pericardial effusion leading to cardiac tamponade and this patient underwent reoperation. The patients were followed up for a mean of four years and control echocardiography didn"t detect increase in mitral regurgitation degree.

Conclusion

Transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair can be used in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. This technique is feasible with shorter cross-clamp time and can reduce mortality and morbidity in selected high-risk patients.

Gender-specific differences in valvular heart disease

The development of new devices and treatment options has greatly increased the interest in heart valve diseases. In this context, the consideration of gender differences in diagnosis, treatment success, and prognosis is of great importance. Available data show that women and men with heart valve disease have different risk profiles, which have a significant impact on treatment outcomes and prognosis.

It is the purpose of this review article to give an overview of gender-related differences in patients with valvular heart disease, regarding clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. In light of the emerging treatment possibilities, future research should emphasize the role of gender since both sexes benefit from tailored management.

Timing of Surgical Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation

OPINION STATEMENT

Aortic regurgitation is a frequently encountered condition, in which traditional measurements of severity have proven to be of limited value in identifying those who would be best served by aortic valve replacement. Novel methods of assessing severity are vital, particularly as an entirely new paradigm of aortic regurgitation has surfaced, with the advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and the adverse events that are being observed with varying degrees of aortic regurgitation. With that in mind, a comprehensive assessment of aortic regurgitation should now include indexed left ventricular systolic volumes and a comprehensive assessment of right ventricular function, in addition to the quantitative measures that are currently recommended. Cardiac MRI also provides valuable information and should be strongly considered, particularly in challenging cases. The incremental value of additional echocardiographic parameters such as strain imaging, speckle tracking imaging, and tissue Doppler imaging remains unclear, and evidence for their utility is not, as yet, compelling. However, the field of aortic regurgitation assessment has been reinvigorated by the prevalence of paravalvular regurgitation post-TAVR, and many of the abovementioned parameters may need to be re-visited so that we can more accurately determine prognosis and risk stratify patients in a more reliable and evidence-based manner.

Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with normal ejection fraction and severe left ventricular dilatation

OBJECTIVES

According to current guidelines, aortic valve surgery is a Class II indication for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) accompanied by left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) >70 mm. This study aims to assess the postoperative outcomes of asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD >70 mm after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and to identify prognostic indicators of the surgery, especially in terms of LV ejection fraction and degree of LV dilatation.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 192 consecutive asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD > 70 mm who underwent isolated AVR from January 2003 to December 2013. Postoperative outcomes and prognostic indicators were evaluated and analysed.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 52.4 ± 16.1 years, and 69.3% were male. The mean LVEF and the mean LVEDD were 58.6 ± 6.6% and 76.0 ± 6.9 mm, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% and survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 94.5 and 86.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that postoperative mortality was associated with age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.059, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.010-1.125, P = 0.049], preoperative LVEF (HR 0.860 95% CI: 0.748-0.989, P = 0.035) and LVEDD (HR 1.094 95% CI: 1.008-1.188, P = 0.032). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that preoperative LVEF < 55% and LVEDD ≥ 81 mm were the best cut-off values for predicting postoperative mortality. By subgroup analysis, patients with 50 ≤ LVEF < 55% had poorer 5- and 10-year survival rates of 87.4 and 74.8% compared with 97.3% and 91.7% for patients with LVEF ≥ 55% (P = 0.023). Patients with LVEDD ≥ 81 mm had poorer 5- and 10-year survival rates of 85.6 and 72.6% compared with 98.2% and 85.6% for those with LVEDD < 81 mm (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

AVR can be performed with satisfactory outcomes for severe aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD > 70 mm. It is observed that 50% ≤ LVEF < 55% or LVEDD ≥ 81 mm are associated with poorer prognosis in patients undergoing AVR.

Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

In most patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) function, but some patients will not have favorable remodeling. Our objectives were to review long term clinical results of AVR for AR and to examine what factors affect the normalization of LV function after AVR for chronic AR.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 2010, 177 patients underwent isolated AVR for chronic pure AR. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on indexed end-systolic LV diameter (iESD): Group L (iESD) ≥25 mm/m(2)) (130 patients) and Group S (iESD <25 mm/m(2)) (47 patients).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in late mortality, freedom from cardiac-related death and rehospitalization for heart failure at late follow up after operation. At postoperative follow-up, 16% of patients had not recovered normal LV systolic function. By means of multivariate analysis, iESD and cardiac index (CI) were independent predictors of recovery of LV function and iESD >26.7 mm/m(2) and CI <2.71 l/min/m(2) were the best cut-off values.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and late surgical results of AVR for chronic AR were good, but for the preservation of postoperative normal LV function, AVR for AR patients should be performed before iESD reaches 26.7 mm/m(2).

Timing of aortic valve intervention in pediatric chronic aortic insufficiency

The timing of aortic valve intervention (AVI) in pediatric patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI) is largely based on adult experience, which is fraught with uncertainty and controversy. Current adult guidelines in the absence of symptoms use left ventricular (LV) systolic function and LV dimensions to guide AVI timing, with few studies translating these recommendations to pediatric patients. This article reviews the current guidelines for AVI timing in chronic AI along with the emerging data for pediatric patients.

Contemporary reviews by surgeon: timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation

The timing of operation for severe chronic and asymptomatic aortic regurgitation remains problematic, though the present trend is to prefer early surgery. In this article, we review recent reports, mainly published after 2006, regarding indications for surgical treatment for pure chronic AR.

Aneurysms of the ascending aorta

BACKGROUND

Aneurysms of the ascending aorta present a special challenge to primary care physicians, internists, and cardiac surgeons because they remain asymptomatic until they present with either dissection or rupture.

METHOD

This review article is based on a selective search of the literature.

RESULTS

In the elderly, aneurysms of the ascending aorta are mainly caused by atherosclerosis. In younger patients, the most common cause is Marfan syndrome; less commonly, younger patients may have Loeys-Dietz syndrome, non-syndromic familial aortic aneurysms, or aortic valve malformations. Genetic variants predisposing to the development of sporadic aortic aneurysms have recently been identified. The risk of rupture and dissection depends on the aortic diameter: when the diameter exceeds 55 mm, surgery improves the outcome, as the risk of surgical complications is lower than the mortality due to rupture or dissection. A more accurate prognosis can be obtained by normalizing the aortic diameter to the body surface area. For patients with Marfan syndrome or a bicuspid aortic valve, the indications for surgery should be determined on an individual basis, depending on additional risk factors. Randomized treatment trials are lacking. The medical management of aneurysms of the ascending aorta consists of monitoring the size of the aneurysm, controlling blood pressure, and treating any cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with Marfan syndrome benefit from preventive treatment with beta-blockers. Advances in the pathophysiological understanding of aortic aneurysms have led to the testing of new types of treatment, e.g., with AT1 antagonists.

CONCLUSION

With the aid of a risk-based treatment strategy, surgery can be properly timed to prevent dissection, which is usually lethal when it occurs. More research is needed on the pathogenesis of this condition so that better preventive treatments can be developed.

Does aortic valve replacement mitigate the risk of preoperative heart failure?

Congestive heart failure complicating aortic valve disease has been reported to increase the operative mortality associated with aortic valve replacement. To determine whether this adverse effect remains late after aortic valve replacement, we analyzed prospectively collected and survival data of 849 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement between 1999 and 2008. There were 243 (29%) cases of heart failure preoperatively (138 current and 105 prior). Both operative and late mortality rates (up to 10 years) were significantly higher in heart failure patients. Current congestive heart failure caused a 3-fold increase in operative mortality and an 86% increase in late mortality, whereas previous history of heart failure caused a doubling of late mortality. Preoperative heart failure still compromises early and late survival after aortic valve replacement. Surgery should be considered early in patients with aortic valve disease and deferred, when possible, in those with frank heart failure.