Transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder: initial clinical applications in children

Delivery systems for transcatheter therapies of congenital heart disease

INTRODUCTION

Delivery systems are crucially important for the implantation of medical devices in patients with congenital heart disease. However, very little data is available comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the various delivery systems.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the delivery systems and methods used for delivery of atrial septal occluder devices, ventricular septal occluder devices, devices to occlude patent arterial ducts, and transcatheter pulmonary valves. Delivery systems are compared relating to prepping and loading, positioning of the delivery sheath/catheter, deployment, ability to recapture and reposition, as well as device release.

EXPERT OPINION

For most ASD/VSD/PDA occluder devices, the basic delivery mechanism has changed very little over the preceding 20 years. Future modifications may focus on meaningful modifications to the cable systems that reduce stiffness and improve angulation at the connection to the device. Over the next 5-10 years, it is expected to see significant changes to delivery systems used for transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, that result in improvements in the ability to recapture and reposition self-expandable transcatheter valves during the deployment process, combined with kink resistant sheaths that facilitate easy tracking across often complex right ventricular outflow tracts.

The Amplatzer duct occluder (ADOII) and Piccolo devices for patent ductus arteriosus closure: a large single institution series

Purpose

Evaluate Piccolo and ADOII devices for transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure. Piccolo has smaller retention discs reducing risk of flow disturbance but residual leak and embolization risk may increase.

Methods

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing PDA closure with an Amplatzer device between January 2008 and April 2022 in our institution. Data from the procedure and 6 months follow-up were collected.

Results

762 patients, median age 2.6 years (range 0-46.7) years and median weight 13 kg (range 3.5-92) were referred for PDA closure. Overall, 758 (99.5%) had successful implantation: 296 (38.8%) with ADOII, 418 (54.8%) with Piccolo, and 44 (5.8%) with AVPII. The ADOII patients were smaller than the Piccolo patients (15.8 vs. 20.5 kg, p < 0.001) and with larger PDA diameters (2.3 vs. 1.9 mm, p < 0.001). Mean device diameter was similar for both groups. Closure rate at follow-up was similar for all devices ADOII 295/296 (99.6%), Piccolo 417/418 (99.7%), and AVPII 44/44 (100%). Four intraprocedural embolizations occurred during the study time period: two ADOII and two Piccolo. Following retrieval the PDA was closed with an AVPII in two cases, ADOI in one case and with surgery in the fourth case. Mild stenosis of the left pulmonary artery (LPA) occurred in three patients with ADOII devices (1%) and one patient with Piccolo device (0.2%). Severe LPA stenosis occurred in one patient with ADOII (0.3%) and one with AVPII device (2.2%).

Conclusions

ADOII and Piccolo are safe and effective for PDA closure with a tendency to less LPA stenosis with Piccolo. There were no cases of aortic coarctation related to a PDA device in this study.

Wheezing caused by a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) device occluder: Case report and review of the literature

Wheezing often occurs in infants and young children with respiratory infections. For children with recurrent wheezing, after controlling their wheezing, they should be alert to rare diseases. Here, we report a case of wheezing following the application of the patent ductus arteriosus occlusion device ADO II (AGA Medical Corporation) with the occlusion device pressing against the adjacent left main bronchus. After the pressure end of the occluder was removed, the child's wheezing was effectively relieved.

Trans-catheter closure of large PDA in adult patients with Amplatzer device: case series

Ductus arteriosus is a physiological structure if not closed after birth, may lead to many complications. Today, trans-catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus with Occluder devices is the preferred method. Surgical ligation is used only in certain cases such as large symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in very small infants and premature babies; unfavourable structure of the duct or economic considerations. In this article, we described haemodynamic and morphological characteristics of five patients with large patent ductus arteriosus which were occluded with Amplatzer device.From 23 January, 2010 to 31 July, 2018, five patients referred to our clinic with large patent ductus arteriosus and pulmonary arterial hypertension for further evaluation. After assessing them with various diagnostic methods, we decided to close defect with ventricular septal defect Occluder device. Patients aged 21-44 years and one of them was male. Ductus closure was successfully done with ventricular septal defect Occluder device. Closure was successful for all of them but in one case, whose device was embolized to pulmonary artery after 24 hr and he underwent surgery.Trans-catheter closure of large patent ductus arteriosus in adult patients with pulmonary hypertension is feasible. Despite the fact that complications may occur even with the most experienced hands, the 'double disk' Amplatzer ventricular septal defect muscular Occluder could be advantageous in this setting.

The Outcomes of Transcatheter Closure in Patients with Patent Ductus Arteriosus at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Indonesia

BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is one of the most common acyanotic congenital heart diseases. The incidence of PDA is approximately 1 in 500 full-term neonates. The current management of PDA includes pharmacological and surgical treatments. Transcatheter closure is a preferable PDA treatment than pharmacological intervention, for medications have a higher failure rate in premature infants. Several studies have reported the efficacy and safety of transcatheter closure in smaller and lower-weight infants. AIM: This study aims to describe the outcomes of transcatheter closure of PDA, which are complete closure, migrating device, and residuals, while also investigating factors that might affect these outcomes. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2018 in the pediatric cardiology outpatient clinic of Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia. All PDA patients who underwent transcatheter closure were included in this study. We collected patients’ demographic data (age and sex), PDA size (categorize into large, moderate, and small), and PDA closure outcomes from medical records. The collected data were then analyzed with SPSS. RESULTS: One hundred and two children were included in this study, comprised 34 (33.3%) males and 68 (66.7%) females, with a mean age of 4.3 (±4.02) years old and the mean size of the defects 4.4 (±2.25) mm. Transcatheter closure with Lifetech® PDA Occluder was performed in 95 (93.1%) and MFO® in 7 (6.9%) patients. Small residuals were found in three patients, device migration was found in one patient. No relationship was found between the size of PDA and the outcomes measured. CONCLUSION: We concluded that transcatheter closure remains an effective treatment for PDA, with a considerable success rate.

Transcatheter closure of elongated and pulmonary hypertensive patent arterial duct in infants using Amplatzer vascular plug II

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of Amplatzer vascular plug II in large and elongated ducts in infants.

INTRODUCTION

Patent arterial duct device closure is technically challenging in infants with large and elongated ducts because Amplatzer duct occluder and Amplatzer duct occluder II have high chances of causing aortic coarctation and left pulmonary artery stenosis, respectively. The Amplatzer vascular plug II being soft with no retention discs on either sides helps in mitigating these problems.

METHOD

This is a prospective, observational study involving infants with clinical, echocardiographic and angiographic evidence of large left to right shunt. All the children underwent duct closure using Amplatzer vascular plug II.

RESULTS

Eighteen infants qualified for the study. Mean age and weight were 8.63 ± 3.84 months and 6.3 ± 1.7 kg, respectively. The angiographic mean duct diameter at the pulmonary artery end was 4.66 ± 0.92 mm, and the mean duct length was 9.4 ± 2.48 mm. The size of Amplatzer vascular plug II used varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. Technical success was achieved in 16/18 cases. One patient had device embolisation, and in the other, the device was found to be unstable. The ratio of Amplatzer vascular plug II size to the duct diameter was 1.65 ± 0.27, while the ratio of ductal length to device length was 1.48 ± 0.46 in those with successful outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Amplatzer vascular plug II is a safe and effective option in appropriately selected infants with elongated ducts. Diameter and length of Amplatzer vascular plug II vis-a-vis those of the ductus are important determinants of the successful outcome.

Left pulmonary artery stenting for relief of left pulmonary artery stenosis following ductal closure using Amplatzer Duct Occluder II

A 6-month-old infant with moderate-sized patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and inadequate weight gain underwent closure of the duct using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder II (ADO II). She developed severe progressive left pulmonary artery (LPA) stenosis due to protrusion of the disc at the pulmonary end of the ADO II. She was subjected to balloon angioplasty of the LPA stenosis with suboptimal result. Hence, she was subjected to stenting of the LPA using a Formula stent which could be subsequently postdilated to keep up with the growth of the child. Immediate and short-term results were excellent anatomically as well as physiologically.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of different devices used for the closure of small-to-medium-sized patent ductus arteriosus in pediatric patients

Aims:

In this study, we examined the differences in cost and effectiveness of various devices used for the closure of small to medium sized patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).

Setting and Design:

We retrospectively studied 116 patients who underwent closure of small PDAs between January 2010 and January 2015.

Subjects and Methods:

Three types of devices were used: the Amplatzer duct occluder (ADO) II, the cook detachable coil and the Nit Occlud coil (NOC). Immediate and late complications were recorded and patients were followed up for 3 months after the procedure.

Statistical Methods:

All statistical calculations were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science software. P <0.05 were considered significant.

Results:

We successfully deployed ADO II devices in 33 out of 35 cases, cook detachable coils in 36 out of 40 cases and NOCs in 38 out of 41 cases. In the remaining nine cases, the first device was unsuitable or embolized and required retrieval and replacement with another device. Eleven patients (9.5%) developed vascular complications and required anticoagulation therapy. Patients who had hemolysis or vascular complications remained longer in the intensive care unit, with consequently higher total cost (P = 0.016). Also, the need for a second device increased the cost per patient.

Conclusions:

The cook detachable coil is the most cost-effective device for closure of small-to medium-sized PDAs. Calculations of the incremental cost-effectiveness. (ICE) revealed that the Cook detachable coil had less ICE than the ADO II and NOC. The NOC was more effective with fewer complications.

ADO II in Percutaneous VSD Closure in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Main aim of our study to show that ADO II device can be used for the small ventricular septal defects successfully and safely with low complication rates in pediatric population.

BACKGROUND

It is hard to find an ideal device to use for every VSD successfully. If inappropriate device was chosen; complication rate increases, procedure time gets longer that prolongs exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore interventionalists are in the search for new ideal devices.

MATERIAL

Between the dates April 2011-October 2014, 21 VSD closures with ADO-II device. were performed. Twenty patients were included, age ranged between 4 months 18 years. Weight of the patients was between 5-76 kg.

RESULTS

VSD diameter ranges between 2-6 mm (3.75 ± 1.25). VSD types were muscular in 2 patients, rest of them were perimembranous type. Most of the perimembranous defects (19/21) were aneursymatic and tunnel shaped. All the cases were successfully closed, no major complications were reported. There was no incidence of left bundle branch block, P-R prolongation, or complete heart block.

CONCLUSION

Considering perimembraneous ventricular septal defects as difficult and risky for percutaneous closure because of its proximity to aortic, atrioventricular valves and conduction tissue, we suggest that ADO II device can be safely and effectively used for such defects in particular if an aneurysm formation is present which is also compatible with the literature.

Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus in children using amplatzer duct occluder II: relationship between PDA type and risk of device protrusion into the descending aorta

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADOII) among the various patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) types, and to assess the association between development of aortic obstruction and the PDA type in terms of measurable parameters as the device angulation and distance of upper end protrusion into the aortic lumen.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study involving 50 consecutive subjects who underwent ADO II device closure of PDA.

RESULTS

The median age and weight at intervention were 13 months (5.5 months to 18 years) and 11 (6-67) kg respectively. The median smallest ductal diameter by angiography was 3.2 (1.9-5.4) mm. Thirty two patients had type A PDA, 5 had type C, 5 had type D, and 8 had type E. Residual shunt was seen in only 1 patient who had a tubular PDA and resolved within 2 months of the procedure. No device embolization or pulmonary side protrusion were noted. There was a 16% aortic protrusion rate. The median distance of protrusion of the upper end of the device into the aortic lumen was 3.1 (0-9) mm and the median angle formed between the aortic end of the device and the PDA take-off was 10.4 (0-80.6) degrees. These latter parameters of aortic obstruction were significantly higher in the non-conical PDA group as compared to the conical PDA. Nevertheless, there was no significant coarctation due to aortic retention disc protrusion.

CONCLUSION

Device closure of PDA using the ADO II is a safe procedure for chosen types of PDA. We demonstrated a novel technique for objective assessment of device protrusion into the descending aorta based on measurable parameters. ADOII device closure of non-conical PDAs warrants closer follow ups.

[Percutaneous closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in children with the Amplatzer Duct Occluder II]

INTRODUCTION

In the last decades, several devices have been used for the percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus, with its own limitations and risks. The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II has been designed to overcome those limitations and reduce risks.

OBJECTIVE

We described our initial series of patients who underwent percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus with the Amplatzer Duct Occluder II, emphasis on the technical aspects of the procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical records of 9 patients with patent ductus arteriosus who underwent percutaneous closure with the Amplatzer Duct Occluder II. Median age was 24 months (range 8-51 months) and the median weight was 10.7kg (range 6-16.3kg). The minimal ductus arteriosus diameter was 2.7mm (1-5mm).

RESULTS

Implantation was successful in all cases. The devices most commonly used (33.3%) were the dimensions 4-4mm (3 patients), in 2 patients were used 3-4mm and in the rest of the patients were employed occluder other sizes. Four cases showed slight residual flow immediately after implantation. Total closure was achieved in 24h in 8 of 9 patients (89%). There was no embolization of the occluder or deaths during the procedure and we only observed one minor complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II in this series was effective in 89% of the patients at 24hs after the procedure and 100% follow-up. The implantation was safe and no major complications were observed. The occlusion rate is comparable to those reported for the Amplatzer Duct Occluder I.

Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: past, present and future

This review aims to describe the past history, present techniques and future directions in transcatheter treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Transcatheter PDA closure is the standard of care in most cases and PDA closure is indicated in any patient with signs of left ventricular volume overload due to a ductus. In cases of left-to-right PDA with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, closure may be performed under specific conditions. The management of clinically silent or very tiny PDAs remains highly controversial. Techniques have evolved and the transcatheter approach to PDA closure is now feasible and safe with current devices. Coils and the Amplatzer Duct Occluder are used most frequently for PDA closure worldwide, with a high occlusion rate and few complications. Transcatheter PDA closure in preterm or low-bodyweight infants remains a highly challenging procedure and further device and catheter design development is indicated before transcatheter closure is the treatment of choice in this delicate patient population. The evolution of transcatheter PDA closure from just 40 years ago with 18F sheaths to device delivery via a 3F sheath is remarkable and it is anticipated that further improvements will result in better safety and efficacy of transcatheter PDA closure techniques.

Percutaneous closure of a moderate to large tubular or elongated patent ductus arteriosus in children younger than 3 years: is the ADO II appropriate?

Protrusion of the Amplatzer duct occluder (ADO) II device into the aortic isthmus or the pulmonary artery causing obstruction and residual flow has been reported, but the same has not been widely studied in small children with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) anatomy not considered suitable for closure with the ADO I device. This study aimed to report the safety and efficacy of the ADO II device in children younger than 3 years with a tubular or elongated PDA and to analyze the possible reasons for residual flow in children with such a PDA. In this study, 17 children younger than 3 years (mean age, 10.3 ± 7 months; mean weight, 6 ± 3.6 kg) underwent attempted closure of a tubular or elongated PDA (mean diameter at the narrowest point, 4.1 ± 1.1 mm) with the ADO II device between July 2010 and July 2012. Of the 17 patients, 16 (2 boys and 14 girls) completed the follow-up evaluation. A complete echocardiographic evaluation was performed on all the patients before PDA closure and at the follow-up visit, and the results were compared with those of previous published studies. Of the 16 patients, the 15 who completed the follow-up evaluation had successful device closure (1 device embolization). Residual flow was present in six patients immediately after deployment, which was reduced to three patients at the last follow-up visit. Five of nine patients closed with a 6-mm-long device had residual flow compared with only one of seven patients closed with a 4-mm-long device. After device closure, significant elevations of the left and right pulmonary artery velocities occurred in three and two patients, respectively; in 12 patients, descending thoracic aortic (DTA) velocities increased mildly. There was trend toward a fall in the elevated pressures at the last follow-up visit, although one patient had an elevation in right pulmonary artery velocity at last the follow-up echocardiogram compared with the echocardiogram immediately after closure. Hence, in children younger than 3 years with or without pulmonary arterial hypertension, closure of a PDA not amenable to closure with the ADO I device is feasible using the ADO II device, with an increased incidence of clinically nonsignificant complications. Selection of device dimensions according to the manufacturer's recommendation may not be the optimal strategy.

Ductal closure using the Amplatzer duct occluder type two: experience in Port Elizabeth hospital complex, South Africa: cardiovascular topic

OBJECTIVE

To report outcomes in percutaneous ductal closure using the Amplatzer duct occluder type two (ADO II).

METHODS

Records of patients admitted for percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) were reviewed.

RESULTS

From May 2009 to July 2012, 36 patients were assigned to closure using the ADO II. There were 21 females and 15 males. The median age was 16.5 (2-233) months; median weight, 8 (3.94-39.2) kg; and median height, 75 (55-166) cm. The mean pulmonary artery pressure was 24.4 (± 10.4) mmHg, the pulmonary blood flow:systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) ratio was 2.25 (± 1.97), and mean pulmonary resistance (Rp) was 1.87 (± 1.28) Wood units. The mean ductal size was 2.74 (± 1.3) mm. In 30 patients the device was delivered through the pulmonary artery. Thirty-three patients achieved complete closure by discharge (day one).

CONCLUSION

The ADO II is capable of closing a wide range of ducts in carefully selected patients. Our findings are comparable with other studies regarding ductal closure rates.

Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations

BACKGROUND

Children diagnosed with congenital heart disease often undergo cardiac catheterization for their treatment, which involves the use of ionizing radiation and therefore a risk of radiation-induced cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to calculate the effective and equivalent organ doses (H(T)) in those children and estimate the risk of exposure-induced death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-three children were divided into three groups: atrial septal defect (ASD), ventricular septal defect (VSD) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). In all procedures, the exposure conditions and the dose-area product meters readings were recorded for each individual acquisition. Monte Carlo simulations were run using the PCXMC 2.0 code and mathematical phantoms simulating a child's anatomy. The H(T) values to all irradiated organs and the resulting E and risk of exposure-induced death values were calculated.

RESULTS

The average dose-area product values were, respectively, 40 ± 12 Gy·cm(2) for the ASD, 17.5 ± 0.7 Gy·cm(2) for the VSD and 9.5 ± 1 Gy·cm(2) for the PDA group. The average E values were 40 ± 12, 22 ± 2.5 and 17 ± 3.6 mSv for ASD, VSD and PDA groups, respectively. The respective estimated risk of exposure-induced death values per procedure were 0.109, 0.106 and 0.067%.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac catheterizations in children involve a considerable risk for radiation-induced cancer that has to be further reduced.

Comparison of the efficacy of different-sized Amplatzer duct occluders (I, II, and II AS) in children weighing less than 10 kg

The transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) may cause more complications in small children. Amplatzer (St. Jude Medical, Plymouth, MN) has produces three types of devices for ductal occlusion: the Amplatzer duct occluder I (ADO I) and II (ADO II) and the recently introduced ADO II additional sizes (ADO II AS). We performed this study to determine the efficacy and complication rates in children who weigh <10 kg for the three types of devices used in our clinic. Between February 2007 and March 2012, 77 patients weighing <10 kg had their PDAs occluded with ADOs. The mean age of the patients was 0.76 ± 0.44 years (range 17 days-2 years), and their mean weight was 6.73 ± 2.05 (range 1.2-9.9) kg. In total, 54 girls (70.1 %) and 23 boys (29.9 %) with a mean pulmonary ductus diameter of 2.55 ± 1.0 (1.08-5.94) mm were included in the study. The ADO I was used in 26 patients (33.8 %); the ADO II was used in 43 patients (55.8 %); and the ADO II AS was used in 8 patients (10.4 %). The mean ages of patients with the ADO I, ADO II, and ADO II AS were 1.07 ± 0.48, 0.66 ± 0.31, and 0.28 ± 0.17 years (p < 0.05), respectively. Their mean weights were 7.86 ± 1.45, 6.50 ± 1.85, and 4.36 ± 2.49 kg (p < 0.05), respectively. Their mean narrowest ductal diameters were 3.11 ± 0.96, 2.25 ± 1.06, and 2.33 ± 1.01 mm (p < 0.05), respectively. The use of the ADO II and ADO II AS was found to be more common in type C defects. One patient with the ADO I and 5 patients with the ADO II (7.8 %) developed varying degrees of left pulmonary artery stenosis or iatrogenic aortic coarctation. In 1 patient, the ADO II AS was replaced with the ADO II due to a significant residual shunt observed during the procedure. Each of the ADOs has its own advantages and disadvantages. Although the ADO I is convenient for medium- and large-sized defects, the ADO II and ADO II AS can be used both anterogradely and retrogradely. The ADO II AS is safe and efficient to use in small infants.

Patent ductus arteriosus closure using the Amplatzer® vascular plug II for all anatomic variants

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer® Vascular Plug II (AVPII) for closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).

BACKGROUND

The PDA has significant anatomic variation. No device has proven applicable to all PDAs. Previous case reports and small series have documented limited use of the AVPII for some PDA types. We describe the largest and most diverse experience using the AVPII.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing percutaneous PDA closure between 01/01/2009 and 05/01/2012 was performed. The PDA was characterized, measured, and the device chosen was listed. Deployment technique, complications and procedural results were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven procedures were performed. The AVPII was utilized for 43 (64.2%), 15 (20.9%) had coils, 7 (10.4%) had the AGA duct occluder, and 3 (4.5%) were referred for surgery. The AVPII was placed in infants as young as 2 months and 4.2 kg. AVPII size ranged from 4 to 10 mm. All PDA types were closed. Retrograde and antegrade deployments were performed, using the outer disc as a "retention skirt" to secure the device and improve occlusion. Three patients were up-sized prior to release. All deployments were successful; 89% "in-lab" and 100% closure on postprocedural echocardiogram. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the largest experience with the AVPII for PDA closure. The device was used in all morphologic types and small patients. It is low profile, easily repositioned, and had excellent results without complications. We contend that this is the most versatile device currently available.

The new Amplatzer duct occluder II: when is its use advantageous?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer duct occluder and the Amplatzer duct occluder II in different types of arterial ducts, and to determine in which types of ducts the use of this new device can be advantageous.

METHODS

All children with a device-based ductal closure between September, 2005 and February, 2010 were included. We retrospectively analysed the catheterisation and follow-up data.

RESULTS

Between September, 2005 and February, 2010, 44 ducts were closed with the Amplatzer duct occluder - group Amplatzer duct occluder - and 52 ducts were closed with the Amplatzer duct occluder II - group Amplatzer duct occluder II. In the Amplatzer duct occluder group, the mean age was 3 years and 4 months, and the mean weight was 14.7 kilograms. Closure was successfully performed in all children. Complete closure at 24 hours was attained in 42 of 44 children (95.45%). No major complications occurred. In the Amplatzer duct occluder II group, the mean age was 6 years and 2 months, and the mean weight was 25.4 kilograms. Closure was successfully performed in all children, except in two children in whom the occluder protruded into the aortic isthmus and was replaced by the Amplatzer duct occluder. Complete closure at 24 hours was attained in 51 of 52 children (98.08%). No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, duct closure with the Amplatzer duct occluder II is a safe and effective method. The advantages of using it are the smaller sheath sizes and softer shape.

Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus and interruption of inferior vena cava with azygous continuation using an Amplatzer duct occluder II

We report a case of transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder II in an adult patient with interrupted inferior vena cava with azygous continuation via the femoral artery approach.

Transradial approach for percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus with the Amplatzer duct occluder II: a case report

Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure is a safe and feasible treatment, and it is recommended over surgical approach in the majority of cases. Amplatzer duct occluder (ADO-AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, MN) is the preferred device for transcatheter treatment of PDA. Recently, the ADO II (AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, MN), allowing PDA closure through a small delivery catheter from an antegrade or retrograde approach, received the European Community mark approval. Here, we report, for the first time, successful PDA closure in a 66-year-old female with the ADO II device, using a transradial approach.

Failure of the Amplatzer ductal occluder II: kinking of the aortic retention disk at 24 hours

Since March 2008, the new Amplatzer duct occluder II (ADO II) has been used clinically for PDA closure in Europe. We report an interesting case of a 2(1/2)-year-old girl with a 3-mm conical shape PDA (type A PDA) who underwent uneventful implantation of 3/4 ADO II with complete closure by angiography and echocardiographic control at the end of the procedure. To our surprise, echocardiography 24 hr later revealed a moderate secondary shunt due to kinking of the aortic retention disk of the device with the central waist and the pulmonary retention disk still in correct position. The persistent shunt was closed 1 year later in the cath lab with a 9/6 Nit-Occlud device. To our knowledge, this is the first reported late complication directly related to the device.

Further experience with catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder in children

The aim of the present study was to report our additional experience with transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in 65 consecutive patients using the new Amplatzer duct occluder. The median patient age was 3.6 years (range 0.2to 12), and the median weight was 10.5 kg (range 4 to 38). The device was a modified Amplatzer duct occluder made of fabric-free fine Nitinol wire net in to 2 very low profile disks with an articulated connecting waist. It is delivered through a 4Fr to 5Fr delivery sheath. The device was permanently implanted in 62 of 65 patients. The mean patent ductus arteriosus diameter (at the pulmonary end) was 3.6 +/- 1.3 mm (range 0.5 to 5.5). The mean device diameter (waist diameter) was 4.2 +/- 1.5 mm (range 3 to 6). Complete echocardiographic closure of the PDA at 1 month follow-up was observed in 61 (98%) of 62 patients. Immediately after the procedure, mild left pulmonary stenosis (peak pressure gradient of 8, 10, and 12 mm Hg) in 3 of 63 patients. Device embolization in 1 patient was the main complication of the procedure. No other complications were observed. In conclusion, catheter closure using the Amplatzer duct occluder II is an effective and safe therapy for most patients with patent ductus arteriosus. Additional studies are required to document its efficacy, safety, and long-term results in a larger patient population.

The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II: a new device for percutaneous ductus arteriosus closure

OBJECTIVE

Study the new Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II). Limitations were encountered with the preexisting devices in nonconical ducts, large ducts, or in small infants. These include failure, residual shunts, protrusion, migration, and vascular damage.

METHODS

Between June 2008 and March 2009, 20 consecutive patients were enrolled. In cases where different devices were applicable, we favored the use of the ADO II to maximize our experience with this device and prove its superiority. No coils were required in these 20 patients.

RESULTS

There were 15 females and 5 males (median age 2 years). ADO II group (n = 16): Immediate complete closure in 75% of the patients, rising to 93.7% at 24 hours. A residual shunt persisted at 3 months in one child. Aortic narrowing from device protrusion was noted in two type E ducts, without any significant gradient, however. ADO I group (n = 4): In two adolescents and in one adult patient, the duct was successfully closed. In a 2-year-old patient with a 6.6 mm type B duct, the ADO I totally obstructed the aortic flow and was retrieved before releasing. The child was sent for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Even though we did not compare the ADO II to other devices, we feel that it has the capacity to substitute most of the coils, and some of the original ADO I indications. Arterial access was sufficient in most patients, but venous delivery is advised in small infants with large or long ducts, to avoid aortic protrusion and residual shunts.