Lack of impact of calcium-channel blockers on the pharmacodynamic effect and the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel after drug-eluting stenting

Clinical and pharmacological parameters determine relapse during clopidogrel treatment of acute coronary syndrome

The therapeutic efficacy of clopidogrel as an anti-platelet drug varies among individuals, being the mainstream hypothesis that its bioavailability depends on the individual genetic background and/or interactions with other drugs. A total of 477 patients receiving double anti-aggregation therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, after suffering a first event, were followed for 1 year to record relapse, as a surrogate end point to measure their therapeutic response, as defined by presenting with an acute coronary event (unstable angina, STEMI, or NSTEMI), stent thrombosis/restenosis or cardiac mortality. Anthropometric, clinical and pharmacological variables along with CYP2C19 genotypes were analyzed for their association with the disease relapse phenotype. Only 75 patients (15%) suffered a relapse, which occurred during the first six months of therapy, with a peak at 4.5 months. An initial univariate analysis identified that patients in the relapse group were significantly older (67.4 ± 11.0 vs 61.6 ± 12.3 years old) and presented with diffuse coronary disease, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus dyslipidemia, and arterial hypertension. A poor clinical response to the platelet anti-aggregation regime also occurred more frequently among patients taking, along with aspirin and clopidogrel, acenocoumarol and Calcium Channel Blockers, while no association was found according to CYP2C19 genotypes. A retrospective multivariate analysis indicated that patients belonging to the non-responder phenotype to treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel were older, presented with diffuse coronary disease, a group largely overlapping with type 2 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and were taking dihidropyrimidinic calcium channel blockers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Iranian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clopidogrel is used in patients with coronary syndromes and at risk of thrombotic events or receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for reducing heart attack and stroke. Here we present genotype and phenotype study of Iranian patients undergoing PCI treated with clopidogrel during a 6-month period of follow-up; common variants of CYP2C19, CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genes were determined as well as the patients' cardiovascular outcomes to find out the effect of these variants individually and in combination. 388 individuals receiving PCI were enrolled in this study. Different pretreatment doses of clopidogrel were prescribed under the interventional cardiologists' guidance. The patients were followed for a duration of 1 month, and 6 months. Six SNPs were selected for genotyping including CYP2C19*2 (c.681G > A), CYP2C19*3 (c.636G > A), CYP2C19*17 allele (c.-806C > T), ABCB1 (c.3435C > T), CYP3A5 (c.6986A > G), and CYP3A4 (c.1026 + 12G > A). The mean loading dose was 600 mg/day in 267 (68.8%) individuals, 300 mg/day in 121 (31.2%). 8 patients had cardiovascular events such as thrombosis, unstable angina, and non-STEMI. The studied alleles and genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. None of the SNPs individually were significantly associated with outcome events. Our results indicate that combinations of different alleles of genes are involved in pharmacokinetic variability and joint factors are important; this means that genotyping and analysis of an individual variant may not be as straightforward in risk assessment and pharmacogenetics. This highlights the importance of personalized medicine in risk assessment and treatment.

CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 Genotyping Does Not Predict Clinical Response to Clopidogrel

Along with aspirin, clopidogrel has been a widely used antiplatelet therapeutic regimen. Although generally well tolerated, its efficacy varies among individuals, with the main hypothesis that its bioavailability relies on its bioconversion to the active compound, which, in turn, depends on the genetic background and/or interactions with other drugs. To determine which factors influenced response in our patients, 368 patients receiving combined antiaggregation therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel were followed for 1 year to record 30 novel cardiovascular acute events. This clinical relapse was considered a surrogate end point to measure therapeutic response under the influence of the CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 and CYP3A5*3 alleles, as well as the effects of concomitant medication and the presence of known cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidity. We show that either single CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 genotyping or combined were not useful to predict clinical efficacy in this cohort. Rather than genetic testing, we have found that clinical observations such as suffering type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, having several vessels affected, and concurrent medication with calcium channel blockers, regardless of CYP3A5 genotype or drug class were, in that order, the strongest independent predictors of disease relapse.

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: an evolution in drug design to prevent arterial thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

P2Y12 inhibitors are a critical component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which is the superior strategy to prevent arterialthrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing stent implantation.. Areas covered: Basic science articles, clinical studies, and reviews from 1992-2017 were searched using Pubmed library to collet impactful literature. After an introduction to the purinergic receptor biology, this review summarizes current knowledge on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Furthermore, we describe the subsequent improvements of next-generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors facing the ambivalent problem of bleeding events versus prevention of arterial thrombosis in a variety of clinical settings. Therefore, we summarize data from relevant preclinical and clinical trials of currently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor) and provide strategies of drug switching and management of bleeding events. Expert opinion: An enormous amount of pharmacologic and clinical data is available for the application of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Today prasugrel, ticagrelor and clopidogrel are the standard of care drugs during dual antiplatelet therapy for ACS patients, but have considerable rates of bleeding. Recent and future clinical trials will provide evidence for subsequent escalation and de-escalation strategies of P2Y12 receptor inhibition. These data may pave the way for an evidence-based, individualized P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy.

Platelet function variability and non-genetic causes

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been established for the treatment of coronary artery disease, especially in and after acute coronary syndromes, and after coronary interventions. Data suggest that a significant percentage of individuals treated with clopidogrel do not receive the expected therapeutic benefit because of a decreased responsiveness of their platelets, which is caused by several extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms. The clinical consequence of clopidogrel non-responsiveness is severe cardiovascular complications. Besides genetic variability in response to antiplatelet therapy, non-genetic causes such as drug interactions (proton-pump inhibitors, statins, calcium-channel blockers, coumarine derivates, antibiotics, antimycotics) and co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus, renal failure, obesity) are responsible for this phenomenon. Large clinical trials with standardised laboratory methods and hard clinical endpoints are needed to identify these interactions with clopidogrel and predictors for its non-responsiveness.

High platelet reactivity and clinical outcome – Fact and fiction

In patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, oral antiplatelet treatment is routinely administered with the primary aim of inhibiting platelet-mediated thrombus formation and subsequent abrupt vessel occlusion. Simultaneous inhibition of blood platelet cyclooxygenase-1 by aspirin and of the P2Y12 receptor by clopidogrel or prasugrel is currently recommended in this setting. Inter-individual response variability to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is the subject of much debate as evidence has grown over the years linking an attenuated response to treatment with the occurrence of ischaemic events. Consequently, the clinical entity of high (on-treatment) platelet reactivity (HPR) was born and subsequently characterised in numerous studies over the last decade. Until recently, alternative treatment options were limited in patients exhibiting HPR. At present the antiplatelet therapy landscape is changing with the advent of prasugrel and ticagrelor as alternative and more potent treatment options. Different tests for monitoring platelet function are available and are being increasingly employed in research projects and clinical routine. These tests may prove useful for achieving optimal platelet inhibition for the individual patient, and several centres now incorporate such testing in day-to-day practice. Widespread adoption of this practice and incorporation into clinical guidelines awaits the results of ongoing trials in which treatment is changed based on platelet function monitoring. This review aims to summarise available facts and fiction in relation to platelet function testing and reactivity with a particular focus on P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

Effects of Concurrent Calcium Channel Blocker on Antiplatelet Efficacy of Clopidogrel Therapy: A Systematic Review

Clopidogrel is a widely used drug in clinical practice. Controversy persists as to whether it interacts with proton pump inhibitors. Recently, research interest has grown in the area concerning an interaction of clopidogrel with calcium channel blockers. Multiple studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of calcium channel blockers on the efficacy of clopidogrel, both in vitro and in vivo. The authors aim to present a systematic review of the published studies in the literature. Various terms were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane database. Abstracts of studies were read and based on strict exclusion criteria; a study was included/excluded into the review. A total of 424 studies were initially included. Based on exclusion criteria, 22 studies were finally included in the review. Various studies report widely different results regarding the effects of calcium channel blockers on antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel. Large prospective studies are needed to delineate the association or lack thereof.

Calcium-Channel Blockers Attenuate the Antiplatelet Effect of Clopidogrel

AIMS

Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) inhibit cytochrome 3A4 and could therefore interfere with the conversion of clopidogrel to its active form. The impact of CCBs on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel has not been studied with assays directly capturing platelet activation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), so far. We therefore sought to investigate platelet activation in response to ADP by flow cytometry in clopidogrel-treated patients without and with CCBs.

METHODS

Platelet surface P-selectin expression and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa in response to ADP were determined by flow cytometry in 302 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after successful angioplasty with stent implantation.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (30.5%) received CCBs. Patients with concomitant CCB therapy showed significantly higher platelet surface expressions of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to ADP than patients without CCBs (both P ≤ 0.03). Moreover, the fold increase of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to ADP was significantly more pronounced in patients taking CCBs (both P ≤ 0.03). The associations of ADP-inducible activated GPIIb/IIIa and fold increase of activated GPIIb/IIIa after the addition of ADP with CCB therapy remained significant after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics and factors that were previously associated with clopidogrel response by multivariate regression analyses (both P < 0.05). High levels of ADP-inducible P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa were seen significantly more frequent in patients with CCBs than in patients without CCB therapy (both P ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Dihydropyridine CCBs attenuate the effect of clopidogrel on ADP-inducible platelet activation in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain life-threatening disorders, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. However, there is substantial inter-individual variability in the response to clopidogrel treatment, in addition to prolonged recovery of platelet reactivity as a result of irreversible binding to P2Y12 receptors. This high inter-individual variability in treatment response has primarily been associated with genetic polymorphisms in the genes encoding for cytochrome (CYP) 2C19, which affect the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel. While the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a boxed warning for CYP2C19 poor metabolizers because of potentially reduced efficacy in these patients, results from multivariate analyses suggest that additional factors, including age, sex, obesity, concurrent diseases and drug-drug interactions, may all contribute to the overall between-subject variability in treatment response. However, the extent to which each of these factors contributes to the overall variability, and how they are interrelated, is currently unclear. The objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive update on the different factors that influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel and how they mechanistically contribute to inter-individual differences in the response to clopidogrel treatment.

Role of CYP450 in Antiplatelet Therapy: Considerations for Patients at Risk for Further Cardiovascular or Cerebrovascular Problems

Objective:

To determine how interactions with cytochrome P450 ( CYP450) isoenzyme pathways may influence the selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1966-September 2012) was performed using the following MeSH search terms: clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, aspirin, dipyridamole, drug interactions, polymorphism, cytochrome P450, platelets, platelet reactivity testing, and platelet function. In addition, reference citations were reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Selected studies analyzed the effects of CYP450 isoenzymes on the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy and potential drug-drug interactions.

Data Synthesis:

Antiplatelet therapy is pivotal in reducing the risk of acute coronary syndromes. Thienopyridines are commonly prescribed for antiplatelet drug therapy; however, a multitude of factors can influence their efficacy, given that thienopyridines require activation through CYP450 isoenzymes. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP450 isoenzymes and the susceptibility of drug-drug interactions mediated through the CYP450 system have led to variability in antiplatelet response. Two factors in particular have been prime targets in elucidating the role of CYP450 isoenzymes on thienopyridine activity and bioavailability: CYP2C19*2 polymorphisms and drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors. Additionally, many studies have surfaced in an attempt to quantify a patient's response to antiplatelet therapy but, to date, none has determined whether platelet reactivity testing is mandatory prior to initiation of therapy or whether it correlates with clinical efficacy. This review spotlights the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic influences that CYP450 isoenzymes exert on antiplatelet therapies and attempts to categorize the role of platelet reactivity testing in determining the clinical significance of drug interactions.

Conclusions:

Suboptimal responses to antiplatelet therapy may occur because of interactions with CYP450 isoenzyme pathways. Further studies are warranted to clarify the impact of genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.

Use of clopidogrel and calcium channel blockers and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

The CYP3A4 inhibition by calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may attenuate the effectiveness of clopidogrel. Using time-varying drug exposure ascertainment, we examined whether CCB use modified the association between clopidogrel use and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary stent implantation.

DESIGN

We conducted this population-based cohort study in western Denmark (population 3 million) using medical databases. We identified all 13,001 patients with coronary stent implantation between 2002 and 2005 and their comorbidities. During 12-month follow-up, we tracked the use of clopidogrel and CCBs and the rate of MACE (composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, or cardiac death). We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, the 12-month risk for MACE was 14·5%. The rate was 130 per 1000 person years for concomitant clopidogrel and CCB use, 106 for clopidogrel without CCB use, 213 for CCB without clopidogrel use, and 248 for no use of either drug. The adjusted hazard ratio for MACE comparing clopidogrel use with nonuse was 0·52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0·42-0·64] for CCB users and 0·48 (95% CI: 0·42-0·54) for nonusers, yielding an interaction effect, i.e. relative rate increase, of 1·09 (95% CI: 0·86-1·38). The adjusted hazard ratio for MACE comparing CCB use with nonuse was 1·06 (95% CI: 0·89-1·25) among clopidogrel users.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of CCBs as a class did not modify the protective effect of clopidogrel and was not associated with increased cardiovascular risk among patients using clopidogrel after coronary stent implantation.

Thienopyridines and other ADP-receptor antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.

The future of platelet function testing to guide therapy in clopidogrel low and enhanced responders

Dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the therapy of choice in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in patients undergoing coronary stent placement to lower the risk of thrombotic events. Responsiveness to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is not uniform and is subject to considerable interindividual variability. Furthermore, there is a broad consensus that clopidogrel low response or so-called high on-treatment platelet reactivity is linked to the occurrence of ischemic events. On the other hand, evidence is accumulating that enhanced clopidogrel responders are at increased risk of bleeding. Newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, are more potent and produce more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation via the P2Y(12) ADP platelet receptor. A variety of methods of platelet function testing are available for evaluating platelet inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients in order to help determine the individual risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. Although not yet routinely undertaken, platelet function testing offers the potential to tailor antiplatelet therapy for individual patients. Whether alteration of therapy based on platelet function testing improves patients' outcomes remains unclear and is currently under investigation. This article reviews the impact of antiplatelet drug responsiveness on clinical outcomes with a focus on P2Y(12) receptor inhibition as well as on current and future concepts for personalized antiplatelet strategies.

The influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition are assay-dependent

BACKGROUND

Influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition have only been evaluated by one or two different test systems in the same population so far. Since previous studies revealed poor correlations between the various platelet function tests, the identification of influencing variables for clopidogrel response may vary from one test system to the next. We therefore investigated whether the influencing factors for clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition depend on the used assay.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and the Impact-R in 288 patients after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease. By univariate and multivariate regression analyses, we evaluated the impact of age ≥ 75, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, active smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, C-reactive protein, platelet count, creatinine, use of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), statins, proton pump inhibitors, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers on clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in each test system.

RESULTS

None of the independent influencing variables was consistent through all test systems. Only by LTA and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, age ≥ 75 and the use of CCBs were independently associated with higher on-treatment platelet reactivity. Only by the VASP assay and MEA, on-treatment platelet reactivity increased linearly with BMI. Further, only by MEA, residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity increased linearly with platelet count, whereas an increase in platelet count was independently associated with a decrease in ADP-inducible platelet activation by the Impact-R.

CONCLUSION

The influencing factors for platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy are assay-dependent.