Prognostic value of renin and prorenin in heart failure patients with decreased kidney function

Right Heart Function in Cardiorenal Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since CRS is critically dependent on right heart function and involved in interorgan crosstalk, assessment and monitoring of both right heart and kidney function are of utmost importance for clinical outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively report on novel diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms that are gaining importance for the clinical management of the growing heart failure population suffering from CRS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in patients with heart failure is associated with poor outcome. Although systemic venous congestion and elevated central venous pressure have been recognized as main contributors to CRS, they are often neglected in clinical practice. The delicate hemodynamic balance in CRS is particularly determined by the respective status of the right heart. The consideration of hemodynamic and CRS profiles is advantageous in tailoring treatment for better preservation of renal function. Assessment and monitoring of right heart and renal function by known and emerging tools like renal Doppler ultrasonography or new biomarkers may have direct clinical implications.

Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Heart Failure Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Effects on Clinical Outcomes: A Literature Review

Vitamin D deficiency has become a global pandemic affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. Much attention has been paid to the association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and various chronic diseases, especially heart failure (HF). A clear role of vitamin D deficiency has been established, with increased mortality and morbidity in heart failures. However, previous randomized control trials have failed to show improvement in clinical outcomes with calciferol supplementation in these patients. Therefore, it is still unclear whether calciferol therapy can be added to the standard care in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with deficiency. Hence, to evaluate the role of vitamin D supplementation in CHF patients with low serum 25(OH)D, we conducted an extensive search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of keywords. All potentially eligible studies that evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes in HF patients were retrieved and extensively studied. We also checked the references of all eligible studies to identify additional relevant publications. In this study, we reviewed various mechanisms of vitamin D affecting the cardiovascular system and examined the impact of deficiency on heart failures in terms of mortality and hospitalizations. In conclusion, vitamin D supplementation has failed to improve the clinical outcomes in HF patients. The possible long-term benefits of supplementation cannot be excluded. Therefore, for future clinical trials, we recommend considering large sample sizes, longer follow-up durations, along with optimal dosage and appropriate dosing frequency.

Efficacy of aliskiren supplementation for heart failure : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Aliskiren might be beneficial for heart failure. However, the results of various studies are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of aliskiren supplementation for heart failure.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of aliskiren for heart failure were included. Two investigators independently searched for articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 1973 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control interventions in heart failure, aliskiren supplementation was found to significantly reduce NT-proBNP levels (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.21 to -0.03 pg/ml; p = 0.008) and plasma renin activity (SMD = -0.66; 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.44 ng/ml.h; p < 0.00001) while increasing plasma renin concentration (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.30-0.75 ng/l; p < 0.00001); however, it demonstrated no significant influence on BNP levels (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI = -0.31-0.15 pg/ml; p = 0.49), mortality (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.79-1.20; p = 0.79), aldosterone levels (SMD = -0.09; 95% CI = -0.32-0.14 pmol/l; p = 0.44), adverse events (RR = 3.03; 95% CI = 0.18-49.51; p = 0.44), and serious adverse events (RR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.54-3.33; p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Aliskiren supplementation was found to significantly decrease NT-proBNP levels and plasma renin activity and to improve plasma renin concentration in the setting of heart failure.

Variability of biomarkers in patients with chronic heart failure and healthy controls

Aims

Biomarkers can be used for diagnosis, risk stratification, or management of patients with heart failure (HF). Knowledge about the biological variation is needed for proper interpretation of serial measurements. Therefore, we aimed to determine and compare the biological variation of a large panel of biomarkers in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic HF.

Methods and results

The biological variability of established biomarkers [NT‐proBNP and high‐sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT)], novel biomarkers [galectin‐3, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF‐15)], and renal/neurohormonal biomarkers (aldosterone, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, plasma renin concentration, and creatinine) was determined in 28 healthy subjects and 83 HF patients, over a period of 4 months and 6 weeks, respectively. The analytical (CV_a), intraindividual (CV_i), and interindividual (CV_g) variations were calculated, as well as the reference change value (RCV), which reflects the percentage of change that may indicate a ‘relevant’ change. All crude biomarker levels were significantly increased or decreased in HF patients compared with controls (all P < 0.01). Variation indices were comparable in healthy individuals and HF patients. CV_i was not influenced by the individual levels of the biomarker itself. NT‐proBNP and GDF‐15 had relatively high CV_i (21.8% and 16.6%) and RCV (61.7% and 64.3%), whereas ST2 (CV_i, 15.0; RCV, 42.9%), hsTnT (CV_i, 11.1; RCV, 31.4%), and galectin‐3 (CV_i, 8.1; RCV, 25.0%) had lower indices of variation.

Conclusion

Biological variation indices are comparable between healthy subjects and HF patients for a broad spectrum of biomarkers. NT‐proBNP and GDF‐15 have substantial variation, with lower variation for ST2, hsTnT, and galectin‐3. These data are instrumental in proper interpretation of biomarker levels in HF patients.

Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations

Blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), that is, renin inhibitors, angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Ang II type 1 receptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, are a cornerstone in the treatment of hypertension. How exactly they exert their effect, in particular in patients with low circulating RAAS activity, also taking into consideration the so-called Ang II/aldosterone escape that often occurs after initial blockade, is still incompletely understood. Multiple studies have tried to find parameters that predict the response to RAAS blockade, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Consequently, the question should now be answered on what basis (eg, sex, ethnicity, age, salt intake, baseline renin, ACE or aldosterone, and genetic variance) a RAAS blocker can be chosen to treat an individual patient. Are all blockers equal? Does optimal blockade imply maximum RAAS blockade, for example, by combining ≥2 RAAS blockers or by simply increasing the dose of 1 blocker? Exciting recent investigations reveal a range of unanticipated extrarenal effects of aldosterone, as well as a detailed insight in the genetic causes of primary aldosteronism, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers have now become an important treatment option for resistant hypertension. Finally, apart from the deleterious ACE-Ang II-Ang II type 1 receptor arm, animal studies support the existence of protective aminopeptidase A-Ang III-Ang II type 2 receptor and ACE2-Ang-(1 to 7)-Mas receptor arms, paving the way for multiple new treatment options. This review provides an update about all these aspects, critically discussing the many controversies and allowing the reader to obtain a full understanding of what we currently know about RAAS alterations in hypertension.

Effect of additive renin inhibition with aliskiren on renal blood flow in patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Renal Dysfunction (Additive Renin Inhibition with Aliskiren on renal blood flow and Neurohormonal Activation in patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Renal Dysfunction)

AIMS

We examined the effect of the renin inhibitor, aliskiren, on renal blood flow (RBF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Renal blood flow is the main determinant of GFR in HFREF patients. Both reduced GFR and RBF are associated with increased mortality. Aliskiren can provide additional renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition and increases RBF in healthy individuals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% and estimated GFR 30 to 75 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) on optimal medical therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive aliskiren 300 mg once daily or placebo. Renal blood flow and GFR were measured using radioactive-labeled (125)I-iothalamate and (131)I-hippuran at baseline and 26 weeks. After 41 patients were included, the trial was halted based on an interim safety analysis showing futility. Mean age was 68 ± 9 years, 82% male, GFR (49 ± 16 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), RBF (294 ± 77 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and NT-proBNP 999 (435-2040) pg/mL. There was a nonsignificant change in RBF after 26 weeks in the aliskiren group compared with placebo (-7.1 ± 30 vs +14 ± 54 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = .16). However, GFR decreased significantly in the aliskiren group compared with placebo (-2.8 ± 6.0 vs +4.4 ± 9.6 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = .01) as did filtration fraction (-2.2 ± 3.3 vs +1.1 ± 3.1%; P = .01). There were no significant differences in plasma aldosterone, NT-proBNP, urinary tubular markers, or adverse events. Plasma renin activity was markedly reduced in the aliskiren group versus placebo throughout the treatment phase (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding aliskiren on top of optimal HFREF medical therapy did not improve RBF and was associated with a reduction of GFR and filtration fraction.

When cardiac failure, kidney dysfunction, and kidney injury intersect in acute conditions: the case of cardiorenal syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review and describe diagnostic and prognostic value of biomarkers of renal function and renal injury in the cardiorenal syndrome complicating acutely decompensated heart failure.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search and review of relevant medical literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers screened and selected studies in English with diagnostic or prognostic assessment of biomarkers of renal injury.

DATA EXTRACTION

Narrative review of the medical literature.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cardiorenal syndrome has a complex pathophysiology and has a generally poor prognosis in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Among the methods to recognize risk for cardiorenal syndrome may be the use of circulating or urinary biomarkers, which may allow for more accurate early diagnosis and risk stratification; use of biomarkers may provide important pathophysiologic understanding beyond risk prediction. However, different phenotypes of patients with acute renal dysfunction may be present, which has ramifications with respect to response to treatment strategies. Addition of biomarkers of renal injury may provide additional prognostic value to biomarkers of renal or cardiac function, but more data are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers reflecting renal function and injury are likely to better phenotype subgroups of patients with cardiorenal syndrome and to provide unique prognostic information. Future studies are needed relative to strategies using such biomarkers to guide care of affected patients.

Short-term vitamin D3 supplementation lowers plasma renin activity in patients with stable chronic heart failure: an open-label, blinded end point, randomized prospective trial (VitD-CHF trial)

BACKGROUND

Many chronic heart failure (CHF) patients have low vitamin D (VitD) and high plasma renin activity (PRA), which are both associated with poor prognosis. Vitamin D may inhibit renin transcription and lower PRA. We investigated whether vitamin D3 (VitD3) supplementation lowers PRA in CHF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a single-center, open-label, blinded end point trial in 101 stable CHF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were randomized to 6 weeks of 2,000 IU oral VitD3 daily or control. At baseline, mean age was 64 ± 10 years, 93% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 35% ± 8%, and 56% had VitD deficiency. The geometric mean (95% CI) of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 increased from 48 nmol/L (43-54) at baseline to 80 nmol/L (75-87) after 6 weeks in the VitD3 treatment group and decreased from 47 nmol/L (42-53) to 44 nmol/L (39-49) in the control group (P < .001). The primary outcome PRA decreased from 6.5 ng/mL per hour (3.8-11.2) to 5.2 ng/mL per hour (2.9-9.5) in the VitD3 treatment group and increased from 4.9 ng/mL per hour (2.9-8.5) to 7.3 ng/mL per hour (4.5-11.8) in the control group (P = .002). This was paralleled by a larger decrease in plasma renin concentration in the VitD3 treatment group compared to control (P = .020). No significant changes were observed in secondary outcome parameters, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide natriuretic peptide and fibrosis markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CHF patients had VitD deficiency and high PRA levels. Six weeks of supplementation with 2,000 IU VitD3 increased 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels and decreased PRA and plasma renin concentration.

New roles for renin and prorenin in heart failure and cardiorenal crosstalk

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) plays a central role in the pathophysiology of heart failure and cardiorenal interaction. Drugs interfering in the RAAS form the pillars in treatment of heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome. Although RAAS inhibitors improve prognosis, heart failure–associated morbidity and mortality remain high, especially in the presence of kidney disease. The effect of RAAS blockade may be limited due to the loss of an inhibitory feedback of angiotensin II on renin production. The subsequent increase in prorenin and renin may activate several alternative pathways. These include the recently discovered (pro-) renin receptor, angiotensin II escape via chymase and cathepsin, and the formation of various angiotensin subforms upstream from the blockade, including angiotensin 1–7, angiotensin III, and angiotensin IV. Recently, the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren has been proven effective in reducing plasma renin activity (PRA) and appears to provide additional (tissue) RAAS blockade on top of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin receptor blockers, underscoring the important role of renin, even (or more so) under adequate RAAS blockade. Reducing PRA however occurs at the expense of an increase plasma renin concentration (PRC). PRC may exert direct effects independent of PRA through the recently discovered (pro-) renin receptor. Additional novel possibilities to interfere in the RAAS, for instance using vitamin D receptor activation, as well as the increased knowledge on alternative pathways, have revived the question on how ideal RAAS-guided therapy should be implemented. Renin and prorenin are pivotal since these are at the base of all of these pathways.

Renin and prorenin as biomarkers in hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the evidence that plasma renin and/or prorenin level may be used to guide therapy in hypertension and as an independent risk factor for future cardiovascular events.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large number of retrospective analyses of patient populations in clinical trials, in whom 'baseline' renin measurements were available, supports that high renin, but not high prorenin levels, are indicative of future cardiovascular disease and death, particularly in patients with kidney dysfunction and/or hypertension. The relationship is not affected by the use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. High renin levels also tend to support the use of RAS inhibitors as first-choice antihypertensive agents. However, the added value of a renin measurement on top of traditional risk factors is modest, and the pressure response to RAS blockade, even in high-renin patients, varies widely.

SUMMARY

Measuring 'baseline' renin as a marker of future cardiovascular events or to determine the choice of drug is of limited value in an individual patient.