Rationale and design of the Hunting for the off-target propertIes of Ticagrelor on Endothelial function and other Circulating biomarkers in Humans (HI-TECH) trial

Effects of Ticagrelor, Prasugrel, or Clopidogrel on Endothelial Function and Other Vascular Biomarkers: A Randomized Crossover Study

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to assess whether treatment with ticagrelor, as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel, improves endothelium-dependent dilation throughout the course of the treatment and other vascular biomarkers, including systemic adenosine plasma levels.

BACKGROUND

The in vivo off-target effects of ticagrelor in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remain poorly characterized.

METHODS

Fifty-four stable post-ACS patients were sequentially exposed to each of the 3 oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors following a 3-period balanced Latin square crossover design with 4 weeks per treatment in 5 European centers. The primary endpoint was the assessment of endothelial function with pulse amplitude tonometry and expressed as reactive hyperemia index at treatment steady state. Secondary endpoints included reactive hyperemia index after loading or before maintenance regimen, systemic adenosine plasma levels, a wide set of vascular biomarkers, and ticagrelor or AR-C124910XX plasma levels throughout each ticagrelor period. In 9 patients, the evaluation of endothelial function was performed simultaneously by pulse amplitude tonometry and flow-mediated dilation.

RESULTS

Reactive hyperemia index did not differ after ticagrelor (1.970 ± 0.535) as compared with prasugrel (2.007 ± 0.640; p = 0.557) or clopidogrel (2.072 ± 0.646; p = 0.685), nor did systemic adenosine plasma levels or vascular biomarkers at any time points. P2Y₁₂ platelet reactivity units were lower after ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel at all time points and after maintenance dose as compared with prasugrel. Flow-mediated dilation did not differ after the maintenance dose of ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor did not improve endothelial function or increased systemic adenosine plasma levels as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel in stabilized patients who suffered from an ACS. (Hunting for the Off-Target Properties of Ticagrelor on Endothelial Function in Humans [HI-TECH]; NCT02587260).

Absence of differential effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel maintenance dose on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function may be improved by ticagrelor through adenosine-mediated mechanisms. We aimed to assess the effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, crossover study, 22 stable CAD patients under prasugrel 10 mg once daily maintenance dose (MD) for at least 3 months were randomized to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or prasugrel 10 mg once daily for 15 days with a direct treatment-crossover for another 15 days. Endothelial function was assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT 2000 system, Itamar Medical, Caesarea, Israel) at Day 0 (randomization), Day 15, and Day 30. Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) was calculated by using an automated software, and endothelial dysfunction (ED) was defined as RHI <1.67. RHI at the end of the two treatment periods did not differ between ticagrelor and prasugrel MD treatments. Least squares estimates (95% confidence interval) were 1.78 (1.58-1.99) versus 1.88 (1.67-2.08), with a fixed estimate of -0.099 (95% CI: -0.45 to 0.25) for the difference between them (p = 0.5). ED rate did not differ significantly between ticagrelor and prasugrel (45.5% vs 45.5%, p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In CAD patients, we have failed to find evidence of alteration of endothelial function following ticagrelor compared to prasugrel MD treatment, as assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV UNIQUE IDENTIFIER

NCT01957540.