Changes in renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: Efficacy and safety of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

A Differential Profile of Biomarkers between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Controls

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is explained by anatomical and electrophysiological changes in the atria determined by high pressure, dilatation, infiltration and inflammation in the myocardium. There are some biomarkers implicated in these processes, namely, NT-proBNP, high sensitivity troponin (Hs-Tn), urate, galectin-3, ST2, C reactive protein and fibrinogen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in these biomarkers between patients with AF and healthy controls. We designed a cross-sectional study consecutively including all patients undergoing electrical cardioversion in our hospital for persistent AF and matched healthy controls. We included 115 patients with persistent non-valvular AF and 33 healthy subjects. The biomarkers NT-proBNP, ST2 and Hs-Tn T were significantly related to the presence of AF (1054 ± 833.30 vs. 58.31 ± 59.40, p < 0.001; 35.43 ± 15.89 vs. 27.43 ± 10.95, p < 0.001 and 10.25 ± 6.11 vs. 8.42 ± 6.85, p < 0.001, respectively). NT-proBNP was the best biomarker differentiating AF patients (area under the curve 0.995). The best NT-proBNP cut-off point to differentiate AF was 102 pg/mL; for Hs-Tn T it was 11.5 ng/L and for ST2 it was 37.7 ng/mL. It is possible that these biomarkers intervene at the onset of AF and have no role in AF maintenance.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: Use in Patients with Advanced Renal Impairment, Obesity, or Other Weight-Related Special Populations

There are currently more than 7 million patients taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), with more new prescriptions per year than warfarin. Despite impressive efficacy and safety data for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, patients with obesity or advanced renal impairment represented a small portion of the patients enrolled in the phase 3 clinical trials. Therefore, to evaluate the potential use of DOACs in these special populations, clinicians need to have an understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents in these settings. Since data from randomized controlled trials are limited, data from observational trials are helpful in gaining comfort with the use of DOACs in these special populations. Selecting the appropriate dose for each agent is imperative in achieving optimal patient outcomes. We provide an extensive review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, phase 3 clinical trials, and observational studies on the use of DOACs in patients with advanced renal impairment, obesity, or other weight-related special populations to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the data for optimal drug and dose selection.

Association of different oral anticoagulants use with renal function worsening in patients with atrial fibrillation: A multicentre cohort study

AIMS

To investigate the decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

METHODS

Multicentre prospective cohort study including 1667 patients with nonvalvular AF. The eGFR was assessed by the CKD-EPI formula at baseline and during follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study was the median annual decline of eGFR according to VKA (n = 743) or NOAC (n = 924) use. As secondary endpoints, we analysed the transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m² and the eGFR class worsening.

RESULTS

Median age was 73.7 ± 9.1 years and 43.3% were women. VKA-treated patients showed an eGFR decline of -2.11 (interquartile range [IQR] -5.68/-0.62), which was -0.27 (IQR -9.00/4.54, P < 0.001 vs VKAs), -1.21 (IQR -9.98/4.02, P = 0.004 vs VKAs) and -1.32 (IQR -8.70/3.99, P = 0.003 vs VKAs) in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m² was lower in dabigatran- and apixaban-treated patients: odds ratio (OR) 0.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.298-0.813, P = 0.006 and OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.276-0.728, P = 0.001, respectively. A lower rate of eGFR class worsening was found in all groups of NOACs compared to VKAs. No difference between full and reduced dose of NOAC was found. Subgroup analysis showed that the association between NOAC and eGFR changes was markedly reduced in diabetic patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients prescribed NOACs showed a lower decline of renal function compared to those prescribed VKAs. This effect was partially lost in patients with diabetes.

Real-world 2-year outcome of atrial fibrillation treatment with dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with and without chronic kidney disease

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of stroke and bleeding. Although direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials excluded patients with severe CKD, a growing portion of CKD patients have been starting DOACs and limited data from real-world outcome in this high-risk setting are available. The INSigHT registry included 632 consecutive NVAF patients that started apixaban (256 patients, 41%), dabigatran (245, 39%) and rivaroxaban (131, 20%) between 2012 and 2015. Based on creatinine clearance, two sub-cohorts were defined: (1) non-CKD group (CrCl 60-89 mL/min, 413 patients) and (2) CKD group (15-59 ml/min, 219). Compared to non-CKD patients, those with CKD, were at higher ischemic (CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.5 vs 2.9, p < 0.001) and hemorrhagic risk (HAS-BLED 2.4 vs 1.8, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, the overall ISTH-major bleeding and thromboembolic event rates were 5.2% and 2.3% and no significant difference between non-CKD and CKD patients for both efficacy and safety endpoints were observed. In non-CKD patients, the 2-year ISTH-major bleeding rates were higher in rivaroxaban group (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.3; p = 0.047) while dabigatran showed non-significant excess in thromboembolic events (HR 4.3, 95% CI 0.9-20.8; p = 0.068). In CKD patients, a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic events was observed in rivaroxaban (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.1-38.1; p = 0.044). This real-world, non-insurance database registry shows remarkable 2-year safety and efficacy profile of DOACs even in patients with moderate to severe CKD. Head to head differences between DOACs are exploratory, hypothesis generating and warrant further investigation in larger studies.