Prevalence and consequences of noncardiac incidental findings on preprocedural imaging in the workup for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, renal sympathetic denervation, or MitraClip implantation

Preoperative Nonselective Chest Computed Tomography Prior to Primary Cardiac Surgery Results in Meaningful Change to Surgical Management: Systematic Review and Pooled Prevalence Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine screening chest computed tomography (CT) prior to primary cardiac surgery is advocated by some surgeons due to the purported benefits of identifying significant aortic calcification that impacts ongoing management, such as performing anaortic off-pump surgery or adjusting cannulation strategy. Additionally, axial imaging can identify incidental findings that may require concomitant or staged procedures such as ascending aortic dilatation or pulmonary lesions. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact that nonselective chest CT prior to primary cardiac surgery had on subsequent management.

METHOD

A systematic review and pooled prevalence meta-analyses were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Included studies performed non-selective chest CT prior to primary cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies, including 2,250 patients were included. The rate of mortality and stroke was low (1% and 2%, respectively). Calcification of the ascending aorta was identified in 15% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-26.0). A significant change to the surgical plan such as cannulation strategy, off-pump surgery, cancellation, or an additional procedure was required in 7% (95% CI 2.0-12.0). Clinically relevant incidental findings requiring in-patient management or follow-up were identified in 10% (95% CI 6.0-14.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonselective CT chest prior to primary cardiac surgery identifies clinically relevant findings that result in a modification of the surgical plan in a significant population of patients to address the risk of stroke associated with aortic calcification as well as the identification of important incidental findings such as pulmonary lesions.

Incidental findings on routine preoperative noncontrast chest computed tomography and chest radiography prior to cardiac surgery in the multicenter randomized controlled CRICKET study

Objective

To describe the prevalence and consequences of incidental findings when implementing routine noncontrast CT prior to cardiac surgery.

Methods

In the multicenter randomized controlled CRICKET study, 862 adult patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were randomized 1:1 to undergo standard of care (SoC), which included a chest-radiograph, or an additional preoperative noncontrast chest CT-scan (SoC+CT). In this subanalysis, all incidental findings detected on the chest radiograph and CT-scan were analyzed. The influence of smoking status on incidental findings was also evaluated, adjusting for sex, age, and group allocation.

Results

Incidental findings were observed in 11.4% (n = 49) of patients in the SoC+CT group and in 3.7% (n = 16) of patients in the SoC-group (p < 0.001). The largest difference was observed in findings requiring follow-up (SoC+CT 7.7% (n = 33) vs SoC 2.3% (n = 10), p < 0.001). Clinically relevant findings changing the surgical approach or requiring specific treatment were observed in 10 patients (1.2%, SoC+CT: 1.6% SoC: 0.7%), including lung cancer in 0.5% of patients (n = 4) and aortic dilatation requiring replacement in 0.2% of patients (n = 2). Incidental findings were more frequent in patients who stopped smoking (OR 1.91, 1.03–3.63) or who actively smoked (OR 3.91, 1.85–8.23).

Conclusions

Routine CT-screening increases the rate of incidental findings, mainly by identifying more pulmonary findings requiring follow-up. Incidental findings are more prevalent in patients with a history of smoking, and preoperative CT might increase the yield of identifying lung cancer in these patients. Incidental findings, but not specifically the use of routine CT, are associated with delay of surgery.

Key Points

• Clinically relevant incidental findings are identified more often after a routine preoperative CT-scan, when compared to a standard of care workup, with some findings changing patient management.

• Patients with a history of smoking have a higher rate of incidental findings and a lung cancer rate comparable to that of lung cancer screening trials.

• We observed no clear delay in the time to surgery when adding routine CT screening.

Atypical presentation of a locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Extensive workup of an incidental finding on computed tomography performed for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

This case report presents the diagnostic workup of liver malignancy incidentally detected in a 72-year-old male patient on routine body computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed for planning transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

The patient initially presented to an outside hospital with chest discomfort, where routine diagnostic procedures in the emergency room revealed grade III aortic valve stenosis.

Routine CTA for TAVI planning in our department then revealed tumor thrombosis of the portal vein suspicious for hepatic malignancy.

In contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) only the left hepatic lobe was inhomogeneously transformed with early arterial contrast enhancement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a primary hepatic malignancy involving the left liver. Transcutaneous biopsy with ultrasound guidance established the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Incidental findings may be of prognostic relevance for the patient and in a number of cases, TAVI can be a prerequisite for the appropriate therapy.

Incidental findings on computed tomography for preoperative assessment before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Japanese patients

Extra-cardiovascular incidental findings (IFs) on preoperative computed tomography (CT) are frequently observed in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates. However, the backgrounds of TAVI candidates and comorbidities differ based on the race and/or country, and data on IFs in a specific population are not always applicable to another. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, type, and clinical impact of IFs in Japanese TAVI candidates. This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. CT reports of 257 TAVI candidates were reviewed, and IFs were classified as (a) insignificant: findings that did not require further investigation, treatment, or follow-up; (b) intermediate: findings that needed to be followed up or were considered for further investigation but did not affect the planning of TAVI; and (c) significant: findings that required further investigation immediately or affected the planning of TAVI. At least one IF was found in 254 patients (98.8%). Insignificant, intermediate, and significant IFs were found in 253 (98.4%), 153 (59.5%), and 34 (13.2%) patients, respectively. Newly indicated significant IFs were found in 19 patients (7.4%). In 2 patients (0.8%), TAVI was canceled because of significant IFs. In patients who consequently underwent TAVI, the presence of significant IFs was not associated with the duration from CT performance to TAVI [28 (19-40) days vs. 27 (19-43) days, p = 0.74] and all-cause mortality during the median follow-up period of 413 (223-805) days (p = 0.44). Almost all Japanese TAVI candidates had at least one IF, and the prevalence of significant IFs was not negligible. Although the presence of significant IFs was not associated with mid-term mortality, appropriate management of IFs was considered important.

Clinically significant incidental findings during preoperative computed tomography of patients undergoing cardiac surgery

With the development of minimally invasive cardiac surgery, chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans are becoming an integral part of preoperative assessment and planning. Therefore, the number of incidental findings (IFs) detected with CT is rising. We aimed to investigate the frequency of clinically significant IFs on chest and abdominal CT scans performed during the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery in a 2-year period. In a cohort of 401 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 12.3, female gender 28.9%, median logistic EuroSCORE 5.8 [0.9, 90.5]) who underwent chest or abdominal CT imaging during the study period, we identified 75 patients (18.7%) with clinically significant IFs who needed a further treatment or work-up to confirm the diagnosis or postoperative follow-up. Our data indicate that clinically significant IFs in patients referred for cardiac surgery are frequent. It is important to identify clinically significant Ifs, as a clear postoperative follow-up plan should be made.

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Incidentally Discovered Masses on Computed Tomography

Routine preprocedural chest and abdomen computed tomography is done prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which, in turn, have led to the discovery of radiographic potentially malignant incidental masses (pMIM). It is largely unknown whether pMIM impact the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI. In this retrospective cohort study from a single center, 1,081 patients underwent TAVI from 2012 to 2016, who had available computed tomographies, survived the index hospitalization, and also had 1 year follow-up data for review. Machine learning (backward propagation neural network)-augmented multivariable regression for mortality by pMIM was conducted. In this cohort of 1,081 patients, the mean age was 79.1 (± 9.0), 48.8% were females, 16.8% had a history of prior malignancy, and 21.1% had pMIM. One-year mortality for the entire cohort was 12.6%. The most common prior malignancies were prostate, breast, and lymphoma and the most common pMIM were present in the lung, kidneys, and thyroid. In a fully adjusted regression analysis, neither prior malignancy nor pMIM increased mortality odds. However, having both was associated with a higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio 4.02, 95% confidence interval 1.50 to 10.73, p = 0.006). In conclusion, presence of pMIM alone was not associated with an increased 1-year mortality among patients undergoing TAVI. However, the presence of pMIM and a history of prior malignancy was associated with a significant increase in 1-year mortality.

Frequency and impact of incidental findings on computed tomography during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: single centre experience and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency and impact of incidental findings (IF) on CT during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI).

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of patients referred for consideration of TAVI who underwent a CT scan between 2009 and 2018 were studied retrospectively. CT reports were reviewed for the presence of IFs and categorised based upon their clinical significance: (a) insignificant-findings that did not require specific treatment or follow-up; (b) intermediate-findings that did not impact on the decision-making process but required follow-up; (c) significant-findings that either required urgent investigation or meant that TAVI was clinically inappropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 652 patients were included, whose median age was 82 years. One or more insignificant IF was found in 95.6% of patients. Intermediate IFs were documented in 5.4%. 91 (14%) patients had at least one significant IF. These included possible malignancy in 67 (74%). The ultimate decision to offer aortic valve intervention was only changed by the presence of an IF in 3.5% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant IFs are detected in more than 1 in 10 of patients undergoing CT as part of a TAVI work-up, although just over half of these patients still receive aortic valve intervention.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study is the largest UK cohort, which, when combined with a review of existing literature, provides a clear picture of the frequency and clinical impact of IFs found at CT for TAVI assessment.