Safety and efficacy outcomes of left atrial posterior wall isolation compared to pulmonary vein isolation and pulmonary vein isolation with linear ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation based on atrial electrogram duration map: methodology and clinical outcomes from the AEDUM pilot study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) represents a challenge for the electrophysiologist and there are still divergences regarding the best ablative approach to adopt. Create a new map of the duration of atrial bipolar electrograms (Atrial Electrogram DUration Map, AEDUM) to recognize a functional substrate during sinus rhythm and guide a patient-tailored ablative strategy for PsAF.

METHODS

Forty PsAF subjects were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either for PVI alone (Group B1) or PVI+AEDUM areas ablation (Group B2). A cohort of 15 patients without AF history undergoing left-sided accessory pathway ablation was used as a control group (Group A). In all patients, voltage and AEDUM maps were created during sinus rhythm. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, with rhythm monitoring via 48-h ECG Holter or by implantable cardiac device.

RESULTS

Electrogram (EGM) duration was higher in Group B than in Group A (49±16.2ms vs 34.2±3.8ms; p-value<0.001). In Group B the mean cumulative AEDUM area was 21.8±8.2cm2; no difference between the two subgroups was observed (22.3±9.1cm2 vs 21.2±7.2cm2; p-value=0.45). The overall bipolar voltage recorded inside the AEDUM areas was lower than in the remaining atrial areas [median: 1.30mV (IQR: 0.71-2.38mV) vs 1.54mV (IQR: 0.79-2.97mV); p-value: <0.001)]. Low voltage areas (<0.5mV) were recorded in three (7.5%) patients in Group B. During the follow-up [median 511 days (376-845days)] patients who underwent PVI-only experienced more AF recurrence than those receiving a tailored approach (65% vs 35%; p-value= 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

All PsAF patients exhibited AEDUM areas. An ablation approach targeting these areas resulted in a more effective strategy compared with PVI only.

Development and Validation of a Postoperative Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) have a high risk of recurrence after catheter radiofrequency ablation. Nevertheless, no effective prognostic tools have been developed to identify these high-risk patients to date. This study sought to develop and validate a simple linear predictive model for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with PsAF.

Methods: From June 2013 to June 2021, patients with PsAF admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. The characteristics substantially associated with recurrence in patients with PsAF were screened through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the predictive significance of the nomogram model after nomogram development. Furthermore, to assess the clinical value of the nomogram, we performed calibration curve and decision curve analyses.

Results: A total of 209 patients were included in the study, 42 (20.10%) of whom were monitored up to 1 year for recurrent AF. The duration of AF episodes, left atrial diameter, BMI, CKMB, and alcohol consumption were found to be independent risk factors (P<0.05) and were integrated into the nomogram model development. The area under the curve was 0.895, the sensitivity was 93.3%, and the specificity was 71.4%, thus indicating the model’s excellent predictive ability. The C-index of the predictive nomogram model was 0.906. Calibration curve and decision curve analyses further revealed that the model had robust prediction and strong discrimination ability.

Conclusion: This simple, practical, and innovative nomogram can help clinicians in evaluation of the risk of PsAF recurrence after catheter ablation, thus facilitating preoperative evaluation, postoperative monitoring and ultimately the construction of more personalized therapeutic protocols.

Low voltage-guided ablation of posterior wall improves 5-year arrhythmia-free survival in persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The posterior wall (PW) has been proposed as a standard target for ablation beyond pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies have shown inconsistent outcomes with the addition of PW ablation. The presence or absence of low voltage on the PW may explain these inconsistencies. We evaluated whether PW ablation based on the presence or absence of low voltage improves long-term arrhythmia-free outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 5-year follow-up in 152 consecutive patients who received either standard ablation (SA) with PVI alone or PVI + PW ablation (PWA) based on physician discretion (n = 77) or voltage-guided ablation (VGA) with PVI and addition of PWA only if low voltage was present on the PW (n = 75).

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. At 5-year follow-up, 64% of patients receiving VGA were atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)/AF free compared to 34% receiving SA (HR 0.358 p < .005). PWA had similar AF recurrence in SA and VGA groups (0.30 vs. 0.27 p = .96) but higher AT recurrence when comparing SA and VGA groups (0.39 vs. 0.15 p = .03). In multivariate analysis, both VGA and PWA predicted AF arrhythmia-free survival (HR 0.33, p = .001 and HR 0.20, p = .008, respectively). For AT, VGA predicted arrhythmia-free survival (HR 0.22, p = .028), while PWA predicted AT recurrence (HR 4.704, p = .0219).

CONCLUSION

VGA of the posterior wall ablation beyond PVI in persistent AF significantly improves long-term arrhythmia-free survival when compared with non-voltage-guided ablation. PW ablation without voltage-guidance reduced AF recurrence but at the cost of a higher incidence of AT.

Simplified stepwise anatomical ablation strategy for mitral isthmus: efficacy, efficiency, safety, and outcome

AIMS

Bidirectional and durable block of mitral isthmus (MI) is essential for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and perimitral flutter (PMF), but it remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to create a simple anatomical ablation strategy with minimal fluoroscopy that would yield a high success rate for MI block.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with PeAF or PMF were included. Mitral isthmus was ablated in a stepwise strategy. In Step 1, endocardial MI linear ablation was performed; in Step 2, ablation was targeted to the posterolateral portion of the left atrium along the MI line; in Step 3, epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus (CS) was performed across the MI line to the ostium of the vein of Marshall (VOM) or performed within the VOM if available; in Step 4, the catheter was rotated and ablated in the CS to isolate the CS; and in Step 5, the early activation site with complex component potential above the MI line during distal CS pacing was considered as the ablation target. All patients were followed up. A total of 178 (17 patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral valve) were included. One hundred and sixty-six patients achieved a confirmed MI bidirectional conduction block (93%). One patient had cardiac tamponade. Four patients showed re-conduction across the MI line during a repeated ablation. In the latest follow-up [12 (7, 16) months], 161 of 178 (90%) patients maintained their sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSION

A simple stepwise anatomical ablation strategy for MI shows a high success rate with low fluoroscopy exposure.

Clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after technologic advances including contact force-guided and ablation index-guided ablation

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the influence of technological advances on ablation outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF). Radiofrequency ablation for patients with AF has advanced, including contact force (CF)-sensing catheters and the ablation index (AI).

Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, we analyzed 173 patients with PeAF who underwent catheter ablation. We categorized them into three groups: AF ablation without CF and AI information (no-CF group, n = 63), with CF without AI (CF-only group, n = 49), and with optimal AI-guided ablation (AI group, n = 61). Early (within 3 months, ER) and late (from 3 months to 1 year, LR) AF recurrence after ablation was assessed. Procedure-related complications were also evaluated.

Results

The baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, excluding the baseline antiarrhythmic drug history. Additional substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation was significantly low in frequency in the AI group (71.4%, no-CF; 69.4%, CF-only; 41.0%, AI, p = 0.001). The AI group had a shorter mean procedure-related time than the other groups. Both ER and LR of PeAF showed a trend of reduction with technological advances. With a short experience (less than 1 year), the CF-only group showed more ER and LR than that shown by the AI group. However, with a long experience (more than 1 year), ER and LR occurred similarly in the two groups. Procedure-related complications improved with technological advances.

Conclusion

As ablation technology advanced, favorable clinical outcomes with short procedural times were observed. However, prospective, large multicenter studies are needed to verify these results.

Adjunctive Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation in Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Insight From a Large Secondary Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the role of adjunctive left atrium posterior wall isolation (PWI) in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

BACKGROUND

The left atrium posterior wall is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the development of AF.

METHODS

This was an updated pooled analysis that included clinical data regarding PWI plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in treating AF. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies with 3,287 patients with AF (age 61.7 ± 10.8 years) were included. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 8.4 months. Procedural success to achieve PWI was 92.8%. In paroxysmal AF, adjunctive PWI did not reduce the recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (P = 0.21) or AF (P = 0.37); however, in persistent AF, adjunctive PWI was associated with substantially lower recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (risk ratio: 0.74; P < 0.001) and AF (risk ratio: 0.67; P = 0.01), particularly when randomized data were included. Subgroup analyses based on meta-regression demonstrated that patients with older age, a larger left atrial diameter, and persistent AF benefited more significantly from the adjunctive PWI. Adjunctive PWI using either radiofrequency or a cryoballoon reduced AF recurrence, whereas using radiofrequency seemed to be associated with higher recurrence rate of atrial tachycardias and/or atrial flutter. Non-BOX adjunctive PWI rather than BOX PWI was associated with significantly lower recurrence of AF. The incidence of procedural adverse events between the PVI+PWI (3.2%) and PVI (2.8%) groups was low and similar. PVI+PWI needed longer ablation and/or procedural time but had similar fluoroscopy time.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive PWI can be achieved in most patients without compromising safety. Patients with persistent AF appear to benefit from this approach. The ablation technology and/or approach may affect the clinical outcome of PWI.

Efficacy of electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall depends on the existence of left atrial low-voltage zone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Modification of the low-voltage zone in the left atrium (LA-LVZ) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not shown sufficient improvement in arrhythmia-free survival in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Further, the effect of electrical posterior wall isolation (PWI) is controversial. We investigated the impact of existence of LA-LVZ on the outcome of patients undergoing additional PWI for PerAF.

METHODS

A total of 347 patients with PerAF who underwent primary catheter ablation with LA-LVZ based strategy were retrospectively analyzed. Voltage mapping in the left atrium (LA) was performed during sinus rhythm. Additional LVZ ablation was performed in patients with LA-LVZ. The operators decided whether additional PWIs were to be performed.

RESULTS

Of 347 patients, 108 had LA-LVZ. In the LVZ group, patients with additional PWI (N = 70) had higher rates of freedom from tachyarrhythmia recurrence than those without (77.1% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, even when patients were limited to those with LA-LVZ in areas other than the posterior wall (N = 85), PWI had higher success rates (80.9% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients without LVZ (N = 239), there was no significant difference in the rate of successful outcome between those with and without PWI (81.3% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.112). On the other hand, the patients with PWI had greater atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate than those without PWI (10.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

PWI, in addition to PVI and LVZ modification, may improve single procedural outcomes in patients with PerAF who have LVZ, regardless of the distribution in the LA. A combination of voltage-guided ablation and PWI may be a simple, tailored, and effective ablation strategy.

Cerebral Microbleeds With Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation Therapy

Background

The prevalence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) is significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) than in those without AF. CMBs in patients with AF have been reported to be primarily of the lobar type, but the exact cause of this remains unknown. We investigated the possibility that hemorrhagic transformation of embolic microinfarction can account for de novo lobar CMBs.

Methods

A total of 101 patients who underwent ablation therapy for AF were prospectively registered, and 72 patients completed the assessment with MRI 6 months after catheter ablation. Brain MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), were examined at 1–3 days (baseline) and 6 months after catheter ablation. We quantitatively evaluated the spatial and temporal distribution of embolic microinfarctions and de novo CMBs.

Results

Of the 101 patients, 68 were enrolled in this study. Fifty-nine patients (86.8%) showed embolic microinfarctions on baseline DWI immediately after catheter ablation. There were 137 CMBs in SWI, and 96 CMBs were of the lobar type. Six months later, there were 208 CMBs, including 71 de novo CMBs, and 60 of 71 (84.5%) were of the lobar type. Of the 71 de novo CMBs, 56 (78.9%) corresponded to the location of previous embolic microinfarctions found on baseline DWI. The platelet count was significantly lower and hematocrit/hemoglobin and Fazekas score were higher in the group with de novo CMBs than in the group without de novo CMBs.

Conclusion

De novo CMBs frequently appeared after catheter ablation therapy. Our results suggest that embolic microinfarction can cause lobar CMBs.

Outcomes of posterior wall isolation with pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have shown that addition of posterior wall isolation (PWI) may reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. No data on PWI in paroxysmal AF (pAF) patients with normal left atrial voltage is available, to date.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients presenting with pAF and normal left atrial voltage.

METHODS

Consecutive patient registry analysis was performed on all patients with pAF and normal left atrial voltage undergoing initial radiofrequency ablation from November 1, 2018 to November 15, 2019. Primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL).

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were studied, 214 in the PVI group and 107 in the PWI + PVI group. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia occurred in 18.2% of patients in the PVI group and 16.8% in the PVI + PWI cohort (p = 0.58). At 1 year, recurrence was 14.0% in the PVI group and 15.0% in the PWI + PVI group (p = 0.96). There was a lower AT/AFL recurrence in the PVI + PWI group, not reaching significance (3.7% in the PWI + PVI group vs. 7.9% in PVI group, p = 0.31). Need for carina lesions predicted recurrence in the PVI-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of PWI to PVI in pAF patients undergoing their first ablation did not reduce the frequency of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. This warrants further study in a prospective trial.

Modified ablation index: a novel determinant of a successful first-pass left atrial posterior wall isolation

Although a left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) in addition to a pulmonary vein isolation is a well-accepted option for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), a complete isolation can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a modified ablation index (AI) (AI/bipolar voltage along the ablation line) for predicting a durable LAPWI. The study included 55 consecutive patients, aged 65 ± 11 years, who underwent an electroanatomic mapping-guided LAPWI of AF. The association between the gaps (first-pass LAPWI failure and/or acute LAPW reconnections), voltage amplitude along the roof and floor lines, and thickness of the LAPW was investigated. Gaps occurred in 22 patients (40%) and in 26 (8%) of the 330 line segments. Gaps were associated with a relatively high bipolar voltage (3.38 ± 1.83 vs. 1.70 ± 1.12 mV, P < 0.0001) and thick LA wall (2.52 ± 1.15 vs. 1.42 ± 0.44 mm, P < 0.0001). A modified AI ≤ 199 AU/mV, bipolar voltage ≥ 2.64 mV, wall thickness ≥ 2.04 mm, and roof ablation line ≥ 43.4 mm well predicted gaps (AUCs: 0.783, 0.787, 0.858, and 0.752, respectively). A high-voltage zone, thick LAPW, and long roof ablation line appeared to be determinants of gaps, and a modified AI ≥ 199 AU/mV along the ablation lines appeared to predict an acute durable LAPWI.

Impact of left atrial posterior wall isolation on arrhythmia outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing repeat ablation

Background

It remains unclear whether additional left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) beyond pulmonary vein reisolation (PVRI) is beneficial in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing repeat ablation.

Objective

We sought to assess impact of LAPWI on arrhythmia outcomes in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation.

Methods

All AF patients that underwent repeat ablation between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Those undergoing PVRI only served as control, whereas those undergoing LAPWI (with or without PVRI) were the study group. Primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 1 year follow-up. Secondary endpoint was freedom from AA on/off AADs at 1 year follow-up.

Results

One hundred ninety-six patients (61% paroxysmal AF, 39% persistent AF) participated; 93 underwent PVRI and 103 underwent LAPWI±PVRI. Patients in the LAPWI group were older, had more hypertension and persistent AF, and had lower rates of PV reconnection (52.4% vs 100%, P < .001). LAPWI was performed empirically in 79.6% and to target triggers in 20.4%. It was accomplished by linear lesions across the LA floor and roof alone in 65% and additional LAPW lesions in 35%. The primary and secondary endpoints were similar between patients undergoing LAPWI and those undergoing PVRI (43.7% vs 69.9%, P = .50 and 66% vs 77.4%, P = .36, respectively). There was no difference in adverse events between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

LAPWI did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmias on or off AADs at 1 year beyond PVRI in AF patients undergoing repeat ablation. Differences in patient demographics and AF type may underlie the observed lack of benefit of LAPWI, and further study is warranted.

Single-catheter simplified stepwise approach to persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The strategy for atrial fibrillation ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation remains controversial. A single-catheter approach was recently validated for pulmonary vein isolation.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of this approach to performing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, if needed.

METHODS

We prospectively included 159 consecutive patients referred to our centre for a first persistent atrial fibrillation ablation between January 2018 and December 2018. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation. If the patient was still in atrial fibrillation (spontaneously or inducible), we subsequently performed a stepwise approach, including roof line, anterior mitral line, posterior box lesion and cavotricuspid isthmus line. Finally, if patient remained in atrial fibrillation at the end of the procedure, a synchronized direct-current cardioversion was applied to restore sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

At baseline, 54 patients were in sinus rhythm and underwent pulmonary vein isolation. For patients in atrial fibrillation, after pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of additional lines, if needed, 18 patients were converted to atrial tachycardia and one directly to sinus rhythm; 96 were still in atrial fibrillation and underwent direct-current cardioversion. After a mean follow-up of 17±6 months, 57 patients (36%) experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrence. No deaths, tamponades or phrenic nerve injuries were observed following the procedure. The main mode of arrhythmia recurrence was atrial fibrillation in 75% of cases and atrial tachycardia in 25% of cases.

CONCLUSION

A single-catheter approach, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, is feasible and safe in patients undergoing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, with an acceptable success rate of 64% at mid-term follow-up.

Approach to recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed sustained rhythm disorder during adult ages. Since it has been shown that the ectopic beat initiating AF is usually caused by pulmonary veins, AF ablation has become the mainstay of therapy worldwide. Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation are the most commonly used methods in today's technologies. However, despite technological advances, the success of a single procedure in AF ablation is still limited and multiple procedures may be required for the majority of patients. In cases in which a redo ablation is required, pulmonary vein isolation is still the main target, but non-pulmonary vein targets should also be considered in AF episodes that continue despite multiple ablations. Many issues are still unclear as to which energy to choose in the first procedure, and what ablation strategy will be utilized when a redo ablation is required. The studies on this subject are very limited but, it still seems feasible and a rational approach to utilize a customized treatment strategy in each specific patient subgroup.

Is pulmonary vein isolation enough for persistent atrial fibrillation?

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, studies report suboptimal outcomes in persistent AF. Adjuvant ablation targeting the substrate outside the pulmonary veins has been proposed to improve the success rates of the procedure. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding additional ablation over PVI in persistent AF. We describe the different approaches for adjuvant ablation, outcomes, and future perspectives.