Discrepancy in recognition of symptom burden among patients with atrial fibrillation

Physician Estimates and Patient-Reported Health Status in Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

A primary objective in managing atrial fibrillation (AF) is to optimize patients' health status, which can be done only if physicians accurately quantify the outcomes associated with AF in patients' lives.

Objective

To explore physicians' estimation of the health status of patients with AF and its association with subsequent care and outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 2 outpatient practices in Tokyo, Japan. Participants included patients with newly diagnosed AF or those referred for initial treatment of AF at outpatient practices and treating physicians from November 8, 2018, to April 1, 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 22, 2022, to July 7, 2023.

Exposures

Participating patients completed the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire, a 20-item tool covering 4 domains with a 7-point Likert scale; 3 domains (symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concerns) were used in this study. Blinded to patients' responses, treating physicians answered a 3-item questionnaire quantifying each patient's AFEQT domain with a single item. Patients' mean Likert scale responses within each AFEQT domain were subtracted from the physicians' assessments so that higher scores (≥0.5 points) indicate physician underestimation, while lower scores (≤0.5 points) indicate physician overestimation of the health status of patients with AF.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The independent association of physician-patient concordance with treatment escalation (alteration or initiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, or catheter ablation) and 1-year adjusted changes in AFEQT scores.

Results

Among 330 patients (238 [72.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 67.9 [11.9] years; 163 [49.4%] with paroxysmal AF), physicians correctly estimated health status in 112 patients (33.9%), underestimated it in 42 patients (12.7%), and overestimated it in 176 patients (53.3%). Treatment escalation occurred in 63.6% of patients whose health status was correctly estimated, 47.6% of those whose health status was underestimated, and 66.3% of patients whose health status was overestimated. After multivariable adjustment, underestimation of health status was independently associated with less treatment escalation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.90) and less frequent AFEQT overall summary score improvement at 1 year (underestimated, 2.5 [95% CI, -1.6 to 6.7] vs correctly and overestimated health status, 8.4 [95% CI, 7.0-9.9] points; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, physician underestimation of the health status of patients with AF was common and associated with less aggressive treatment and less health status improvement at 1 year.

Urinary Incontinence Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Literature Review

Prostate cancer ranks as one of the most prevalent cancers among men in the United States, contributing significantly to cancer-related mortality. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a cornerstone in the management of localized prostate cancer. This literature review delves into the outcomes of RARP, specifically its impact on urinary incontinence (UI) compared to other surgical methods. We also present the importance of patient perception versus medical reports. Recent studies and trials have unveiled that postoperative UI and erectile dysfunction (ED) remain common concerns following prostatectomy. However, studies have shown that RARP has lower occurrences of UI and ED compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). While the choice of surgical method may not drastically affect these outcomes, the review emphasizes that urinary incontinence extends beyond physical symptoms. It profoundly impacts patients' psychological well-being, social interactions, and overall quality of life. Differences in symptom recording and interpretation between patients and healthcare professionals can significantly influence the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Enhanced patient-physician communication and patient-centered care are essential to providing a holistic approach to prostate cancer management. The choice of surgical methods may not significantly impact postoperative urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Continued research and advancements in treatment and patient care are crucial for improving outcomes and the overall well-being of prostate cancer patients.

Baseline Health Status and its Association With Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend optimizing the health status of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as a primary treatment goal. Whether disease-specific health status is associated with subsequent clinical events is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between health status and subsequent clinical events among patients with AF.

METHODS

Using a prospective cohort study of patients with new-onset AF referred to 11 hospitals (n = 3,313, 68.4% men, mean age 67.8 ± 11.6 years), data were extracted from 3,296 patients (99.4%) who completed the disease-specific Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire between 2012 and 2018. Factors associated with baseline AFEQT overall summary (OS) score and associations between major adverse cardiovascular or neurologic events (MACNE; a composite of all-cause death, stroke, or new-onset heart failure hospitalization) over 2 years were investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 517 participants (15.6%) had poor to fair health status (AFEQT OS <60), and 1,035 (31.2%) had fair to good health status (AFEQT OS 60 to <80) at baseline. Female sex, younger age, family history of AF, higher baseline heart rate, paroxysmal AF, initial visit to the emergency department, and history of heart failure were associated with lower AFEQT OS scores. Of those, 226 participants (6.8%) experienced MACNE; restricted cubic spline analysis with adjustment for factors associated with baseline AFEQT score showed a nonlinear increase in the risk for MACNE with AFEQT OS score <80. The strongest associations were observed for baseline AFEQT daily activity scores (for AFEQT daily activity score of <80 vs ≥80, HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.21-2.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Diminished health status in patients with AF is common and is independently associated with subsequent adverse cardiovascular events.

Clinical Outcomes of Rhythm Control Strategies for Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation According to the Quality-of-Life Score: The CODE-AF (Comparison Study of Drugs for Symptom Control and Complication Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation) Registry

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes; appropriate rhythm control can reduce the incidence of these adverse events. Therefore, catheter ablation is recommended in symptomatic patients with AF. The aims of this study were to compare AF-related outcomes according to a baseline symptom scale score and to determine the best treatment strategy for asymptomatic patients with AF. Methods and Results This study enrolled all patients who completed a baseline Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) survey in a prospective observational registry. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to AFEQT score at baseline; scores ≤80 were defined as symptomatic, whereas scores >80 represented asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of hospitalization for heart failure, ischemic stroke, or cardiac death. This study included 1515 patients (mean age: 65.7±10.5 years; 998 [65.9%] men). The survival curve showed a poorer outcome in the symptomatic group compared with the asymptomatic group (log-rank P=0.04). Rhythm control led to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome in asymptomatic patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27-0.84], P=0.01). Rhythm control was associated with more favorable composite outcomes in the asymptomatic group with paroxysmal AF, left atrium diameter ≤50 mm, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3. Conclusions Symptomatic patients with AF experienced more adverse outcomes compared with asymptomatic patients. In asymptomatic patients with AF, a strategy of rhythm control improved the outcomes, especially with paroxysmal AF, smaller left atrium size, or higher stroke risk. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02786095.

Implications of QRS Prolongation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from a Multicenter Outpatient Registry)

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at the highest risk of progression to heart failure (HF) need to be identified. We investigated whether QRS duration can stratify patients with AF at risk for poor clinical outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). We analyzed data from a multicenter registry-based cohort study of patients with AF. Patients were grouped according to the QRS duration (narrow: <120 ms; wide: ≥120 ms) at registration (baseline). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations during a 2-year follow-up. In addition, the AF effect on the quality-of-life overall summary score was compared between the groups. In 3,269 patients, 302 (9.2%) had a wide QRS; these patients were more likely to be older, male, and have higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores than those with a narrow QRS. The incidence of the composite outcome was higher in patients with a wide QRS than those with a narrow QRS (13.1% vs 4.9%, p <0.001). After adjustment, a wide QRS was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.29, p = 0.016), and the results persisted after the exclusion of patients with bundle branch block or cardiac implantable electronic devices. Regarding HR-QoL outcomes, patients with a wide QRS were less likely to improve AF effect on quality-of-life overall summary scores at 1 year than those with a narrow QRS (adjusted difference -2.31, 95% confidence interval -4.06 to -0.57, p = 0.009). QRS prolongation, even for a nonspecific conduction disturbance, was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and worse HR-QoL in patients with AF.

Heart failure and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Navigating the difficult waters of heart failure phenotypes

The use of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFA) is increasing and it has now been extended to include higher risk patients with heart failure (HF), based on evidence from observational studies and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicating it as safe and beneficial in terms of quality of life, AF recurrence and hospital readmissions in the short-to-middle term. However, the RCTs so far have been relatively small with short follow-up, and few larger trials with long follow-up inconclusive about hard outcomes for large patient crossover undermining the robustness of the results. Importantly, most RCTs involved HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). In contrast, most observational studies show that the majority of ablated HF patients in clinical practice have a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a condition representing roughly half of all HF patients. This article provides an overview of the available scientific evidence in this clinical field and examines the current guideline recommendations. In the absence of robust evidence-based research, the recommendations on AFA in HF may be inconsistent or abstain from taking firm positions, particularly regarding AFA in HFpEF. There is need for clinical research in such a surprisingly orphan setting, in parallel with the current attempts to sort out the knotty question of the HF phenotypes, in particular, again, of the HFpEF phenotypes.

Baseline and Postprocedural Health Status Outcomes in Contemporary Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Underwent Catheter Ablation: A Report from the Japanese Outpatient Registry

Background

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation improves health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). In daily practice, however, CA is performed on a wide range of patients, and outcomes may vary. We aimed to examine baseline and 1‐year HRQoL outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation after CA in daily practice.

Methods and Results

Using a registry‐based cohort study designed to recruit patients with atrial fibrillation newly referred to 11 hospitals, we extracted data from 1097 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent CA between 2012 and 2019. The Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality of Life Overall Summary (AFEQT‐OS) was assessed at registration and 1 year after, and a 5‐point increase in AFEQT‐OS score was considered a meaningful improvement. Overall, the median age was 64 (interquartile range, 56–70) years, 836 (76.2%) were men, and 93.0% (n=1021) of the patients answered the AFEQT questionnaire. The mean AFEQT‐OS score was 74.9 (SD, 18.0) at registration and 88.8 (SD, 12.6) at 1 year after. Notably, the incidence of meaningful improvement in HRQoL after CA was 88.6% for the patients with impaired HRQoL (AFEQT‐OS score <80), which was only 40.1% in those with preserved HRQoL (AFEQT‐OS score ≥80). Female sex, left atrium diameter, and high baseline HRQoL were independently associated with nonimprovement after CA.

Conclusions

The improvement in HRQoL after CA was similar to that seen in clinical trials; however, one‐third of patients did not show improvement. These results underscore the importance of quantitative evaluation of patients’ HRQoL to maximize the effect of CA before its performance.

Integrated Care in Atrial Fibrillation: A Road Map to the Future

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia in clinical practice with an epidemiological coupling appreciated with advancing age, cardiometabolic risk factors, and structural heart disease. This has resulted in a significant public health burden over the years, evident through increasing rates of hospitalization and AF-related clinical encounters. The resultant gap in health care outcomes is largely twinned with suboptimal rates of anticoagulation prescription and adherence, deficits in symptom identification and management, and insufficient comorbid cardiovascular risk factor investigation and modification. In view of these shortfalls in care, the establishment of integrated chronic care models serves as a road map to best clinical practice. The expansion of integrated chronic care programs, which include multidisciplinary team care, nurse-led AF clinics, and use of telemedicine, are expected to improve AF-related outcomes in the coming years. This review will delve into current gaps in AF care and the role of integrated chronic care models in bridging fragmentations in its management.

Symptom Under-Recognition of Atrial Fibrillation Patients in Consideration for Catheter Ablation: A Report From the KiCS-AF Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate whether symptom under-recognition is associated with the application of catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) symptom burden is frequently under-recognized and may affect the choice of treatment strategies.

METHODS

A total of 3,276 patients with AF consecutively registered in a Japanese multicenter database from 2012 to 2017 were analyzed. All patients underwent AF symptom burden assessment via the symptom and daily activities domain within the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire. For the present analysis, 1,173 symptomatic patients (AFEQT score ≤80) with a clinical indication for catheter ablation were included. Under-recognition of symptom burden was defined as no subjective complaints checked by physicians despite self-reported AFEQT scores ≤80. Logistic regression analysis identified the predictors associated with receiving catheter ablation.

RESULTS

Of the 1,173 patients (age: 68 ± 12 years, men: 61%) analyzed, 459 underwent catheter ablation (ablation group); they had lower overall AFEQT scores (p < 0.01 for all domains) compared with the nonablation group. At the 1-year follow-up, greater improvement in the AFEQT scores was noted in the ablation group, even after adjusting for clinically relevant factors (+20.0 ± 1.2, +14.2 ± 0.9, respectively; p < 0.001). Notably, 306 (28%) patients met the criteria for symptom under-recognition, which was associated with the nonuse of catheter ablation during follow-up (odds ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.28 to 0.60; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Under-recognition of AF symptom burden was frequently noted and was associated with less use of catheter ablation. Standardized recognition of symptoms using the application of validated questionnaires may facilitate outcome improvement.