Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial

Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1-2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.

RESULTS

Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33-0,59; p < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29-0.83; p = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with left main Coronary Artery Stenting

PURPOSE

The left main (LM) coronary artery disease poses high risks for its special anatomical characteristics. Optimal antiplatelet therapy is still controversial in this disease. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery.

METHODS

We analyzed 3221 patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery from January 2011 to June 2022. Patients were separated into two groups: the ticagrelor group (n = 1550) and the clopidogrel group (n = 1671). Baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as BARC 3, 5 bleeding.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (n = 1228 in each group), ticagrelor was linked to a lower incidence of all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel after a three-year follow-up (5.7% vs. 8.5%; HR:0.728; 95%CI:0.537-0.985, P = 0.040). Ticagrelor treatment reduced target lesion revascularization (3.3% vs. 6.4%; HR: 0.542; 95%CI: 0.371-0.791, P = 0.001) and stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 3.7%; HR: 0.459; 95%CI: 0.271-0.776, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Multivariate COX analysis suggested that age, heart rate, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ticagrelor, DAPT duration, LM true-bifurcation, LM stent diameters, and IVUS were independent predictive parameters of all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality and no increased risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in LM stenting patients. Thus, ticagrelor can be considered a viable substitute for clopidogrel in LM disease.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes (IVUS-ACS): a two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to result in superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. However, insufficient data are available concerning the advantages of intravascular ultrasound guidance for patients with an acute coronary syndrome. This trial aimed to investigate whether the use of intravascular ultrasound guidance, as compared with angiography guidance, improves the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

In this two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial, patients aged 18 years or older and presenting with an acute coronary syndrome at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients, follow-up health-care providers, and assessors were masked to random assignment; however, staff in the catheterisation laboratory were not. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation at 1 year after randomisation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 20, 2019 and Oct 27, 2022, 3505 patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1753) or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1752). 1-year follow-up was completed in 3504 (>99·9%) patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 70 patients in the intravascular ultrasound group and 128 patients in the angiography group (Kaplan-Meier rate 4·0% vs 7·3%; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·74]; p=0·0001), driven by reductions in target vessel myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation. There were no significant differences in all-cause death or stent thrombosis between groups. Safety endpoints were also similar in the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of contemporary drug-eluting stents resulted in a lower 1-year rate of the composite outcome of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven revascularisation compared with angiography guidance alone.

FUNDING

The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project.

TRANSLATION

For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement to treat acute coronary syndromes, international clinical guidelines generally recommend dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for 12 months to prevent myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. However, data on single antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor earlier than 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with an acute coronary syndrome are scarce. The aim of this trial was to assess whether the use of ticagrelor alone, compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, could reduce the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding events without an accompanying increase in major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, patients aged 18 years or older with an acute coronary syndrome who completed the IVUS-ACS study and who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events after 1-month treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus oral aspirin (100 mg once daily) or oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus a matching oral placebo, beginning 1 month and ending at 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (11 months in total). Recruitment took place at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK. Patients were required to remain event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents. Randomisation was done using a web-based system, stratified by acute coronary syndrome type, diabetes, IVUS-ACS randomisation, and site, using dynamic minimisation. The primary superiority endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [known as BARC] types 2, 3, or 5). The primary non-inferiority endpoint was MACCE (defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation), with an expected event rate of 6·2% in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group and an absolute non-inferiority margin of 2·5 percentage points between 1 month and 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The two co-primary endpoints were tested sequentially; the primary superiority endpoint had to be met for hypothesis testing of the MACCE outcome to proceed. All principal analyses were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 21, 2019, and Oct 27, 2022, 3400 (97·0%) of the 3505 participants in the IVUS-ACS study were randomly assigned (1700 patients to ticagrelor plus aspirin and 1700 patients to ticagrelor plus placebo). 12-month follow-up was completed by 3399 (>99·9%) patients. Between month 1 and month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention, clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 35 patients (2·1%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 78 patients (4·6%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·30 to 0·66]; p<0·0001). MACCE occurred in 61 patients (3·6%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 63 patients (3·7%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (absolute difference -0·1% [95% CI -1·4% to 1·2%]; HR 0·98 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·39]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001, psuperiority=0·89).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome who had percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents and remained event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy, treatment with ticagrelor alone between month 1 and month 12 after the intervention resulted in a lower rate of clinically relevant bleeding and a similar rate of MACCE compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. Along with the results from previous studies, these findings show that most patients in this population can benefit from superior clinical outcomes with aspirin discontinuation and maintenance on ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy.

FUNDING

The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and the Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project.

TRANSLATION

For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions

BACKGROUND

In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) lesions, intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) guidance has shown potential for enhancing clinical outcomes. However, studies confirming its superiority to conventional angiographic-guided PCI remain few. This study aimed to assess if IVUS-guided PCI for patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis improves clinical outcomes compared to angiographic-guided PCI.

METHODS

This randomized clinical study enrolled 181 patients with ULMCA lesions scheduled for drug-eluting stent implantation. Patients were split into 90 in the IVUS-guided group and 91 in the conventional group. Procedural characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) were evaluated for all patients. The risk reduction associated with IVUS-guided PCI was evaluated using a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent IVUS demonstrated significantly higher pre-dilatation before stenting (88.9% vs. 72.5%, P  = 0.005), post-dilatation balloon diameter (4.46 ± 0.48 vs. 4.21 ± 0.49, P  < 0.001), stent diameter (3.9 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.3, P  = 0.002), and pressure for post dilatation (18 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 2, P  = 0.001). Regarding 12-month outcomes, patients who underwent IVUS demonstrated significantly lower MACE (3.3% vs. 18.7%, P  < 0.001) than those who underwent the conventional method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that IVUS was related to 84.4% risk reduction of 1-year MACE (HR = 0.156, 95% CI = 0.044-0.556, P  = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Compared to angiographic-guided PCI, IVUS-guided PCI resulted in improved clinical results and a markedly reduced risk of MACE in patients with ULMCA lesions.

Aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies after percutaneous coronary interventions

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard antithrombotic treatment after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Several trials have challenged guideline-recommended DAPT after PCI by testing the relative clinical effect of an aspirin-free antiplatelet approach-consisting of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course (mostly 1-3 months) of DAPT-among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Overall, these studies have shown P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding without an increase in thrombotic or ischaemic events compared with continued DAPT. Moreover, the effects of the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without prior DAPT or following a very short course of DAPT after PCI are being investigated in emerging studies, of which one has recently reported unfavourable efficacy results associated with the aspirin-free approach compared with conventional DAPT. Finally, P2Y12 inhibitor alone has been compared with aspirin alone as chronic therapy after DAPT discontinuation, thus challenging the historical role of aspirin as a standard of care for secondary prevention following PCI. A thorough understanding of study designs, populations, treatments, results, and limitations of trials testing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. DAPT or vs. aspirin is required to consider adopting this treatment in clinical practice. This review addresses the use of aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for OAC, providing an overview of clinical evidence, guideline indications, practical implications, ongoing issues, and future perspectives.

The Evaluation and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation can greatly improve quality of life and extend survival in those with end-stage lung disease. In order to derive the maximal benefit from such a procedure, patients must be carefully selected and be otherwise healthy enough to survive a high-risk surgery and sometimes prolonged immunosuppressive therapy following surgery. Patients therefore must be critically assessed prior to being listed for transplantation with close attention paid towards assessment of cardiovascular health and operative risk. One of the biggest dictators of this is coronary artery disease. In this review article, we discuss the assessment and management of coronary artery disease in the potential lung transplant candidate.

Drug-Coated Balloon in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

According to the latest coronary interventional guidelines, a drug-eluting stent is the recommended reperfusion therapy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). However, deficiencies and defects, such as in-stent restenosis (ISR), incomplete stent apposition, stent thrombosis, reinfarction after stent implantation, long-term dual antiplatelet drug use, and adverse reactions of metal implants, plague clinicians and patients. Drug-coated balloon (DCB), which delivers antiproliferative agents into the vessel wall without stent implantation and leaves no implants behind after the procedure, is a novel option for percutaneous coronary intervention and has proven to be a promising strategy in cases of ISR, small vessel coronary artery disease, and bifurcation lesions. However, most of the available experience has been gained in elective percutaneous coronary intervention, and experience in pPCI is lacking. The current evidence for the use of DCB-only in pPCI was discussed and analyzed in this review.

Admission Hyperglycemia is Associated with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score and Complications Following Acute Myocardial Infarction During 1-Year Follow-Up

We explored the effect of admission hyperglycemia (AH) on the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) incidence during 1-year follow-up in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. In this retrospective observational study enrolling 1098 AMI patients, hyperglycemia was defined as blood glucose level ≥180 mg/dl at admission. Overall, 158 and 84 patients of 272 diabetic and 826 non-diabetic patients were diagnosed with AH, respectively. Glucose levels at admission were closely associated with the GRACE score in patients with/without diabetes. MACCEs occurred in 222 patients; patients with AH showed significantly higher MACCE incidence (28.1%). Multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis indicated that AH was an independent risk factor for 1-year MACCEs. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that hyperglycemia increases MACCE risk in non-diabetic patients but not in diabetic patients. The admission glucose level combined with GRACE risk score showed a certain predictive value for MACCE incidence according to ROC analysis (OR = 0.798, p < .001). AH was strongly associated with a higher GRACE risk score in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Thus, AH was an independent risk factor and had a high predictive value for MACCE during 1-year follow-up after AMI.