Sensory impairments and cognitive decline in older adults: A review from a population-based perspective

The relationship between self-reported sensory decline and cognitive frailty in older persons

This study aimed to explore the relationship between self-reported sensory decline, including poor hearing and vision, and cognitive frailty in older persons. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2020 National Survey of Living Conditions and Welfare Needs of Older Koreans. Binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between self-reported sensory decline and cognitive frailty. Of 9,692 participants, 39.8 % experienced sensory decline. The prevalence of cognitive frailty was 15.7 % among participants with poor hearing, 6.9 % among those with poor vision, and 17.9 % among those with combined poor hearing and vision. In our model, adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related variables, the cognitive frailty was significantly associated with poor hearing alone and combined poor hearing and vision. The findings suggest that healthcare professionals should prioritize their attention to the risk of cognitive frailty in older adults experiencing poor hearing alone and combined with poor vision.

Defining and assessing intrinsic capacity in older people: A systematic review and a proposed scoring system

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization has introduced the term 'intrinsic capacity' (IC) as a marker of healthy ageing. However, controversy exists on the definition and assessment of IC. We aimed to review the definitions and methods used for the assessment of IC in older adults. In addition, we proposed a new IC scoring method.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus and SPORTDiscus (up to February 10th, 2022) for studies assesing IC in older adults (>60 years).

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included. There is overall consensus on the definition of IC as well as on its different dimensions, that is: locomotion, vitality, sensory, cognition and psychological. However, the methods for assessing each of these five dimensions differ substantially across studies and there is no consensus on the best method to compute an eventual global compound score to evaluate IC taking into account all its different dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

The IC represents a highly relevant clinical concept that has been unfortunately underutilized. We propose a standardization for the assessment of each dimension of IC, with a global 0 (worst) to 10 (highest) score.