Low plasma vasopressin/norepinephrine ratio predicts septic shock

A randomised-controlled trial (TARGET-C) of high vs. low target mean arterial pressure in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A high mean arterial pressure (MAP) target has been associated with improved renal outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, though it has not been studied in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and septic shock (CICs). We compared the efficacy of a high (80-85 mmHg; H-MAP) vs. low (60-65; L-MAP) target MAP strategy in improving 28-day mortality in CICs.

METHODS

We performed open-label 1:1 randomisation of 150 CICs (H-MAP 75; L-MAP 75). The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality and secondary endpoints included reversal of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) at day 5, the incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and adverse events. Endothelial markers were analysed in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable. On intention-to-treat analysis, 28-day mortality (65% vs. 56%; p = 0.54), reversal of shock (47% vs. 53%; p = 0.41) and AKI development (45% vs. 31%;p = 0.06) were not different between the H-MAP and L-MAP groups, respectively. A lower incidence of IDH (12% vs. 48%; p <0.001) and higher adverse events necessitating protocol discontinuation (24% vs. 11%; p = 0.031) were noted in the H-MAP group. On per-protocol analysis (L-MAP 67; H-MAP 57), a significantly higher reversal of AKI (53% vs. 31%; p = 0.02) and a lower incidence of IDH (4% vs. 53%; p <0.001) were observed in the H-MAP group. Endothelial repair markers such as ADAMTS (2.11 ± 1.13 vs. 1.15 ± 0.48; p = 0.002) and angiopoietin-2 (74.08 ± 53.00 vs. 41.80 ± 15.95; p = 0.016) were higher in the H-MAP group.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher MAP strategy does not confer a survival benefit in CICs, but improves tolerance to dialysis, lactate clearance and renal recovery. Higher adverse events indicate the need for better tools to evaluate target microcirculation pressures in CICs.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Maintaining an appropriate organ perfusion pressure during sepsis is the ultimate goal of haemodynamic management. A higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) improves renal outcomes in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with cirrhosis and septic shock have severe circulatory disturbances, low MAP, and poor tissue perfusion. In these patients, targeting higher MAP vs. lower MAP does not confer any survival benefit but is associated with more adverse events. A higher target strategy was associated with better tolerance and lesser episodes of hypotension on dialysis. Patients who could achieve the higher target MAP, without the development of adverse events, had improved renal outcomes and better lactate clearance. Higher MAP was also associated with improvements in markers of endothelial function. A higher target MAP strategy, with close monitoring of adverse events, may be recommended for patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT03145168.

The Eight Unanswered and Answered Questions about the Use of Vasopressors in Septic Shock

Septic shock is mainly characterized-in addition to hypovolemia-by vasoplegia as a consequence of a release of inflammatory mediators. Systemic vasodilatation due to depressed vascular tone results in arterial hypotension, which induces or worsens organ hypoperfusion. Accordingly, vasopressor therapy is mandatory to correct hypotension and to reverse organ perfusion due to hypotension. Currently, two vasopressors are recommended to be used, norepinephrine and vasopressin. Norepinephrine, an α₁-agonist agent, is the first-line vasopressor. Vasopressin is suggested to be added to norepinephrine in cases of inadequate mean arterial pressure instead of escalating the doses of norepinephrine. However, some questions about the bedside use of these vasopressors remain. Some of these questions have been well answered, some of them not clearly addressed, and some others not yet answered. Regarding norepinephrine, we firstly reviewed the arguments in favor of the choice of norepinephrine as a first-line vasopressor. Secondly, we detailed the arguments found in the recent literature in favor of an early introduction of norepinephrine. Thirdly, we reviewed the literature referring to the issue of titrating the doses of norepinephrine using an individualized resuscitation target, and finally, we addressed the issue of escalation of doses in case of refractory shock, a remaining unanswered question. For vasopressin, we reviewed the rationale for adding vasopressin to norepinephrine. Then, we discussed the optimal time for vasopressin administration. Subsequently, we addressed the issue of the optimal vasopressin dose, and finally we discussed the best strategy to wean these two vasopressors when combined.

Vasopressin and its analogues in shock states: a review

Activation of arginine–vasopressin is one of the hormonal responses to face vasodilation-related hypotension. Released from the post-pituitary gland, vasopressin induces vasoconstriction through the activation of V1a receptors located on vascular smooth muscle cells. Due to its non-selective receptor affinity arginine–vasopressin also activates V2 (located on renal tubular cells of collecting ducts) and V1b (located in the anterior pituitary and in the pancreas) receptors, thereby potentially promoting undesired side effects such as anti-diuresis, procoagulant properties due to release of the von Willebrand’s factor and platelet activation. Finally, it also cross-activates oxytocin receptors. During septic shock, vasopressin plasma levels were reported to be lower than expected, and a hypersensitivity to its vasopressor effect is reported in such situation. Terlipressin and selepressin are synthetic vasopressin analogues with a higher affinity for the V1 receptor, and, hence, potentially less side effects. In this narrative review, we present the current knowledge of the rationale, benefits and risks of vasopressin use in the setting of septic shock and vasoplegic shock following cardiac surgery. Clearly, vasopressin administration allows reducing norepinephrine requirements, but so far, no improvement of survival was reported and side effects are frequent, particularly ischaemic events. Finally, we will discuss the current indications for vasopressin and its agonists in the setting of septic shock, and the remaining unresolved questions.

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Is Involved in Mediating the Anti-inflammation Effects of Vasopressin

Vasopressin possesses potent anti-inflammatory capacity. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream activator Akt contribute to endogenous anti-inflammation capacity. We sought to elucidate whether PI3K is involved in mediating the anti-inflammation effects of vasopressin. Macrophages (RAW264.7 cells) were randomized to receive endotoxin, endotoxin plus vasopressin, or endotoxin plus vasopressin plus the nonselective PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) or the selective isoform inhibitor of PI3Kα (PIK-75), PI3Kβ (TGX-221), PI3Kδ (IC-87114), or PI3Kγ (AS-252424). Compared to macrophages treated with endotoxin, the concentrations of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6) and chemokine (macrophage inflammatory protein-2) in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). The concentrations of phosphorylated nuclear factor-κB p65 (p-NF-κB p65) in nuclear extracts and phosphorylated inhibitor-κBα (p-I-κBα) in cytosolic extracts as well as NF-κB-DNA binding activity were also lower (all P < 0.05). Of note, except for macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus PIK-75, the concentrations of cytokines, chemokine, p-NF-κB p65, and p-I-κBα as well as NF-κB-DNA binding activity in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus LY294002, TGX-221, IC-87114, or AS-252424 were significantly higher than those in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin (all P < 0.05). In contrast, the phosphorylated Akt concentration in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin was significantly higher than that in macrophages treated with endotoxin or in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus LY294002, TGX-221, IC-87114, or AS-252424, but not PIK-75. These data confirmed that PI3K, especially the isoforms of PI3Kβ, PI3Kδ, and PI3Kγ, is involved in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin.

Catecholamines for inflammatory shock: a Jekyll-and-Hyde conundrum

Catecholamines are endogenous neurosignalling mediators and hormones. They are integral in maintaining homeostasis by promptly responding to any stressor. Their synthetic equivalents are the current mainstay of treatment in shock states to counteract myocardial depression and/or vasoplegia. These phenomena are related in large part to decreased adrenoreceptor sensitivity and altered adrenergic signalling, with resultant vascular and cardiomyocyte hyporeactivity. Catecholamines are predominantly used in supraphysiological doses to overcome these pathological consequences. However, these adrenergic agents cause direct organ damage and have multiple 'off-target' biological effects on immune, metabolic and coagulation pathways, most of which are not monitored or recognised at the bedside. Such detrimental consequences may contribute negatively to patient outcomes. This review explores the schizophrenic 'Jekyll-and-Hyde' characteristics of catecholamines in critical illness, as they are both necessary for survival yet detrimental in excess. This article covers catecholamine physiology, the pleiotropic effects of catecholamines on various body systems and pathways, and potential alternatives for haemodynamic support and adrenergic modulation in the critically ill.

Vasopressin inhibits endotoxin binding in activated macrophages

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin possesses potent anti-inflammatory effects. Endotoxin recognition (mediated by cluster of differentiation 14 [CD14]), endotoxin binding, and subsequent nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation are essential mechanisms for initiation of the inflammatory response. We elucidated the effects of vasopressin on these essential mechanisms of inflammation with the hypothesis that vasopressin could inhibit CD14 expression, endotoxin binding, and NF-κB activation in activated macrophages.

METHODS

Murine macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]; 100 ng/mL) or LPS plus vasopressin (1000 pg/mL; designated as the LPS and the LPS + V groups, respectively). After reaction, between-group differences in inflammatory molecule concentrations and levels of NF-κB activation, endotoxin-macrophages binding, and CD14 expression were compared. Analysis of variance was performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The concentrations of chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 2 and cytokine interleukin 6 of the LPS + V group were significantly lower than those of the LPS group (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). The nuclear concentration of phosphorylated NF-κB p65 and cytosolic concentration of phosphorylated inhibitor-κBα of the LPS + V group were significantly lower than those of the LPS group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the level of endotoxin-macrophages binding of the LPS + V group was significantly lower than that of the LPS group (P < 0.001). The level of surface CD14 expression of the LPS + V group was also significantly lower than that of the LPS group (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the potent anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin. The mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin may involve its effects on inhibiting CD14 expression, endotoxin binding, and subsequent NF-κB activation.

Divergent neuroendocrine responses to localized and systemic inflammation

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is part of an integrative network that functions to restore homeostasis following injury and infection. The SNS can provide negative feedback control over inflammation through the secretion of catecholamines from postganglionic sympathetic neurons and adrenal chromaffin cells (ACCs). Central autonomic structures receive information regarding the inflammatory status of the body and reflexively modulate SNS activity. However, inflammation and infection can also directly regulate SNS function by peripheral actions on postganglionic cells. The present review discusses how inflammation activates autonomic reflex pathways and compares the effect of localized and systemic inflammation on ACCs and postganglionic sympathetic neurons. Systemic inflammation significantly enhanced catecholamine secretion through an increase in Ca(2+) release from the endoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, acute and chronic GI inflammation reduced voltage-gated Ca(2+) current. Thus it appears that the mechanisms underlying the effects of peripheral and systemic inflammation neuroendocrine function converge on the modulation of intracellular Ca(2+) signaling.

Endotoxemia enhances catecholamine secretion from male mouse adrenal chromaffin cells through an increase in Ca(2+) release from the endoplasmic reticulum

Enhanced epinephrine secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells (ACCs) is an important homeostatic response to severe systemic inflammation during sepsis. Evidence suggests that increased activation of ACCs by preganglionic sympathetic neurons and direct alterations in ACC function contribute to this response. However, the direct effects of sepsis on ACC function have yet to be characterized. We hypothesized that sepsis enhances epinephrine secretion from ACCs by increasing intracellular Ca(2+) signaling. Plasma epinephrine concentration was increased 5-fold in the lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia model of sepsis compared with saline-treated control mice. Endotoxemia significantly enhanced stimulus-evoked epinephrine secretion from isolated ACCs in vitro. Carbon fiber amperometry revealed an increase in the number of secretory events during endotoxemia, without significant changes in spike amplitude, half-width, or quantal content. ACCs isolated up to 12 hours after the induction of endotoxemia exhibited larger stimulus-evoked Ca(2+) transients compared with controls. Similarly, ACCs from cecal ligation and puncture mice also exhibited enhanced Ca(2+) signaling. Although sepsis did not significantly affect ACC excitability or voltage-gated Ca(2+) currents, a 2-fold increase in caffeine (10 mM)-stimulated Ca(2+) transients was observed during endotoxemia. Depletion of endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) stores using cyclopiazonic acid (10 μM) abolished the effects of endotoxemia on catecholamine secretion from ACCs. These findings suggest that sepsis directly enhances catecholamine secretion from ACCs through an increase in Ca(2+) release from the endoplasmic reticulum. These alterations in ACC function are likely to amplify the effects of increased preganglionic sympathetic neuron activity to further enhance epinephrine levels during sepsis.

Neural regulation of gastrointestinal inflammation: role of the sympathetic nervous system

The sympathetic innervation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract regulates motility, secretion and blood flow by inhibiting the activity of the enteric nervous system (ENS) and direct vasoconstrictor innervation of the gut microvasculature. In addition to these well-established roles, there is evidence that the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) can modulate GI inflammation. Postganglionic sympathetic neurons innervate lymphoid tissues and immune cells within the GI tract. Furthermore, innate and adaptive immune cells express receptors for sympathetic neurotransmitters. Activation of these receptors can affect a variety of important immune cell functions, including cytokine release and differentiation of helper T lymphocyte subsets. This review will consider the neuroanatomical evidence of GI immune cell innervation by sympathetic axons, the effects of blocking or enhancing SNS activity on GI inflammation, and the converse modulation of sympathetic neuroanatomy and function by GI inflammation.

[Septic shock. Update of treatment using hypertonic saline and antidiuretic hormone-vasopressin]

Safety in the use of small volumes of hypertonic saline solution for hypovolaemic shock and in the treatment of intracranial hypertension has been demonstrated in studies in the field of resuscitation. There is little experience of this for septic shock in humans. Beneficial immunomodulatory effects have been detected in pre-clinical studies. Interactions with the pituitary-adrenal axis and with the secretion of anti-diuretic hormone are varied and suggestive, but are not sufficiently understood. On the other hand, vasopressin has cardiovascular, osmoregulatory, and coagulation effects, and also acts on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. There is a relative deficit of vasopressin in septic shock. Its use in these patients does not seem to have any advantages as regards mortality, but may be beneficial in patients at risk from acute renal failure, or those who receive corticosteroids. Terlipressin is a vasopressin analogue that has also been studied. The synergy between vasopressin and hypertonic saline is a hypothesis that is mainly supported in pre-clinical studies. The use of hypertonic saline solution in septic shock, although promising, is still experimental, and must be restricted to the field of controlled clinical trials.

Bench-to-bedside review: Vasopressin in the management of septic shock

This review of vasopressin in septic shock differs from previous reviews by providing more information on the physiology and pathophysiology of vasopressin and vasopressin receptors, particularly because of recent interest in more specific AVPR1a agonists and new information from the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST), a randomized trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock. Relevant literature regarding vasopressin and other AVPR1a agonists was reviewed and synthesized. Vasopressin, a key stress hormone in response to hypotension, stimulates a family of receptors: AVPR1a, AVPR1b, AVPR2, oxytocin receptors and purinergic receptors. Rationales for use of vasopressin in septic shock are as follows: first, a deficiency of vasopressin in septic shock; second, low-dose vasopressin infusion improves blood pressure, decreases requirements for norepinephrine and improves renal function; and third, a recent randomized, controlled, concealed trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine (VASST) suggests low-dose vasopressin may decrease mortality of less severe septic shock. Previous clinical studies of vasopressin in septic shock were small or not controlled. There was no difference in 28-day mortality between vasopressin-treated versus norepinephrine-treated patients (35% versus 39%, respectively) in VASST. There was potential benefit in the prospectively defined stratum of patients with less severe septic shock (5 to 14 μg/minute norepinephrine at randomization): vasopressin may have lowered mortality compared with norepinephrine (26% versus 36%, respectively, P = 0.04 within stratum). The result was robust: vasopressin also decreased mortality (compared with norepinephrine) if less severe septic shock was defined by the lowest quartile of arterial lactate or by use of one (versus more than one) vasopressor at baseline. Other investigators found greater hemodynamic effects of higher dose of vasopressin (0.06 units/minute) but also unique adverse effects (elevated liver enzymes and serum bilirubin). Use of higher dose vasopressin requires further evaluation of efficacy and safety. There are very few studies of interactions of therapies in critical care - or septic shock - and effects on mortality. Therefore, the interaction of vasopressin infusion, corticosteroid treatment and mortality of septic shock was evaluated in VASST. Low-dose vasopressin infusion plus corticosteroids significantly decreased 28-day mortality compared with corticosteroids plus norepinephrine (44% versus 35%, respectively, P = 0.03; P = 0.008 interaction statistic). Prospective randomized controlled trials would be necessary to confirm this interesting interaction. In conclusion, low-dose vasopressin may be effective in patients who have less severe septic shock already receiving norepinephrine (such as patients with modest norepinephrine infusion (5 to 15 μg/minute) or low serum lactate levels). The interaction of vasopressin infusion and corticosteroid treatment in septic shock requires further study.

Vasopressin: Its current role in anesthetic practice

Vasopressin or antidiuretic hormone is a potent endogenous hormone, which is responsible for regulating plasma osmolality and volume. In high concentrations, it also raises blood pressure by inducing moderate vasoconstriction. It acts as a neurotransmitter in the brain to control circadian rhythm, thermoregulation and adrenocorticotropic hormone release. The therapeutic use of vasopressin has become increasingly important in the critical care environment in the management of cranial diabetes insipidus, bleeding abnormalities, esophageal variceal hemorrhage, asystolic cardiac arrest and septic shock. After 10 years of ongoing research, vasopressin has grown to a potential component as a vasopressor agent of the anesthesiologist's armamentarium in the treatment of cardiac arrest and severe shock states.

Inotropes in cardiac patients: update 2011

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

ICU patients frequently develop low output syndromes due to cardiac dysfunction, myocardial injury, and inflammatory activation. Conventional inotropic agents seem to be useful in restoring hemodynamic parameters and improving peripheral organ perfusion, but can increase short-term and long-term mortality in these patients. Novel inotropes may be promising in the management of ICU patients, having no serious adverse effects. This review summarizes all the current knowledge about the use of conventional and new inotropic agents in various clinical entities of critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines, inotropic agents are administered in patients with low output syndrome due to impaired cardiac contractility, and signs and symptoms of congestion. The most recommended inotropes in this condition are levosimendan and dobutamine (both class of recommendation: IIa, level of evidence: B). Recent data indicate that levosimendan may be useful in postmyocardial infarction cardiac dysfunction and septic shock through increasing coronary flow and attenuating inflammatory activation, respectively. Furthermore, calcium sensitizing by levosimendan can be effectively used for weaning of mechanical ventilation in postcardiac surgery patients and has also cardioprotective effect as expressed by the absence of troponin release in this patient population. Finally, new agents, such as istaroxime and cardiac myosin activators may be safe and improve central hemodynamics in experimental models of heart failure and heart failure patients in phase II clinical trials; however, large-scale randomized clinical trials are required.

SUMMARY

In an acute cardiac care setting, short-term use of inotropic agents is crucial for the restoration of arterial blood pressure and peripheral tissue perfusion, as well as weaning of cardiosurgery. New promising agents should be tested in randomized clinical trials.

Arginine vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilatory septic shock

Vasodilatory septic shock is characterized by profound vasodilation of the peripheral circulation, relative refractoriness to catecholamines and a relative deficiency of the posterior pituitary hormone, vasopressin. Arginine vasopressin is effective in restoring vascular tone in vasodilatory septic shock and may be associated with decreased mortality in less severe septic shock as well as improved mortality and decreased renal failure in septic shock patients at risk for renal failure.

Role of nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent induction of cytokines in the regulation of vasopressin V1A-receptors during cecal ligation and puncture-induced circulatory failure

OBJECTIVE

Here we characterize the impact of nuclear factor-kappaB and cytokines on cecal ligation and puncture-induced circulatory failure and regulation of vasopressin V1A-receptors during inflammation.

DESIGN

Prospective animal trial.

SETTING

Laboratory of the Department of Anesthesiology.

SUBJECTS

Male C57/BL6 mice.

INTERVENTIONS

The effects of cecal ligation and puncture on hemodynamic parameters and V1A-receptor expression were measured in cytokine knock-out mice, in mice with/without treatment with glucocorticoids or NF-kappaB-inhibitors, in mice pretreated with small interfering RNA silencing NF-kappaB and in mice treated with V1 receptor agonists. Furthermore, the effects of cytokines on V1A-receptor expression were determined.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cecal ligation and puncture resulted in a hyperdynamic circulatory failure with diminished blood pressor dose response to V1 receptor agonists and down-regulation of V1A-receptors. Dexamethasone inhibited proinflammatory cytokine production and attenuated cecal ligation and puncture-induced cardiovascular failure in parallel with attenuated down-regulation of V1A-receptor expression. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interferon-gamma or interleukin-6 dose-dependently decreased V1A-receptor expression, whereas cecal ligation and puncture-induced down-regulation of V1A-receptors was not affected in cytokine knock-out mice. In contrast, inhibition of NF-kappaB strongly reduced induction of cytokines, prevented septic circulatory failure and down-regulation of V1A-receptor gene expression and improved survival of septic animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that down-regulation of V1A-receptor expression during sepsis may be due to proinflammatory cytokines. Our findings explain the failure of therapeutic strategies targeting single cytokines as well as the success of glucocorticoid therapy and define a critical role for NF-kappaB in the pathogenesis of septic shock.

Review article: inotrope and vasopressor use in the emergency department

Shock is a common presentation to the ED, with the incidence of septic shock increasing in Australasia over the last decade. The choice of inotropic agent is likely dependent on previous experience and local practices of the emergency and other critical care departments. The relatively short duration of stay in the ED before transfer leaves little room for evaluating the appropriateness of and response to the agent chosen. Delays in transfer to inpatient facilities means that patients receive advanced critical care within the ED for longer, requiring initiation and titration of vasoactive agents in the ED. This article discusses the general concepts of shock and the indicators for inotrope and vasopressor use, revises the various agents available and reviews the current evidence for their use.

Vasopressin in vasodilatory and septic shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review mechanisms of action of vasopressin and clinical studies of vasopressin in septic shock.

RECENT FINDINGS

Arginine vasopressin is an important stress hormone that has both vasoactive and antidiuretic properties. The vasoactive properties of vasopressin have been more applicable clinically because of the discovery by Landry and colleagues that there is a deficiency of vasopressin in septic shock and that infusion of relatively low doses of vasopressin improves responsiveness to infused catecholamines (such as norepinephrine). There are at least 16 clinical studies of infusion of vasopressin in patients who have septic shock. The majority of studies found that vasopressin infusion increased blood pressure and urine output, and decreased the dose requirement of norepinephrine. Several studies showed that vasopressin infusion increased urine output. Both vasopressin and norepinephrine have important adverse effects including decreased cardiac output, decreased heart rate, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, mesenteric ischemia, and digital ischemia.

SUMMARY

It is still unclear whether there is net benefit from low dose vasopressin infusion in patients who have septic shock. There may be certain patients who benefit but there are few studies of a prolonged vasopressin infusion to determine which patients benefit.

Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy update for the intensive care unit

Pharmacologic agents including vasodilators, inotropes, and vasopressors are frequently used in the critical care setting for management of the unstable cardiac patient. These medications are used to elicit varying effects on vascular resistance, myocardial contractility, and heart rate to help achieve desired hemodynamic and clinical endpoints. Therefore, it is important for the critical care nurse to have a practical understanding and working knowledge of cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in the intensive care unit setting. This article reviews the pharmacology and clinical utility of commonly used intravenous "vasoactive" medications encountered in the intensive care unit. We also highlight innovations in pharmacotherapy for this patient population, and provide practical considerations for the most appropriate and safe use of these medications.

Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED

OBJECTIVE

The main objective was to evaluate if consensus "bundle" measures to optimize the treatment of sepsis have been integrated in our routine practice. We also tried to identify variables significantly associated to mortality.

METHODS

An observational, unblinded study of those patients who, according to their physicians, met criteria for sepsis under its different stages of severity was conducted. Six items as proposed by surviving sepsis campaign were evaluated: (1) measurement of blood lactate; (2) obtaining blood samples for culture before use of antibiotics; (3) early use of antibiotics (>3 h); (4) fluid replacement with at least 20 mL/kg of crystalloids in the first hour, unless contraindicated, if hypotension or blood lactate >4 mmol/L; (5) use of vasoactive drugs, other than dopaminergic doses of dopamine, if hypotension or shock; (6) measurement of central venous pressure and central venous O2 saturation in shock. Data concerning several aspects of diagnosis, treatment, and consultation to ICU were collected.

RESULTS

Compliance with published guidelines is poor after evaluating the 6 items proposed: 12.5% of shocked patients had determinations of blood lactate; 15% of septic patients had no blood cultures drawn; 32% had received their first dose of antibiotics in the first 3 hours after admission; 46.6% of the cases of severe sepsis or shock received a fluid aggressive therapy; 43.3% of the patients with an indication for vasoactive drugs received them; no patient had central venous pressure monitoring at the ED. In addition, intensive care specialists were seldom consulted (17%). Having used dopaminergic doses of dopamine and having a respiratory focus as a source of infection were independently associated to mortality, respective OR: 21 ([1.7-254.9]; 95% CI) and 9.6 ([1.7-52]; 95% CI).

CONCLUSIONS

The "bundle" measures proposed in the surviving sepsis campaign seem not to have had enough impact in our ED. This is the start point of a "plan-do-study-act" process directed to improve the outcome of patients with sepsis at our institution.

Arginine-vasopressin in catecholamine-refractory septic versus non-septic shock in extremely low birth weight infants with acute renal injury

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) as a rescue therapy in catecholamine-refractory septic and non-septic shock in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with acute renal injury.

Methods

Prospective assessment of AVP therapy in three ELBW infants with catecholamine-refractory septic shock and acute renal injury (mean birth weight 600 ± 30 g) and three ELBW infants with non-septic shock and acute renal injury (mean birth weight 770 ± 110 g) at a University hospital. The main outcome measures were restoration of blood pressure with adequate organ perfusion and survival at discharge.

Results

In all three ELBW infants with catecholamine-resistant septic shock, systemic arterial blood pressure increased substantively with restoration of urine output after AVP administration (dosage, 0.035 to 0.36 U/kg/h; length, 70 ± 21 hours). In the three ELBW infants with non-septic shock, only a transient stabilization in mean arterial pressure with restoration of urine output was observed after AVP therapy (dosage, 0.01 to 0.36 U/kg/h; length, 30 ± 16 hours). The mortality rate was 1/3 in the sepsis group versus 3/3 in the non-septic group.

Conclusion

AVP may be a promising rescue therapy in catecholamine-resistant shock in ELBW infants with acute renal injury. Larger prospective clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of AVP as a pressor adjunct in septic versus non-septic shock in ELBW infants.

Vasopressin in Hypotensive and Shock States

Clinical reports and experimental studies support the beneficial effects of low-dose vasopressin infusions in vasodilatory shock. Before we can recommend vasopressin for routine clinical use in vasodilatory shock, and particularly septic shock, we must await the results of currently ongoing and recently completed randomized clinical trials to ensure that vasopressin does indeed have beneficial effects on organ function and outcome.