Management of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the ED

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy of Antiarrhythmics in the Pharmacological Cardioversion of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

Since atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major arrhythmias managed in hospitals worldwide, it has a major impact on public health. The guidelines agree on the desirability of cardioverting paroxysmal AF episodes. This meta-analysis aims to answer the question of which antiarrhythmic agent is most effective in cardioverting a paroxysmal AF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, were performed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling a population of unselected adult patients with a paroxysmal AF that compared at least two pharmacological regimes to restore the sinus rhythm or a cardioversion agent against a placebo. The main outcome was efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

Sixty-one RCTs (7988 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis [deviance information criterion (DIC) 272.57; I² = 3%]. Compared with the placebo, the association verapamil-quinidine shows the highest SUCRA rank score (87%), followed by antazoline (86%), vernakalant (85%), tedisamil at high dose (i.e., 0.6 mg/kg; 80%), amiodarone-ranolazine (80%), lidocaine (78%), dofetilide (77%), and intravenous flecainide (71%). Taking into account the degree of evidence of each individual comparison between pharmacological agents, we have drawn up a ranking of pharmacological agents from the most effective to the least effective.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing the antiarrhythmic agents used to restore sinus rhythm in the case of paroxysmal AF, vernakalant, amiodarone-ranolazine, flecainide, and ibutilide are the most effective medications. The verapamil-quinidine combination seems promising, though few RCTs have studied it. The incidence of side effects must be taken into account in the choice of antiarrhythmic in clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2022, CRD42022369433 (Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022369433 ).

Development of a Care Pathway for Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the Emergency Department

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and its prevalence is continuously increasing in the United States, leading to a progressive rise in the number of disease-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Although optimal long-term outpatient management for AF is well defined, the guidelines for optimal ED management of acute AF episodes is less clear. Studies have demonstrated that discharging patients with AF from the ED after acute stabilization is both safe and cost effective; however, the majority of these patients in the United States and in our institution are admitted to the hospital. To improve care of these patients, we established a multidisciplinary collaboration to develop an evidence-based systematic approach for the treatment and management of AF in the ED, that led to the creation of the University of California-Cardioversion, Anticoagulation, Rate Control, Expedited Follow-up/Education Atrial Fibrillation Pathway. Our pathway focuses on the acute stabilization of AF, adherence to best practices for anticoagulation, and reduction in unnecessary admissions through discharge from the ED with expedited outpatient follow-up whenever safe. A novel aspect of our pathway is that it is primarily driven by the ED physicians, while other published protocols primarily involve consulting cardiologists to guide management in the ED. Our protocol is very pertinent considering the current trend toward increased AF prevalence in the United States, coupled with a need for widespread implementation of strategies aimed at improving management of these patients while safely reducing hospital admissions and the economic burden of AF.

Predictors of time to conversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm with amiodarone therapy

BACKGROUND

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent cause of presentation to the emergency department (ED). Epicardial fat thickness (EFT) is associated with the presence and recurrence of AF. However, no study has investigated the predictors of the time to conversion of AF to sinus rhythm with amiodarone therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of time to conversion of AF to sinus rhythm in patients with new-onset AF.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients admitted to the ED with symptoms of hemodynamically stable new-onset AF (lasting <48 hours) were registered consecutively. These patients received intravenous amiodarone. EFT was measured using 2D echocardiography in parasternal long-axis views.

RESULTS

A significant positive correlation was determined between EFT and conversion time (rho = 0.267, P = .017) in all patients. The median time for conversion from the start of amiodarone infusion was 410 min (150-830 minutes). Based on the median conversion time, patients were classified as early conversion (time < 410 minutes; n = 41) and late conversion (time > 410 minutes; n = 40). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that EFT (P = .033, odds ratio [OR]: 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-2.7), higher troponin I level > 0.04 (P = .034, OR: 5.3, 95% CI: 1.1-24.8), and lower age (P = .003, OR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9) were significantly associated with longer conversion time.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that EFT and high troponin level affected the time to conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with new-onset AF.

Efficacy and safety in pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matching to compare amiodarone vs class IC antiarrhythmic drugs

The acute management of recent-onset (<48 h) atrial fibrillation (AF) is still debated. Aim of our study was to compare efficacy and safety of intravenously administered class IC antidysrhythmic agents vs amiodarone in a propensity score matched series of patients acutely treated for AF in the emergency department. During a 3-year period, we retrospectively evaluated all episodes of recent-onset (<48 h) AF pharmacologically treated for sinus rhythm restoration in the emergency department. By means of a propensity score matching considering the main statistically different covariates, we selected two accurately matched treatment groups. We analysed the differences between amiodarone and class IC group in terms of efficacy and safety that is conversion to sinus rhythm rates within 12 and 48 h after starting treatment, time to conversion, and adverse drug effects. An overall number of 817 episodes of recent-onset AF were collected (amiodarone group = 406, class IC group = 411). After matching, we obtained 358 episodes equally divided (amiodarone group = 179 and class IC group = 179). Conversion rates within 12 h were 139 (53.1 %) in amiodarone group and 95 (72.6 %) in class IC group (p < 0.05). Median time for cardioversion was 420 min (331.6-508.3 CI 95 %) in amiodarone and 55 min (44.9-65.1 CI 95 %) in class IC group (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events in both groups was very low and equally distributed (p = ns). Intravenously administration of class IC agents, when compared with amiodarone, proved to be more rapid and effective, and equally safe in the acute management of recent-onset AF.

Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent cardiac arrhythmia that leads to hospitalizations for complications and adverse events each year. Despite significant improvement in our therapeutic approaches in the past decade, management of AF remains a difficult task. Novel therapies have failed to terminate AF and prevent its recurrence, and patients with AF continue to have thromboembolic complications. With the increasingly aging population and associated conditions, the prevalence of AF is expected to progressively increase, becoming a public health problem. Most patients with AF have multiple comorbidities and are of advanced age, making long-term anticoagulation challenging. This article provides an overview of the current pharmacological therapies for the management of AF, with particular emphasis on the emerging agents.

Long-term prognostic value of dysglycemia and ischemic vascular disease beyond abnormal troponin levels in patients presenting acute atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Prognostication beyond troponin levels in patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unclear.

METHODS

One-month and 1-year outcomes in 1091 patients with acute AF were analyzed. Primary endpoints were stroke or the composite of acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, and death.

RESULTS

In the short term, troponin (odds ratio (OR) 15, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-67.9, P < 0.001) and known ischemic heart disease (OR 5.83, 95% CI, 1.3-26.2, P = 0.021) were predictors of the composite endpoint, with multivariate analysis. No variables linked with stroke. In the long term, metabolic syndrome (OR 4.7, 95% CI, 1.2-18.3, P = 0.024) and age (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1, P = 0.009) were predictors of stroke; metabolic syndrome (OR 4.3, 95% CI, 1.6-11.0, P = 0.003), known ischemic heart disease (OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.7-6.4, P = 0.001), persistence of AF after the first-line approach (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.2-4.3, P = 0.018), and age (OR 1.0, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1, P = 0.025), but not troponin so were of the composite endpoint. In the short term, increased discriminative values in prognostication of the composite endpoint were observed with C-statistic when troponin was compared with dysglycemia (P = 0.032). No variables did better than others in the prognostication of stroke. In the long term, increased discriminative values in the prognostication of stroke were observed with C-statistic when age was compared with troponin (P = 0.020), ischemic heart disease (P = 0.025), and persistence of AF after the first-line approach (P = 0.049); so was for CHADS2 score ≥1 versus vascular disease (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute AF, abnormal troponin levels add prognostic value to clinical parameters in the short term; dysglycemia and known vascular disease in the long term.

Safety and efficiency of calcium channel blockers versus beta-blockers for rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and no acute underlying medical illness

OBJECTIVES

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are not candidates for rhythm control and may require rate control, typically with beta-blocking (BB) or calcium channel blocking (CCB) agents. Although these patients appear to have a low 30-day rate of stroke or death, it is unclear if one class of agent is safer or more effective. The objective was to determine whether BBs or CCBs would have a lower hospital admission rate and to measure 30-day safety outcomes including stroke, death, and emergency department (ED) revisits.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used a database from two urban EDs to identify consecutive patients with ED discharge diagnoses of AF from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2010. Comorbidities, rhythms, management, and immediate outcomes were obtained by manual chart review, and patients with acute underlying medical conditions were excluded by predefined criteria. Patients managed only with rate control agents were eligible for review, and patients receiving BB agents were compared to those receiving CCB agents. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring hospital admission; secondary outcomes included the ED length of stay (LOS), the proportion of patients having adverse events, the proportion of patients returning within 7 or 30 days, and the number of patients having a stroke or dying within 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 259 consecutive patients were enrolled, with 100 receiving CCBs and 159 receiving BBs. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar. Twenty-seven percent of BB patients were admitted, and 31.0% of CCB patients were admitted (difference = 4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -7.7% to 16.1%), and there were no significant differences in ED LOS, adverse events, or 7- or 30-day ED revisits. One patient who received metoprolol had a stroke, and one patient who received diltiazem died within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of ED patients with AF and no acute underlying medical illness who underwent rate control only, patients receiving CCBs had similar hospital admission rates to those receiving BBs, while both classes of medications appeared equally safe at 30 days. Both CCBs and BBs are acceptable options for rate control.

Aggressive approach and outcome in patients presenting atrial fibrillation and hypertension

AIM

Aggressive approach in patients presenting atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension could result in improving rhythm control and reducing admission.

METHODS

Out of 3475 patients presenting AF, those with hypertension (n=1739, 52%) underwent standard (n=591, group 1, years 2004-2005) or aggressive pharmacological and electrical approach (n=1148, group 2, years 2006-2009). Overall, in 1071 patients AF duration was less than 48 h. Primary endpoint was rhythm conversion; secondary endpoints were modalities of rhythm conversion and reduction of admissions.

RESULTS

At univariate and multivariate analyses, AF lasting less than 48 h, absence of comorbidities and younger age were independent predictors of sinus rhythm; conversely, lack of sinus rhythm, older age, AF lasting more than 48 h and comorbidities were independent predictors of hospitalization. Overall, 55% of patients achieved sinus rhythm in group 1 versus 62% in group 2 (p=0.018). Interestingly, in patients with AF lasting less than 48 h, 89% achieved sinus rhythm, more likely by class 1C than by class III antiarrhythmic drugs (p<0.001). Overall reduction of admission accounts for 60%; 50% of patients need admission in group 1 versus 29% in group 2 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive pharmacological and electrical approach in patients presenting AF and hypertension significantly improved rhythm conversion overall up to 62%. Patients with AF lasting less than 48 h eventually achieved sinus rhythm up to 89%, mostly by class IC antiarrhythmic drugs. Admissions eventually reduced up to 60%.