Buprenorphine/naloxone inhibition of remifentanil procedural sedation

Treating Perioperative and Acute Pain in Patients on Buprenorphine: Narrative Literature Review and Practice Recommendations

Opioid use disorder (OUD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA, can be effectively treated with buprenorphine. However, the same pharmacologic properties (e.g., high affinity, partial agonism, long half-life) that make it ideal as a treatment for OUD often cause concern among clinicians that buprenorphine will prevent effective management of acute pain with full agonist opioid analgesics. Because of this concern, many patients are asked to stop buprenorphine preoperatively or at the onset of acute pain, placing them at high risk for both relapse and a difficult transition back to buprenorphine after acute pain has resolved. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing literature for acute pain and perioperative management in patients treated with buprenorphine for OUD and to provide practical management recommendations for generalist practitioners based on evidence and clinical experience. In short, evidence suggests that sufficient analgesia can be achieved with maintenance of buprenorphine and use of both opioid and non-opioid analgesic options for breakthrough pain. We recommend that clinicians (1) continue buprenorphine in the perioperative or acute pain period for patients with OUD; (2) use a multi-modal analgesic approach; (3) pay attention to care coordination and discharge planning when making an analgesic plan for patients with OUD treated with buprenorphine; and (4) use an individualized approach founded upon shared decision-making. Clinical examples involving mild and severe pain are discussed to highlight important management principles.

Perioperative Management of Buprenorphine: Solving the Conundrum

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on the optimal perioperative management of patients on buprenorphine (BUP) for opioid use disorder (OUD). This article will review the available literature on BUP and the analgesic efficacy of BUP combined with full mu-opioid agonists and discuss the conflicting management strategies in the context of acute pain and our institution's protocol for the periprocedural management of BUP.

METHODS

We searched published data on BUP periprocedural management from inception through March 2018 without language restrictions. Study selection included publications reporting outcomes on perioperative pain management in OUD patients maintained on BUP.

RESULTS

Our search resulted in four case reports supporting periprocedural discontinuation of BUP and two case series, one secondary observational study, one prospective matched cohort study, and four retrospective cohort studies supporting periprocedural continuation of BUP. No clinical trials were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining BUP perioperatively does not lead to worsened clinical outcomes. Patients can receive adequate pain control from mu-opioid agonists while maintained on BUP. Based upon available evidence, we recommend continuing BUP at a reduced dose when indicated to avoid withdrawal symptoms and to facilitate the analgesic efficacy of mu-opioid agonists administered in combination for acute postoperative pain.

Effect of pretreatment with hydromorphone or buprenorphine on thermal antinociception induced by fentanyl in awake cats

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment with hydromorphone or buprenorphine on thermal antinociception induced by fentanyl in cats.

METHODS

Seven healthy cats received five different treatments consisting of two drugs. Drug 1 was administered intravenously 1 h before drug 2. Drug 2 was given as an intravenous loading dose followed by an infusion for 4 h. The drug combinations used were: buprenorphine 20 µg/kg followed by fentanyl (BF; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h), buprenorphine 20 µg/kg followed by 0.9% saline solution (B), hydromorphone 0.07 mg/kg followed by 0.9% saline solution (H), hydromorphone 0.07 mg/kg followed by fentanyl (HF; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h) and 0.9% saline solution followed by fentanyl (F; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h). Thermal thresholds were obtained prior to treatment and at predetermined times up to 7 h after drug 1.

RESULTS

Thermal thresholds were significantly higher than baseline in all treatment groups as follows: H from 0.25 to 2.50 h; B from 0.25 to 2.50 h; F from 1.25 to 5.50 h; HF from 0.25 to 5.50 h and BF from 0.25 to 5.25 h. Thermal thresholds were significantly higher in HF and BF than in F treatment before the fentanyl infusion was commenced (from 0.25 to 1.00 h). During the fentanyl infusion thermal thresholds in BF compared with F were lower at 1.75 h and from 2.50 to 3.50 h. After the constant rate infusion of fentanyl was started, thermal thresholds were significantly lower in HF compared with F at one time point (3 h).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pretreatment with buprenorphine did partially inhibit the antinociceptive action of fentanyl. Hydromorphone did inhibit the antinociceptive action of fentanyl at one single time point in cats.