Prospective evaluation of an ED observation unit protocol for trauma activation patients

Utility of an Emergency Department Observation Unit in Providing Care for Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma

Background The use of Emergency Department Observation Units (EDOUs) to treat patients with a variety of complaints has grown over recent years. However, the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries in EDOUs is infrequently described. Our study sought to describe the feasibility of treating patients with blunt thoracic trauma in an EDOU in consultation with our trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) team. Together, our Emergency Department (ED) and TACS teams designed a protocol for the treatment of patients with specific blunt thoracic injuries (fewer than three rib fractures, nondisplaced sternal fractures) that we felt would require less than 24 hours of care in a hospital setting. Methods This study is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis comparing two groups before (pre-EDOU) and after (EDOU) the creation of the EDOU protocol, which was implemented in August 2020. Data was collected at a single, Level 1 trauma center with approximately 95,000 annual visits. Similar inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select patients in both groups. We conducted two-sample t-tests and Chi-square testing to assess for significance. Primary outcomes include length of stay and bounce-back rate. Results A total of 81 patients were included in our data set across both groups. Forty-three patients were included in our pre-EDOU group while 38 patients were treated in our EDOU once the protocol was implemented. Patients in both groups were of similar age, gender and had similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) ranging from 9 to 14. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the EDOU group (31.5 hours) compared to the pre-EDOU group (36.4 hours) although not statistically significant. When risk stratified by ISS, hospital length of stay did reach statistical significance and was found to be shorter for patients with ISS scores greater than or equal to 9 that were treated in the EDOU (29.1 hours vs. 43.8 hours, p = .028). Both groups had one patient each bounce back for repeat evaluation and additional care. Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential use of EDOUs to treat patients with mild to moderate blunt thoracic injuries. The availability of trauma surgeons for consultation along with ED provider experience may be rate-limiting steps in utilizing observation units to care for trauma patients. Additional research with more participants is needed to determine the impact of implementing such a practice at other institutions.

Care of Traumatic Conditions in an Observation Unit

Patients presenting to the emergency department with certain traumatic conditions can be managed in observation units. The evidence base supporting the use of observation units to manage injured patients is smaller than the evidence base supporting the management of medical conditions in observation units. The conditions that are eligible for management in an observation unit are not limited to those described in this article, and investigators should continue to identify types of conditions that may benefit from this type of health care delivery.

Identifying patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk of decompensation who are safe for ED observation

BACKGROUND

Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and mild traumatic brain injury (mTIH) receive broadly variable care which often includes transfer to a trauma center, neurosurgery consultation and ICU admission. However, there may be a low risk cohort of patients who can be managed without utilizing such significant resources.

OBJECTIVE

Describe mTIH patients who are at low risk of clinical or radiographic decompensation and can be safely managed in an ED observation unit (EDOU).

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients age≥16, GCS≥13 with ICH on CT. Primary outcomes included clinical/neurologic deterioration, CT worsening or need for neurosurgery.

RESULTS

1185 consecutive patients were studied. 814 were admitted and 371 observed patients (OP) were monitored in the EDOU or discharged from the ED after a period of observation. None of the OP deteriorated clinically. 299 OP (81%) had a single lesion on CT; 72 had mixed lesions. 120 patients had isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (iSAH) and they did uniformly well. Of the 119 OP who had subdural hematoma (SDH), 6 had worsening CT scans and 3 underwent burr hole drainage procedures as inpatients due to persistent SDH without new deficit. Of the 39 OP who had cerebral contusions, 3 had worsening CT scans and one required NSG admission. No patient returned to the ED with a complication. Follow-up was obtained on 81% of OP. 2 patients with SDH required burr hole procedure >2weeks after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mTIH, particularly those with iSAH, have very low rates of clinical or radiographic deterioration and may be safe for monitoring in an emergency department observation unit.

Effect of a Multi-Diagnosis Observation Unit on Emergency Department Length of Stay and Inpatient Admission Rate at Two Canadian Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Observation units (OUs) have been shown to reduce emergency department (ED) lengths of stay (LOS) and admissions. Most published studies have been on OUs managing single complaints.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine whether an OU reduces ED LOS and hospital admission rates for adults with a variety of presenting complaints.

METHODS

We comparatively evaluated two hospitals in British Columbia, Canada (hereafter ED A and ED B) using a pre-post design. Data were extracted from administrative databases. The post-OU cohort included all adults presenting 6 months after OU implementation. The pre-OU cohort included all adults presenting in the same 6-month period 1 year before OU implementation.

RESULTS

There were 109,625 patient visits during the study period. Of the 56,832 visits during the post-OU period (27,512 to ED A and 29,318 to ED B), 1.9% were managed in the OU in ED A and 1.4% in ED B. Implementation was associated with an increase in the median ED LOS at ED A (179.0 min pre vs. 192.0 min post [+13.0 min]; p < 0.001; mean difference -12.5 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -15.2 to -9.9 min), but no change at ED B (182.0 min pre vs. 182.0 min post; p = 0.55; mean difference +2.0 min, 95% CI -0.7 to +4.7 min). Implementation significantly decreased the hospital admission rate for ED A (17.8% pre to 17.0% post [-0.8%], 95% CI -0.18% to 0.15%; p < 0.05) and did not significantly change the hospital admission rate at ED B (18.9% pre to 18.3% post [-0.6%], 95% CI -1.19% to -0.09%; p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-diagnosis OU can reduce hospital admission rate in a site-specific manner. In contrast to previous studies, we did not find that an OU reduced ED LOS. Further research is needed to determine whether OUs can reduce ED overcrowding.

Emergency department observation units and the older patient

An increasing number of emergency departments (EDs) are providing extended care and monitoring of patients in ED observation units (EDOUs). EDOUs can be useful for older adults as an alternative to hospitalization and as a means of risk stratification for older adults with unclear presentations. They can also provide a period of therapeutic intervention and reassessment for older patients in whom the appropriateness and safety of immediate outpatient care are unclear. This article discusses the general characteristics of EDOUs, reviews appropriate entry and exclusion criteria for older adults in EDOUs, and discusses regulatory implications of observation status for patients with Medicare.