Anaphylactic shock associated with intravenous thrombolytics

Cutting-edge advances in nano/biomedicine: A review on transforming thrombolytic therapy

Thrombotic blockages within blood vessels give rise to critical cardiovascular disorders, including ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and myocardial infarction. The current approach to the therapy of thrombolysis involves administering Plasminogen Activators (PA), but it is hindered by fast drug elimination, narrow treatment window, and the potential for bleeding complications. Leveraging nanomedicine to encapsulate and deliver PA offers a solution by improving the efficacy of therapy, safeguarding the medicine from proteinase biodegradation, and reducing unwanted effects in in vivo trials. In this review, we delve into the underlying venous as well as arterial thrombus pathophysiology and provide an overview of clinically approved PA used to address acute thrombotic conditions. We explore the existing challenges and potential directions within recent pivotal research on a variety of targeted nanocarriers, such as lipid, polymeric, inorganic, and biological carriers, designed for precise delivery of PA to specific sites. We also discuss the promising role of microbubbles and ultrasound-assisted Sono thrombolysis, which have exhibited enhanced thrombolysis in clinical studies. Furthermore, our review delves into approaches for the strategic development of nano-based carriers tailored for targeting thrombolytic action and efficient encapsulation of PA, considering the intricate interaction in biology systems as well as nanomaterials. In conclusion, the field of nanomedicine offers a valuable method for the exact and effective therapy of severe thrombus conditions, presenting a pathway toward improved patient outcomes and reduced complications.

Angioedema After Use of Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activators in Stroke

Angioedema without concomitant urticaria is a well-known complication of treatment with the recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) alteplase and its genetically modified variant tenecteplase. It is potentially lethal when causing airway obstruction and can require intubation. The latest guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association advises to treat this complication initially by interfering with the histamine pathway. This article aims to clarify the pathophysiological mechanism of r-tPA-induced angioedema and provides several arguments that this condition is primarily bradykinin-mediated and hence should be treated initially by intervening with the bradykinin pathway. Second, other-less frequently reported-adverse symptoms after r-tPA therapy and their proposed pathophysiological mechanisms leading to specific treatment are described. This manuscript describes the need for an update of the section "3.5 IV alteplase" from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline to treat this r-tPA-induced angioedema adequately and prevent potentially fatal outcomes.

Might life-threatening acute pulmonary edema occur after using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator? A case report

Background

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-pa) is the first-line drug for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, and can lead to some complications.There were rare reports of death due to acute pulmonary edema during rt-pa thrombolysis treatment.

Case presentation

This study reports a 30-year-old man was diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and underwent rt-pa thrombolytic therapy. Finally he died despite active rescue.

Conclusions

The autopsy revealed that he died of acute pulmonary edema. This case suggests that it is necessary to pay close attention to the changes of vital signs during thrombolysis and be aware of possibility of pulmonary edema during thrombolysis.

Asthma and stroke: a narrative review

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation, bronchial reversible obstruction and hyperresponsiveness to direct or indirect stimuli. It is a severe disease causing approximately half a million deaths every year and thus possessing a significant public health burden. Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. Asthma and asthma medications may be a risk factors for developing stroke. Nevertheless, since asthma is associated with a variety of comorbidities, such as cardiovascular, metabolic and respiratory, the increased incidence of stroke in asthma patients may be due to a confounding effect. The purpose of this review is to analyze the complex relationship between asthma and stroke.

Biologics and anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of biologicals as therapeutic agents in oncology and other inflammatory diseases has dramatically increased during the last years. Due to their biological nature and inherent immunological activity, they are able to induce important adverse events, such as cytokine release reactions (rapid release of proinflammatory cytokines), serum sickness disease, and immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. The aim of the current article is to review the state of the art of anaphylaxis because of biological agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different phenotypes, and potential underlying endotypes, have been described in anaphylactic reactions to biologicals. There seems to be a spectrum from type 1 reactions (IgE or non-IgE-mediated) to cytokine release reactions, with some reactions falling in between both. Management should be directed according to such phenotypes.

SUMMARY

There is ongoing research to further define immediate adverse reactions to biologicals and to find relevant biomarkers to aid in their diagnosis. Such information will serve in defining their immediate and long term management.

Association Between Intravenous Thrombolysis and Anaphylaxis Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose- Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, can sometimes occur after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, it remains unclear whether patients with stroke who receive thrombolytic agents face a higher risk of anaphylaxis than those who do not receive thrombolytics. Methods- We performed a retrospective cohort study using inpatient and outpatient claims between 2008 and 2015 from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We included patients who were ≥65 years old and hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke, defined by validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Our exposure was treated with an intravenous thrombolytic agent during the index hospitalization (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 99.10). Our primary outcome was anaphylaxis, defined using an accepted International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm (989.5, 995.0-4, 995.6x, E905, E905.3, E905.5, or E905.8-9). A secondary outcome was anaphylactic shock (995.0 or 995.6x). Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between intravenous thrombolysis and anaphylaxis after adjustment for demographics, vascular risk factors, the Charlson comorbidity index, exposure to intravenous contrast dye, treatment with mechanical thrombectomy, and history of allergic reactions. Results- Among 66 989 patients with stroke, the 3176 (4.7%) who underwent intravenous thrombolysis more often had atrial fibrillation (47.7% versus 37.4%) and more often received intravenous contrast dye (44.3% versus 21.9%) but were otherwise similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities. Anaphylaxis developed in 17 (0.54%; 95% CI, 0.31%-0.86%) patients who received intravenous thrombolysis versus 45 (0.07%; 95% CI, 0.05%-0.09%) who did not. After adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, contrast dye, mechanical thrombectomy, and history of allergies, there was a significant association between receipt of intravenous thrombolysis and anaphylaxis (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% CI, 4.3-13.9). We found a similar association for anaphylactic shock. Conclusions- Although a rare occurrence, the risk of anaphylaxis among patients with acute ischemic stroke was significantly higher among those who received intravenous thrombolysis.

Thrombolysis and thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke

The likelihood of disability-free recovery after acute ischemic stroke is significantly improved by reperfusion either by intravenous thrombolytic drug treatment or with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in selected cases. The use of intravenous thrombolysis is limited by the short treatment window and you need to assess individual balance of benefit and risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Benefit is greater for shorter onset-to-reperfusion time intervals, requiring optimisation of pre-hospital and in-hospital pathways. Symptomatic haemorrhage is more likely with more severe strokes, but a greater proportion of patients are left free of disability than suffer a treatment-related haemorrhage at all levels of severity. Extracranial haemorrhage and orolingual angioedema are less common complications. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy can be used in selected patients with imaging-proven large artery occlusion. Successful therapy depends on well-organised services that can deliver treatment within a short time window at centres with adequate expertise to perform the procedure.