Emergency physician knowledge of reimbursement rates associated with emergency medical care

Payment perception in the emergency department: The mediating role of perceived quality of healthcare and patient satisfaction

The aim of this research is to identify the main factors associated with patients' payment perception and the effects of these factors on payment perception. Patients admitted between January and December 2016 at an emergency department of a public hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, were included in this study, with a representative sample size of 382 patients. A 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence interval were used, and all the data were collected between May and November 2017. To test the mediation models, stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used. The effect of doctors on payment perception through satisfaction and through perceived quality of healthcare (PQHC) is explained by 3% and 4% of the variation, respectively, with statistically significant results (P < .01). Moreover, the effect of privacy and meeting expectations on payment perception through PQHC is explained by 4% and 4% of the variation, with statistically significant results (P < .01). Doctors play a crucial role in understanding the patients' payment perception (with direct and indirect effects). Mediators, in turn, strengthen this effect, in which the contribution of PQHC is more significant than that of satisfaction.

No longer a blank cheque: a narrative scoping review of physician awareness of cost

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare costs have been steadily rising, and attention to cost containment in healthcare systems is increasingly important. It has been previously established that physicians lack adequate awareness of cost in health care and that by increasing awareness, costs can be reduced. This scoping review examines cost awareness of medications, investigations and procedures and identifies potential interventions that may serve to improve physician awareness.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature based on established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

A review of electronic databases was performed for studies regarding physician awareness of cost, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

An initial 4350 citations were identified, and 76 articles were included for full text analysis. Combined, these studies assessed 18,901 physicians. The overwhelming majority (91%) found cost awareness in physicians was low and demonstrated significant room for cost reduction. Eighteen of the 76 studies assessed an intervention to improve physician awareness of cost and used either a price list (89%) or a teaching session (11%) as the primary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research demonstrates that there is still a lack of awareness among physicians of the costs of medications, investigations and procedures/consumables. Initial approaches using price display and teaching sessions have shown promise. Further research into best practices for education around cost, beginning in medical school and continuing into established medical and surgical practices, may lead to increased cost savings in health care.

'But what if you miss something …?': factors that influence medical student consideration of cost in decision making

CONTEXT

Cost-conscious care is critical for healthcare sustainability but evidence suggests that most doctors do not consider cost in their clinical decision making. A critical step in changing this is understanding the barriers to encouraging behaviours and attitudes related to cost-conscious care. We therefore conducted a qualitative study to address the research question: what factors influence consideration of cost in emergency medicine (ED) clinical decision making?

METHODS

This was a qualitative focus group study using patient vignettes to explore attitudes towards cost-conscious clinical decision making. Participants were Year 4 and Year 5 medical students from Singapore, a country with a fee-for-service healthcare system. After a data-driven initial data analysis, and to make sense of a multitude of factors impacting on cost conscious care, we selected Fishbein's integrative model of behavioural prediction to underpin secondary data analysis.

RESULTS

Via four focus groups with 21 participants, we identified five main themes relevant to the integrative model of behavioural prediction. These were: attitudes towards considering cost when managing a patient (e.g., "better safe than sorry"); normative beliefs (e.g., doing what others do, perceptions of patient wishes); efficacy beliefs (e.g., no authority to take decisions or challenge); skills and knowledge (e.g., little knowledge of costs), and environmental constraints (e.g., the nature of the healthcare system).

DISCUSSION

Medical students do not consider cost in their clinical decision making due to numerous factors, of which lack of knowledge of costs is but one. While some of the factors identified reflect those found in previous studies with residents and fully-trained staff, and in other contexts, theory driven analysis added value in that it facilitated a richer exploration of why students do not consider cost in clinical decision making. Our findings provide insight to inform how best to engage and empower educators and learners in teaching and learning about cost-conscious care.

PET/computed tomography in inpatients: part 1, international survey

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to (1) identify patterns of inpatient PET/computed tomography (CT) use in and outside of the USA and (2) characterize inpatient PET/CT use by location and indication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board. A survey link through REDCap was emailed to the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) members and PET Centers of Excellence members and posted on the SNMMI website. Data were collected from May 2018 to August 2018. Analyses were conducted using SAS Software 9.4 with the NPAR1WAY procedure. Differences were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with statistical significance defined as P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 124 people responded to the survey, 71.8% (89/124) in the USA, and 26.6% (33/124) outside the USA [1.6% (2/124) no response]. 81.5% (101/124) read inpatient PET/CTs. Median percent of inpatient PET/CTs was 8.0% (range 0-100). Use of inpatient PET/CT was different (P < 0.0001) in the USA (5%, range 0-80%) versus outside USA (17.7%, range 0-100%). Use of inpatient PET/CT was different by institution type: median percent of inpatient PET/CTs in community teaching hospitals was 4.5% (range 0-50) versus 1.1% (range 0-20) in community nonteaching, 10% (range 0-80) in academic medical centers, and 20.0% (range 6.3-40) in government-affiliated institutions (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most US and non-US respondents read inpatients PET/CTs. Non-US respondents read a higher percentage of inpatient PET/CTs than US respondents. Respondents in government-affiliated institutions read the highest percent of inpatient PET/CTs and community nonteaching institutions the least. Results of this survey may help physicians evaluate whether their practice of providing inpatient PET/CT fits with current practice patterns.

Utility of repeat magnetic resonance imaging in surgical patients with lumbar stenosis without disc herniation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis is becoming more prevalent due to the aging population. Currently, there is no clinical guideline to clarify the utility of repeat MRI in patients with lumbar stenosis, without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of routine use of MRI as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis, and to help formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective radiographic analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Retrospective chart review was performed to review patients with lumbar stenosis, who underwent lumbar decompression without fusion from 2011 to 2015 at a single institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Previously established stenosis grading systems were used to measure and compare the initial and the subsequent repeat lumbar MRIs performed preoperatively. If patients were found to have a moderate or severe grade change, and if the surgical plan was altered due to such exacerbated radiographic findings, then their grade changes were considered clinically meaningful.

METHODS

We identified patients with lumbar stenosis without radiographic instability or neurological deficits, who had at least two preoperative lumbar MRIs performed and underwent decompressive surgeries. At each pathologic disc level, the absolute value of the change in grade for central and lateral recess stenosis, right foraminal stenosis, and left foraminal stenosis from the first preoperative MRI to the repeated MRI was calculated. These changed data were then used to calculate the mean and median changes in each of the three types of stenosis for each pathologic disc level. Identical calculations were carried out for the subsample of patients who only underwent discectomy or had a discectomy included as part of their surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37 of those patients had more than one level surgically addressed, and a total of 161 lumbar levels were reviewed. Among the subset of patients that had any grade change, the majority of the grades only had a mild change of 1 (36 out of 42 patients, 85.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1%-94.1%); there was a moderate grade change of 2 in two patients (4.8%, CI: 0.8%-14.0%), and a severe change of 3 in one patient (2.4%, CI: 0.2%-10.1%). There were three patients with decreased grade change (7.1%, CI: 1.8%-17.5%). All clinically meaningful grade changes were from the subset of patients who had only discectomy or discectomy as part of the procedure. Lastly, both patients that had a clinically meaningful grade change had their MRIs performed at an interval of greater than 360 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiographic evaluation of the utility of routinely repeated MRIs in lumbar stenosis without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniations demonstrated that there were no significant changes found in the repeated MRI in the preoperative setting, especially if the MRIs were performed less than one year apart. The results of this present study can help to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar stenosis and to formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis patients.

Challenges in Statewide Implementation of a Prehospital Evidence-Based Guideline: An Assessment of Barriers and Enablers in Five States

BACKGROUND

Individual states, regions, and local emergency medical service (EMS) agencies are responsible for the development and implementation of prehospital patient care protocols. Many states lack model prehospital guidelines for managing common conditions. Recently developed national evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) may address this gap. Barriers to statewide dissemination and implementation of model guidelines have not been studied. The objective of this study was to examine barriers and enablers to dissemination and implementation of an evidence-based guideline for traumatic pain management across 5 states.

METHODS

This study used mixed methods to evaluate the statewide dissemination and implementation of a prehospital EBG. The guideline provided pain assessment tools, recommended opiate medication dosing, and indications and contraindications for analgesia. Participating states were provided an implementation toolkit, standardized training materials, and a state-specific implementation plan. Outcomes were assessed via an electronic self-assessment tool in which states reported barriers and enablers to dissemination and implementation and information about changes in pain management practices in their states after implementation of the EBG.

RESULTS

Of the 5 participating states, 3 reported dissemination of the guideline, one through a state model guideline process and 2 through regional EMS systems. Two states did not disseminate or implement the guideline. Of these, one state chose to utilize a locally developed guideline, and the other state did not perform guideline dissemination at the state level. Barriers to state implementation were the lack of authority at the state level to mandate protocols, technical challenges with learning management systems, and inability to track and monitor training and implementation at the agency level. Enablers included having a state/regional EMS office champion and the availability of an implementation toolkit. No participating states demonstrated an increase in opioid delivery to patients during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Statewide dissemination and implementation of an EBG is complex with many challenges. Future efforts should consider the advantages of having statewide model or mandatory guidelines and the value of local champions and be aware of the challenges of a statewide learning management system and of tracking the success of implementation efforts.

Pediatric Training Faculty and Resident Perceptions on Teaching High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC) is care that promotes optimal patient outcomes while reducing unnecessary costs. Teaching to promote HVCCC is essential, yet little research has assessed the dual perspectives of residents and faculty on this topic. Our aim was to investigate pediatric resident and faculty perspectives of HVCCC training and role modeling to more effectively promote curriculum and faculty development on this subject.

METHODS

Pediatric residents and teaching faculty in 2 academic medical centers were surveyed during the 2015-2016 academic year. Questions addressed comfort with HVCCC, current teaching practices, barriers to teaching HVCC, and desired curriculum. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and Fisher's exact or χ² tests were used to assess for associations between responses. Institutional review board approval was obtained at both participating institutions.

RESULTS

We received responses from 51% of faculty (128 of 249) and 60% of residents (73 of 123). Most faculty and residents agreed that HVCCC training is important, but only 26% of residents (18 of 69) felt comfortable practicing HVCCC. Faculty and residents identified lack of training or knowledge (50%, 61 of 121 and 53%, 37 of 70, respectively) and lack of hospital support (73%, 88 of 121 and 69%, 47 of 68, respectively) as the largest barriers. Of residents, >85% (60 of 69) reported a lack of attending physician role modeling. Most faculty (83%, 102 of 123) desired faculty development.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents and faculty agree that HVCCC is important and that training institutions have a responsibility to address it. However, most residents were not comfortable with HVCCC. Faculty development in HVCCC as well as hospital support for access to pricing data will be key for programs to develop effective resident training in this area.

Emergency Health Care Professionals' Understanding of the Costs of Care in the Emergency Department

Background

Efficiency and fiscal responsibility are important to the equal, safe, and effective delivery of care in the emergency department, where all presenting patients must be evaluated for emergent conditions. Health care professionals' understanding of the costs of care is a first step to developing rational approaches for the efficient distribution of the finite resources hospitals and emergency departments have at their disposal to reduce costs to patients and health care systems.

Objective

To determine emergency department health care professionals' knowledge of the costs to patients of routine care delivered in the emergency department.

Methods

An internet-based survey of currently practicing emergency medicine health care professionals with various levels of training (physicians, residents, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) was conducted to evaluate their ability to identify the cost of care for 3 common presentations to the emergency department: abdominal pain, dyspnea, and sore throat.

Results

Four hundred forty-one emergency medicine health care professionals participated. In the 3 cases presented, correct costs were determined by 43.0%, 32.0%, and 40.1% of participants, respectively. Geographic region was not related to cost determination. Larger institution size was related to greater cost chosen (P=.01). Higher level of training was significantly correlated with perceived understanding of cost (P<.001); however, it was not related to accurate cost assessment in this study.

Conclusion

Emergency medicine health care professionals have an inadequate understanding of the costs associated with care routinely provided in the emergency department.

A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents

BACKGROUND

Costs of care are increasingly important in healthcare policy and, more recently, in clinical care in the emergency department (ED). We compare ED resident and patient perspectives surrounding costs in emergency care.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study using surveys and qualitative interviews at a single, academic ED in the United States. The two study populations were a convenience sample of adult ED patients (>17 years of age) and ED residents training at the same institution. Participants answered open- and closed-ended questions on costs, medical decision making, cost-related compliance, and communication about costs. Closed-ended data were tabulated and described using standard statistics while open-ended responses were analyzed using grounded theory.

RESULTS

Thirty ED patients and 24 ED residents participated in the study. Both patients and residents generally did not have knowledge of medical costs. Patients were comfortable discussing costs while residents were less comfortable. Residents agreed that doctors should consider costs when making medical decisions whereas patients somewhat disagreed. Additionally, residents generally took costs into consideration during clinical decision-making, yet nearly all residents agreed that they had too little education on costs.

CONCLUSION

There were several notable differences in ED patient and resident perspectives on costs in this U.S. sample. While patients somewhat disagree that cost should factor into decision making, generally they are comfortable discussing costs yet report having insufficient knowledge of what care costs. Conversely, ED residents view costs as important and agree that cost should factor into decision making but lack education on what emergency care costs.

Effect of Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial Results on the Performance of Carotid Artery Stent Placement and Carotid Endarterectomy in the United States

BACKGROUND

CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial) results, published in 2010, showed no difference in the rates of composite outcome (stroke, myocardial infarction, or death) between carotid artery stent placement (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

OBJECTIVE

To identify any changes in use and outcomes of CAS and CEA subsequent to the CREST results.

METHODS

We estimated the frequency of CAS and CEA procedures in the years 2009 (pre-CREST period) and 2011 (post-CREST period), using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Demographic and clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of pre- and post-CREST CAS-treated and post-CREST CEA-treated patients were compared with pre-CREST CEA-treated patients.

RESULTS

A total of 225,191 patients underwent CEA or CAS in the pre- and post-CREST periods. The frequency of CAS among carotid revascularization procedures did not change after publication of the CREST results (12.3% vs. 12.7%, P = .9). In the pre-CREST period, the CAS group (compared with the CEA group) had higher rates of congestive heart failure (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), and renal failure (P < .001). The post-CREST CAS group had a higher frequency of atrial fibrillation (P = .003), congestive heart failure (P < .0001), coronary artery disease (P < .0001), and renal failure (P = .0001). Discharge with moderate to severe disability (P < .0001) and postprocedure neurological complications (P = .005) were more frequently reported in the post-CREST CAS group. After adjusting for age, sex, and risk factors, the odds ratio (OR) for moderate to severe disability was 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.2) in the pre-CREST CAS group and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.7) in the post-CREST CAS group compared with the reference group. The adjusted OR for neurological complications in the pre-CREST CAS group was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2-2.1, P = .002), and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-2.0, P = .01) in the post-CREST CAS group.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of CAS and CEA for carotid artery stenosis has not changed after publication of the CREST. The demographics, pretreatment comorbidity profile, and in-hospital complication rates remained unchanged during the 2 time periods.

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Interventional Radiologists and Vascular Surgeons Regarding the Cost and Reimbursement of Common Devices and Procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate knowledge of interventional radiologists (IRs) and vascular surgeons (VSs) on the cost of common devices and procedures and to determine factors associated with differences in understanding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was administered to US faculty IRs and VSs. Demographic information and physicians' opinions on hospital costs were elicited. Respondents were asked to estimate the average price of 15 commonly used devices and to estimate the work relative value units (wRVUs) and average Medicare reimbursements for 10 procedures. Answer estimates were deemed correct if values were ± 25% of the actual costs. Multivariate logistical regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of the 4,926 participants contacted, 1,090 (22.1%) completed the questionnaire. Overall, 19.8%, 22.8%, and 31.9% were accurate in price estimations of devices, Medicare reimbursement, and wRVUs for procedures. Physicians who thought themselves adequately educated about wRVUs were more accurate in predicting procedural costs in wRVUs than physicians who responded otherwise (odds ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.52; P < .0001). Estimation accuracies for procedures showed a positive trend in more experienced physicians (≥ 16 y), private practice physicians, and physicians who practice in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that IRs and VSs have limited knowledge regarding device costs. Given the current health care environment, more attention should be placed on cost education and awareness so that physicians can provide the most cost-effective care.