Massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest; thrombolytic therapy in a patient with recent intracranial surgery and glioblastoma multiforme

Reduced-Dose Thrombolysis in Acute Pulmonary Embolism A Systematic Review

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third-leading cause of cardiovascular mortality and the second-leading cause of death in cancer patients. The clinical efficacy of thrombolysis for acute PE has been proven, yet the therapeutic window seems narrow, and the optimal dosing for pharmaceutical reperfusion therapy has not been established. Higher doses of systemic thrombolysis inevitably associated with an incremental increase in major bleeding risk. To date, there is no high-quality evidence regarding dosing and infusion rates of thrombolytic agents to treat acute PE. Most clinical trials have focused on thrombolysis compared with anticoagulation alone, but dose-finding studies are lacking. Evidence is now emerging that lower-dose thrombolytic administered through a peripheral vein is efficacious in accelerating thrombolysis in the central pulmonary artery and preventing acute right heart failure, with reduced risk for major bleeding. The present review will systematically summarize the current evidence of low-dose thrombolysis in acute PE.

Systemic thrombolysis in a patient with massive pulmonary embolism and recent glioblastoma multiforme resection

While trials of systemic thrombolysis for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE) report intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) rates of 2%-3%, the risk of ICH in patients with recent brain surgery or intracranial neoplasm is unknown since these patients were excluded from these trials. We report a case of massive PE treated with systemic thrombolysis in a patient with recent neurosurgery for an intracranial neoplasm. We discuss the risks and benefits of systemic thrombolysis for massive PE in the context of previous case reports, prior cohort studies and trials, and current guidelines. There may be times when the immediate risk of death from massive PE outweighs the risk of ICH from systemic thrombolysis, even when guideline-listed major contraindications exist. This case provides an example of how the haemodynamic benefit of systemic thrombolysis outweighed the impact of ICH in a patient who had undergone recent neurosurgical resection of a glioblastoma multiforme tumour.

Vascular complications in glioma patients

Vascular complications in patients with glioma most commonly include venous and arterial thromboembolism; however, treatment-induced vasculopathies are also problematic, especially in long-term survivors. The interactions between treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy, the coagulation cascade, endothelium, and regulators of angiogenesis are complex, drive glioma growth and invasion, and create common management problems in the clinic. We review the incidence of thrombotic complications in glioma, the biology of the coagulome as related to glioma progression, prevention and treatment of thrombosis, the role of anticoagulants as anticancer therapy, and vascular complications such as ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding. The coagulation cascade is intimately involved in cancer-related thrombosis, glioma progression, and vascular complications of glioma therapy. Tissue factor is the principal initiator of coagulation and is upregulated in a glioma subtype-specific fashion. Short-term (perioperative) antithrombotic prophylaxis is effective, but long-term anticoagulation, although attractive, is not routinely indicated. Most patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism can be safely anticoagulated, including those on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapeutics such as bevacizumab. Initial therapy should include low-molecular-weight heparin, and protracted anticoagulant treatment, perhaps indefinitely, is indicated. Many complex interactions resulting in vessel wall injury can lead to ischemic stroke, intracranial and intratumoral hemorrhage, and long-term sequelae such as cognitive impairment.

Decision-making in a patient with cardiac arrest due to venous thromboembolism within 24 h after glioblastoma resection

In the fulminant VTE form with cardiac arrest, systemic thrombolysis remains the most effective therapy. However, several contraindications restrict the use such as intracranial neoplasm or a recent history of intracranial surgery. Here, we report the case of a 59-year-old man who underwent glioblastoma resection and suffered from a fulminant pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest. After CPR, continuous tPA infusion via an endovascularly placed pulmonary catheter was maintained over a period of 8 h. In this case, we report on our decision-making process and the use of local thrombolysis as a successful therapy in a patient with multiple contraindications.

Ischaemic stroke in the setting of glioblastoma: A case series and review of the literature

Ischaemic strokes are an uncommon occurrence in the setting of glioblastoma, and clinically challenging due to co-existing deficits from the tumour, but important to consider as a possible cause of clinical deterioration. Modern therapies and their associated improvements in survival may lead to a greater overall incidence. The possible underlying causes of ischaemia are multiple, and several factors may contribute in a given patient. This review discusses the causative mechanisms of ischaemic strokes in the setting of glioblastoma, with some illustrative cases.