Emergency department recidivism in adults older than 65 years treated for fractures

Readmission rates and associated factors following rib cage injury

BACKGROUND

There remains a lack of knowledge about readmission characteristics after sustaining rib fractures. We aimed to determine rates, characteristics, and predictive/protective factors associated with unexpected reevaluation and readmission after rib cage injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed based on trauma patients evaluated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 2014 to December 2016. Adult patients sustaining blunt trauma with more than one rib fracture or a sternomanubrial fracture were defined as having moderate to severe rib cage injury. Exclusion criteria included penetrating injury, death during initial hospitalization, and only one rib fracture. Reevaluation was defined as presenting at a hospital within 90 days of discharge urgently or emergently. Demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidities, complications, imaging, and readmission data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with a significance of p less than 0.05.

RESULTS

During the study period, 11,667 patients underwent trauma evaluation, of which 1,717 patients were found to have a moderate to severe rib cage injury. Within 90 days, 397 (23.1%) of patients underwent reevaluation, while 177 (10.3%) required readmission. One hundred forty-two (8.3%) patients were reevaluated specifically for chest-related complaints, and 55 (3.2%) required readmission. On univariate analysis, Injury Severity Score greater than 15, hospital length of stay longer than 7 days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay longer than 3 days, a worsened chest x-ray at discharge, a psychiatric comorbidity, a smoking comorbidity, deep vein thrombosis, unplanned readmission to the ICU, and unplanned intubation were higher in the overall reevaluation cohort. On multivariate analysis, age of 15 years to 35 years, Risk Assessment Profile score greater than 8, hypertension, psychiatric comorbidity, current smoker, and unplanned return to the ICU on index admission were predictive of reevaluation of overall reevaluation.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to severe rib cage injury is associated with high rates of reevaluation and readmission. Younger patients who smoke and required a return to the ICU are at greater risk for readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Prognostic and Epidemiologic.

Risk Factors Associated with Emergency Department Recidivism in the Older Adult

Our objective was to review risk factors predictive of older adult recidivism in the emergency department. Certain risk factors and themes commonly occurred in the literature. These recurring factors included increasing age, male gender, certain diagnoses (abdominal pain, traumatic injuries, and respiratory complaints), psychosocial factors (depression, anxiety, poor social support, and limited health literacy), and poor general health (cognitive health and physical functioning). Many of the identified risk factors are not easily modifiable posing a significant challenge in the quest to develop and implement effective intervention strategies.

Beyond observation: Protocols and capabilities of an Emergency Department Observation Unit

OBJECTIVE

Emergency Department Observation Units (Obs Units) provide a setting and a mechanism for further care of Emergency Department (ED) patients. Our hospital has a protocol-driven, type 1, complex 20 bed Obs Unit with 36 different protocols. We wanted to understand how the different protocols performed and what types of care were provided.

METHODS

This was an IRB-approved, retrospective chart review study. A random 10% of ED patient charts with a "transfer to observation" order were selected monthly from October 2015 through June 2017. This database was designed to identify high and low functioning protocols based on length of stays (LOS) and admission rates.

RESULTS

Over 20 months, a total of 984 patients qualified for the study. The average age was 49.5 ± 17.2 years, 57.3% were women, and 32.3% were non-Caucasian. The admission rate was 23.5% with an average LOS in observation of 13.7 h [95% CI 13.3-14.1]. Thirty day return rate was 16.8% with 5.3% of the patients returning to the ED within the first 72 h. Thirty six different protocols were used, with the most common being chest pain (13.9%) and general (13.2%). Almost 70% received a consultation from another service, and 7.2% required a procedure while in observation. Procedures included fluoroscopic-guided lumbar punctures, endoscopies, dental extractions, and catheter replacements (nephrostomy, gastrostomy, and biliary tubes).

CONCLUSIONS

An Obs Unit can care for a wide variety of patients who require multiple consultations, procedures, and care coordination while maintaining an acceptable length of stay and admission rate.

Specialized rheumatology clinic in an emergency department: A year of the rheumatology and musculoskeletal emergencies clinic (RMSEC) experience

BACKGROUND

In October 2013, the emergency department of our hospital started up a rheumatology and musculoskeletal emergencies clinic (RMSEC) with the participation of three specialists in Rheumatology. The purpose of this study was to describe the experience gained in the first year since the beginning of our activity.

METHOD

A descriptive study of healthcare activity of the RMSEC throughout its first year of operation was performed.

RESULTS

1788 assessments on 1663 patients were performed. The range of age was 7 to 67 years. 1530 (85.57%) assessments were performed in patients of the healthcare area of our hospital. Of all the assessments made, 633 (35.4%) were related to inflammatory processes and the remaining 1155 (64.6%) to mechanical or degenerative joint or soft tissue processes. According to the topography of the complaint, 435 (24.3%) patients consulted for a process related to the knee, 362 (20.3%) with axial lumbar region and 336 (18.8%) with the shoulder.

CONCLUSION

Our results denote an intense clinical activity that could have a positive impact on the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal general emergency.

Head Trauma from Falling Increases Subsequent Emergency Department Visits More Than Other Fall-Related Injuries in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether fall-related injuries affect return to the ED after the initial visit.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic Level 1 trauma center ED.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 65 and older evaluated for a fall from standing height or less and discharged (N = 263, average age 77, 70% female).

MEASUREMENTS

After institutional review board approval, electronic medical record data were queried. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with risk of returning to the ED within 90 days.

RESULTS

Injuries included fractures (45%, n = 117); head trauma (22%, n = 58); abrasions, lacerations, or contusions (34%, n = 88); and none (22%, n = 57). Emergency care was frequently required, with 13 (5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.3-7.6%) returning within 72 hours, 35 (13%, 95% CI = 9.2-17%] within 30 days, and 57 (22%, 95% CI = 17-27%) within 90 days. Univariately, the odds of returning to the ED within 90 days was more than two times as high for those with head trauma as for those without (odds ratio = 2.66). This remained significant in the multivariable model, which controlled for Charlson Comorbidity Index, fractures, soft tissue injuries, and ED observation unit use.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third of older adults with minor head trauma from a fall will need to return to the ED in the following 90 days. These individuals should receive close attention from primary care providers. The link between minor head trauma and ED recidivism is a new finding.