1
|
Nanack JJ, Ferndale L. Factors influencing outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease at a South African tertiary hospital. S AFR J SURG 2023; 61:207-211. [PMID: 38450692 DOI: 10.36303/sajs.4005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in low to middle income countries. This study aimed to scrutinise the clinical course of patients diagnosed with PPU and identify modifiable factors to improve outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of the hybrid electronic medical record (HEMR) database at Grey's Hospital was performed. All patients diagnosed with PPU between January 2013 and December 2020 were entered into the study. The variables collected include age, ethnicity, comorbid profile, Boey score, type of surgery performed and complications. These factors were analysed to determine the factors responsible for morbidity and mortality. RESULTS One hundred and ninety four patients were diagnosed with PPU during the study period. Six patients were treated non-operatively, all of whom survived. In the surgically treated group, omental patch repair was performed in 159 (84.5%) patients, and primary closure in 26 (13.8%) patients. The leak rate was 32% in the cohort that underwent relaparotomy and the overall mortality was 14%. There was no significant relationship between the type of repair performed and outcome. All patients had a Boey score of 1 or more. The following factors were found to increase the probability of in-hospital mortality: age > 40 years (OR: 8.49, 95% CI 2.46-29.29 p < 0.01), female gender (OR: 2.509, CI 0.98-6.37, p = 0.048), need for relaparotomy (OR: 0.398, CI 0.17-0.91, p = 0.027) and Boey score > 1 (OR: 46.437, CI 6.13-350.28, p < 0.01). A Boey score > 1 was the only variable that increased the likelihood of finding a leaking repair at relaparotomy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The Boey score was a significant predictor of mortality and leak rate in our patients with PPU. Adding age as a variable may improve the ability to predict mortality in our setting, while the impact of gender and ethnicity needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Nanack
- Department of General Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - L Ferndale
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Grey's Hospital, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang YK, Wu KT, Su YS, Chen CY, Chen JH. Predicting in-hospital mortality risk for perforated peptic ulcer surgery: the PPUMS scoring system and the benefit of laparoscopic surgery: a population-based study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6834-6843. [PMID: 37308764 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10180-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The major treatment for perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) is surgery. It remains unclear which patient may not get benefit from surgery due to comorbidity. This study aimed to generate a scoring system by predicting mortality for patients with PPU who received non-operative management (NOM) and surgical treatment. METHOD We extracted the admission data of adult (≥ 18 years) patients with PPU disease from the NHIRD database. We randomly divided patients into 80% model derivation and 20% validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was applied to generate the scoring system, PPUMS. We then apply the scoring system to the validation group. RESULT The PPUMS score ranged from 0 to 8 points, composite with age (< 45: 0 points, 45-65: 1 point, 65-80: 2 points, > 80: 3 points), and five comorbidities (congestive heart failure, severe liver disease, renal disease, history of malignancy, and obesity: 1 point each). The areas under ROC curve were 0.785 and 0.787 in the derivation and validation groups. The in-hospital mortality rates in the derivation group were 0.6% (0 points), 3.4% (1 point), 9.0% (2 points), 19.0% (3 points), 30.2% (4 points), and 45.9% when PPUMS > 4 point. Patients with PPUMS > 4 had a similar in-hospital mortality risk between the surgery group [laparotomy: odds ratio (OR) = 0.729, p = 0.320, laparoscopy: OR = 0.772, p = 0.697] and the non-surgery group. We identified similar results in the validation group. CONCLUSION PPUMS scoring system effectively predicts in-hospital mortality for perforated peptic ulcer patients. It factors in age and specific comorbidities is highly predictive and well-calibrated with a reliable AUC of 0.785-0.787. Surgery, no matter laparotomy or laparoscope, significantly reduced mortality for scores < = 4. However, patients with a score > 4 did not show this difference, calling for tailored approaches to treatment based on risk assessment. Further prospective validation is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Kai Huang
- Bariatric and Metabolism International Surgery Center, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ta Wu
- Bariatric and Metabolism International Surgery Center, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Shan Su
- Division of General Surgery, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yen Chen
- Division of General Surgery, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Bariatric and Metabolism International Surgery Center, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Han Chen
- Division of General Surgery, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Bariatric and Metabolism International Surgery Center, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Konishi T, Fujiogi M, Michihata N, Kumazawa R, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Tanabe M, Seto Y, Yasunaga H. Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2770-2777. [PMID: 33825122 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroduodenal ulcer perforation is a common abdominal emergency that may be curable without surgical repair in non-elderly patients with localized and stable symptoms. However, the outcomes of nonoperative approaches have rarely been described. METHODS Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified 14,918 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation who were hospitalized and received nonoperative treatment from July 2010 to March 2017. We categorized these patients into three groups according to age: 18 to 64 years (young group, n=8407), 65 to 74 years (old group, n=2616), and ≥75 years (old-old group, n=3895). We investigated the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes in each group. RESULTS Most of the patients were men (71%), and the median patient age was 62 years (interquartile range, 47-75 years). The old and old-old groups had more comorbidities than the young group. Whereas most patients were administered proton pump inhibitors and various antibiotics (96% and 90%, respectively), only 58% of patients underwent gastric tube placement. Surgical repair >3 days after admission was performed in 7.1% of all patients (6.3% vs. 7.9% vs. 5.5%, P<0.001). The old and old-old groups showed higher mortality (1.4% vs. 8.3% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and morbidity (6.6% vs. 15% vs. 17%, P<0.001) than the young group. The median length of stay was almost 2 weeks (13 vs. 17 vs. 20 days, P<0.001). DISCUSSION Unlike previous studies, many patients aged >65 years received nonoperative treatment in this nationwide cohort. Our findings provide useful information for clinicians and patients hospitalized for gastric ulcer perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Konishi
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Michimasa Fujiogi
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kumazawa
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Masahiko Tanabe
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang CY, Chang WC, Huang HH, Chang WK, Shih YL, Hsieh TY, Lin HH. Safety Issues in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan with Retention of Olympus Long Clips in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Curr Med Imaging 2021; 17:1243-1247. [PMID: 34170809 DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210624125335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Not all endoscopic clips are compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of MRI-incompatible endoscopic clips in patients undergoing MRI scans. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had received endoscopic clip placement of Olympus Long Clip MRI-incompatible clips and then had undergone MRI scans within two weeks in our hospital between 2014 and 2019. RESULTS A total of 44,292 patients had undergone an MRI examination at our hospital. Only 15 patients had MRI scans within two weeks after the endoscopic clip placement. Their median age was 65.5 years, and 12 of the 15 patients were men. At the time of the clip placement and MRI scan, four patients were taking anti-coagulation or anti-platelet agents. The indication for endoscopic clip placement of the 15 patients was mucosal/submucosal defect or hemorrhage and colonic perforation. Endoscopic clips were placed in the colon of 14 patients and in the stomach of only one patient for gastric hemorrhage. One patient experienced clip migration and three displayed artifacts in abdominal images. No patient complications of mortality, hemorrhage, or organ perforation occurred. CONCLUSION No serious adverse event occurred during MRI scans of patients with MRI-incompatible clips in this study, suggesting that MRI-incompatible clips may be safe to use in MRI scans. However, this does not guarantee the safety of the Long Clip for MRI scans, as further tests are needed to verify that this clip is safe for use during MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Yi Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chou Chang
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hung Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Kuo Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Lueng Shih
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsai-Yuan Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Hwai Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Korotkevich AG, Yaroshchuk SA, Leontyev AS, May SA, Bersenev AA. Treatment of subhepatic abscess due to complicated perforation of gastric ulcer. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-174-2-95-98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Formation of abdominal abscesses with perforated ulcers of the stomach and duodenum with conservative treatment ranges from 3% to 14%. The main strategy for their treatment is a minimally invasive puncture treatment. A case of a patient’s late treatment of 56 years with a perforated giant gastric ulcer, the formation of a subhepatic abscess and its drainage into the lumen of the stomach is presented. Used methods of drainage of an abscess through a mini-access under the control of gastroscopy. A complex of therapeutic measures has been described, which allowed for the obliteration of an abscess cavity and the healing of a giant stomach ulcer within a month. It is concluded that the need for early use of gastroscopy in the differential diagnosis of perforated ulcers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. G. Korotkevich
- Novokuznetsk State Institute for Further Training of Physicians — Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29
| | | | - A. S. Leontyev
- Novokuznetsk State Institute for Further Training of Physicians — Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29
| | - S. A. May
- Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
The case series of peritonitis due to perforated peptic ulcer: How does conservative management play role? Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 58:74-76. [PMID: 31009897 PMCID: PMC6479104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.03.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical intervention is a conventional treatment for perforated peptic ulcer patients. This study aims to determine whether and how conservative non-operative management plays role in patients with pneumoperitoneum-peritonitis due to perforated peptic ulcers. METHODS A 9-year retrospective study was conducted in patients, who visit one surgeon service, with peritonitis due to perforated peptic ulcer and received non-operation conservative treatment. The treatment consists of nasogastric suction, intravenous fluid (IV) resuscitation, IV antibiotic and IV omeprazole. Outcomes and clinical course of conservative treatment in the selected group were reviewed. Factors associated with those outcomes and clinical course were analyzed. RESULTS There were 38 patients in this case series. Of which, 36 patients (94.7%) showed improvement after 24 h of conservative treatment and discharged without operation. Two patients underwent laparotomy in the 3rd day of admission due to severe abdominal pain and progression of abdominal sign. There was no mortality in this case series. The conservative series had shorter hospital stay and lesser complication but prolong fever. Three factors indicated good outcomes in this series were found i.e. 1) free air in abdominal x-ray was not broader than the 1st lumbar vertebral column height, 2) no free fluid seen in intra-peritoneal cavity by bedside ultrasound, 3) resuscitate fluid in the first 24 h was not more than 5 ml/kg/h. CONCLUSION In this case series, conservative non-surgical management showed good results for patients with peptic ulcers perforation. It could be used as an effective alternative modality when carefully patient selection and closely observed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, Cimbanassi S, Poiasina E, Ceresoli M, Agresta F, Allievi N, Bellanova G, Coccolini F, Coy C, Fugazzola P, Martinez CA, Montori G, Paolillo C, Penachim TJ, Pereira B, Reis T, Restivo A, Rezende-Neto J, Sartelli M, Valentino M, Abu-Zidan FM, Ashkenazi I, Bala M, Chiara O, De' Angelis N, Deidda S, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Finotti E, Kenji I, Moore E, Wexner S, Biffl W, Coimbra R, Guttadauro A, Leppäniemi A, Maier R, Magnone S, Mefire AC, Peitzmann A, Sakakushev B, Sugrue M, Viale P, Weber D, Kashuk J, Fraga GP, Kluger I, Catena F, Ansaloni L. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:36. [PMID: 30123315 PMCID: PMC6090779 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
ᅟ Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). Methods The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. Results CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann’s procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted. With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value. Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required. Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. Conclusions The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Pisano
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Zorcolo
- 2Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Cecilia Merli
- Unit of Emergency Medicine Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Elia Poiasina
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- 5Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Niccolò Allievi
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Federico Coccolini
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| | - Claudio Coy
- 9Colorectal Unit, Campinas State University, Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Ciro Paolillo
- Emergency Department Udine Healthcare and University Integrated Trust, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Pereira
- 14Department of Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Tarcisio Reis
- Oncology Surgery and Intensive Care, Oswaldo Cruz Hospital, Recife, Brazil
| | - Angelo Restivo
- 2Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Joao Rezende-Neto
- 16Department of Surgery Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Massimo Valentino
- 18Radiology Unit Emergency Department, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Tolmezzo, UD Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- 19Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Miklosh Bala
- 21Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit Hadassah, Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Nicola De' Angelis
- 22Unit of Digestive Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Simona Deidda
- 2Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery Cannes' Hospital Cannes, Cedex, Cannes, France
| | | | - Elena Finotti
- Department of General Surgery ULSS5 del Veneto, Adria, (RO) Italy
| | - Inaba Kenji
- 25Division of Trauma & Critical Care University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Ernest Moore
- 26Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Steven Wexner
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery Cleveland Clinic Florida, Tallahassee, USA
| | - Walter Biffl
- 28Acute Care Surgery The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - Raul Coimbra
- 29Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, USA
| | - Angelo Guttadauro
- 5Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Second Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ron Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, Seattle, USA
| | - Stefano Magnone
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alain Chicom Mefire
- 32Department of Surgery and Obs/Gyn, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- 33Department of Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Services, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- 34General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Michael Sugrue
- General Surgery Department, Letterkenny Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- 37Trauma and General Surgeon, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- 38Surgery and Critical Care Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- 39Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Ioran Kluger
- 40Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of Drain Insertion After Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair in a Japanese Nationwide Database Analysis. World J Surg 2017; 42:758-765. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4211-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|