Coggins A, Nottingham C, Chin M, Warburton S, Han M, Murphy M, Sutherland J, Moore N. A prospective evaluation of the 'C.O.A.C.H.E.D.' cognitive aid for emergency defibrillation.
Australas Emerg Care 2018;
21:81-86. [PMID:
30998882 DOI:
10.1016/j.auec.2018.08.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
International guidelines recommend that interruptions to chest compressions are minimised during defibrillation. As a result, some resuscitation educators have adopted a more structured approach to defibrillation. One such approach is the 'C.O.A.C.H.E.D.' cognitive aid (Continue compressions, Oxygen away, All others away, Charging, Hands off, Evaluate, Defibrillate or Disarm). To date, there are no studies assessing the use of this cognitive aid.
METHODS
This study utilised an Emergency Department in situ simulated model of cardiac arrest. The defibrillator used was a proprietary R-Series (Zoll, PA, USA) connected to a CS1201 rhythm generator (Symbio, Beaverton, OR, USA). The study cohorts were interdisciplinary advanced life support (ALS) providers. Paired providers were enrolled in a mechanical CPR (M-CPR) training programme with no feedback related to defibrillation performance. As part of this 6-month programme, serial defibrillation performance was assessed. The outcome measures were the length of 'peri-shock' pause and 'safety' of defibrillation practice. Comparative statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U-test was made between groups of providers with 'correct use or near correct' or 'entirely incorrect or absent' use of the cognitive aid.
RESULTS
The C.O.A.C.H.E.D. cognitive aid was applied correctly in 92 of 109 defibrillations. Providers with correct cognitive aid use had a median length of peri-shock pause time of 6.0s (IQR 5.0-7.0). Providers with 'entirely incorrect or absent' cognitive aid use had a peri-shock pause time of 8.0s (IQRF 6.6-10.0) (p≤0.001). No unsafe defibrillation practices were observed.
CONCLUSION
In this observational study of defibrillation performance, the use of the C.O.A.C.H.E.D. cognitive aid was associated with a significant decrease in the length of peri-shock pause. Therefore, we conclude that the use of a cognitive aid is appropriate for teaching and performing defibrillation.
Collapse