Utility of the simplified Wells and revised Geneva scores to exclude pulmonary embolism in femur fracture patients

Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism: What's update?

Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in severe trauma patients. Primary fibrinolytic hyperactivity combined with hemorrhage and consequential hypercoagulability in severe trauma patients create a huge challenge for clinicians. It is crucial to ensure a safe anticoagulant therapy for trauma patients, but a series of clinical issues need to be answered first, for example, what are the risk factors for traumatic venous thromboembolism? How to assess and determine the status of coagulation dysfunction of patients? When is the optimal timing to initiate pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism? What types of prophylactic agents should be used? How to manage the anticoagulation-related hemorrhage and to determine the optimal timing of restarting chemoprophylaxis? The present review attempts to answer the above questions.

Risk scoring models fail to predict pulmonary embolism in trauma patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify risk factors and risk scoring models to help identify post-traumatic pulmonary embolisms (PE).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review (2014-2019) of all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center that received a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) for a suspected PE. A systematic literature search found eleven risk scoring models, all of which were applied to these patients. Scores of patients with and without PE were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 235 trauma patients that received CTPA, 31 (13%) showed a PE. No risk scoring model had both a sensitivity and specificity above 90%. The Wells Score had the highest area under the curve (0.65). After logistic regression, no risk scoring model variables were independently associated with PE.

CONCLUSIONS

In trauma patients with clinically suspected PE, clinical variables and current risk scoring models do not adequately differentiate patients with and without PE.

Comparison of international societal guidelines for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism during pregnancy

Pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy is challenging, with symptoms of pulmonary embolism mimicking those of pregnancy. Several key components such as clinical prediction tools, risk stratification, laboratory tests, and imaging widely used for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the non-pregnant population show limitations for diagnosis in pregnancy. Further, because of the difficulty of studying pregnant patients, high-quality research evaluating the performance of these diagnostic components in pregnancy is scarce. Seven international medical society guidelines present clinical diagnostic pathways for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy that show conflicting recommendations on the use of these diagnostic components. This Review assesses all key components of diagnostic clinical pathways recommended by guidelines for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy, reviews current evidence, compares the guideline recommendations with respect to each key component, and provides our preferred diagnostic pathway. It provides the guidelines and available data needed for informed decision making to diagnose pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

A comparative analysis of the diagnostic performances of four clinical probability models for acute pulmonary embolism in a sub-Saharan African population: a cross-sectional study

Background

The diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most challenging in emergency settings where prompt and accurate decisions need to be taken for life-saving purposes. Here, the assessment of the clinical probability of PE is a paramount step in its diagnosis. Although clinical probability models (CPM) for PE are routinely used in emergency departments (EDs) of low-resource settings, few studies have cited their diagnostic performances in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We aimed to comparatively assess the accuracy of four CPM in the diagnosis of acute PE in sub-Saharan Africans.

Methods

We carried out a cross-sectional study to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of four CPM namely; the Wells, simplified Wells, revised Geneva and the simplified revised Geneva (SRG) Scores to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in all adults patients with suspected PE admitted to the EDs of the Gynaeco-obstetric and Paediatric Hospital of Yaoundé and the Yaoundé Central Hospital in Cameroon between January 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018.

Results

In total, we enrolled 30 patients with clinical suspicion of acute PE. PE was confirmed on CTPA in 16 (53.3%) cases. Their mean age was 53.7 ± 15.5 years and 36.7% were males. All four scores had a diagnostic performance superior to 50% in all criteria assessed. The simplified Wells score had the highest sensitivity (62.5%) followed by the Wells score (56.3%). The SRG score had the highest specificity (71.4%). The score with highest PPV was the SRG score (66.7%) and that with the highest NPV was the Wells score (56.3%). Overall the models with the highest accuracies were the Wells and SRG scores (60% for each).

Conclusion

All CPM had a suboptimal diagnostic performance, perhaps highlighting the need of a more optimal CPM for acute PE in SSA. However, the Wells and the SRG scores appeared to be most accurate than the other two scores in the ED. Hence, both or either of them may be used in first intention to predict PE and guide which ED patients should undergo further investigations in an emergency SSA setting.

The sensitivities and prognostic values of the Wells and revised Geneva scores in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the Japanese population

OBJECTIVE

To assess the sensitivities of the Wells score (WS) and the revised Geneva score (RGS) and their prognostic values in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the Japanese population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with PE aged 16 years or older who were assessed between December 2008 and August 2014. Patients were divided into the PE unlikely and PE likely groups according to the WS and PE unlikely and PE likely groups according to the RGS. We also described the characteristics and three-month mortality of the patients. Univariate predictors with p < 0.05 were included in the multiple regression model. Fisher׳s exact test and Student׳s t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

PE was confirmed in 53 patients, and seven (13%) patients died within 3 months. The mean age was 66.0 ± 14.4 years. There were 32 female patients (60.4%). The RGS had a higher sensitivity than the WS (20.8% vs. 15.1%, P <0.01), although both scores had low yields. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with syncope than in those without (33.3% vs. 7.3%, respectively; P = 0.039). After age and sex adjustments, the presence of syncope showed a statistically significant association with mortality. The mortality rate did not significantly differ between the two groups categorized according to the WS (17.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.58) and RGS (21.7% vs. 14.3%; P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

WS and RGS had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PE and had limited prognostic values in a Japanese community hospital setting. Promoting awareness about the risk of mortality in patients with PE, especially those with syncope, is necessary.