1
|
Huhtanen JT, Nyman M, Sequeiros RB, Koskinen SK, Pudas TK, Kajander S, Niemi P, Löyttyniemi E, Aronen HJ, Hirvonen J. Discrepancies between Radiology Specialists and Residents in Fracture Detection from Musculoskeletal Radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3207. [PMID: 37892028 PMCID: PMC10605667 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to compare the competence in appendicular trauma radiograph image interpretation between radiology specialists and residents. (2) Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we collected radiology reports from radiology specialists (N = 506) and residents (N = 500) during 2018-2021. As a reference standard, we used the consensus of two subspecialty-level musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists, who reviewed all original reports. (3) Results: A total of 1006 radiograph reports were reviewed by the two subspecialty-level MSK radiologists. Out of the 1006 radiographs, 41% were abnormal. In total, 67 radiographic findings were missed (6.7%) and 31 findings were overcalled (3.1%) in the original reports. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.86, 0.92, 0.91 and 0.88 respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between radiology specialists' and residents' competence in interpretation (p = 0.44). However, radiology specialists reported more subtle cases than residents did (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences between errors made in the morning, evening, or night shifts (p = 0.57). (4) Conclusions: This study found a lack of major discrepancies between radiology specialists and residents in radiograph interpretation, although there were differences between MSK regions and in subtle or obvious radiographic findings. In addition, missed findings found in this study often affected patient treatment. Finally, there are MSK regions where the sensitivity or specificity is below 90%, and these should raise concerns and highlight the need for double reading and should be taken into consideration in radiology education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarno T. Huhtanen
- Faculty of Health and Well-Being, Turku University of Applied Sciences, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (S.K.); (P.N.)
| | - Mikko Nyman
- Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (M.N.); (R.B.S.); (H.J.A.); (J.H.)
| | - Roberto Blanco Sequeiros
- Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (M.N.); (R.B.S.); (H.J.A.); (J.H.)
| | - Seppo K. Koskinen
- Terveystalo Inc., Jaakonkatu 3, 00100 Helsinki, Finland; (S.K.K.); (T.K.P.)
| | - Tomi K. Pudas
- Terveystalo Inc., Jaakonkatu 3, 00100 Helsinki, Finland; (S.K.K.); (T.K.P.)
| | - Sami Kajander
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (S.K.); (P.N.)
| | - Pekka Niemi
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (S.K.); (P.N.)
| | | | - Hannu J. Aronen
- Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (M.N.); (R.B.S.); (H.J.A.); (J.H.)
| | - Jussi Hirvonen
- Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; (M.N.); (R.B.S.); (H.J.A.); (J.H.)
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radiologic discrepancies in diagnosis of fractures in a Dutch teaching emergency department: a retrospective analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:38. [PMID: 32404206 PMCID: PMC7222339 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00727-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Missed fractures in the emergency department (ED) are common and may lead to patient morbidity. Aim To determine the rate and nature of radiographic discrepancies between ED treating physicians, radiologists and trauma/orthopaedic surgeons and the clinical consequences of delayed diagnosis. A secondary outcome measurement is the timeframe in which most fractures were missed. Methods A single-centre retrospective analysis of all missed fractures in a general teaching hospital from 2012 to 2017 was performed. Data regarding missed fractures were provided by the hospital’s complication list and related database. Additional data were retrieved from the electronic medical records as required for the study. Results A total of 25,957 fractures were treated at our ED. Initially, 289 fractures were missed by ED treating physicians (1.1%). The most frequently missed fractures were the elbow (28.6%) and wrist (20.8%) in children, the foot (17.2%) in adults and the pelvis and hip (37.3%) in elderly patients. Patients required surgery in 9.3% of missed fractures, received immobilization by a cast or brace in 45.7%, had no treatment alterations during the first week in 38.1%. Follow-up data were lacking for 6.9% of cases. 49% of all missed fractures took place between 4 PM and 9 PM. There is a discrepancy in percentages of correctly diagnosed fractures and missed fractures between 5 PM and 3 AM. Conclusion Adequate training of ED treating physicians in radiographic interpretation is essential in order to increase diagnostic accuracy. A daily multidisciplinary radiology meeting is very effective in detecting missed fractures.
Collapse
|
3
|
Liberman DB, McCarthy TJ. The cost of callbacks: return visits for diagnostic imaging discrepancies in a pediatric emergency department. Emerg Radiol 2019; 26:381-389. [DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01681-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|