1
|
Zhao AY, Ferraro S, Agarwal A, Mikula JD, Mun F, Ranson R, Best M, Srikumaran U. Prior fragility fractures are associated with a higher risk of 8-year complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int 2024:10.1007/s00198-024-07147-9. [PMID: 38900164 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07147-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Patients who sustain fragility fractures prior to total shoulder arthroplasty have significantly higher risk for bone health-related complications within 8 years of procedure. Identification of these high-risk patients with an emphasis on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative bone health optimization may help minimize these preventable complications. PURPOSE As the population ages, more patients with osteoporosis are undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), including those who have sustained a prior fragility fracture. Sustaining a fragility fracture before TSA has been associated with increased risk of short-term revision rates, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and secondary fragility fractures but long-term implant survivorship in this patient population is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the association of prior fragility fractures with 8-year risks of revision TSA, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture. METHODS Patients aged 50 years and older who underwent TSA were identified in a large national database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a fragility fracture within 3 years prior to TSA. Patients who had a prior fragility fracture (7631) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol use. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used to observe the cumulative incidences of all-cause revision, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of index surgery. RESULTS The 8-year cumulative incidence of revision TSA (5.7% vs. 4.1%), periprosthetic fracture (3.8% vs. 1.4%), and secondary fragility fracture (46.5% vs. 10.1%) were significantly higher for those who had a prior fragility fracture when compared to those who did not. On multivariable analysis, a prior fragility fracture was associated with higher risks of revision (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.74; p < 0.001), periprosthetic fracture (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.18-4.07; p < 0.001) and secondary fragility fracture (HR, 8.39; 95% CI, 7.62-9.24; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prior fragility fracture was a significant risk factor for revision, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of primary TSA. Identification of these high-risk patients with an emphasis on preoperative and postoperative bone health optimization may help minimize these complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, District of Columbia, George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Samantha Ferraro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, District of Columbia, George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amil Agarwal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, District of Columbia, George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jacob D Mikula
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Frederick Mun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rachel Ranson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, District of Columbia, George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Matthew Best
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brown AW, Jovevski JJ, Naville-Cook CA, Roberts JL, Triboletti MD, Williams MJ, Smith CR. Cost analysis of one-time intravenous antibiotic doses in the emergency department. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024:102114. [PMID: 38705468 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research shows that one-time doses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics do not improve resolution of infection. However, providers continue to use them-especially in the emergency department (ED). Very few studies have aimed to quantify the cost of this practice. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to evaluate the difference in average total cost of ED stay between patients who received a one-time dose of IV antibiotics in the ED before discharging on oral antibiotics and patients who were just discharged on oral antibiotics. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the differences in durations of stay between the 2 groups, as well as the differences in adverse drug effects and need for health care contact after discharge. METHODS Chart review was conducted to identify patients who received and did not receive a one-time dose of IV antibiotics in the ED between April 30, 2020, and April 30, 2022. A microcosting approach was used to determine ED-associated costs per patient. Comparisons in primary and secondary outcomes were performed using statistical inferential tests. RESULTS A total of 102 patients were analyzed in each group. Patients who received a one-time dose of IV antibiotics in the ED before being discharged on oral antibiotics had an average length of stay of 4.55 hours, as opposed to patients who did not receive a one-time dose of IV antibiotics before being discharged on oral antibiotics who had an average length of stay of 2.82 hours (absolute difference 1.73 hours, P < 0.001). One-time dosing of IV antibiotics in the ED incurred an additional cost of approximately $556 per patient, totaling to more than $56,000 in our study cohort. CONCLUSION The use of one-time IV antibiotics in the ED did not confer any additional benefits to patients. The use of one-time doses resulted in statistically significant reduced throughput in the ED and statistically significant increased health care costs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Grossman ES, Fradinho J, Chiu D, Wolfe RE, Grossman SA. The effect of increasing emergency department observation volumes on downstream admission rates. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 77:17-20. [PMID: 38096635 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Rising length of stay and inpatient boarding in emergency departments have directly affected patient satisfaction and nearly all provider-to-patient care metrics. Prior studies suggest that ED observation has significant clinical and financial benefits including decreasing hospitalization and length of stay. ED observation is one method long employed to shorten ED length of stay and to free up inpatient beds, yet many patients continue to be admitted to the hospital with an average hospital length of stay of only one day. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether vigorous tracking and provider reviews of one day hospital admits affected the utilization of ED observation and whether this correlated with significant change in rates of admission from observation status. Between September 2020 and May 2021, in a tertiary care hospital with an annual ED volume of 55,0000, chart reviews of 24-h inpatient discharges were initiated by two senior EM faculty to determine perceived suitability for ED observation. Non-punitive email reviews were then initiated with ED attending providers in order to encourage evaluation of whether these patients would have benefitted from being placed into observation. We then analyzed ED observation patient volumes and subsequent admission rates to the hospital from ED observation and compared these numbers to baseline ED observation volume and admission rates between September 2018 and May 2019. A total of 1448 reviews were conducted on 24-h discharges which correlated with an increase in utilization of ED observation from 11.77% (95% CI [11.62, 12.31]) of total ED volume in our control period to 14.21% (95% CI [13.84, 14.58]) during the study period. We found that the overall admission rate from ED observation increased from 20.12% (95% CI [18.97, 21.26]) baseline to 23.80% (95% CI [22.60, 25.00]) during the same time periods. Our data suggest that increasing the total number of patients placed into observation by 21% correlated with a relative increase in admission rates from ED observation by 18%. This would suggest that our efforts to potentially include more patients into our observation program led to a significant increase in subsequent admission rates. There is likely a balance that must be struck between under- and over-utilization of ED observation, and expanding ED observation may be an effective solution to hospital boarding and ED overcrowding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elianna S Grossman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jorge Fradinho
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Chiu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard E Wolfe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shamai A Grossman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trecartin KW, Wolfe RE. Emergency department observation implementation guide. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2023; 4:e13013. [PMID: 37520081 PMCID: PMC10375260 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Emergency department (ED) crowding poses significant operational challenges to hospitals. One strategy to address these issues is the implementation of an ED observation (EDO) unit. EDO involves placing patients in observation status after their initial evaluation, allowing for continued assessment, treatment, and the determination of a safe disposition. This paper provides a comprehensive guide for ED leaders on the implementation of ED observation in their departments. It includes a checklist summarizing key implementation points, operational and financial considerations, staffing and location planning, patient selection, clinical care protocols, documentation and communication processes, securing buy-in from stakeholders, and outcome measurement. The guide also highlights the updated billing codes based on the 2023 updated Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) guidelines. Successful implementation of an EDO program has shown benefits such as improved patient flow, enhanced revenue generation, reduced costs, and comparable clinical outcomes. This guide aims to equip ED leaders with the necessary knowledge and tools to implement and manage an effective ED observation program in their departments, ultimately improving the overall efficiency of emergency care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard E. Wolfe
- Department of Emergency MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineHarvard Medical Faculty PhysiciansBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wright B, Akiyama J, Potter AJ, Sabik LM, Stehlin GG, Trivedi AN, Wolinsky FD. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital-Based Care Among Dual Eligibles Who Use Health Centers. Health Equity 2023; 7:9-18. [PMID: 36744239 PMCID: PMC9892926 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2022.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Health center use may reduce hospital-based care among Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibles, but racial and ethnic disparities in this population have not been widely studied. We examined the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in hospital-based care among duals using health centers and the degree to which disparities occur within or between health centers. Methods We used 2012-2018 Medicare claims and health center data to model emergency department (ED) visits, observation stays, hospitalizations, and 30-day unplanned returns as a function of race and ethnicity among dual eligibles using health centers. Results In rural and urban counties, age-eligible Black individuals had more ED visits (7.9 [4.0, 11.7] and 13.7 [10.0, 17.4] per 100 person-years) and were more likely to experience an unplanned return (1.4 [0.4, 2.4] and 1 [0.4, 1.6] percentage points [pp]) than White individuals, but were less likely to be hospitalized (-3.3 [-3.9, -2.8] and -1.2 [-1.6, -0.9] pp). In urban counties, age-eligible Black individuals were 1.2 [0.9, 1.5] pp more likely than White individuals to have observation stays. Other racial and ethnic groups used the same or less hospital-based care than White individuals. Including state and health center fixed effects eliminated Black versus White disparities in all outcomes, except hospitalization. Results were similar among disability-eligible duals. Conclusion Racial and ethnic disparities in hospital-based care among dual eligibles are less common within than between health centers. If health centers are to play a more central role in eliminating racial and ethnic health disparities, these differences across health centers must be understood and addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad Wright
- Department of Family Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,*Address correspondence to: Brad Wright, PhD, Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 355, Columbia, SC 29208, USA,
| | - Jill Akiyama
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew J. Potter
- Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice, California State University, Chico, California, USA
| | - Lindsay M. Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Grace G. Stehlin
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amal N. Trivedi
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Fredric D. Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wright B, Akiyama J, Potter AJ, Sabik LM, Stehlin GG, Trivedi AN, Wolinsky FD. Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018. Health Serv Res 2022; 57:1045-1057. [PMID: 35124817 PMCID: PMC9441286 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between federally qualified health center (FQHC) use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. DATA SOURCES Data were obtained from 2012 to 2018 Medicare claims. STUDY DESIGN We modeled hospital-based care as a function of FQHC use, person-level factors, a Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) indicator, and ZIP code fixed effects. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits (overall and nonemergent), observation stays, hospitalizations (overall and for ambulatory care sensitive conditions), and 30-day unplanned returns. We stratified all models on the basis of eligibility and rurality. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS Our sample included individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid for at least two full consecutive years, residing in a primary care service area with an FQHC. We excluded individuals without primary care visits, who died, or had end-stage renal disease. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS After the Medicare PPS was introduced, FQHC use in rural counties was associated with fewer ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years among both age-eligible (-14.8 [-17.5, -12.1]; -6.6 [-7.5, -5.6]) and disability-eligible duals (-11.3 [-14.4, -8.3]; -6 [-7.4, -4.6]) as well as a lower probability of observation stays (-0.8 pp age-eligible; -0.4 pp disability-eligible) and unplanned returns (-2.1 pp age-eligible; -1.9 pp disability-eligible). In urban counties, FQHC use was associated with more ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years (10.6 [8.4, 12.8]; 4.0 [2.6, 5.4]) among disability-eligible duals (a decrease of more than 60% compared with the pre-PPS period) and increases in the probability of hospitalization (1.1 pp age-eligible; 0.8 pp disability-eligible) and ACS hospitalization (0.5 pp age-eligible; 0.3 pp disability-eligible) (a decrease of roughly 50% compared with the pre-PPS period). CONCLUSIONS FQHC use is associated with reductions in hospital-based care among dual enrollees after introduction of the Medicare PPS. Further research is needed to understand how FQHCs can tailor care to best serve this complex population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad Wright
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jill Akiyama
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Andrew J. Potter
- Department of Political Science and Criminal JusticeCalifornia State UniversityChicoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lindsay M. Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Grace G. Stehlin
- Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Amal N. Trivedi
- Department of Health Services Policy and PracticeBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Fredric D. Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and PolicyUniversity of Iowa College of Public HealthIowa CityIowaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaiksow FA, Powell WR, Locke CF, Caponi B, Kind AJH, Sheehy AM. Improving healthcare value: Addressing the confusing costs of observation hospitalizations. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:757-759. [PMID: 35535936 PMCID: PMC9394737 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Acher Kaiksow
- Drs. Kaiksow and Powell are co-first authors on this manuscript
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
- Health Services and Care Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
| | - W. Ryan Powell
- Drs. Kaiksow and Powell are co-first authors on this manuscript
- Health Services and Care Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
| | - Charles F. Locke
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Bartho Caponi
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
| | - Amy J. H. Kind
- Health Services and Care Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
| | - Ann M. Sheehy
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
- Health Services and Care Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Value Proposition of Observation Medicine in Managing Acute Oncologic Pain. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:595-602. [PMID: 35192121 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01245-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite recommended best practice guidelines, pain remains an ongoing but undertreated symptom in patients with cancer, many of whom require emergency department evaluation for acute oncologic pain. A significant proportion of these patients are hospitalized for pain management, which increases healthcare costs and exposes patients to the risks of hospitalization. We reviewed the literature on observation medicine: an emerging mode of healthcare delivery which can offer patients with acute pain access to a hospital's pain management solutions and specialists without an inpatient hospitalization. Specifically, we appraised the role of observation medicine in acute pain management and its financial implications in order to consider its potential impact on the management of acute oncologic pain. RECENT FINDINGS Recent evidence shows that observation medicine has the potential to decrease short-stay hospitalizations in cancer patients presenting with various concerns, including pain. Observation medicine is reported to be successful in providing comprehensive and cost-effective care for non-cancer patients with acute pain, making it a promising alternative to short-stay hospitalizations for cancer patients with acute oncologic pain.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tian Y, Hall M, Ingram MCE, Hu A, Raval MV. Trends and Variation in the Use of Observation Stays at Children's Hospitals. J Hosp Med 2021; 16:645-651. [PMID: 34328847 DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observation status could improve efficiency of healthcare resource use but also might shift financial burdens to patients and hospitals. Although the use of observation stays has increased for adult patient populations, the trends are unknown among hospitalized children. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to describe recent trends in observation stays for pediatric populations at children's hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Both observation and inpatient stays for all conditions were retrospectively studied using the Pediatric Health Information System database (2010 to 2019). EXPOSURE, MAIN OUTCOMES, AND MEASURES Patient type was classified as inpatient or observation status. Main outcomes included annual percentage of observation stays, annual percentage of observation stays having prolonged length of stay (>2 days), and growth rates of observation stays for the 20 most common conditions. Risk adjusted hospital-level use of observation stays was estimated using generalized linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS The percentage of observation stays increased from 23.6% in 2010 to 34.3% in 2019 (P < .001), and the percentage of observation stays with prolonged length of stay rose from 1.1% to 4.6% (P < .001). Observation status was expanded among a diverse group of clinical conditions; diabetes mellitus and surgical procedures showed the highest growth rates. Adjusted hospital-level use ranged from 0% to 67% in 2019, indicating considerable variation among hospitals. CONCLUSION Based on the increase in observation stays, future studies should explore the appropriateness of observation care related to efficient use of healthcare resources and financial implications for hospitals and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Tian
- Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas
| | - Martha-Conley E Ingram
- Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew Hu
- Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mehul V Raval
- Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cichowitz C, Loevinsohn G, Klein EY, Colantuoni E, Galiatsatos P, Rennert J, Irvin NA. Racial and ethnic disparities in hospital observation in Maryland. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 46:532-538. [PMID: 33243537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospital observation is a key disposition option from the emergency department (ED) and encompasses up to one third of patients requiring post-ED care. Observation has been associated with higher incidence of catastrophic financial costs and has downstream effects on post-discharge clinical services. Yet little is known about the non-clinical determinants of observation assignment. We sought to evaluate the impact of patient-level demographic factors on observation designation among Maryland patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of all ED encounters in Maryland between July 2012 and January 2017 for four priority diagnoses (heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], pneumonia, and acute chest pain) using multilevel logistic models allowing for heterogeneity of the effects across hospitals. The primary exposure was self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was the initial status assignment from the ED: hospital observation versus inpatient admission. RESULTS Across 46 Maryland hospitals, 259,788 patient encounters resulted in a disposition of inpatient admission (65%) or observation designation (35%). Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.23) and Hispanic (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.21) patients were significantly more likely to be placed in observation than white, non-Hispanic patients. These differences were consistent across the majority of acute-care hospitals in Maryland (27/46). CONCLUSION Black and Hispanic patients in Maryland are more likely to be treated under the observation designation than white, non-Hispanic patients independent of clinical presentation. Race agnostic, time-based status assignments may be key in eliminating these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody Cichowitz
- Massachussetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Center for Global Health, Boston, MA, USA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gideon Loevinsohn
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eili Y Klein
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Colantuoni
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Panagis Galiatsatos
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jodi Rennert
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan A Irvin
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lamsam L, Bhambhvani HP, Ratliff JK, Kvam KA. Emergent neuroimaging for seizures in epilepsy: A population study. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 112:107339. [PMID: 32911297 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We determined how often patients with epilepsy presented to the emergency department (ED) for seizure and the frequency and predictors for undergoing emergent neuroimaging during those visits. We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative claims' data from 2007 to 2015. Adults with epilepsy were identified based on a diagnosis of epilepsy and an outpatient prescription for an antiepileptic medication. The Bonferroni corrected significance level was 0.0018. We identified 381,362 patients with a mean follow-up period of 1.99 years, of whom 35,015 (9.2%) patients presented to the ED for seizure at least once. Patients with at least one ED visit were younger, more likely to be male, had fewer comorbidities, and had longer follow-up as compared with those with no ED visit (all p < 0.001). Among the 35,015 patients presenting to the ED, 13.6% had neuroimaging, mostly commonly head computed tomography (CT; 95.5%). Patients undergoing neuroimaging were younger (46 versus 48 years) and with higher rates of psychosis (17.4% versus 13.8%) and depression (16.1% versus 12.2%; p < 0.001). This helps to quantify the burden of ED and emergent neuroimaging utilization for patients with epilepsy and can help inform efforts to curtail unnecessary neuroimaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layton Lamsam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hriday P Bhambhvani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John K Ratliff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Kvam
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Escobar GJ, Plimier C, Greene JD, Liu V, Kipnis P. Multiyear Rehospitalization Rates and Hospital Outcomes in an Integrated Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1916769. [PMID: 31800072 PMCID: PMC6902762 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Since the introduction of the rehospitalization rate as a quality measure, multiple changes have taken place in the US health care delivery system. Interpreting rehospitalization rates without taking a global view of these changes and new data elements from comprehensive electronic medical records yields a limited assessment of the quality of care. OBJECTIVE To examine hospitalization outcomes from a broad perspective, including the implications of numerator and denominator definitions, all adult patients with all diagnoses, and detailed clinical data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study obtained data from 21 hospitals in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care delivery system that serves patients with Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid, and/or Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. The KPNC electronic medical record system was used to capture hospitalization data for adult patients who were 18 years of age or older; discharged from June 1, 2010, through December 31, 2017; and hospitalized for reasons other than childbirth. Hospital stays for transferred patients were linked using public and internal sources. EXPOSURES Hospitalization type (inpatient, for observation only), comorbidity burden, acute physiology score, and care directives. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mortality (inpatient, 30-day, and 30-day postdischarge), nonelective rehospitalization, and discharge disposition (home, home with home health assistance, regular skilled nursing facility, or custodial skilled nursing facility). RESULTS In total, 1 384 025 hospitalizations were identified, of which 1 155 034 (83.5%) were inpatient and 228 991 (16.5%) were for observation only. These hospitalizations involved 679 831 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [18.1] years; 362 582 female [53.3%]). The number of for-observation-only hospitalizations increased from 16 497 (9.4%) in the first year of the study to 120 215 (20.5%) in the last period of the study, whereas inpatient hospitalizations with length of stay less than 24 hours decreased by 33% (from 12 008 [6.9%] to 27 108 [4.6%]). Illness burden measured using administrative data or acute physiology score increased significantly. The proportion of patients with a Comorbidity Point Score of 65 or higher increased from 20.5% (range across hospitals, 18.4%-26.4%) to 28.8% (range, 22.3%-33.0%), as did the proportion with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 4 or higher, which increased from 28.8% (range, 24.6%-35.0%) to 38.4% (range, 31.9%-43.4%). The proportion of patients at or near critical illness (Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score [LAPS2] ≥110) increased by 21.4% (10.3% [range across hospitals, 7.4%-14.7%] to 12.5% [range across hospitals, 8.3%-16.6%]; P < .001), reflecting a steady increase of 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.10) LAPS2 points per month. Unadjusted inpatient mortality in the first year of the study was 2.78% and in the last year was 2.71%; the corresponding numbers for 30-day mortality were 5.88% and 6.15%, for 30-day postdischarge mortality were 3.94% and 4.22%, and for nonelective rehospitalization were 12.00% and 12.81%, respectively. All outcomes improved after risk adjustment. Compared with the first month, the final observed to expected ratio was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.84) for inpatient mortality, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) for 30-day mortality, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95) for 30-day nonelective rehospitalization, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) for 30-day postdischarge mortality. The proportion of nonelective rehospitalizations meeting public reporting criteria decreased substantially over the study period (from 58.0% in 2010-2011 to 45.2% in 2017); most of this decrease was associated with the exclusion of observation stays. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that in this integrated system, the hospitalization rate decreased and risk-adjusted hospital outcomes improved steadily over the 7.5-year study period despite worsening case mix. The comprehensive results suggest that future assessments of care quality should consider the implications of numerator and denominator definitions, display multiple metrics concurrently, and include all hospitalization types and detailed data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel J. Escobar
- Systems Research Initiative, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | - Colleen Plimier
- Systems Research Initiative, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | - John D. Greene
- Systems Research Initiative, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | - Vincent Liu
- Systems Research Initiative, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
- Intensive Care Unit, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Santa Clara, California
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Systems Research Initiative, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
- TPMG Consulting Services, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sabbatini AK, Wright B, Kocher K, Hall MK, Basu A. Postdischarge Unplanned Care Events Among Commercially Insured Patients With an Observation Stay Versus Short Inpatient Admission. Ann Emerg Med 2018; 74:334-344. [PMID: 30470517 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Observation stays are composing an increasing proportion of unscheduled hospitalizations in the United States, with unclear consequences for the quality of care. This study used a nationally representative data set of commercially insured patients hospitalized from the emergency department (ED) to compare 30-day postdischarge unplanned care events after an observation stay versus a short inpatient admission. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of ED hospitalizations using the 2015 Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data set. Adult observation stays and short inpatient hospitalizations of 2 days or less were identified and followed for 30 days from hospital discharge to identify unplanned care events, defined as a subsequent inpatient admission, observation stay, or return ED visit. A propensity score analysis was used to compare rates of unplanned events after each type of index hospitalization. RESULTS Among the propensity-weighted cohorts, patients with an index observation stay were 28% more likely to experience any unplanned care event within 30 days of discharge compared with those with a short inpatient admission (20.4% versus 15.9%; risk ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 1.34). Specifically, patients in the observation stay group had substantially higher rates of postdischarge observation stays (4.8% versus 1.9%; odds ratio 2.60; 95% CI 2.15 to 3.16) and ED revisits with discharge (11.1% versus 8.8%; odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44) compared with those in the inpatient group, but were less likely to be readmitted as inpatients (6.4% versus 7.2%; odds ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96). CONCLUSION Commercially insured patients with an observation stay from the ED have a higher risk of postdischarge acute care events compared with similar patients with a short inpatient admission. Additional research is necessary to determine the extent to which quality of care, including care transitions, may differ between these 2 groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber K Sabbatini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Brad Wright
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Keith Kocher
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan
| | - M Kennedy Hall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Departments of Health Services and Center for Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|