Misconceptions in acute heart failure diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department

A multidisciplinary approach to heart failure care in the hospital: improving the patient journey

Despite advancements in care for patients with heart failure (HF), morbidity and mortality remain high. Hospitalizations and readmissions for HF have been the focus of significant attention among health care providers and payers, with an eye towards reducing health care costs. However, considerable variability exists with regard to inpatient workflows and management for patients with HF, which represents a significant opportunity to improve care. Here we provide a summary of optimal inpatient management strategies for HF, focusing on the multidisciplinary team of emergency medicine providers, admitting hospitalists, cardiovascular consultants, pharmacists, nurses, and social workers. The patient journey serves as the template for this review article, from the initial presentation in the emergency department, to decongestion and stabilization, optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, and discharge and appropriate disposition. Lastly, this review aims not to be proscriptive but rather to provide best practices that are clinically relevant and actionable, with the goal of improving care for patients during the sentinel hospitalization for HF.

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Heart Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common emergency presentation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In the current review, we present the most recent data on the epidemiology of AHF in SSA and discuss recommended approaches to management in resource-limited settings, with a particular focus on primary and secondary facilities (e.g., health centers and district hospitals), where these patients often present.

RECENT FINDINGS

AHF in SSA is most often due to hypertension, cardiomyopathies, and rheumatic heart disease. The etiology of AHF may be different in rural as compared with urban settings. Diagnostic tools for AHF are often lacking in SSA, especially at the first-level facilities. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and biomarker tests, such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), offer promise in helping to mitigate diagnostic challenges. POCUS can also help distinguish among types of heart failure and prompt the correct treatment strategy. Many of the drugs and equipment commonly used to treat AHF in resource-rich settings are lacking in SSA. However, some adaptations of commonly available materials may provide temporary alternatives. The epidemiology of AHF in SSA differs from that of high-income settings. Management of AHF at the first-level facility in SSA is an important and understudied problem. Simplified diagnostic and treatment algorithms rooted in knowledge of the local epidemiology should be developed and tested as part of broader efforts to combat cardiovascular disease in SSA.

Dysrhythmias and heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: An emergency medicine review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may suffer several complications after the acute event, including dysrhythmias and heart failure (HF). These complications place patients at risk for morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review evaluates literature and guideline recommendations relevant to the acute emergency department (ED) management of AMI complicated by dysrhythmia or HF, with a focus on evidence-based considerations for ED interventions.

DISCUSSION

Limited evidence exists for ED management of dysrhythmias in AMI due to relatively low prevalence and frequent exclusion of patients with active cardiac ischemia from clinical studies. Management decisions for bradycardia in the setting of AMI are determined by location of infarction, timing of the dysrhythmia, rhythm assessment, and hemodynamic status of the patient. Atrial fibrillation is common in the setting of AMI, and caution is warranted in acute rate control for rapid ventricular rate given the possibility of compensation for decreased ventricular function. Regular wide complex tachycardia in the setting of AMI should be managed as ventricular tachycardia with electrocardioversion in the majority of cases. Management directed towards HF from left ventricular dysfunction in AMI consists of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, nitroglycerin therapy, and early cardiac catheterization. Norepinephrine is the first line vasopressor for patients with cardiogenic shock and hypoperfusion on clinical examination. Early involvement of a multi-disciplinary team is recommended when caring for patients in cardiogenic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

This review discusses considerations of ED management of dysrhythmias and HF associated with AMI.