Comparison of pediatric post-reduction fluoroscopic- and ultrasound forearm fracture images

Sonographic Fracture Diagnosis in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Clinical examination after trauma, especially in young children, often proves difficult. As a result, the majority of images show unremarkable findings in the imaging workup of trauma by radiography. Sonography represents an imaging technique without the use of X-rays. As the quality of ultrasound equipment has increased over the past 20 years, numerous studies have demonstrated that fractures in children and adolescents can be detected with very high sensitivity and specificity by sonography.

METHOD

This paper reviews the results obtained so far in the literature. Based on these findings, the importance of sonographic fracture diagnosis in childhood and adolescence for the most important locations is demonstrated.

RESULTS

When examining with a high-frequency linear transducer, sensitivities and specificities of more than 90 % can be achieved for the detection of fractures. Dislocations are also reliably detected. In contrast to X-ray examination, sonography allows the diagnosis of cartilage and soft-tissue injuries. Sonography reveals callus formation earlier than radiographs. The examination causes less pain than X-ray examination. If sonographic clarification is limited purely to fracture detection or exclusion, less time is required compared to X-ray diagnosis. The procedure can be learned quickly. If the documentation follows a defined standard examination procedure, the results can also be reproduced by non-examiners.

CONCLUSION

So far, sonography has only been an additive procedure in fracture diagnosis. However, there are now initial recommendations for sonographic fracture diagnosis alone, such as in skull, clavicle and non-displaced distal forearm fractures.

KEY POINTS

· Sonography can be used to detect or rule out fractures very sensitively.. · Sonographic examination causes less pain than X-ray examination.. · Sonography is usually an additive procedure in fracture diagnosis.. · In the meantime, sonography alone may be sufficient for diagnosing individual fractures..

ZITIERWEISE

· Moritz JD. Sonografische Frakturdiagnostik im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 790 - 796.

Ultrasound, a new adjuvant method for treating acute Monteggia fracture in children

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail for fixation in the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 cases of acute Monteggia fracture in children treated with ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation between April 2020 and December 2022, including 14 cases of Kirschner wire fixation and 17 cases of elastic intramedullary nail fixation. During the operation, soft tissue compression and nerve and vascular injuries were explored, fracture reduction was performed under ultrasound guidance, and operation time was recorded. After the operation, X-ray examination was conducted to assess the quality of fracture reduction. At the last follow-up, the flexion, extension, pronation, and supination angles of both affected and unaffected elbow joints were measured, and the Mayo score was used to evaluate elbow joint function.

RESULTS

The average duration of surgery was 50.16 ± 19.21 min (ranging from 20 to 100 min). Based on the evaluation criteria for assessing reduction quality, 28 cases were deemed excellent, while 3 cases were considered good. After immobilization with long-arm cast for 4-6 weeks postoperatively, elbow and forearm rotation exercises were performed. Kirschner wires were removed after an average of 6.64 ± 0.93 weeks (ranging from 6 to 9 weeks) postoperatively, and elastic intramedullary nails were removed after an average of 5.12 ± 1.54 months (ranging from 4 to 10 months) postoperatively. The average follow-up time was 19.13 ± 11.22 months (ranging from 4 to 36 months). During the final follow-up, the affected limb's range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination was (141.16 ± 4.24)°, (4.61 ± 2.81)°, (84.52 ± 3.74)°, and (84.23 ± 3.69)°, respectively. There was no notable variance when compared to the healthy limb, which had a range of motion of (141.81 ± 2.99)°, (4.81 ± 2.50)°, (85.61 ± 3.12)°, and (85.03 ± 2.73)° (P > 0.05). The Mayo Elbow Performance index classified 29 cases as excellent and 2 cases as good.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided Kirschner wire or elastic intramedullary nail fixation can be used for the treatment of acute Monteggia fracture in children, which can explore the surrounding nerves, blood vessels, and soft tissue compression, reduce the difficulty of reduction, and cause minimal trauma. It can greatly reduce the risk of radiation exposure and complications such as vascular and nerve injury during the operation.

Ultrasound assistance in treatment with elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation in radial and ulnar fractures in children

PURPOSE

Radial and ulnar fractures are one of the most common fractures in children. When closed reduction of fractures fails, elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) fixation can mostly be used under the guidance of fluoroscopy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US) as assistance for radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs.

METHODS

There were 56 patients with midshaft radial and ulnar fractures included in our hospital from March 2019 to August 2021. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the treatment method, they were divided into the US group (patients treated with US assistance) and the conventional group (C-group, patients treated with fluoroscopy guidance). All patients' clinical data were collected. Operation time, fluoroscopy times, radiation dose, and post-operative complications were analyzed. The elbow function was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients in the US group and 30 in the C-group. The average operation time was 44.5±19.4 min in the US group and 65.1±16.2 min in the C-group. There were significant differences regarding the surgery time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose between the groups (all p = 0.001). The average follow-up time was 13.5±3.1 months. No significant difference was found regarding radial nerve injury, extensor pollicis longus rupture, non-union or delayed union, ulnar nerve injury, or acute compartment syndrome. There was no difference in elbow function at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

US guidance can be adopted for the treatment of displaced radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. It can significantly decrease fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, and duration of surgery.

[Imaging after trauma in clinics and practice for children and adolescents : Part 1 of the results of a nationwide online survey of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Trauma Society]

BACKGROUND

The indication for radiography should strictly follow the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle in pediatric and adolescent trauma patients. The effect of radiation on the growing sensitive tissue of these patients should not be disregarded.

QUESTION

The Pediatric Traumatology Section (SKT) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) wanted to clarify how the principle is followed in trauma care.

METHODS

An online survey was open for 10 weeks. Target groups were trauma surgeons, pediatric surgeons, general surgeons, and orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

From Nov. 15, 2019, to Feb. 29, 2020, 788 physicians participated: branch office 20.56%, MVZ 4.31%, hospital 75.13%; resident 16.62%, senior 38.07%, chief 22.59%. By specialist qualification, the distribution was: 38.34% surgery, 33.16% trauma surgery, 36.66% special trauma surgery, 70.34% orthopedics and trauma surgery, 18.78% pediatric surgery. Frequency of contact with fractures in the above age group was reported as 37% < 10/month, 27% < 20/M, 36% > 20/M. About 52% always request radiographs in 2 planes after acute trauma. X-ray of the opposite side for unclear findings was rejected by 70%. 23% use sonography regularly in fracture diagnosis. In polytrauma children and adolescents, whole-body CT is never used in 18%, rarely in 50%, and standard in 14%.

DISCUSSION

The analysis shows that there is no uniform radiological management of children and adolescents with fractures among the respondents.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the results of the survey with the consensus findings of the SKT recently published in this journal, persuasion is still needed to change the use of radiography in primary diagnosis.

The use of real-time sonography-assisted fracture reduction in children with displaced forearm fractures

Pediatric forearm and wrist fractures are common; furthermore, some are displaced and require manipulation and reduction. The procedure is commonly performed without real-time image guidance and evaluated radiographically after reduction and casting, leading to multiple reduction attempts and malalignment. Although fluoroscopy can provide real-time assessment of fracture alignment during the procedure, it is not readily available in many emergency departments (EDs) and involves radiation exposure. Ultrasonography is an alternative real-time imaging modality that is inexpensive and readily available. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of real-time bedside sonography during closed reduction of distal and middle third forearm fractures can decrease the number of reduction attempts and reduce the number of patients requiring surgery. We compared the results of a conventional blind manipulation, fracture reduction, and casting to fracture reduction under real-time ultrasonographic guidance, in patients treated in our ED between 2014 and 2016. Overall, 458 patients with distal or middle third fractures were included. Of these reductions, 289 were performed without real-time imaging (group 1) and 169 under real-time ultrasound guidance (group 2). In group 1, 10% of patients required re-reduction, and 5% of patients needed surgery. In group 2, only one patient (0.6%) required re-reduction and 1% of patients required surgery due to fracture instability. In conclusion, the current study shows that real-time ultrasound-guided forearm fracture reduction is an effective and inexpensive method for correction of displaced forearm and wrist fractures in children, which does not involve any radiation exposure.

Ultrasound-Guided Distal Forearm Fracture Reduction by Pediatric Emergency Physicians: A Single Center Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Fracture reduction under point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance facilitates measurement of residual angulation or displacement that may not be apparent on examination. Point-of-care ultrasound is without patient or staff exposure to ionizing radiation and enlists no additional staffing resources or patient transfer.

METHODS

We conducted a chart review of all children who underwent reduction of a distal forearm fracture in the pediatric emergency department over a 2-year period, from September 2018 to September 2020. We compared length of stay (LOS) with that for orthopedist-performed distal forearm reductions during the study period. We allowed a 6-week lag period to ensure no missed rereduction before analyzing the data. After reduction, children were instructed to follow up with an orthopedist within 1 week. Children with loss of reduction on orthopedic follow-up are referred back through our emergency department for operative reduction.

RESULTS

A total of 74 children with 75 distal forearm fractures were identified. Average LOS was 179 minutes for the pediatric emergency medicine physician reductions and 215 minutes for the orthopedist reductions (P < 0.001). Ninety-six percent of reductions were completed with POCUS assistance, and 61% had less than 5 degrees of angulation on postreduction radiography. Only 2.7% of children underwent rereduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal forearm fracture reductions by a pediatric emergency medicine physician under POCUS guidance have a high rate of excellent alignment, low rate of failed reduction, and significantly shorter LOS (P < 0.001) than reductions performed by orthopedists.

Radiation Reduction Strategies in Pediatric Orthopaedics

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric orthopaedic patients have the potential for significant radiation exposure from the use of imaging studies, such as computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. With the potential for long-term treatment, such as is required for scoliosis or osteogenesis imperfecta, patients are at even greater risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

DISCUSSION

Although an association between radiation and cancer risk is evident, causation is difficult to prove because comorbidities or genetic predispositions may play a role in the higher baseline rates of malignancy later in life. Efforts have been made over the years to reduce exposure using more modern imaging techniques and simple radiation reduction strategies. Educational efforts and clinical practice guidelines are decreasing the rate of computed tomography scan use in pediatrics. Although considerable work is being done on the development of radiation-free imaging modalities, imaging that uses ionizing radiation will, in the near term, be necessary in specific circumstances to provide optimal care to pediatric orthopaedic patients.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the ionizing radiation exposure associated with commonly used tests as well as radiation-reduction strategies is essential for the optimal and safe care of pediatric orthopaedic patients.

Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for determining the adequacy of pediatric forearm fracture reductions

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to the determine the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in assessing closed reduction (CR) of pediatric forearm fractures in a pediatric emergency setting.

METHODS

After determination of the need for CR using X-ray images by an orthopedic consultant, POCUS examinations were performed just before and after the reduction attempt. The transducer was positioned longitudinally over the dorsal, volar, and lateral surfaces of the radius and ulna to view the fracture site. The presence of angulation, displacement, or bayonetting of the fracture fragments was recorded. The adequacy of realignment according to the POCUS and the orthopedic consultant's final determination were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study and 96 bones were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for adequacy of CR were 95.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.3-99.1)] and 95.8% (95% CI: 78.8-99.8), the positive predictive value was 98.5% (95% CI: 91.0-99.7), and the negative predictive value was 88.4% (95% CI: 71.6-95.8). The corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios were 23 (3.37-156.77) and 0.04 (0.01-0.12). There was high agreement between POCUS and X-ray images for predicting adequacy of CR [κ: 0.892 (±0.053)]. There was also a significant correlation between POCUS and X-ray measurements of angulation and displacement performed before and after CR, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study has reported the successful use of POCUS for the management of pediatric forearm fractures in a pediatric emergency department. Point-of-care ultrasound can minimize radiation exposure and appears to be an alternative and accurate tool for reduction attempts.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided reduction of forearm fractures in children

PURPOSE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be used to guide and assess reduction of pediatric forearm fractures. In this study, we sought to compare the success rate of ultrasound-guided fracture reduction with fluoroscopy-guided fracture reduction. We also sought to determine whether there are cost or time benefits to using ultrasound instead of fluoroscopy.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients less than 18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department with a forearm fracture between April 2016 and March 2019 were screened for inclusion in this study. A total of 27 ultrasound-guided reductions were identified during this time period and 81 fluoroscopy-guided reductions were randomly selected for comparison. Cost data was provided by the financial department. Reduction success, total length of stay, and costs were compared between the two groups, and multiple linear regression was used to determine the influence of any confounding predictor variables.

RESULTS

There were no failed reductions in either group. Length of stay was shorter in the POCUS group (221 min) compared with the fluoroscopy group (254 min, p = 0.014), but this significance was lost in the regression model when adjusted for ketamine use. Provider costs ($430 v $442, p = 0.822) and total costs ($1219 v $1204, p = 0.851) were the same between the POCUS group and the fluoroscopy group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

POCUS appears to be an equally effective imaging modality to guide reduction of forearm fractures as compared to fluoroscopy.

Ultrasound Imaging of Orthopedic Injuries

With the high cost and limited availability of gold standard imaging modalities, ultrasound has become an alternative in many musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. Ultrasound has become increasingly portable and readily available in many acute care settings. Its ability to diagnose MSK injuries and help guide management has the potential to improve patient safety and flow. Ultrasound has been shown to diagnose fractures, dislocations, and tendon and ligament injuries. It helps guide fracture and dislocation reductions and aids in regional anesthesia for pain management. This article reviews the common MSK injuries that can be diagnosed with ultrasound with a focus on point-of-care ultrasound.