Nurok M, Flynn BC, Pineton de Chambrun M, Kazemian M, Geiderman J, Nunnally ME. A Review and Discussion of Full-Time Equivalency and Appropriate Compensation Models for an Adult Intensivist in the United States Across Various Base Specialties.
Crit Care Explor 2024;
6:e1064. [PMID:
38533294 PMCID:
PMC10965199 DOI:
10.1097/cce.0000000000001064]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Physicians with training in anesthesiology, emergency medicine, internal medicine, neurology, and surgery may gain board certification in critical care medicine upon completion of fellowship training. These clinicians often only spend a portion of their work effort in the ICU. Other work efforts that benefit an ICU infrastructure, but do not provide billing opportunities, include education, research, and administrative duties. For employed or contracted physicians, there is no singular definition of what constitutes an intensive care full-time equivalent (FTE). Nevertheless, hospitals often consider FTEs in assessing hiring needs, salary, and eligibility for benefits.
DATA SOURCES
Review of existing literature, expert opinion.
STUDY SELECTION
Not applicable.
DATA EXTRACTION
Not applicable.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Not applicable.
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding how an FTE is calculated, and the fraction of an FTE to be assigned to a particular cost center, is therefore important for intensivists of different specialties, as many employment models assign salary and benefits to a base specialty department and not necessarily the ICU.
Collapse